Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments

Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacy practice has experienced significant growth in the past decade, but the scope of services provided for freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) has not been previously described. Objectives The primary objective was to describe EM pharmacist interventi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 2021-08, Vol.4 (8), p.939-946
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, Matthew J., Tietz, David, Sayles, Stephen, Hustey, Frederic, Phelan, Michael P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 946
container_issue 8
container_start_page 939
container_title JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
container_volume 4
creator Campbell, Matthew J.
Tietz, David
Sayles, Stephen
Hustey, Frederic
Phelan, Michael P.
description Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacy practice has experienced significant growth in the past decade, but the scope of services provided for freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) has not been previously described. Objectives The primary objective was to describe EM pharmacist interventions provided through telepharmacy services for three FSEDs. Methods This was a retrospective chart review conducted in three FSEDs that are part of a large health system. EM pharmacists provide remote clinical coverage for the FSEDs. Pharmacist interventions for FSED patients between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Documentation related to non‐direct patient care activities was excluded. Drug therapy recommendations were categorized by therapeutic drug class and the proportion associated with Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) high‐alert medications was analyzed. The clinical significance of a random sample of drug therapy recommendations was rated using a validated scale. Data was analyzed descriptively and a weighted Kappa statistic was calculated to assess inter‐rater reliability. Results A total of 4313 interventions met inclusion criteria with drug therapy recommendations accounting for 38.4% of all interventions. Of 1664 drug therapy recommendations, there were 1424 linked to a medication with the most frequently implicated therapeutic classes being antimicrobial agents (n = 732; 51.4%), vaccines (n = 168; 11.8%), and cardiovascular agents (n = 90; 6.3%). ISMP high‐alert medications accounted for 11% (n = 157) of these recommendations with antithrombotic agents (n = 51; 32.5%), insulin (n = 34; 21.7%), and opioids (n = 20; 12.7%) most frequently implicated. In a random sample of drug therapy recommendations, 19.2% were rated as significant errors by both reviewers with moderate inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.55; SE 0.09). When assessing the value of service, 59% of interventions were rated as significant by both reviewers with fair inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.22; SE 0.05). Conclusion EM pharmacists provided clinically significant drug therapy recommendations through telepharmacy services which may represent a novel approach to optimize patient care in FSEDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jac5.1492
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jac5_1492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAC51492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2292-9059eb4560779dc897d174e04de873d090c323b256919c381df7f786b8f79e3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtvwjAUha2qlYooQ_-B1w6B60diuxuK-hQSHegcOfYNBCUhsqNW_PuSwtCl0z1X-s4ZPkLuGcwZAF_srUvnTBp-RSY8VTIxWsH1n3xLZjHuAYAZITXLJmT9sTt0SC3tdza01tVxeKQbbPDyH2nE8FU7jNQOtAqIcbCdr7stxRbDFrsT4rG3YWixG-IdualsE3F2uVPy-fy0yV-T1frlLV-uEse54YmB1GAp0wyUMt5pozxTEkF61Ep4MOAEFyVPM8OME5r5SlVKZ6WulEGBYkoezrsuHGIMWBV9qFsbjgWDYpRRjDKKUcaJXZzZ77rB4_9g8b7M09_GD1ePYJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Campbell, Matthew J. ; Tietz, David ; Sayles, Stephen ; Hustey, Frederic ; Phelan, Michael P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Matthew J. ; Tietz, David ; Sayles, Stephen ; Hustey, Frederic ; Phelan, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacy practice has experienced significant growth in the past decade, but the scope of services provided for freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) has not been previously described. Objectives The primary objective was to describe EM pharmacist interventions provided through telepharmacy services for three FSEDs. Methods This was a retrospective chart review conducted in three FSEDs that are part of a large health system. EM pharmacists provide remote clinical coverage for the FSEDs. Pharmacist interventions for FSED patients between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Documentation related to non‐direct patient care activities was excluded. Drug therapy recommendations were categorized by therapeutic drug class and the proportion associated with Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) high‐alert medications was analyzed. The clinical significance of a random sample of drug therapy recommendations was rated using a validated scale. Data was analyzed descriptively and a weighted Kappa statistic was calculated to assess inter‐rater reliability. Results A total of 4313 interventions met inclusion criteria with drug therapy recommendations accounting for 38.4% of all interventions. Of 1664 drug therapy recommendations, there were 1424 linked to a medication with the most frequently implicated therapeutic classes being antimicrobial agents (n = 732; 51.4%), vaccines (n = 168; 11.8%), and cardiovascular agents (n = 90; 6.3%). ISMP high‐alert medications accounted for 11% (n = 157) of these recommendations with antithrombotic agents (n = 51; 32.5%), insulin (n = 34; 21.7%), and opioids (n = 20; 12.7%) most frequently implicated. In a random sample of drug therapy recommendations, 19.2% were rated as significant errors by both reviewers with moderate inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.55; SE 0.09). When assessing the value of service, 59% of interventions were rated as significant by both reviewers with fair inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.22; SE 0.05). Conclusion EM pharmacists provided clinically significant drug therapy recommendations through telepharmacy services which may represent a novel approach to optimize patient care in FSEDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-9870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-9870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>drug therapy ; emergency medicine ; emergency service ; hospital ; pharmacists ; telemedicine</subject><ispartof>JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021-08, Vol.4 (8), p.939-946</ispartof><rights>2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2292-9059eb4560779dc897d174e04de873d090c323b256919c381df7f786b8f79e3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7698-477X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjac5.1492$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjac5.1492$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayles, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hustey, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><title>Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments</title><title>JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy</title><description>Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacy practice has experienced significant growth in the past decade, but the scope of services provided for freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) has not been previously described. Objectives The primary objective was to describe EM pharmacist interventions provided through telepharmacy services for three FSEDs. Methods This was a retrospective chart review conducted in three FSEDs that are part of a large health system. EM pharmacists provide remote clinical coverage for the FSEDs. Pharmacist interventions for FSED patients between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Documentation related to non‐direct patient care activities was excluded. Drug therapy recommendations were categorized by therapeutic drug class and the proportion associated with Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) high‐alert medications was analyzed. The clinical significance of a random sample of drug therapy recommendations was rated using a validated scale. Data was analyzed descriptively and a weighted Kappa statistic was calculated to assess inter‐rater reliability. Results A total of 4313 interventions met inclusion criteria with drug therapy recommendations accounting for 38.4% of all interventions. Of 1664 drug therapy recommendations, there were 1424 linked to a medication with the most frequently implicated therapeutic classes being antimicrobial agents (n = 732; 51.4%), vaccines (n = 168; 11.8%), and cardiovascular agents (n = 90; 6.3%). ISMP high‐alert medications accounted for 11% (n = 157) of these recommendations with antithrombotic agents (n = 51; 32.5%), insulin (n = 34; 21.7%), and opioids (n = 20; 12.7%) most frequently implicated. In a random sample of drug therapy recommendations, 19.2% were rated as significant errors by both reviewers with moderate inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.55; SE 0.09). When assessing the value of service, 59% of interventions were rated as significant by both reviewers with fair inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.22; SE 0.05). Conclusion EM pharmacists provided clinically significant drug therapy recommendations through telepharmacy services which may represent a novel approach to optimize patient care in FSEDs.</description><subject>drug therapy</subject><subject>emergency medicine</subject><subject>emergency service</subject><subject>hospital</subject><subject>pharmacists</subject><subject>telemedicine</subject><issn>2574-9870</issn><issn>2574-9870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtvwjAUha2qlYooQ_-B1w6B60diuxuK-hQSHegcOfYNBCUhsqNW_PuSwtCl0z1X-s4ZPkLuGcwZAF_srUvnTBp-RSY8VTIxWsH1n3xLZjHuAYAZITXLJmT9sTt0SC3tdza01tVxeKQbbPDyH2nE8FU7jNQOtAqIcbCdr7stxRbDFrsT4rG3YWixG-IdualsE3F2uVPy-fy0yV-T1frlLV-uEse54YmB1GAp0wyUMt5pozxTEkF61Ep4MOAEFyVPM8OME5r5SlVKZ6WulEGBYkoezrsuHGIMWBV9qFsbjgWDYpRRjDKKUcaJXZzZ77rB4_9g8b7M09_GD1ePYJQ</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Campbell, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Tietz, David</creator><creator>Sayles, Stephen</creator><creator>Hustey, Frederic</creator><creator>Phelan, Michael P.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-477X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments</title><author>Campbell, Matthew J. ; Tietz, David ; Sayles, Stephen ; Hustey, Frederic ; Phelan, Michael P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2292-9059eb4560779dc897d174e04de873d090c323b256919c381df7f786b8f79e3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>drug therapy</topic><topic>emergency medicine</topic><topic>emergency service</topic><topic>hospital</topic><topic>pharmacists</topic><topic>telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayles, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hustey, Frederic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phelan, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, Matthew J.</au><au>Tietz, David</au><au>Sayles, Stephen</au><au>Hustey, Frederic</au><au>Phelan, Michael P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments</atitle><jtitle>JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>939-946</pages><issn>2574-9870</issn><eissn>2574-9870</eissn><abstract>Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) pharmacy practice has experienced significant growth in the past decade, but the scope of services provided for freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) has not been previously described. Objectives The primary objective was to describe EM pharmacist interventions provided through telepharmacy services for three FSEDs. Methods This was a retrospective chart review conducted in three FSEDs that are part of a large health system. EM pharmacists provide remote clinical coverage for the FSEDs. Pharmacist interventions for FSED patients between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Documentation related to non‐direct patient care activities was excluded. Drug therapy recommendations were categorized by therapeutic drug class and the proportion associated with Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) high‐alert medications was analyzed. The clinical significance of a random sample of drug therapy recommendations was rated using a validated scale. Data was analyzed descriptively and a weighted Kappa statistic was calculated to assess inter‐rater reliability. Results A total of 4313 interventions met inclusion criteria with drug therapy recommendations accounting for 38.4% of all interventions. Of 1664 drug therapy recommendations, there were 1424 linked to a medication with the most frequently implicated therapeutic classes being antimicrobial agents (n = 732; 51.4%), vaccines (n = 168; 11.8%), and cardiovascular agents (n = 90; 6.3%). ISMP high‐alert medications accounted for 11% (n = 157) of these recommendations with antithrombotic agents (n = 51; 32.5%), insulin (n = 34; 21.7%), and opioids (n = 20; 12.7%) most frequently implicated. In a random sample of drug therapy recommendations, 19.2% were rated as significant errors by both reviewers with moderate inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.55; SE 0.09). When assessing the value of service, 59% of interventions were rated as significant by both reviewers with fair inter‐rater reliability (κ = 0.22; SE 0.05). Conclusion EM pharmacists provided clinically significant drug therapy recommendations through telepharmacy services which may represent a novel approach to optimize patient care in FSEDs.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jac5.1492</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-477X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-9870
ispartof JAACP : Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 2021-08, Vol.4 (8), p.939-946
issn 2574-9870
2574-9870
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jac5_1492
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects drug therapy
emergency medicine
emergency service
hospital
pharmacists
telemedicine
title Phone a pharmacist: Telepharmacy services at freestanding emergency departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A47%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phone%20a%20pharmacist:%20Telepharmacy%20services%20at%20freestanding%20emergency%20departments&rft.jtitle=JAACP%20:%20Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Clinical%20Pharmacy&rft.au=Campbell,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=939-946&rft.issn=2574-9870&rft.eissn=2574-9870&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jac5.1492&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJAC51492%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true