Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A

This paper defines the geomorphic and stratigraphic contexts, and site formation processes for the Hebior and Schaefer woolly mammoths in southeastern Wisconsin. Both mammoths were butchered, and there are artifacts associated with the faunal remains. Radiocarbon ages obtained from purified mammoth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geoarchaeology 2003-01, Vol.18 (1), p.91-114
Hauptverfasser: Overstreet, David F., Kolb, Michael F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Geoarchaeology
container_volume 18
creator Overstreet, David F.
Kolb, Michael F.
description This paper defines the geomorphic and stratigraphic contexts, and site formation processes for the Hebior and Schaefer woolly mammoths in southeastern Wisconsin. Both mammoths were butchered, and there are artifacts associated with the faunal remains. Radiocarbon ages obtained from purified mammoth bone collagen range between 12,200 and 12,600 yr B.P. for the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths and between 13,440 and 13,510 yr B.P. for the nearby Mud Lake and Fenske mammoths. These ages indicate human use of an ice marginal landscape 1000–2000 years before human–mammoth interaction in the American southwest. They also indicate these sites are pre‐Clovis in age and may be associated with the recently defined non‐Clovis Paleoindian variant called the Chesrow complex. Chesrow complex sites are located on glacial lake and moraine features or in deposits that are of similar ages as the butchered mammoths, but they have not been unequivocally linked to the mammoth sites. Geomorphic and stratigraphic data were collected from profiles in archaeological excavations and backhoe trenches, and from cores. The Hebior and Schaefer sites lie in a topographic low between two end moraines. Mammoths remains rest on deglacial deposits and are encased in the post‐glacial deposits. At Hebior, these deposits consist of glaciolacustrine clays overlain by a thin stratum of glaciofluvial sands, on which the bones rest, overlain by laminated peat and muck. Sills and dikes of sand cross‐cut the organic deposits and formed late in the depositional sequence. At the Schaefer site, the bone pile rests on glaciolacustrine clays and is encased in clastic pond deposits and laminated peat and muck. Contextual analysis indicates the bone piles are in situ and were preserved initially by inundation in ponds and subsequently by organic deposition in wetlands. Radiocarbon ages, stratigraphic/geomorphic contexts, and taphonomic studies indicate the Hebior and Schaefer mammoths are in situ evidence for human interaction with megafauna very near the active glacial ice margin in the mid‐continent by 12,500 yr B.P. and perhaps as early as 13,500 yr B.P. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gea.10052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_gea_10052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>GEA10052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-34330820086081981e54c2535843342b6069a43d47b6beeb65e2ab1df3d7d833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoO8CnZLmyZNH8eYVRxTcTrwJaTtdY22jSQd276FH9nOqQ-CT3dwv_8d90Po3CcDn5BguAS1a1hwgHo-C4jHWSgOUY8IQT1OGT1GJ869EkLimLAe-kjAKJuVCkxlljpTFc5M08KmdbgwFk9VC_i-Au1ak0ED-A_sdAsOr3Vb4nJVq8arTa4LDTleG1NVW1yrujbd1EKtdOOwbrAzq7YE5VqwDV5o1x10urnET4PHwegUHRWqcnD2XftofjWZj6-96V1yMx5NvYx233k0pJSIgBDBifBj4QMLs4BRJrpBGKSc8FiFNA-jlKcAKWcQqNTPC5pHuaC0jy72azNrnLNQyHera2W30idyZ1J2JuWXyY4d7tm1rmD7PyiTyegn4e0TnTbY_CaUfZM8ohGTi1kiI_7yzG9nvnygn-GvhiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Overstreet, David F. ; Kolb, Michael F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Overstreet, David F. ; Kolb, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper defines the geomorphic and stratigraphic contexts, and site formation processes for the Hebior and Schaefer woolly mammoths in southeastern Wisconsin. Both mammoths were butchered, and there are artifacts associated with the faunal remains. Radiocarbon ages obtained from purified mammoth bone collagen range between 12,200 and 12,600 yr B.P. for the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths and between 13,440 and 13,510 yr B.P. for the nearby Mud Lake and Fenske mammoths. These ages indicate human use of an ice marginal landscape 1000–2000 years before human–mammoth interaction in the American southwest. They also indicate these sites are pre‐Clovis in age and may be associated with the recently defined non‐Clovis Paleoindian variant called the Chesrow complex. Chesrow complex sites are located on glacial lake and moraine features or in deposits that are of similar ages as the butchered mammoths, but they have not been unequivocally linked to the mammoth sites. Geomorphic and stratigraphic data were collected from profiles in archaeological excavations and backhoe trenches, and from cores. The Hebior and Schaefer sites lie in a topographic low between two end moraines. Mammoths remains rest on deglacial deposits and are encased in the post‐glacial deposits. At Hebior, these deposits consist of glaciolacustrine clays overlain by a thin stratum of glaciofluvial sands, on which the bones rest, overlain by laminated peat and muck. Sills and dikes of sand cross‐cut the organic deposits and formed late in the depositional sequence. At the Schaefer site, the bone pile rests on glaciolacustrine clays and is encased in clastic pond deposits and laminated peat and muck. Contextual analysis indicates the bone piles are in situ and were preserved initially by inundation in ponds and subsequently by organic deposition in wetlands. Radiocarbon ages, stratigraphic/geomorphic contexts, and taphonomic studies indicate the Hebior and Schaefer mammoths are in situ evidence for human interaction with megafauna very near the active glacial ice margin in the mid‐continent by 12,500 yr B.P. and perhaps as early as 13,500 yr B.P. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-6353</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gea.10052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Geoarchaeology, 2003-01, Vol.18 (1), p.91-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-34330820086081981e54c2535843342b6069a43d47b6beeb65e2ab1df3d7d833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-34330820086081981e54c2535843342b6069a43d47b6beeb65e2ab1df3d7d833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgea.10052$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgea.10052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Overstreet, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><title>Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A</title><title>Geoarchaeology</title><addtitle>Geoarchaeology</addtitle><description>This paper defines the geomorphic and stratigraphic contexts, and site formation processes for the Hebior and Schaefer woolly mammoths in southeastern Wisconsin. Both mammoths were butchered, and there are artifacts associated with the faunal remains. Radiocarbon ages obtained from purified mammoth bone collagen range between 12,200 and 12,600 yr B.P. for the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths and between 13,440 and 13,510 yr B.P. for the nearby Mud Lake and Fenske mammoths. These ages indicate human use of an ice marginal landscape 1000–2000 years before human–mammoth interaction in the American southwest. They also indicate these sites are pre‐Clovis in age and may be associated with the recently defined non‐Clovis Paleoindian variant called the Chesrow complex. Chesrow complex sites are located on glacial lake and moraine features or in deposits that are of similar ages as the butchered mammoths, but they have not been unequivocally linked to the mammoth sites. Geomorphic and stratigraphic data were collected from profiles in archaeological excavations and backhoe trenches, and from cores. The Hebior and Schaefer sites lie in a topographic low between two end moraines. Mammoths remains rest on deglacial deposits and are encased in the post‐glacial deposits. At Hebior, these deposits consist of glaciolacustrine clays overlain by a thin stratum of glaciofluvial sands, on which the bones rest, overlain by laminated peat and muck. Sills and dikes of sand cross‐cut the organic deposits and formed late in the depositional sequence. At the Schaefer site, the bone pile rests on glaciolacustrine clays and is encased in clastic pond deposits and laminated peat and muck. Contextual analysis indicates the bone piles are in situ and were preserved initially by inundation in ponds and subsequently by organic deposition in wetlands. Radiocarbon ages, stratigraphic/geomorphic contexts, and taphonomic studies indicate the Hebior and Schaefer mammoths are in situ evidence for human interaction with megafauna very near the active glacial ice margin in the mid‐continent by 12,500 yr B.P. and perhaps as early as 13,500 yr B.P. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><issn>0883-6353</issn><issn>1520-6548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoO8CnZLmyZNH8eYVRxTcTrwJaTtdY22jSQd276FH9nOqQ-CT3dwv_8d90Po3CcDn5BguAS1a1hwgHo-C4jHWSgOUY8IQT1OGT1GJ869EkLimLAe-kjAKJuVCkxlljpTFc5M08KmdbgwFk9VC_i-Au1ak0ED-A_sdAsOr3Vb4nJVq8arTa4LDTleG1NVW1yrujbd1EKtdOOwbrAzq7YE5VqwDV5o1x10urnET4PHwegUHRWqcnD2XftofjWZj6-96V1yMx5NvYx233k0pJSIgBDBifBj4QMLs4BRJrpBGKSc8FiFNA-jlKcAKWcQqNTPC5pHuaC0jy72azNrnLNQyHera2W30idyZ1J2JuWXyY4d7tm1rmD7PyiTyegn4e0TnTbY_CaUfZM8ohGTi1kiI_7yzG9nvnygn-GvhiY</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Overstreet, David F.</creator><creator>Kolb, Michael F.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A</title><author>Overstreet, David F. ; Kolb, Michael F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-34330820086081981e54c2535843342b6069a43d47b6beeb65e2ab1df3d7d833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Overstreet, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolb, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geoarchaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Overstreet, David F.</au><au>Kolb, Michael F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A</atitle><jtitle>Geoarchaeology</jtitle><addtitle>Geoarchaeology</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>91-114</pages><issn>0883-6353</issn><eissn>1520-6548</eissn><abstract>This paper defines the geomorphic and stratigraphic contexts, and site formation processes for the Hebior and Schaefer woolly mammoths in southeastern Wisconsin. Both mammoths were butchered, and there are artifacts associated with the faunal remains. Radiocarbon ages obtained from purified mammoth bone collagen range between 12,200 and 12,600 yr B.P. for the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths and between 13,440 and 13,510 yr B.P. for the nearby Mud Lake and Fenske mammoths. These ages indicate human use of an ice marginal landscape 1000–2000 years before human–mammoth interaction in the American southwest. They also indicate these sites are pre‐Clovis in age and may be associated with the recently defined non‐Clovis Paleoindian variant called the Chesrow complex. Chesrow complex sites are located on glacial lake and moraine features or in deposits that are of similar ages as the butchered mammoths, but they have not been unequivocally linked to the mammoth sites. Geomorphic and stratigraphic data were collected from profiles in archaeological excavations and backhoe trenches, and from cores. The Hebior and Schaefer sites lie in a topographic low between two end moraines. Mammoths remains rest on deglacial deposits and are encased in the post‐glacial deposits. At Hebior, these deposits consist of glaciolacustrine clays overlain by a thin stratum of glaciofluvial sands, on which the bones rest, overlain by laminated peat and muck. Sills and dikes of sand cross‐cut the organic deposits and formed late in the depositional sequence. At the Schaefer site, the bone pile rests on glaciolacustrine clays and is encased in clastic pond deposits and laminated peat and muck. Contextual analysis indicates the bone piles are in situ and were preserved initially by inundation in ponds and subsequently by organic deposition in wetlands. Radiocarbon ages, stratigraphic/geomorphic contexts, and taphonomic studies indicate the Hebior and Schaefer mammoths are in situ evidence for human interaction with megafauna very near the active glacial ice margin in the mid‐continent by 12,500 yr B.P. and perhaps as early as 13,500 yr B.P. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/gea.10052</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-6353
ispartof Geoarchaeology, 2003-01, Vol.18 (1), p.91-114
issn 0883-6353
1520-6548
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_gea_10052
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene archaeological sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in southeastern Wisconsin, U.S.A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A48%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geoarchaeological%20contexts%20for%20Late%20Pleistocene%20archaeological%20sites%20with%20human-modified%20woolly%20mammoth%20remains%20in%20southeastern%20Wisconsin,%20U.S.A&rft.jtitle=Geoarchaeology&rft.au=Overstreet,%20David%20F.&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=91-114&rft.issn=0883-6353&rft.eissn=1520-6548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gea.10052&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EGEA10052%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true