Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China

To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of creative behavior 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Chaoying, Baer, John, Kaufman, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 2
container_start_page 137
container_title The Journal of creative behavior
container_volume 49
creator Tang, Chaoying
Baer, John
Kaufman, James C.
description To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jocb.61
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jocb_61</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1062579</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1062579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9PwjAUxRujiYjGT2DSNx_MsLfb2u1RF0AIgUQgPjZd14YibKSrf_j2bs7w5tM9Oed3z8NB6BbIAAihj9tK5QMGZ6hHgdGAkZifo16T0IAAjy_RVV1vCQlJEkEPvU72h51V1uPVRlfO6hpXBmdOS28_rT9iW-Ks2h8-vHZ4qawulW49v9F4XVqvC7z00jdvsixwtrGlvEYXRu5qffN3-2g9Gq6yl2C2GE-yp1mgQgoQhIzlplGxhjQFqSLFgajCcCYLxWieM9X6YGKWF0mRcJlGWkqTmySljIRhH913vcpVde20EQdn99IdBRDRTiHaKQSDhrzrSO2sOlHDKRBGY542-UOXf9mdPv5XI6aL7Pm3LehoW3v9faKlexeMhzwWb_OxyDKYA0SxGIU_Zcl37g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-6057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jocb.61</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Antisocial Behavior ; China ; Comparative Education ; computer science ; Computer Science Education ; Concept Teaching ; Creative Thinking ; Creativity ; Cross Cultural Studies ; domain-specific ; Educational Theories ; Ethnicity ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; implicit theory ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Intelligence ; Interpersonal Competence ; Likert Scales ; Profiles ; Scientists ; Student Attitudes ; Student Surveys ; United States ; Work Experience</subject><ispartof>The Journal of creative behavior, 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156</ispartof><rights>2014 by the Creative Education Foundation, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjocb.61$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjocb.61$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1062579$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><title>The Journal of creative behavior</title><addtitle>J Creat Behav</addtitle><description>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Antisocial Behavior</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>computer science</subject><subject>Computer Science Education</subject><subject>Concept Teaching</subject><subject>Creative Thinking</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>domain-specific</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>implicit theory</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Work Experience</subject><issn>0022-0175</issn><issn>2162-6057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9PwjAUxRujiYjGT2DSNx_MsLfb2u1RF0AIgUQgPjZd14YibKSrf_j2bs7w5tM9Oed3z8NB6BbIAAihj9tK5QMGZ6hHgdGAkZifo16T0IAAjy_RVV1vCQlJEkEPvU72h51V1uPVRlfO6hpXBmdOS28_rT9iW-Ks2h8-vHZ4qawulW49v9F4XVqvC7z00jdvsixwtrGlvEYXRu5qffN3-2g9Gq6yl2C2GE-yp1mgQgoQhIzlplGxhjQFqSLFgajCcCYLxWieM9X6YGKWF0mRcJlGWkqTmySljIRhH913vcpVde20EQdn99IdBRDRTiHaKQSDhrzrSO2sOlHDKRBGY542-UOXf9mdPv5XI6aL7Pm3LehoW3v9faKlexeMhzwWb_OxyDKYA0SxGIU_Zcl37g</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Tang, Chaoying</creator><creator>Baer, John</creator><creator>Kaufman, James C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><author>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Antisocial Behavior</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>computer science</topic><topic>Computer Science Education</topic><topic>Concept Teaching</topic><topic>Creative Thinking</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>domain-specific</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>implicit theory</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Work Experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of creative behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Chaoying</au><au>Baer, John</au><au>Kaufman, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1062579</ericid><atitle>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of creative behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Creat Behav</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>137-156</pages><issn>0022-0175</issn><eissn>2162-6057</eissn><abstract>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jocb.61</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0175
ispartof The Journal of creative behavior, 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156
issn 0022-0175
2162-6057
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jocb_61
source Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Age Differences
Antisocial Behavior
China
Comparative Education
computer science
Computer Science Education
Concept Teaching
Creative Thinking
Creativity
Cross Cultural Studies
domain-specific
Educational Theories
Ethnicity
Factor Analysis
Foreign Countries
Gender Differences
implicit theory
Intellectual Disciplines
Intelligence
Interpersonal Competence
Likert Scales
Profiles
Scientists
Student Attitudes
Student Surveys
United States
Work Experience
title Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20Theories%20of%20Creativity%20in%20Computer%20Science%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20creative%20behavior&rft.au=Tang,%20Chaoying&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=137-156&rft.issn=0022-0175&rft.eissn=2162-6057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jocb.61&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1062579%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1062579&rfr_iscdi=true