Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography
The effect of sample injection temperature on quantitation is examined for on‐column and conventional split modes of sampling in capillary gas chromatography. Discrimination effects can be observed even with on‐column injection if the injection temperature is too far above the boiling point of the s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of high resolution chromatography 1983-09, Vol.6 (9), p.471-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 479 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | Journal of high resolution chromatography |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Wang, F.-S. Shanfield, H. Zlatkis, A. |
description | The effect of sample injection temperature on quantitation is examined for on‐column and conventional split modes of sampling in capillary gas chromatography. Discrimination effects can be observed even with on‐column injection if the injection temperature is too far above the boiling point of the solvent (or that of a major low boiling constituent(. This is attributed to higher boiling components being left behind in the syringe needle, and a set of simulation experiments are described to illustrate this effect. Various discrimination patterns using conventional split injection were observed, depending on temperature of injection. Apart from syringe needle effects, discrimination is probably due to the preferential venting of higher boiling components as liquid sample droplets, which can have a lifetime greater than the time of transit to the splitter. With such a two‐phase system, involving variable droplet size, the flow distribution in the splitter will be critical to uniform sampling. The use of combination on‐column/split sampling, with the appropriate temperature control to provide sample uniformity to the splitter is discussed as an advantageous alternative to conventional split sampling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jhrc.1240060903 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jhrc_1240060903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_QZ61WXXS_Z</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-5a39f5dc5f7c081f8eaab5089af696515d2e2542689a428e4aee19e988339d0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PAjEQxRujiYievfbgdaHdbpdtPBmigCESvwLhUsduC8X9SrtE-e9dsgbjydMkb97vzeQhdElJjxIS9jdrp3o0jAiJiSDsCHUoD2kQ0Tg5Rh0iGA9iRqJTdOb9hhAiREQ76G1SbLSqbVngWueVdlBvncbamEb1eOttscKzIlBlts0LDEWKfZXZGnvIm9ksbYEVVDbLwO3wCjxWa1fmUJcrB9V6d45ODGReX_zMLnq9u30ZjoPpbDQZ3kwDxXjCAg5MGJ4qbgaKJNQkGuCdk0SAiUXMKU9DHfIojBslChMdgdZUaJEkjImUaNZF_TZXudJ7p42snM2bnyQlcl-Q3BckfwtqiKuWqMAryIyDQll_wARrXEI0tuvW9mkzvfsvVd6Pn4Z_jgQtbX2tvw40uA8ZD9iAy_nDSD4uYzpfLJ7lkn0DiIOIrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wang, F.-S. ; Shanfield, H. ; Zlatkis, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, F.-S. ; Shanfield, H. ; Zlatkis, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of sample injection temperature on quantitation is examined for on‐column and conventional split modes of sampling in capillary gas chromatography. Discrimination effects can be observed even with on‐column injection if the injection temperature is too far above the boiling point of the solvent (or that of a major low boiling constituent(. This is attributed to higher boiling components being left behind in the syringe needle, and a set of simulation experiments are described to illustrate this effect. Various discrimination patterns using conventional split injection were observed, depending on temperature of injection. Apart from syringe needle effects, discrimination is probably due to the preferential venting of higher boiling components as liquid sample droplets, which can have a lifetime greater than the time of transit to the splitter. With such a two‐phase system, involving variable droplet size, the flow distribution in the splitter will be critical to uniform sampling. The use of combination on‐column/split sampling, with the appropriate temperature control to provide sample uniformity to the splitter is discussed as an advantageous alternative to conventional split sampling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0935-6304</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0344-7138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240060903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Capillary gas chromatography ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas chromatographic methods ; On-column injection ; Other chromatographic methods ; Split sampling ; Temperature control</subject><ispartof>Journal of high resolution chromatography, 1983-09, Vol.6 (9), p.471-479</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1983 Dr. Alfred Hüthig Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>1984 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-5a39f5dc5f7c081f8eaab5089af696515d2e2542689a428e4aee19e988339d0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-5a39f5dc5f7c081f8eaab5089af696515d2e2542689a428e4aee19e988339d0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhrc.1240060903$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhrc.1240060903$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=9309099$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, F.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanfield, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlatkis, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography</title><title>Journal of high resolution chromatography</title><addtitle>J. High Resol. Chromatogr</addtitle><description>The effect of sample injection temperature on quantitation is examined for on‐column and conventional split modes of sampling in capillary gas chromatography. Discrimination effects can be observed even with on‐column injection if the injection temperature is too far above the boiling point of the solvent (or that of a major low boiling constituent(. This is attributed to higher boiling components being left behind in the syringe needle, and a set of simulation experiments are described to illustrate this effect. Various discrimination patterns using conventional split injection were observed, depending on temperature of injection. Apart from syringe needle effects, discrimination is probably due to the preferential venting of higher boiling components as liquid sample droplets, which can have a lifetime greater than the time of transit to the splitter. With such a two‐phase system, involving variable droplet size, the flow distribution in the splitter will be critical to uniform sampling. The use of combination on‐column/split sampling, with the appropriate temperature control to provide sample uniformity to the splitter is discussed as an advantageous alternative to conventional split sampling.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Capillary gas chromatography</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>On-column injection</subject><subject>Other chromatographic methods</subject><subject>Split sampling</subject><subject>Temperature control</subject><issn>0935-6304</issn><issn>0344-7138</issn><issn>1521-4168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1PAjEQxRujiYievfbgdaHdbpdtPBmigCESvwLhUsduC8X9SrtE-e9dsgbjydMkb97vzeQhdElJjxIS9jdrp3o0jAiJiSDsCHUoD2kQ0Tg5Rh0iGA9iRqJTdOb9hhAiREQ76G1SbLSqbVngWueVdlBvncbamEb1eOttscKzIlBlts0LDEWKfZXZGnvIm9ksbYEVVDbLwO3wCjxWa1fmUJcrB9V6d45ODGReX_zMLnq9u30ZjoPpbDQZ3kwDxXjCAg5MGJ4qbgaKJNQkGuCdk0SAiUXMKU9DHfIojBslChMdgdZUaJEkjImUaNZF_TZXudJ7p42snM2bnyQlcl-Q3BckfwtqiKuWqMAryIyDQll_wARrXEI0tuvW9mkzvfsvVd6Pn4Z_jgQtbX2tvw40uA8ZD9iAy_nDSD4uYzpfLJ7lkn0DiIOIrg</recordid><startdate>198309</startdate><enddate>198309</enddate><creator>Wang, F.-S.</creator><creator>Shanfield, H.</creator><creator>Zlatkis, A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Hüthig</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198309</creationdate><title>Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography</title><author>Wang, F.-S. ; Shanfield, H. ; Zlatkis, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-5a39f5dc5f7c081f8eaab5089af696515d2e2542689a428e4aee19e988339d0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Capillary gas chromatography</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>On-column injection</topic><topic>Other chromatographic methods</topic><topic>Split sampling</topic><topic>Temperature control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, F.-S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanfield, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlatkis, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of high resolution chromatography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, F.-S.</au><au>Shanfield, H.</au><au>Zlatkis, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of high resolution chromatography</jtitle><addtitle>J. High Resol. Chromatogr</addtitle><date>1983-09</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>471-479</pages><issn>0935-6304</issn><issn>0344-7138</issn><eissn>1521-4168</eissn><abstract>The effect of sample injection temperature on quantitation is examined for on‐column and conventional split modes of sampling in capillary gas chromatography. Discrimination effects can be observed even with on‐column injection if the injection temperature is too far above the boiling point of the solvent (or that of a major low boiling constituent(. This is attributed to higher boiling components being left behind in the syringe needle, and a set of simulation experiments are described to illustrate this effect. Various discrimination patterns using conventional split injection were observed, depending on temperature of injection. Apart from syringe needle effects, discrimination is probably due to the preferential venting of higher boiling components as liquid sample droplets, which can have a lifetime greater than the time of transit to the splitter. With such a two‐phase system, involving variable droplet size, the flow distribution in the splitter will be critical to uniform sampling. The use of combination on‐column/split sampling, with the appropriate temperature control to provide sample uniformity to the splitter is discussed as an advantageous alternative to conventional split sampling.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/jhrc.1240060903</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0935-6304 |
ispartof | Journal of high resolution chromatography, 1983-09, Vol.6 (9), p.471-479 |
issn | 0935-6304 0344-7138 1521-4168 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jhrc_1240060903 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analytical chemistry Capillary gas chromatography Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Exact sciences and technology Gas chromatographic methods On-column injection Other chromatographic methods Split sampling Temperature control |
title | Injection temperature effects using On-column and split sampling in capillary gas chromatography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T23%3A46%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Injection%20temperature%20effects%20using%20On-column%20and%20split%20sampling%20in%20capillary%20gas%20chromatography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20high%20resolution%20chromatography&rft.au=Wang,%20F.-S.&rft.date=1983-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=471-479&rft.issn=0935-6304&rft.eissn=1521-4168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhrc.1240060903&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_QZ61WXXS_Z%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |