Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China
To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of creative behavior 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | The Journal of creative behavior |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Tang, Chaoying Baer, John Kaufman, James C. |
description | To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jocb.61 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jocb_61</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1062579</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1062579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9PwjAUxRujiYjGT2DSNx_MsLfb2u1RF0AIgUQgPjZd14YibKSrf_j2bs7w5tM9Oed3z8NB6BbIAAihj9tK5QMGZ6hHgdGAkZifo16T0IAAjy_RVV1vCQlJEkEPvU72h51V1uPVRlfO6hpXBmdOS28_rT9iW-Ks2h8-vHZ4qawulW49v9F4XVqvC7z00jdvsixwtrGlvEYXRu5qffN3-2g9Gq6yl2C2GE-yp1mgQgoQhIzlplGxhjQFqSLFgajCcCYLxWieM9X6YGKWF0mRcJlGWkqTmySljIRhH913vcpVde20EQdn99IdBRDRTiHaKQSDhrzrSO2sOlHDKRBGY542-UOXf9mdPv5XI6aL7Pm3LehoW3v9faKlexeMhzwWb_OxyDKYA0SxGIU_Zcl37g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-6057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jocb.61</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Differences ; Antisocial Behavior ; China ; Comparative Education ; computer science ; Computer Science Education ; Concept Teaching ; Creative Thinking ; Creativity ; Cross Cultural Studies ; domain-specific ; Educational Theories ; Ethnicity ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; implicit theory ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Intelligence ; Interpersonal Competence ; Likert Scales ; Profiles ; Scientists ; Student Attitudes ; Student Surveys ; United States ; Work Experience</subject><ispartof>The Journal of creative behavior, 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156</ispartof><rights>2014 by the Creative Education Foundation, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjocb.61$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjocb.61$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1062579$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><title>The Journal of creative behavior</title><addtitle>J Creat Behav</addtitle><description>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</description><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Antisocial Behavior</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>computer science</subject><subject>Computer Science Education</subject><subject>Concept Teaching</subject><subject>Creative Thinking</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>domain-specific</subject><subject>Educational Theories</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>implicit theory</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Work Experience</subject><issn>0022-0175</issn><issn>2162-6057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF9PwjAUxRujiYjGT2DSNx_MsLfb2u1RF0AIgUQgPjZd14YibKSrf_j2bs7w5tM9Oed3z8NB6BbIAAihj9tK5QMGZ6hHgdGAkZifo16T0IAAjy_RVV1vCQlJEkEPvU72h51V1uPVRlfO6hpXBmdOS28_rT9iW-Ks2h8-vHZ4qawulW49v9F4XVqvC7z00jdvsixwtrGlvEYXRu5qffN3-2g9Gq6yl2C2GE-yp1mgQgoQhIzlplGxhjQFqSLFgajCcCYLxWieM9X6YGKWF0mRcJlGWkqTmySljIRhH913vcpVde20EQdn99IdBRDRTiHaKQSDhrzrSO2sOlHDKRBGY542-UOXf9mdPv5XI6aL7Pm3LehoW3v9faKlexeMhzwWb_OxyDKYA0SxGIU_Zcl37g</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Tang, Chaoying</creator><creator>Baer, John</creator><creator>Kaufman, James C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</title><author>Tang, Chaoying ; Baer, John ; Kaufman, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-366bf3215e1991ac4c710cdf76adc62bb6c991a1f56bd8d87a94eaafbf8926033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Antisocial Behavior</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>computer science</topic><topic>Computer Science Education</topic><topic>Concept Teaching</topic><topic>Creative Thinking</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>domain-specific</topic><topic>Educational Theories</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>implicit theory</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Work Experience</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of creative behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Chaoying</au><au>Baer, John</au><au>Kaufman, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1062579</ericid><atitle>Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of creative behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Creat Behav</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>137-156</pages><issn>0022-0175</issn><eissn>2162-6057</eissn><abstract>To study implicit concepts of creativity in computer science in the United States and mainland China, we first asked 308 Chinese computer scientists for adjectives that would describe a creative computer scientist. Computer scientists and non‐computer scientists from China (N = 1069) and the United States (N = 971) then rated how well those adjectives described creative computer scientists using a 5‐point Likert Scale. Factor analysis revealed that the concept of a creative computer scientist had four dimensions: (1) smart/effective, (2) outgoing, (3) creative thinking and (4) unsociable. Differences in the implicit concepts across disciplines, ethnicity, gender, age, and working experience were analyzed. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of the domain specificity of creativity.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jocb.61</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0175 |
ispartof | The Journal of creative behavior, 2015-06, Vol.49 (2), p.137-156 |
issn | 0022-0175 2162-6057 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jocb_61 |
source | Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Age Differences Antisocial Behavior China Comparative Education computer science Computer Science Education Concept Teaching Creative Thinking Creativity Cross Cultural Studies domain-specific Educational Theories Ethnicity Factor Analysis Foreign Countries Gender Differences implicit theory Intellectual Disciplines Intelligence Interpersonal Competence Likert Scales Profiles Scientists Student Attitudes Student Surveys United States Work Experience |
title | Implicit Theories of Creativity in Computer Science in the United States and China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20Theories%20of%20Creativity%20in%20Computer%20Science%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20China&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20creative%20behavior&rft.au=Tang,%20Chaoying&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=137-156&rft.issn=0022-0175&rft.eissn=2162-6057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jocb.61&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1062579%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1062579&rfr_iscdi=true |