Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams

Stream temperature, an important measure of ecosystem health, is expected to be altered by future changes in climate and land use, potentially leading to shifts in habitat distribution for aquatic organisms dependent on particular temperature regimes. To assess the sensitivity of stream temperature...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2012-02, Vol.26 (5), p.771-785
Hauptverfasser: Kelleher, C., Wagener, T., Gooseff, M., McGlynn, B., McGuire, K., Marshall, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 785
container_issue 5
container_start_page 771
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 26
creator Kelleher, C.
Wagener, T.
Gooseff, M.
McGlynn, B.
McGuire, K.
Marshall, L.
description Stream temperature, an important measure of ecosystem health, is expected to be altered by future changes in climate and land use, potentially leading to shifts in habitat distribution for aquatic organisms dependent on particular temperature regimes. To assess the sensitivity of stream temperature to change in a region where such a shift has the potential to occur, we examine the variability of and controls on the direct relationship between air and water temperature across the state of Pennsylvania. We characterized the relationship between air and stream temperature via linear and nonlinear regression for 57 sites across Pennsylvania at daily and weekly timescales. Model fit (r2) improved for 92% (daily) and 65% (weekly) of sites for nonlinear versus linear relationships. Fit for weekly versus daily regression analysis improved by 0·08 for linear and 0·06 for nonlinear regression relationships. To investigate the mechanisms controlling stream temperature sensitivity to environmental change, we define ‘thermal sensitivity’ as the sensitivity of stream temperature of a given site to change in air temperature, quantified as the slope of the regression line between air and stream temperature. Air temperature accounted for 60–95% of the daily variation in stream temperature for sites at or above a Strahler stream order (SO) of 3, with thermal sensitivities ranging from low (0·02) to high (0·93). The sensitivity of stream temperature to air temperature is primarily controlled by stream size (SO) and baseflow contribution. Together, SO and baseflow index explained 43% of the variance in thermal sensitivity across the state, and 59% within the Susquehanna River Basin. In small streams, baseflow contribution was the major determinant of thermal sensitivity, with increasing baseflow contributions resulting in decreasing sensitivity values. In large streams, thermal sensitivity increased with stream size, as a function of accumulated heat throughout the stream network. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.8186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_8186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>HYP8186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3696-9e6a072ffe6dd075653f5a43695ac7d8fb862cca98bfbbe54dc5bd406875b8633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAYRS0EEqUg8RM8sqR8aeJHRlToA1XQoVAxWY5jt4bUqWyrkH9PqiIkBoarO9yjOxyErlMYpADD2027G_CU0xPUS6EokhQ4OUU94JwkFDg7RxchvANADhx6aDZzex2iXcto3RqrxkXf1AE3DseNPsRvZY2DdsFGu7exxY3BC-1caOu9dFbiEL2W23CJzoysg7766T56GT8sR9Nk_jyZje7micpoQZNCUwlsaIymVQWMUJIZIvNuI1KxipuS06FSsuClKUtN8kqRssqBcka6Kcv66Ob4q3wTgtdG7LzdSt-KFMRBgegUiIOCDk2O6KetdfsvJ6Zvi7-8DVF__fLSfwjKMkbE6mkilnz6OB_fr8Rr9g1IE26d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kelleher, C. ; Wagener, T. ; Gooseff, M. ; McGlynn, B. ; McGuire, K. ; Marshall, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, C. ; Wagener, T. ; Gooseff, M. ; McGlynn, B. ; McGuire, K. ; Marshall, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Stream temperature, an important measure of ecosystem health, is expected to be altered by future changes in climate and land use, potentially leading to shifts in habitat distribution for aquatic organisms dependent on particular temperature regimes. To assess the sensitivity of stream temperature to change in a region where such a shift has the potential to occur, we examine the variability of and controls on the direct relationship between air and water temperature across the state of Pennsylvania. We characterized the relationship between air and stream temperature via linear and nonlinear regression for 57 sites across Pennsylvania at daily and weekly timescales. Model fit (r2) improved for 92% (daily) and 65% (weekly) of sites for nonlinear versus linear relationships. Fit for weekly versus daily regression analysis improved by 0·08 for linear and 0·06 for nonlinear regression relationships. To investigate the mechanisms controlling stream temperature sensitivity to environmental change, we define ‘thermal sensitivity’ as the sensitivity of stream temperature of a given site to change in air temperature, quantified as the slope of the regression line between air and stream temperature. Air temperature accounted for 60–95% of the daily variation in stream temperature for sites at or above a Strahler stream order (SO) of 3, with thermal sensitivities ranging from low (0·02) to high (0·93). The sensitivity of stream temperature to air temperature is primarily controlled by stream size (SO) and baseflow contribution. Together, SO and baseflow index explained 43% of the variance in thermal sensitivity across the state, and 59% within the Susquehanna River Basin. In small streams, baseflow contribution was the major determinant of thermal sensitivity, with increasing baseflow contributions resulting in decreasing sensitivity values. In large streams, thermal sensitivity increased with stream size, as a function of accumulated heat throughout the stream network. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8186</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>hydrology ; streams ; thermal sensitivity ; water temperature</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2012-02, Vol.26 (5), p.771-785</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3696-9e6a072ffe6dd075653f5a43695ac7d8fb862cca98bfbbe54dc5bd406875b8633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3696-9e6a072ffe6dd075653f5a43695ac7d8fb862cca98bfbbe54dc5bd406875b8633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.8186$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.8186$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooseff, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Stream temperature, an important measure of ecosystem health, is expected to be altered by future changes in climate and land use, potentially leading to shifts in habitat distribution for aquatic organisms dependent on particular temperature regimes. To assess the sensitivity of stream temperature to change in a region where such a shift has the potential to occur, we examine the variability of and controls on the direct relationship between air and water temperature across the state of Pennsylvania. We characterized the relationship between air and stream temperature via linear and nonlinear regression for 57 sites across Pennsylvania at daily and weekly timescales. Model fit (r2) improved for 92% (daily) and 65% (weekly) of sites for nonlinear versus linear relationships. Fit for weekly versus daily regression analysis improved by 0·08 for linear and 0·06 for nonlinear regression relationships. To investigate the mechanisms controlling stream temperature sensitivity to environmental change, we define ‘thermal sensitivity’ as the sensitivity of stream temperature of a given site to change in air temperature, quantified as the slope of the regression line between air and stream temperature. Air temperature accounted for 60–95% of the daily variation in stream temperature for sites at or above a Strahler stream order (SO) of 3, with thermal sensitivities ranging from low (0·02) to high (0·93). The sensitivity of stream temperature to air temperature is primarily controlled by stream size (SO) and baseflow contribution. Together, SO and baseflow index explained 43% of the variance in thermal sensitivity across the state, and 59% within the Susquehanna River Basin. In small streams, baseflow contribution was the major determinant of thermal sensitivity, with increasing baseflow contributions resulting in decreasing sensitivity values. In large streams, thermal sensitivity increased with stream size, as a function of accumulated heat throughout the stream network. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>hydrology</subject><subject>streams</subject><subject>thermal sensitivity</subject><subject>water temperature</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAYRS0EEqUg8RM8sqR8aeJHRlToA1XQoVAxWY5jt4bUqWyrkH9PqiIkBoarO9yjOxyErlMYpADD2027G_CU0xPUS6EokhQ4OUU94JwkFDg7RxchvANADhx6aDZzex2iXcto3RqrxkXf1AE3DseNPsRvZY2DdsFGu7exxY3BC-1caOu9dFbiEL2W23CJzoysg7766T56GT8sR9Nk_jyZje7micpoQZNCUwlsaIymVQWMUJIZIvNuI1KxipuS06FSsuClKUtN8kqRssqBcka6Kcv66Ob4q3wTgtdG7LzdSt-KFMRBgegUiIOCDk2O6KetdfsvJ6Zvi7-8DVF__fLSfwjKMkbE6mkilnz6OB_fr8Rr9g1IE26d</recordid><startdate>20120228</startdate><enddate>20120228</enddate><creator>Kelleher, C.</creator><creator>Wagener, T.</creator><creator>Gooseff, M.</creator><creator>McGlynn, B.</creator><creator>McGuire, K.</creator><creator>Marshall, L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120228</creationdate><title>Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams</title><author>Kelleher, C. ; Wagener, T. ; Gooseff, M. ; McGlynn, B. ; McGuire, K. ; Marshall, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3696-9e6a072ffe6dd075653f5a43695ac7d8fb862cca98bfbbe54dc5bd406875b8633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>hydrology</topic><topic>streams</topic><topic>thermal sensitivity</topic><topic>water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelleher, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooseff, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGlynn, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelleher, C.</au><au>Wagener, T.</au><au>Gooseff, M.</au><au>McGlynn, B.</au><au>McGuire, K.</au><au>Marshall, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2012-02-28</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>771</spage><epage>785</epage><pages>771-785</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Stream temperature, an important measure of ecosystem health, is expected to be altered by future changes in climate and land use, potentially leading to shifts in habitat distribution for aquatic organisms dependent on particular temperature regimes. To assess the sensitivity of stream temperature to change in a region where such a shift has the potential to occur, we examine the variability of and controls on the direct relationship between air and water temperature across the state of Pennsylvania. We characterized the relationship between air and stream temperature via linear and nonlinear regression for 57 sites across Pennsylvania at daily and weekly timescales. Model fit (r2) improved for 92% (daily) and 65% (weekly) of sites for nonlinear versus linear relationships. Fit for weekly versus daily regression analysis improved by 0·08 for linear and 0·06 for nonlinear regression relationships. To investigate the mechanisms controlling stream temperature sensitivity to environmental change, we define ‘thermal sensitivity’ as the sensitivity of stream temperature of a given site to change in air temperature, quantified as the slope of the regression line between air and stream temperature. Air temperature accounted for 60–95% of the daily variation in stream temperature for sites at or above a Strahler stream order (SO) of 3, with thermal sensitivities ranging from low (0·02) to high (0·93). The sensitivity of stream temperature to air temperature is primarily controlled by stream size (SO) and baseflow contribution. Together, SO and baseflow index explained 43% of the variance in thermal sensitivity across the state, and 59% within the Susquehanna River Basin. In small streams, baseflow contribution was the major determinant of thermal sensitivity, with increasing baseflow contributions resulting in decreasing sensitivity values. In large streams, thermal sensitivity increased with stream size, as a function of accumulated heat throughout the stream network. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.8186</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2012-02, Vol.26 (5), p.771-785
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_8186
source Wiley Journals
subjects hydrology
streams
thermal sensitivity
water temperature
title Investigating controls on the thermal sensitivity of Pennsylvania streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A50%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20controls%20on%20the%20thermal%20sensitivity%20of%20Pennsylvania%20streams&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Kelleher,%20C.&rft.date=2012-02-28&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=771&rft.epage=785&rft.pages=771-785&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.8186&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EHYP8186%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true