Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina

In this article, pig manure treatment methods and technical levels in households were considered, and the market value method and the treatment cost approach were applied to estimate the external environmental cost (EEC) of pig‐farming with different scales quantitatively, reflecting the impacts of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental progress & sustainable energy 2015-08, Vol.34 (5), p.1488-1496
Hauptverfasser: Zhengtao, He, Jue, Peng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1496
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1488
container_title Environmental progress & sustainable energy
container_volume 34
creator Zhengtao, He
Jue, Peng
description In this article, pig manure treatment methods and technical levels in households were considered, and the market value method and the treatment cost approach were applied to estimate the external environmental cost (EEC) of pig‐farming with different scales quantitatively, reflecting the impacts of pig farming on the environment. Results show that the total EEC for medium‐scale farms is lower than that of range breeding and small‐scale farms. Its data envelopment analysis overall effective years are most, and its average scale efficiency and comprehensive efficiency are the highest, and its unit EEC is the minimal among the four scales. Therefore, range breeding should be narrowed, but the medium‐scale breeding should be moderately encouraged and developed. This is in line with Chinese policy and planning of developing livestock and poultry industry in moderate scale. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1488–1496, 2015
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ep.12139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ep_12139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_ep_12139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729-521d10c73aa7d1687b13cab79aef1a87e8045295a9b13443960f423d88c00cff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtKAzEUDaJgrYKfkKWbqXlNM1lKqVYouOl-uJO56UTaZEim9bHyE_xGv8RWRThwDpzH4hByzdmEMyZusZ9wwaU5ISNulCq0Ktnpv1binFzk_MzYVCpjRiTO97DZweBjoAcMHVJ8HTAF2FAMe59i2GIYqI15oNHR3q-_Pj6bhNj6sKYvfuho653DdExl_47UhwPbbgeB9inufbB4bM5o5wNckjMHm4xXfzwmq_v5arYolk8Pj7O7ZWG1MEUpeMuZ1RJAt3xa6YZLC402gI5DpbFiqhSmBHMwlJJmypwSsq0qy5h1To7Jze-sTTHnhK7uk99Ceqs5q48_1djXPz_Jb2ZEXQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Zhengtao, He ; Jue, Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhengtao, He ; Jue, Peng</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, pig manure treatment methods and technical levels in households were considered, and the market value method and the treatment cost approach were applied to estimate the external environmental cost (EEC) of pig‐farming with different scales quantitatively, reflecting the impacts of pig farming on the environment. Results show that the total EEC for medium‐scale farms is lower than that of range breeding and small‐scale farms. Its data envelopment analysis overall effective years are most, and its average scale efficiency and comprehensive efficiency are the highest, and its unit EEC is the minimal among the four scales. Therefore, range breeding should be narrowed, but the medium‐scale breeding should be moderately encouraged and developed. This is in line with Chinese policy and planning of developing livestock and poultry industry in moderate scale. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1488–1496, 2015</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-7442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7450</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ep.12139</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Environmental progress &amp; sustainable energy, 2015-08, Vol.34 (5), p.1488-1496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729-521d10c73aa7d1687b13cab79aef1a87e8045295a9b13443960f423d88c00cff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c729-521d10c73aa7d1687b13cab79aef1a87e8045295a9b13443960f423d88c00cff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhengtao, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jue, Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina</title><title>Environmental progress &amp; sustainable energy</title><description>In this article, pig manure treatment methods and technical levels in households were considered, and the market value method and the treatment cost approach were applied to estimate the external environmental cost (EEC) of pig‐farming with different scales quantitatively, reflecting the impacts of pig farming on the environment. Results show that the total EEC for medium‐scale farms is lower than that of range breeding and small‐scale farms. Its data envelopment analysis overall effective years are most, and its average scale efficiency and comprehensive efficiency are the highest, and its unit EEC is the minimal among the four scales. Therefore, range breeding should be narrowed, but the medium‐scale breeding should be moderately encouraged and developed. This is in line with Chinese policy and planning of developing livestock and poultry industry in moderate scale. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1488–1496, 2015</description><issn>1944-7442</issn><issn>1944-7450</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtKAzEUDaJgrYKfkKWbqXlNM1lKqVYouOl-uJO56UTaZEim9bHyE_xGv8RWRThwDpzH4hByzdmEMyZusZ9wwaU5ISNulCq0Ktnpv1binFzk_MzYVCpjRiTO97DZweBjoAcMHVJ8HTAF2FAMe59i2GIYqI15oNHR3q-_Pj6bhNj6sKYvfuho653DdExl_47UhwPbbgeB9inufbB4bM5o5wNckjMHm4xXfzwmq_v5arYolk8Pj7O7ZWG1MEUpeMuZ1RJAt3xa6YZLC402gI5DpbFiqhSmBHMwlJJmypwSsq0qy5h1To7Jze-sTTHnhK7uk99Ceqs5q48_1djXPz_Jb2ZEXQQ</recordid><startdate>20150809</startdate><enddate>20150809</enddate><creator>Zhengtao, He</creator><creator>Jue, Peng</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150809</creationdate><title>Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina</title><author>Zhengtao, He ; Jue, Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c729-521d10c73aa7d1687b13cab79aef1a87e8045295a9b13443960f423d88c00cff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhengtao, He</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jue, Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environmental progress &amp; sustainable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhengtao, He</au><au>Jue, Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina</atitle><jtitle>Environmental progress &amp; sustainable energy</jtitle><date>2015-08-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1488</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1488-1496</pages><issn>1944-7442</issn><eissn>1944-7450</eissn><abstract>In this article, pig manure treatment methods and technical levels in households were considered, and the market value method and the treatment cost approach were applied to estimate the external environmental cost (EEC) of pig‐farming with different scales quantitatively, reflecting the impacts of pig farming on the environment. Results show that the total EEC for medium‐scale farms is lower than that of range breeding and small‐scale farms. Its data envelopment analysis overall effective years are most, and its average scale efficiency and comprehensive efficiency are the highest, and its unit EEC is the minimal among the four scales. Therefore, range breeding should be narrowed, but the medium‐scale breeding should be moderately encouraged and developed. This is in line with Chinese policy and planning of developing livestock and poultry industry in moderate scale. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1488–1496, 2015</abstract><doi>10.1002/ep.12139</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-7442
ispartof Environmental progress & sustainable energy, 2015-08, Vol.34 (5), p.1488-1496
issn 1944-7442
1944-7450
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ep_12139
source Wiley Journals
title Evaluation on the external environment cost of pig‐breeding with different size in sichuan province of C hina
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T02%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20on%20the%20external%20environment%20cost%20of%20pig%E2%80%90breeding%20with%20different%20size%20in%20sichuan%20province%20of%20C%20hina&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20progress%20&%20sustainable%20energy&rft.au=Zhengtao,%20He&rft.date=2015-08-09&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1488&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1488-1496&rft.issn=1944-7442&rft.eissn=1944-7450&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ep.12139&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_ep_12139%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true