An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial
The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2001-10, Vol.96 (5), p.261-269 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 269 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 261 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Amdur, Robert J. Biddle, C.J. |
description | The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo control are explained. A series of case discussions are used to illustrate each decision point. The critical decision points in the evaluation of the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial are as follows: (i) Is placebo being used in place of standard therapy? (ii) Is standard therapy likely to be effective? (iii) Is the toxicity of standard therapy such that patients routinely refuse this treatment? (iv) Could the use of placebo result in severe suffering or irreversible harm? (v) Is the variability in the placebo response such that it is reasonable to consider other options for the control group? (vi) Would a reasonable person with an average degree of altruism and risk aversiveness agree to participate in this study? The algorithm presented in this article gives researchers and research monitors (such as Institutional Review Board members) the tools they need to evaluate the ethics of a study that uses concomitant placebo control. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.1026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_1026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>IJC1026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3476-4b5924ccd86335de09da6718d4a75e38adb65a9aa327eb607cf5506d79a0b21f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMotlbBJ5BcBC-rk-wm2T2WYrVS8KLnZTbJtilptyRbpTcfwWf0SdzaQk-e_oH5mH_-n5BrBvcMgD-4he4GLk9In0GhEuBMnJJ-t4JEsVT2yEWMCwDGBGTnpNdpzoXK-2Q8XFH0sya4dr6kdROo_UC_wdatZrSdW2rbudORNjVFuvaobdX8fH3rZtWGxntraBsc-ktyVqOP9uqgA_I-fnwbPSfT16fJaDhNdJopmWSVKHimtcllmgpjoTAoFctNhkrYNEdTSYEFYsqVrSQoXQsB0qgCoeKsTgfkbn9XhybGYOtyHdwSw7ZkUO6qKLsqyl0VHXqzR9ebamnNETxk74DbA4BRo68DrrSLRy5jHHZ_Dkiy5z6dt9t_DcvJy-jP-BdDE3T4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Amdur, Robert J. ; Biddle, C.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Amdur, Robert J. ; Biddle, C.J.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo control are explained. A series of case discussions are used to illustrate each decision point. The critical decision points in the evaluation of the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial are as follows: (i) Is placebo being used in place of standard therapy? (ii) Is standard therapy likely to be effective? (iii) Is the toxicity of standard therapy such that patients routinely refuse this treatment? (iv) Could the use of placebo result in severe suffering or irreversible harm? (v) Is the variability in the placebo response such that it is reasonable to consider other options for the control group? (vi) Would a reasonable person with an average degree of altruism and risk aversiveness agree to participate in this study? The algorithm presented in this article gives researchers and research monitors (such as Institutional Review Board members) the tools they need to evaluate the ethics of a study that uses concomitant placebo control. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.1026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11582578</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCNAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; ethics ; Ethics, Medical ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; placebo ; Placebos ; Radiation therapy and radiosensitizing agent ; Random Allocation ; Treatment with physical agents ; Treatment. General aspects ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2001-10, Vol.96 (5), p.261-269</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3476-4b5924ccd86335de09da6718d4a75e38adb65a9aa327eb607cf5506d79a0b21f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3476-4b5924ccd86335de09da6718d4a75e38adb65a9aa327eb607cf5506d79a0b21f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.1026$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.1026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14120863$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11582578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amdur, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddle, C.J.</creatorcontrib><title>An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo control are explained. A series of case discussions are used to illustrate each decision point. The critical decision points in the evaluation of the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial are as follows: (i) Is placebo being used in place of standard therapy? (ii) Is standard therapy likely to be effective? (iii) Is the toxicity of standard therapy such that patients routinely refuse this treatment? (iv) Could the use of placebo result in severe suffering or irreversible harm? (v) Is the variability in the placebo response such that it is reasonable to consider other options for the control group? (vi) Would a reasonable person with an average degree of altruism and risk aversiveness agree to participate in this study? The algorithm presented in this article gives researchers and research monitors (such as Institutional Review Board members) the tools they need to evaluate the ethics of a study that uses concomitant placebo control. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>placebo</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Radiation therapy and radiosensitizing agent</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Treatment with physical agents</subject><subject>Treatment. General aspects</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMotlbBJ5BcBC-rk-wm2T2WYrVS8KLnZTbJtilptyRbpTcfwWf0SdzaQk-e_oH5mH_-n5BrBvcMgD-4he4GLk9In0GhEuBMnJJ-t4JEsVT2yEWMCwDGBGTnpNdpzoXK-2Q8XFH0sya4dr6kdROo_UC_wdatZrSdW2rbudORNjVFuvaobdX8fH3rZtWGxntraBsc-ktyVqOP9uqgA_I-fnwbPSfT16fJaDhNdJopmWSVKHimtcllmgpjoTAoFctNhkrYNEdTSYEFYsqVrSQoXQsB0qgCoeKsTgfkbn9XhybGYOtyHdwSw7ZkUO6qKLsqyl0VHXqzR9ebamnNETxk74DbA4BRo68DrrSLRy5jHHZ_Dkiy5z6dt9t_DcvJy-jP-BdDE3T4</recordid><startdate>20011020</startdate><enddate>20011020</enddate><creator>Amdur, Robert J.</creator><creator>Biddle, C.J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011020</creationdate><title>An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial</title><author>Amdur, Robert J. ; Biddle, C.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3476-4b5924ccd86335de09da6718d4a75e38adb65a9aa327eb607cf5506d79a0b21f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>placebo</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Radiation therapy and radiosensitizing agent</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Treatment with physical agents</topic><topic>Treatment. General aspects</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amdur, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biddle, C.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amdur, Robert J.</au><au>Biddle, C.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2001-10-20</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>261-269</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><coden>IJCNAW</coden><abstract>The purpose of this article is to clarify the decision points that are important to consider when evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial. The ethical requirements for research involving human subjects are reviewed, and the rationale for and potential problems with concomitant placebo control are explained. A series of case discussions are used to illustrate each decision point. The critical decision points in the evaluation of the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial are as follows: (i) Is placebo being used in place of standard therapy? (ii) Is standard therapy likely to be effective? (iii) Is the toxicity of standard therapy such that patients routinely refuse this treatment? (iv) Could the use of placebo result in severe suffering or irreversible harm? (v) Is the variability in the placebo response such that it is reasonable to consider other options for the control group? (vi) Would a reasonable person with an average degree of altruism and risk aversiveness agree to participate in this study? The algorithm presented in this article gives researchers and research monitors (such as Institutional Review Board members) the tools they need to evaluate the ethics of a study that uses concomitant placebo control. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>11582578</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.1026</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2001-10, Vol.96 (5), p.261-269 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_1026 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ethics Ethics, Medical Humans Medical sciences placebo Placebos Radiation therapy and radiosensitizing agent Random Allocation Treatment with physical agents Treatment. General aspects Tumors |
title | An algorithm for evaluating the ethics of a placebo‐controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20algorithm%20for%20evaluating%20the%20ethics%20of%20a%20placebo%E2%80%90controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Amdur,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=2001-10-20&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=261-269&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft.coden=IJCNAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.1026&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EIJC1026%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11582578&rfr_iscdi=true |