Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions
Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1149 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Fujii, Shinya Kakite, Suguru Nishihara, Keisuke Kanasaki, Yoshiko Harada, Tasuku Kigawa, Junzo Kaminou, Toshio Ogawa, Toshihide |
description | Purpose
To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion.
Results
The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions.
Conclusion
DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.21575 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_21575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JMRI21575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EYr_wA5DPSAGPHcfxEbGjsghVIHGxXMcOLo1T2SnQf09KWW6c5mnme0-jh9AekEMghB6Nm-gPKXDBV9AmcEozystitdeEswxKIjbQVkpjQoiUOV9HG1BKQRkvNtH41Os6tKnzBmtjZlGbOW4drrxzs-TbkL1bX790tsK-0bUPNfbh62qjDZ3X3WI1ssHXAbvYNrjRk17r0OH2TUevA57YRVDaQWtOT5Ld_Z7baHh-Njy5zAZ3F1cnx4PM5IXgWeXyUZ4TnTMjKinLQkJuuBYUCloyLhgHGJWgJQVZEaYtmAI40444AYVl2-hgGWtim1K0Tk1j_3qcKyBq0Zda9KW--urh_SU8nY0aW_2h3wX1ACyBdz-x83-i1PXNw9VPaLb0-NTZj1-Pjq-qEKxHn24v1PNg-HhJ76W6Zp8XuoZq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion.
Results
The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions.
Conclusion
DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18972356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>ADC ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; apparent diffusion coefficient ; Diagnosis, Differential ; diffusion ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian Neoplasms - classification ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; ovarian tumor ; ovary ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.21575$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.21575$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakite, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishihara, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigawa, Junzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminou, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion.
Results
The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions.
Conclusion
DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>ADC</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>apparent diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>ovarian tumor</subject><subject>ovary</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EYr_wA5DPSAGPHcfxEbGjsghVIHGxXMcOLo1T2SnQf09KWW6c5mnme0-jh9AekEMghB6Nm-gPKXDBV9AmcEozystitdeEswxKIjbQVkpjQoiUOV9HG1BKQRkvNtH41Os6tKnzBmtjZlGbOW4drrxzs-TbkL1bX790tsK-0bUPNfbh62qjDZ3X3WI1ssHXAbvYNrjRk17r0OH2TUevA57YRVDaQWtOT5Ld_Z7baHh-Njy5zAZ3F1cnx4PM5IXgWeXyUZ4TnTMjKinLQkJuuBYUCloyLhgHGJWgJQVZEaYtmAI40444AYVl2-hgGWtim1K0Tk1j_3qcKyBq0Zda9KW--urh_SU8nY0aW_2h3wX1ACyBdz-x83-i1PXNw9VPaLb0-NTZj1-Pjq-qEKxHn24v1PNg-HhJ76W6Zp8XuoZq</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Fujii, Shinya</creator><creator>Kakite, Suguru</creator><creator>Nishihara, Keisuke</creator><creator>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Harada, Tasuku</creator><creator>Kigawa, Junzo</creator><creator>Kaminou, Toshio</creator><creator>Ogawa, Toshihide</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><author>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ADC</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>apparent diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>ovarian tumor</topic><topic>ovary</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakite, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishihara, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigawa, Junzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminou, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujii, Shinya</au><au>Kakite, Suguru</au><au>Nishihara, Keisuke</au><au>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</au><au>Harada, Tasuku</au><au>Kigawa, Junzo</au><au>Kaminou, Toshio</au><au>Ogawa, Toshihide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1156</epage><pages>1149-1156</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion.
Results
The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions.
Conclusion
DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18972356</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.21575</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_21575 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | ADC Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms apparent diffusion coefficient Diagnosis, Differential diffusion Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Female Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Middle Aged Ovarian Neoplasms - classification Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ovarian tumor ovary Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20in%20differentiating%20benign%20from%20malignant%20ovarian%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Fujii,%20Shinya&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1156&rft.pages=1149-1156&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.21575&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJMRI21575%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18972356&rfr_iscdi=true |