Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions

Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156
Hauptverfasser: Fujii, Shinya, Kakite, Suguru, Nishihara, Keisuke, Kanasaki, Yoshiko, Harada, Tasuku, Kigawa, Junzo, Kaminou, Toshio, Ogawa, Toshihide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1156
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1149
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 28
creator Fujii, Shinya
Kakite, Suguru
Nishihara, Keisuke
Kanasaki, Yoshiko
Harada, Tasuku
Kigawa, Junzo
Kaminou, Toshio
Ogawa, Toshihide
description Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion. Results The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.21575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_21575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JMRI21575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EYr_wA5DPSAGPHcfxEbGjsghVIHGxXMcOLo1T2SnQf09KWW6c5mnme0-jh9AekEMghB6Nm-gPKXDBV9AmcEozystitdeEswxKIjbQVkpjQoiUOV9HG1BKQRkvNtH41Os6tKnzBmtjZlGbOW4drrxzs-TbkL1bX790tsK-0bUPNfbh62qjDZ3X3WI1ssHXAbvYNrjRk17r0OH2TUevA57YRVDaQWtOT5Ld_Z7baHh-Njy5zAZ3F1cnx4PM5IXgWeXyUZ4TnTMjKinLQkJuuBYUCloyLhgHGJWgJQVZEaYtmAI40444AYVl2-hgGWtim1K0Tk1j_3qcKyBq0Zda9KW--urh_SU8nY0aW_2h3wX1ACyBdz-x83-i1PXNw9VPaLb0-NTZj1-Pjq-qEKxHn24v1PNg-HhJ76W6Zp8XuoZq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion. Results The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18972356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>ADC ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; apparent diffusion coefficient ; Diagnosis, Differential ; diffusion ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian Neoplasms - classification ; Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis ; ovarian tumor ; ovary ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.21575$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.21575$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18972356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakite, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishihara, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigawa, Junzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminou, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion. Results The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>ADC</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>apparent diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>ovarian tumor</subject><subject>ovary</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EYr_wA5DPSAGPHcfxEbGjsghVIHGxXMcOLo1T2SnQf09KWW6c5mnme0-jh9AekEMghB6Nm-gPKXDBV9AmcEozystitdeEswxKIjbQVkpjQoiUOV9HG1BKQRkvNtH41Os6tKnzBmtjZlGbOW4drrxzs-TbkL1bX790tsK-0bUPNfbh62qjDZ3X3WI1ssHXAbvYNrjRk17r0OH2TUevA57YRVDaQWtOT5Ld_Z7baHh-Njy5zAZ3F1cnx4PM5IXgWeXyUZ4TnTMjKinLQkJuuBYUCloyLhgHGJWgJQVZEaYtmAI40444AYVl2-hgGWtim1K0Tk1j_3qcKyBq0Zda9KW--urh_SU8nY0aW_2h3wX1ACyBdz-x83-i1PXNw9VPaLb0-NTZj1-Pjq-qEKxHn24v1PNg-HhJ76W6Zp8XuoZq</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Fujii, Shinya</creator><creator>Kakite, Suguru</creator><creator>Nishihara, Keisuke</creator><creator>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creator><creator>Harada, Tasuku</creator><creator>Kigawa, Junzo</creator><creator>Kaminou, Toshio</creator><creator>Ogawa, Toshihide</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</title><author>Fujii, Shinya ; Kakite, Suguru ; Nishihara, Keisuke ; Kanasaki, Yoshiko ; Harada, Tasuku ; Kigawa, Junzo ; Kaminou, Toshio ; Ogawa, Toshihide</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-df4b440a43c7d9986914c5a7216283573511b81a9219d03ae1c6153af0f716e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ADC</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>apparent diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>ovarian tumor</topic><topic>ovary</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Shinya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakite, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishihara, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Tasuku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kigawa, Junzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminou, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Toshihide</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujii, Shinya</au><au>Kakite, Suguru</au><au>Nishihara, Keisuke</au><au>Kanasaki, Yoshiko</au><au>Harada, Tasuku</au><au>Kigawa, Junzo</au><au>Kaminou, Toshio</au><au>Ogawa, Toshihide</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1149</spage><epage>1156</epage><pages>1149-1156</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose To clarify the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance images of 123 ovarian lesions in 119 patients. We defined lesions with abnormal signal intensity as malignancy and assessed the location of abnormal intensity within the lesions on DWI. We also assessed the mean and lowest apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the solid portion for each ovarian lesion. Results The majority of malignant ovarian tumors and mature cystic teratomas, and almost half of the endometriomas, showed abnormal signal intensity on DWI, whereas most fibromas and other benign lesions did not. The main locations of abnormal signal intensity were solid portions in malignant ovarian tumors, cystic components suggestive of keratinoid substances and Rokitansky protuberance in mature cystic teratomas, and intracystic clots in endometriomas. On DW imaging, receiver‐operating characteristic analysis yielded mean Az values of 0.703. There was no significant difference in mean and lowest ADC values between malignant and benign lesions. Conclusion DWI of ovarian lesions and ADC values of the solid component are not useful for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misinterpretation in the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1149–1156. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>18972356</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.21575</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1149-1156
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_21575
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects ADC
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
apparent diffusion coefficient
Diagnosis, Differential
diffusion
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Female
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Middle Aged
Ovarian Neoplasms - classification
Ovarian Neoplasms - diagnosis
ovarian tumor
ovary
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Young Adult
title Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A18%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20in%20differentiating%20benign%20from%20malignant%20ovarian%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Fujii,%20Shinya&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1149&rft.epage=1156&rft.pages=1149-1156&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.21575&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJMRI21575%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18972356&rfr_iscdi=true