Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks

Traffic‐induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Deep underground science and engineering (Online) 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Mhanna, Mohannad, Sabaa, Majeed R., Mahdi, Hayder A., Karkush, Mahdi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Deep underground science and engineering (Online)
container_volume
creator Mhanna, Mohannad
Sabaa, Majeed R.
Mahdi, Hayder A.
Karkush, Mahdi
description Traffic‐induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performance of mass scatters for screening ground vibrations. A three‐dimensional numerical model is validated and extended to conduct a comparative study on the efficiency of three geotechnical methods of isolation. These methods include trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks (WIBs), and mass scatters. The results showed that mass scatters represent an efficient way of scattering ground vibrations, and their efficiency is mainly related to the weights of mass scatters and their natural frequency, which control the dynamic soil response in the frequency domain. Rigid trench barriers are less effective than soft ones, and their efficiency is more pronounced regarding the WIB. Soft barriers with a depth of an order of half of the wavelength can decrease the vibration levels by up to 50%, which is comparable to the performance of enormous mass scatters. The dimensions of WIBs must be chosen according to the wavelength of incident waves and the cutoff frequency of the topsoil layer. Considering the significant wavelength of traffic‐induced vibration, the use of trench barriers or WIBs becomes impractical and expensive; therefore, mass scatters appear to be an efficient and practical solution. Ground‐borne vibrations are a frequent source of environmental problems. A full‐scale experiment is presented to study the isolation potency of mass scatters placed on the ground surface. A 3D numerical model is validated to verify the efficiency of three methods of isolation: trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks, and mass scatters. Soft barriers are more effective vibration countermeasures than stiff ones and their efficiency is more pronounced in comparison to the wave‐impeding blocks. Mass scatters represent an innovative and efficient means for impeding the propagation of incident waves without the need for excavation of the soil or the roadwork.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dug2.12130
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_dug2_12130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_dug2_12130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-c15f2de0a9f5b6b89982ed45cc6568a4dbe0cc6b9b294c08be2bac86cc71b65e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EElXpwhN4Rkqxndix2aoKWqRKLDBH_ktr0SSVr9OqG4_AM_IkJJTl3jN8OsNB6J6SOSWEPbp-y-aU0ZxcoQkrS5LRnMnrgYkqMyKEvEUzgGAIz0tSKsknCFax61uHj8FEnULX4gDd_kI9hHaLGw2AweqUfIQnvMC2aw56HB89htS7Mz6FtMMp-tbusNExhmGJ9WA96aP_-foOzcG70WX2nf2EO3RT6z342f-foo-X5_flOtu8rV6Xi01mKRdpvDVznmhVcyOMVEoy7wpureBC6sIZTwY2yjBVWCKNZ0ZbKawtqRHc51P0cPHa2AFEX1eHGBodzxUl1VisGotVf8XyX9VtY0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mhanna, Mohannad ; Sabaa, Majeed R. ; Mahdi, Hayder A. ; Karkush, Mahdi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Mohannad ; Sabaa, Majeed R. ; Mahdi, Hayder A. ; Karkush, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><description>Traffic‐induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performance of mass scatters for screening ground vibrations. A three‐dimensional numerical model is validated and extended to conduct a comparative study on the efficiency of three geotechnical methods of isolation. These methods include trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks (WIBs), and mass scatters. The results showed that mass scatters represent an efficient way of scattering ground vibrations, and their efficiency is mainly related to the weights of mass scatters and their natural frequency, which control the dynamic soil response in the frequency domain. Rigid trench barriers are less effective than soft ones, and their efficiency is more pronounced regarding the WIB. Soft barriers with a depth of an order of half of the wavelength can decrease the vibration levels by up to 50%, which is comparable to the performance of enormous mass scatters. The dimensions of WIBs must be chosen according to the wavelength of incident waves and the cutoff frequency of the topsoil layer. Considering the significant wavelength of traffic‐induced vibration, the use of trench barriers or WIBs becomes impractical and expensive; therefore, mass scatters appear to be an efficient and practical solution. Ground‐borne vibrations are a frequent source of environmental problems. A full‐scale experiment is presented to study the isolation potency of mass scatters placed on the ground surface. A 3D numerical model is validated to verify the efficiency of three methods of isolation: trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks, and mass scatters. Soft barriers are more effective vibration countermeasures than stiff ones and their efficiency is more pronounced in comparison to the wave‐impeding blocks. Mass scatters represent an innovative and efficient means for impeding the propagation of incident waves without the need for excavation of the soil or the roadwork.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2097-0668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2770-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dug2.12130</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Deep underground science and engineering (Online), 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-c15f2de0a9f5b6b89982ed45cc6568a4dbe0cc6b9b294c08be2bac86cc71b65e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6814-9245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Mohannad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabaa, Majeed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hayder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karkush, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><title>Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks</title><title>Deep underground science and engineering (Online)</title><description>Traffic‐induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performance of mass scatters for screening ground vibrations. A three‐dimensional numerical model is validated and extended to conduct a comparative study on the efficiency of three geotechnical methods of isolation. These methods include trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks (WIBs), and mass scatters. The results showed that mass scatters represent an efficient way of scattering ground vibrations, and their efficiency is mainly related to the weights of mass scatters and their natural frequency, which control the dynamic soil response in the frequency domain. Rigid trench barriers are less effective than soft ones, and their efficiency is more pronounced regarding the WIB. Soft barriers with a depth of an order of half of the wavelength can decrease the vibration levels by up to 50%, which is comparable to the performance of enormous mass scatters. The dimensions of WIBs must be chosen according to the wavelength of incident waves and the cutoff frequency of the topsoil layer. Considering the significant wavelength of traffic‐induced vibration, the use of trench barriers or WIBs becomes impractical and expensive; therefore, mass scatters appear to be an efficient and practical solution. Ground‐borne vibrations are a frequent source of environmental problems. A full‐scale experiment is presented to study the isolation potency of mass scatters placed on the ground surface. A 3D numerical model is validated to verify the efficiency of three methods of isolation: trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks, and mass scatters. Soft barriers are more effective vibration countermeasures than stiff ones and their efficiency is more pronounced in comparison to the wave‐impeding blocks. Mass scatters represent an innovative and efficient means for impeding the propagation of incident waves without the need for excavation of the soil or the roadwork.</description><issn>2097-0668</issn><issn>2770-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkL1OwzAURi0EElXpwhN4Rkqxndix2aoKWqRKLDBH_ktr0SSVr9OqG4_AM_IkJJTl3jN8OsNB6J6SOSWEPbp-y-aU0ZxcoQkrS5LRnMnrgYkqMyKEvEUzgGAIz0tSKsknCFax61uHj8FEnULX4gDd_kI9hHaLGw2AweqUfIQnvMC2aw56HB89htS7Mz6FtMMp-tbusNExhmGJ9WA96aP_-foOzcG70WX2nf2EO3RT6z342f-foo-X5_flOtu8rV6Xi01mKRdpvDVznmhVcyOMVEoy7wpureBC6sIZTwY2yjBVWCKNZ0ZbKawtqRHc51P0cPHa2AFEX1eHGBodzxUl1VisGotVf8XyX9VtY0g</recordid><startdate>20241028</startdate><enddate>20241028</enddate><creator>Mhanna, Mohannad</creator><creator>Sabaa, Majeed R.</creator><creator>Mahdi, Hayder A.</creator><creator>Karkush, Mahdi</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-9245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241028</creationdate><title>Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks</title><author>Mhanna, Mohannad ; Sabaa, Majeed R. ; Mahdi, Hayder A. ; Karkush, Mahdi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-c15f2de0a9f5b6b89982ed45cc6568a4dbe0cc6b9b294c08be2bac86cc71b65e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mhanna, Mohannad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabaa, Majeed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdi, Hayder A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karkush, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Deep underground science and engineering (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mhanna, Mohannad</au><au>Sabaa, Majeed R.</au><au>Mahdi, Hayder A.</au><au>Karkush, Mahdi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks</atitle><jtitle>Deep underground science and engineering (Online)</jtitle><date>2024-10-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>2097-0668</issn><eissn>2770-1328</eissn><abstract>Traffic‐induced ground vibrations cause significant problems for residents and nearby structures. Reducing the effect of these vibrations on the neighboring environment is a key challenge, particularly in urban areas. This study presents both numerical and experimental investigations of the performance of mass scatters for screening ground vibrations. A three‐dimensional numerical model is validated and extended to conduct a comparative study on the efficiency of three geotechnical methods of isolation. These methods include trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks (WIBs), and mass scatters. The results showed that mass scatters represent an efficient way of scattering ground vibrations, and their efficiency is mainly related to the weights of mass scatters and their natural frequency, which control the dynamic soil response in the frequency domain. Rigid trench barriers are less effective than soft ones, and their efficiency is more pronounced regarding the WIB. Soft barriers with a depth of an order of half of the wavelength can decrease the vibration levels by up to 50%, which is comparable to the performance of enormous mass scatters. The dimensions of WIBs must be chosen according to the wavelength of incident waves and the cutoff frequency of the topsoil layer. Considering the significant wavelength of traffic‐induced vibration, the use of trench barriers or WIBs becomes impractical and expensive; therefore, mass scatters appear to be an efficient and practical solution. Ground‐borne vibrations are a frequent source of environmental problems. A full‐scale experiment is presented to study the isolation potency of mass scatters placed on the ground surface. A 3D numerical model is validated to verify the efficiency of three methods of isolation: trench barriers, wave‐impeding blocks, and mass scatters. Soft barriers are more effective vibration countermeasures than stiff ones and their efficiency is more pronounced in comparison to the wave‐impeding blocks. Mass scatters represent an innovative and efficient means for impeding the propagation of incident waves without the need for excavation of the soil or the roadwork.</abstract><doi>10.1002/dug2.12130</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-9245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2097-0668
ispartof Deep underground science and engineering (Online), 2024-10
issn 2097-0668
2770-1328
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_dug2_12130
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Ground vibration isolation using mass scatters: A comparative study with trench barriers and wave‐impeding blocks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T14%3A14%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ground%20vibration%20isolation%20using%20mass%20scatters:%20A%20comparative%20study%20with%20trench%20barriers%20and%20wave%E2%80%90impeding%20blocks&rft.jtitle=Deep%20underground%20science%20and%20engineering%20(Online)&rft.au=Mhanna,%20Mohannad&rft.date=2024-10-28&rft.issn=2097-0668&rft.eissn=2770-1328&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dug2.12130&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_dug2_12130%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true