Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective
Background Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in the United States, and the incidence of NMSC is increasing. Though surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain definitive tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dermatological reviews 2024-06, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Dermatological reviews |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Bhupalam, Vishnu Hetzel, John D. Awad, Nardin Nestor, Mark S. |
description | Background
Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in the United States, and the incidence of NMSC is increasing. Though surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain definitive treatments for NMSC, the majority of affected patients are advanced in age and may have relative contraindications to surgery or preferences against it. As such, there is growing value in exploring less‐invasive alternative techniques, such as superficial radiation therapy (SRT). Historically, in the decades following its inception just over a century ago, the field of SRT experienced a boom of innovations that provided the basis for treatment modalities used by dermatologists today.
Aims
This paper outlines the history and evolution of SRT in dermatology and discusses SRT's modern role as an alternative to surgical management of NMSC in select patients.
Conclusion
Although a combination of aging equipment and shifts in interest toward surgical methods diminished the prominence of radiation therapy (RT) in the late 20th century, newer iterations of SRT technology have drawn renewed interest as a nonsurgical extremely effective treatment for NMSC. A brief comparison of key clinical and practical factors indicates that SRT is the optimal choice of RT technique for the definitive management of select NMSCs in patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/der2.229 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_der2_229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>DER2229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719-df1492ad2962a14a504df302a6f00b1cb72b0ac9122c3612da5a72d30c1410233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQBfBFFCy14EfI0UvqzGyaNN5KbatQELT3MNk_diVtwm5U8u3dUg9ePM0cfu8dnhC3CFMEoHttPE2JygsxolwWaZHNy8s__7WYhPABkWKBMKeRWL99dsZbpxw3iWftuHftMen3xnM3JO6YxM4D923Tvg8PySLZu9C33qnIYzB0RvXuy9yIK8tNMJPfOxa79Wq3fEq3L5vn5WKbqgLLVFvMSmJNZU6MGc8g01YCcW4BalR1QTWwKpFIyRxJ84wL0hIUZggk5VjcnWuVb0Pwxladdwf2Q4VQnRaoTgtUcYFI0zP9do0Z_nXV4-qVTv4H-Qpcbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bhupalam, Vishnu ; Hetzel, John D. ; Awad, Nardin ; Nestor, Mark S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhupalam, Vishnu ; Hetzel, John D. ; Awad, Nardin ; Nestor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in the United States, and the incidence of NMSC is increasing. Though surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain definitive treatments for NMSC, the majority of affected patients are advanced in age and may have relative contraindications to surgery or preferences against it. As such, there is growing value in exploring less‐invasive alternative techniques, such as superficial radiation therapy (SRT). Historically, in the decades following its inception just over a century ago, the field of SRT experienced a boom of innovations that provided the basis for treatment modalities used by dermatologists today.
Aims
This paper outlines the history and evolution of SRT in dermatology and discusses SRT's modern role as an alternative to surgical management of NMSC in select patients.
Conclusion
Although a combination of aging equipment and shifts in interest toward surgical methods diminished the prominence of radiation therapy (RT) in the late 20th century, newer iterations of SRT technology have drawn renewed interest as a nonsurgical extremely effective treatment for NMSC. A brief comparison of key clinical and practical factors indicates that SRT is the optimal choice of RT technique for the definitive management of select NMSCs in patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2637-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2637-7489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/der2.229</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>basal cell carcinoma ; dermatology ; nonmelanoma skin cancer ; squamous cell carcinoma ; superficial radiation therapy</subject><ispartof>Dermatological reviews, 2024-06, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c719-df1492ad2962a14a504df302a6f00b1cb72b0ac9122c3612da5a72d30c1410233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8978-7932</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fder2.229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fder2.229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhupalam, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetzel, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awad, Nardin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><title>Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective</title><title>Dermatological reviews</title><description>Background
Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in the United States, and the incidence of NMSC is increasing. Though surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain definitive treatments for NMSC, the majority of affected patients are advanced in age and may have relative contraindications to surgery or preferences against it. As such, there is growing value in exploring less‐invasive alternative techniques, such as superficial radiation therapy (SRT). Historically, in the decades following its inception just over a century ago, the field of SRT experienced a boom of innovations that provided the basis for treatment modalities used by dermatologists today.
Aims
This paper outlines the history and evolution of SRT in dermatology and discusses SRT's modern role as an alternative to surgical management of NMSC in select patients.
Conclusion
Although a combination of aging equipment and shifts in interest toward surgical methods diminished the prominence of radiation therapy (RT) in the late 20th century, newer iterations of SRT technology have drawn renewed interest as a nonsurgical extremely effective treatment for NMSC. A brief comparison of key clinical and practical factors indicates that SRT is the optimal choice of RT technique for the definitive management of select NMSCs in patients.</description><subject>basal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>dermatology</subject><subject>nonmelanoma skin cancer</subject><subject>squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>superficial radiation therapy</subject><issn>2637-7489</issn><issn>2637-7489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9Lw0AQBfBFFCy14EfI0UvqzGyaNN5KbatQELT3MNk_diVtwm5U8u3dUg9ePM0cfu8dnhC3CFMEoHttPE2JygsxolwWaZHNy8s__7WYhPABkWKBMKeRWL99dsZbpxw3iWftuHftMen3xnM3JO6YxM4D923Tvg8PySLZu9C33qnIYzB0RvXuy9yIK8tNMJPfOxa79Wq3fEq3L5vn5WKbqgLLVFvMSmJNZU6MGc8g01YCcW4BalR1QTWwKpFIyRxJ84wL0hIUZggk5VjcnWuVb0Pwxladdwf2Q4VQnRaoTgtUcYFI0zP9do0Z_nXV4-qVTv4H-Qpcbg</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Bhupalam, Vishnu</creator><creator>Hetzel, John D.</creator><creator>Awad, Nardin</creator><creator>Nestor, Mark S.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-7932</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective</title><author>Bhupalam, Vishnu ; Hetzel, John D. ; Awad, Nardin ; Nestor, Mark S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c719-df1492ad2962a14a504df302a6f00b1cb72b0ac9122c3612da5a72d30c1410233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>basal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>dermatology</topic><topic>nonmelanoma skin cancer</topic><topic>squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>superficial radiation therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhupalam, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hetzel, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awad, Nardin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestor, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dermatological reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhupalam, Vishnu</au><au>Hetzel, John D.</au><au>Awad, Nardin</au><au>Nestor, Mark S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective</atitle><jtitle>Dermatological reviews</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2637-7489</issn><eissn>2637-7489</eissn><abstract>Background
Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), such as basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in the United States, and the incidence of NMSC is increasing. Though surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery remain definitive treatments for NMSC, the majority of affected patients are advanced in age and may have relative contraindications to surgery or preferences against it. As such, there is growing value in exploring less‐invasive alternative techniques, such as superficial radiation therapy (SRT). Historically, in the decades following its inception just over a century ago, the field of SRT experienced a boom of innovations that provided the basis for treatment modalities used by dermatologists today.
Aims
This paper outlines the history and evolution of SRT in dermatology and discusses SRT's modern role as an alternative to surgical management of NMSC in select patients.
Conclusion
Although a combination of aging equipment and shifts in interest toward surgical methods diminished the prominence of radiation therapy (RT) in the late 20th century, newer iterations of SRT technology have drawn renewed interest as a nonsurgical extremely effective treatment for NMSC. A brief comparison of key clinical and practical factors indicates that SRT is the optimal choice of RT technique for the definitive management of select NMSCs in patients.</abstract><doi>10.1002/der2.229</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-7932</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2637-7489 |
ispartof | Dermatological reviews, 2024-06, Vol.5 (3), p.n/a |
issn | 2637-7489 2637-7489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_der2_229 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | basal cell carcinoma dermatology nonmelanoma skin cancer squamous cell carcinoma superficial radiation therapy |
title | Superficial radiation therapy in dermatology: A historical perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A46%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Superficial%20radiation%20therapy%20in%20dermatology:%20A%20historical%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Dermatological%20reviews&rft.au=Bhupalam,%20Vishnu&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2637-7489&rft.eissn=2637-7489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/der2.229&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EDER2229%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |