Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources

Several methods of analyzing EM autoradiograms are now available. Two such procedures, the grain density distribution (or histogram) method and the mask method use the resolution of the EM autoradiographic technique to generate grain distributions expected from postulated sources, and compare these...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electron microscopy technique 1984, Vol.1 (1), p.63-81
Hauptverfasser: Salpeter, Miriam M., Smith, Chari D., Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 81
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Journal of electron microscopy technique
container_volume 1
creator Salpeter, Miriam M.
Smith, Chari D.
Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.
description Several methods of analyzing EM autoradiograms are now available. Two such procedures, the grain density distribution (or histogram) method and the mask method use the resolution of the EM autoradiographic technique to generate grain distributions expected from postulated sources, and compare these with the observed grains in the autoradiograms. These two methods are here compared in the analysis of label on linear sources: the distribution of labeled acetylcholine receptor (AChR) down the postjunctional folds of lizard and frog neuromuscular junctions. The receptors were labeled with I‐25‐α‐bungarotoxin and the autoradiograms coated with the high resolution Kodak emulsion 129–01. We found that both methods gave similar results in confirming that the bulk of the AChR is concentrated on the thickened region of the membrane at the top ∼2000 A of the junctional folds, and that there may be a gradient of receptor concentration down the folds. The grain density distribution method is simpler, but does not lend itself easily to quantifying the extent of deviation from simple models. Although computer graphics is not necessary for either method, its use allows the expected grains from linear sources to be generated quickly, making the mask analysis a feasible routine method for assigning the extent of label in different membrane regions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jemt.1060010107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jemt_1060010107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_CFL7GSF4_G</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3297-c8ed911a1e14cc5146e34f4e4a33f0303d68e9d9fb32aeb315c4685dc501e9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUws_oPBOzYjhMxVVUbQC0MVGK0XOeldZvElZ0I8u9JVQRiQm94p9N9NxxCt5TcUULi-x3U7aASQuhw8gyNqBAsIimV52hEJKcRESm9RFch7AjhUsh4hJqJgbavzNZVtgHswcChdR7rFjfQeVd3wXSV9njXNaa1rgl43ePZEutuiOnCuo3Xh22Pu2CbDa512GPd6KoPNgyiwMfaAQ-u8wbCNboodRXg5vuP0Wo-W00fo8Vr_jSdLCLD4kxGJoUio1RToNwYQXkCjJccuGasJIywIkkhK7JyzWINa0aF4UkqCiMIHXw2RvenWuNdCB5KdfC21r5XlKjjWuq4lvpdayAeTsSHraD_L66eZ8vVHzo60Ta08PlDa79XiWRSqPeXXE3nC5m_zbnK2Re3F4Fk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Salpeter, Miriam M. ; Smith, Chari D. ; Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salpeter, Miriam M. ; Smith, Chari D. ; Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Several methods of analyzing EM autoradiograms are now available. Two such procedures, the grain density distribution (or histogram) method and the mask method use the resolution of the EM autoradiographic technique to generate grain distributions expected from postulated sources, and compare these with the observed grains in the autoradiograms. These two methods are here compared in the analysis of label on linear sources: the distribution of labeled acetylcholine receptor (AChR) down the postjunctional folds of lizard and frog neuromuscular junctions. The receptors were labeled with I‐25‐α‐bungarotoxin and the autoradiograms coated with the high resolution Kodak emulsion 129–01. We found that both methods gave similar results in confirming that the bulk of the AChR is concentrated on the thickened region of the membrane at the top ∼2000 A of the junctional folds, and that there may be a gradient of receptor concentration down the folds. The grain density distribution method is simpler, but does not lend itself easily to quantifying the extent of deviation from simple models. Although computer graphics is not necessary for either method, its use allows the expected grains from linear sources to be generated quickly, making the mask analysis a feasible routine method for assigning the extent of label in different membrane regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-0581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-0817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1060010107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Acetylcholine receptor ; Autoradiography ; Junctional folds ; Mask analysis ; Neuromuscular junction</subject><ispartof>Journal of electron microscopy technique, 1984, Vol.1 (1), p.63-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1984 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3297-c8ed911a1e14cc5146e34f4e4a33f0303d68e9d9fb32aeb315c4685dc501e9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3297-c8ed911a1e14cc5146e34f4e4a33f0303d68e9d9fb32aeb315c4685dc501e9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjemt.1060010107$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjemt.1060010107$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4014,27914,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salpeter, Miriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Chari D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources</title><title>Journal of electron microscopy technique</title><addtitle>J. Elec. Microsc. Tech</addtitle><description>Several methods of analyzing EM autoradiograms are now available. Two such procedures, the grain density distribution (or histogram) method and the mask method use the resolution of the EM autoradiographic technique to generate grain distributions expected from postulated sources, and compare these with the observed grains in the autoradiograms. These two methods are here compared in the analysis of label on linear sources: the distribution of labeled acetylcholine receptor (AChR) down the postjunctional folds of lizard and frog neuromuscular junctions. The receptors were labeled with I‐25‐α‐bungarotoxin and the autoradiograms coated with the high resolution Kodak emulsion 129–01. We found that both methods gave similar results in confirming that the bulk of the AChR is concentrated on the thickened region of the membrane at the top ∼2000 A of the junctional folds, and that there may be a gradient of receptor concentration down the folds. The grain density distribution method is simpler, but does not lend itself easily to quantifying the extent of deviation from simple models. Although computer graphics is not necessary for either method, its use allows the expected grains from linear sources to be generated quickly, making the mask analysis a feasible routine method for assigning the extent of label in different membrane regions.</description><subject>Acetylcholine receptor</subject><subject>Autoradiography</subject><subject>Junctional folds</subject><subject>Mask analysis</subject><subject>Neuromuscular junction</subject><issn>0741-0581</issn><issn>1553-0817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAUhC0EEqUws_oPBOzYjhMxVVUbQC0MVGK0XOeldZvElZ0I8u9JVQRiQm94p9N9NxxCt5TcUULi-x3U7aASQuhw8gyNqBAsIimV52hEJKcRESm9RFch7AjhUsh4hJqJgbavzNZVtgHswcChdR7rFjfQeVd3wXSV9njXNaa1rgl43ePZEutuiOnCuo3Xh22Pu2CbDa512GPd6KoPNgyiwMfaAQ-u8wbCNboodRXg5vuP0Wo-W00fo8Vr_jSdLCLD4kxGJoUio1RToNwYQXkCjJccuGasJIywIkkhK7JyzWINa0aF4UkqCiMIHXw2RvenWuNdCB5KdfC21r5XlKjjWuq4lvpdayAeTsSHraD_L66eZ8vVHzo60Ta08PlDa79XiWRSqPeXXE3nC5m_zbnK2Re3F4Fk</recordid><startdate>1984</startdate><enddate>1984</enddate><creator>Salpeter, Miriam M.</creator><creator>Smith, Chari D.</creator><creator>Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1984</creationdate><title>Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources</title><author>Salpeter, Miriam M. ; Smith, Chari D. ; Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3297-c8ed911a1e14cc5146e34f4e4a33f0303d68e9d9fb32aeb315c4685dc501e9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Acetylcholine receptor</topic><topic>Autoradiography</topic><topic>Junctional folds</topic><topic>Mask analysis</topic><topic>Neuromuscular junction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salpeter, Miriam M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Chari D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of electron microscopy technique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salpeter, Miriam M.</au><au>Smith, Chari D.</au><au>Matthews-Bellinger, Julia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electron microscopy technique</jtitle><addtitle>J. Elec. Microsc. Tech</addtitle><date>1984</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>63-81</pages><issn>0741-0581</issn><eissn>1553-0817</eissn><abstract>Several methods of analyzing EM autoradiograms are now available. Two such procedures, the grain density distribution (or histogram) method and the mask method use the resolution of the EM autoradiographic technique to generate grain distributions expected from postulated sources, and compare these with the observed grains in the autoradiograms. These two methods are here compared in the analysis of label on linear sources: the distribution of labeled acetylcholine receptor (AChR) down the postjunctional folds of lizard and frog neuromuscular junctions. The receptors were labeled with I‐25‐α‐bungarotoxin and the autoradiograms coated with the high resolution Kodak emulsion 129–01. We found that both methods gave similar results in confirming that the bulk of the AChR is concentrated on the thickened region of the membrane at the top ∼2000 A of the junctional folds, and that there may be a gradient of receptor concentration down the folds. The grain density distribution method is simpler, but does not lend itself easily to quantifying the extent of deviation from simple models. Although computer graphics is not necessary for either method, its use allows the expected grains from linear sources to be generated quickly, making the mask analysis a feasible routine method for assigning the extent of label in different membrane regions.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/jemt.1060010107</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-0581
ispartof Journal of electron microscopy technique, 1984, Vol.1 (1), p.63-81
issn 0741-0581
1553-0817
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jemt_1060010107
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Acetylcholine receptor
Autoradiography
Junctional folds
Mask analysis
Neuromuscular junction
title Acetylcholine receptor at neuromuscular junctions by EM autoradiography using mask analysis and linear sources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acetylcholine%20receptor%20at%20neuromuscular%20junctions%20by%20EM%20autoradiography%20using%20mask%20analysis%20and%20linear%20sources&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electron%20microscopy%20technique&rft.au=Salpeter,%20Miriam%20M.&rft.date=1984&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=63-81&rft.issn=0741-0581&rft.eissn=1553-0817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jemt.1060010107&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_CFL7GSF4_G%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true