Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T

Biomarkers for assessing osteoarthritis activity necessitate multiple MRI sequences with long acquisition times. To perform 5-minute simultaneous morphometry (thickness/volume measurements) and T relaxometry of both cartilage and meniscus, and semiquantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (MOAKS)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2018-05, Vol.47 (5), p.1328-1341
Hauptverfasser: Chaudhari, Akshay S, Black, Marianne S, Eijgenraam, Susanne, Wirth, Wolfgang, Maschek, Susanne, Sveinsson, Bragi, Eckstein, Felix, Oei, Edwin H G, Gold, Garry E, Hargreaves, Brian A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1341
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1328
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 47
creator Chaudhari, Akshay S
Black, Marianne S
Eijgenraam, Susanne
Wirth, Wolfgang
Maschek, Susanne
Sveinsson, Bragi
Eckstein, Felix
Oei, Edwin H G
Gold, Garry E
Hargreaves, Brian A
description Biomarkers for assessing osteoarthritis activity necessitate multiple MRI sequences with long acquisition times. To perform 5-minute simultaneous morphometry (thickness/volume measurements) and T relaxometry of both cartilage and meniscus, and semiquantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (MOAKS). Prospective. Fifteen healthy volunteers for morphometry and T measurements, and 15 patients (five each Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0/2/3) for MOAKS assessment. A 5-minute double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence was evaluated for generating quantitative and semiquantitative osteoarthritis biomarkers at 3T. Flip angle simulations evaluated tissue signals and sensitivity of T measurements. Morphometry and T reproducibility was compared against morphometry-optimized and relaxometry-optimized sequences. Repeatability was assessed by scanning five volunteers twice. MOAKS reproducibility was compared to MOAKS derived from a clinical knee MRI protocol by two readers. Coefficients of variation (CVs), concordance confidence intervals (CCI), and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared morphometry and relaxometry measurements with their reference standards. DESS MOAKS positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percentage agreement (NPA), and interreader agreement was calculated using the clinical protocol as a reference. Biomarker variations between Kellgren-Lawrence groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Cartilage thickness (P = 0.65), cartilage T (P = 0.69), and meniscus T (P = 0.06) did not significantly differ from their reference standard (with a 20° DESS flip angle). DESS slightly overestimated meniscus volume (P < 0.001). Accuracy and repeatability CVs were
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.25883
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29090500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-395d5df69281aebe9fb5b9ffd07ce08ef6aa70f868dabfe4762995f7c6f258033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFv1DAQhS0EoqVw4QegOSOlTJx1Eh9RRaFSERJaztEkHm9d4nixnYr9Z_w8vNvCaeaN3nsjfUK8rfGyRpQf7n10l1L1ffNMnNdKyqqI9nnZUTVV3WN3Jl6ldI-IWm_US3EmNWpUiOfiz7V74Mq7Zc0MPxdm-Pr9BmyIkJxf50wLhzWBD3F_FzzneABaDGxBQuSZfj_dgoWJYnYz7fhk8Ly4NJXkUZzq2LtfKy3ZZcrlJ0QyLsxh5yaagVLilEoow5rcsgMT1nHmiqe7AG6BlJnMoUolW_ozNNvX4oWlOfGbp3khflx_2l59qW6_fb65-nhbTVJtctVoZZSxrZZ9TTyytqMatbUGu4mxZ9sSdWj7tjc0Wt50rdRa2W5qbYGITXMh3j_2TjGkFNkO--g8xcNQ43DEPxzxDyf8xfzu0bxfR8_mv_Uf7-YvspuGdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Chaudhari, Akshay S ; Black, Marianne S ; Eijgenraam, Susanne ; Wirth, Wolfgang ; Maschek, Susanne ; Sveinsson, Bragi ; Eckstein, Felix ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Gold, Garry E ; Hargreaves, Brian A</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Akshay S ; Black, Marianne S ; Eijgenraam, Susanne ; Wirth, Wolfgang ; Maschek, Susanne ; Sveinsson, Bragi ; Eckstein, Felix ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Gold, Garry E ; Hargreaves, Brian A</creatorcontrib><description>Biomarkers for assessing osteoarthritis activity necessitate multiple MRI sequences with long acquisition times. To perform 5-minute simultaneous morphometry (thickness/volume measurements) and T relaxometry of both cartilage and meniscus, and semiquantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (MOAKS). Prospective. Fifteen healthy volunteers for morphometry and T measurements, and 15 patients (five each Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0/2/3) for MOAKS assessment. A 5-minute double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence was evaluated for generating quantitative and semiquantitative osteoarthritis biomarkers at 3T. Flip angle simulations evaluated tissue signals and sensitivity of T measurements. Morphometry and T reproducibility was compared against morphometry-optimized and relaxometry-optimized sequences. Repeatability was assessed by scanning five volunteers twice. MOAKS reproducibility was compared to MOAKS derived from a clinical knee MRI protocol by two readers. Coefficients of variation (CVs), concordance confidence intervals (CCI), and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared morphometry and relaxometry measurements with their reference standards. DESS MOAKS positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percentage agreement (NPA), and interreader agreement was calculated using the clinical protocol as a reference. Biomarker variations between Kellgren-Lawrence groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Cartilage thickness (P = 0.65), cartilage T (P = 0.69), and meniscus T (P = 0.06) did not significantly differ from their reference standard (with a 20° DESS flip angle). DESS slightly overestimated meniscus volume (P &lt; 0.001). Accuracy and repeatability CVs were &lt;3.3%, except the meniscus T accuracy (7.6%). DESS MOAKS had substantial interreader agreement and high PPA/NPA values of 87%/90%. Bone marrow lesions and menisci had slightly lower PPAs. Cartilage and meniscus T , and MOAKS (cartilage surface area, osteophytes, cysts, and total score) was higher in Kellgren-Lawrence groups 2 and 3 than group 0 (P &lt; 0.05). The 5-minute DESS sequence permits MOAKS assessment for a majority of tissues, along with repeatable and reproducible simultaneous cartilage and meniscus T relaxometry and morphometry measurements. 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1328-1341.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29090500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2018-05, Vol.47 (5), p.1328-1341</ispartof><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-395d5df69281aebe9fb5b9ffd07ce08ef6aa70f868dabfe4762995f7c6f258033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-395d5df69281aebe9fb5b9ffd07ce08ef6aa70f868dabfe4762995f7c6f258033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3667-6796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Akshay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Marianne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijgenraam, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschek, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveinsson, Bragi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Edwin H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Garry E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A</creatorcontrib><title>Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Biomarkers for assessing osteoarthritis activity necessitate multiple MRI sequences with long acquisition times. To perform 5-minute simultaneous morphometry (thickness/volume measurements) and T relaxometry of both cartilage and meniscus, and semiquantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (MOAKS). Prospective. Fifteen healthy volunteers for morphometry and T measurements, and 15 patients (five each Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0/2/3) for MOAKS assessment. A 5-minute double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence was evaluated for generating quantitative and semiquantitative osteoarthritis biomarkers at 3T. Flip angle simulations evaluated tissue signals and sensitivity of T measurements. Morphometry and T reproducibility was compared against morphometry-optimized and relaxometry-optimized sequences. Repeatability was assessed by scanning five volunteers twice. MOAKS reproducibility was compared to MOAKS derived from a clinical knee MRI protocol by two readers. Coefficients of variation (CVs), concordance confidence intervals (CCI), and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared morphometry and relaxometry measurements with their reference standards. DESS MOAKS positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percentage agreement (NPA), and interreader agreement was calculated using the clinical protocol as a reference. Biomarker variations between Kellgren-Lawrence groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Cartilage thickness (P = 0.65), cartilage T (P = 0.69), and meniscus T (P = 0.06) did not significantly differ from their reference standard (with a 20° DESS flip angle). DESS slightly overestimated meniscus volume (P &lt; 0.001). Accuracy and repeatability CVs were &lt;3.3%, except the meniscus T accuracy (7.6%). DESS MOAKS had substantial interreader agreement and high PPA/NPA values of 87%/90%. Bone marrow lesions and menisci had slightly lower PPAs. Cartilage and meniscus T , and MOAKS (cartilage surface area, osteophytes, cysts, and total score) was higher in Kellgren-Lawrence groups 2 and 3 than group 0 (P &lt; 0.05). The 5-minute DESS sequence permits MOAKS assessment for a majority of tissues, along with repeatable and reproducible simultaneous cartilage and meniscus T relaxometry and morphometry measurements. 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1328-1341.</description><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFv1DAQhS0EoqVw4QegOSOlTJx1Eh9RRaFSERJaztEkHm9d4nixnYr9Z_w8vNvCaeaN3nsjfUK8rfGyRpQf7n10l1L1ffNMnNdKyqqI9nnZUTVV3WN3Jl6ldI-IWm_US3EmNWpUiOfiz7V74Mq7Zc0MPxdm-Pr9BmyIkJxf50wLhzWBD3F_FzzneABaDGxBQuSZfj_dgoWJYnYz7fhk8Ly4NJXkUZzq2LtfKy3ZZcrlJ0QyLsxh5yaagVLilEoow5rcsgMT1nHmiqe7AG6BlJnMoUolW_ozNNvX4oWlOfGbp3khflx_2l59qW6_fb65-nhbTVJtctVoZZSxrZZ9TTyytqMatbUGu4mxZ9sSdWj7tjc0Wt50rdRa2W5qbYGITXMh3j_2TjGkFNkO--g8xcNQ43DEPxzxDyf8xfzu0bxfR8_mv_Uf7-YvspuGdA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Chaudhari, Akshay S</creator><creator>Black, Marianne S</creator><creator>Eijgenraam, Susanne</creator><creator>Wirth, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Maschek, Susanne</creator><creator>Sveinsson, Bragi</creator><creator>Eckstein, Felix</creator><creator>Oei, Edwin H G</creator><creator>Gold, Garry E</creator><creator>Hargreaves, Brian A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-6796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T</title><author>Chaudhari, Akshay S ; Black, Marianne S ; Eijgenraam, Susanne ; Wirth, Wolfgang ; Maschek, Susanne ; Sveinsson, Bragi ; Eckstein, Felix ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Gold, Garry E ; Hargreaves, Brian A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-395d5df69281aebe9fb5b9ffd07ce08ef6aa70f868dabfe4762995f7c6f258033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Akshay S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Marianne S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eijgenraam, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirth, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschek, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sveinsson, Bragi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckstein, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Edwin H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gold, Garry E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaudhari, Akshay S</au><au>Black, Marianne S</au><au>Eijgenraam, Susanne</au><au>Wirth, Wolfgang</au><au>Maschek, Susanne</au><au>Sveinsson, Bragi</au><au>Eckstein, Felix</au><au>Oei, Edwin H G</au><au>Gold, Garry E</au><au>Hargreaves, Brian A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1328</spage><epage>1341</epage><pages>1328-1341</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Biomarkers for assessing osteoarthritis activity necessitate multiple MRI sequences with long acquisition times. To perform 5-minute simultaneous morphometry (thickness/volume measurements) and T relaxometry of both cartilage and meniscus, and semiquantitative MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Scoring (MOAKS). Prospective. Fifteen healthy volunteers for morphometry and T measurements, and 15 patients (five each Kellgren-Lawrence grades 0/2/3) for MOAKS assessment. A 5-minute double-echo steady-state (DESS) sequence was evaluated for generating quantitative and semiquantitative osteoarthritis biomarkers at 3T. Flip angle simulations evaluated tissue signals and sensitivity of T measurements. Morphometry and T reproducibility was compared against morphometry-optimized and relaxometry-optimized sequences. Repeatability was assessed by scanning five volunteers twice. MOAKS reproducibility was compared to MOAKS derived from a clinical knee MRI protocol by two readers. Coefficients of variation (CVs), concordance confidence intervals (CCI), and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared morphometry and relaxometry measurements with their reference standards. DESS MOAKS positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percentage agreement (NPA), and interreader agreement was calculated using the clinical protocol as a reference. Biomarker variations between Kellgren-Lawrence groups were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Cartilage thickness (P = 0.65), cartilage T (P = 0.69), and meniscus T (P = 0.06) did not significantly differ from their reference standard (with a 20° DESS flip angle). DESS slightly overestimated meniscus volume (P &lt; 0.001). Accuracy and repeatability CVs were &lt;3.3%, except the meniscus T accuracy (7.6%). DESS MOAKS had substantial interreader agreement and high PPA/NPA values of 87%/90%. Bone marrow lesions and menisci had slightly lower PPAs. Cartilage and meniscus T , and MOAKS (cartilage surface area, osteophytes, cysts, and total score) was higher in Kellgren-Lawrence groups 2 and 3 than group 0 (P &lt; 0.05). The 5-minute DESS sequence permits MOAKS assessment for a majority of tissues, along with repeatable and reproducible simultaneous cartilage and meniscus T relaxometry and morphometry measurements. 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1328-1341.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29090500</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.25883</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-6796</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2018-05, Vol.47 (5), p.1328-1341
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_25883
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Five-minute knee MRI for simultaneous morphometry and T 2 relaxometry of cartilage and meniscus and for semiquantitative radiological assessment using double-echo in steady-state at 3T
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A51%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Five-minute%20knee%20MRI%20for%20simultaneous%20morphometry%20and%20T%202%20relaxometry%20of%20cartilage%20and%20meniscus%20and%20for%20semiquantitative%20radiological%20assessment%20using%20double-echo%20in%20steady-state%20at%203T&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Chaudhari,%20Akshay%20S&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1328&rft.epage=1341&rft.pages=1328-1341&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.25883&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E29090500%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29090500&rfr_iscdi=true