Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950
Hauptverfasser: Woo, Janghee, Palmisiano, Neil, Tester, William, Leighton, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1950
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1941
container_title Cancer
container_volume 119
creator Woo, Janghee
Palmisiano, Neil
Tester, William
Leighton, John C.
description The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.27994
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR27994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwB0osXoTpJ2qY5SvELFgVR8CJlNp26lW5bkuiy_97WrnrzlASeycu8jB1zOOcA4sI0xp4LpXW0w6YctAqBR2KXTQEgDeNIvkzYgXPv_VOJWO6ziZAxRCpJp-w1axtv20-yriIXVE2Aja-oqwqyK6yDN9uu_TIo0fjWBpYMdcPFL8litxn8ijw6j74ygWnrtie-nzPYGLKHbK_E2tHR9pyx5-urp-w2nD_c3GWX89DIWEdhDCkaLXQaJ0WMUvFCREBa4SLWKATpKFVRkRScFCQISpZCgEAgSTItMZUzdjb-a2zrnKUy72y1QrvJOeRDR_nQUf7dUY9PRtx9LFZU_NKfUnpwugXoDNal7Xep3J9TUnMOond8dOuqps0_kXl2nz2O4V-MSH_u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23504768</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cetuximab ; chemotherapy ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; KRAS mutation ; Medical sciences ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; panitumumab ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.27994$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.27994$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27391102$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23504768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmisiano, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tester, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cetuximab</subject><subject>chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>KRAS mutation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>panitumumab</subject><subject>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwB0osXoTpJ2qY5SvELFgVR8CJlNp26lW5bkuiy_97WrnrzlASeycu8jB1zOOcA4sI0xp4LpXW0w6YctAqBR2KXTQEgDeNIvkzYgXPv_VOJWO6ziZAxRCpJp-w1axtv20-yriIXVE2Aja-oqwqyK6yDN9uu_TIo0fjWBpYMdcPFL8litxn8ijw6j74ygWnrtie-nzPYGLKHbK_E2tHR9pyx5-urp-w2nD_c3GWX89DIWEdhDCkaLXQaJ0WMUvFCREBa4SLWKATpKFVRkRScFCQISpZCgEAgSTItMZUzdjb-a2zrnKUy72y1QrvJOeRDR_nQUf7dUY9PRtx9LFZU_NKfUnpwugXoDNal7Xep3J9TUnMOond8dOuqps0_kXl2nz2O4V-MSH_u</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Woo, Janghee</creator><creator>Palmisiano, Neil</creator><creator>Tester, William</creator><creator>Leighton, John C.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><author>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cetuximab</topic><topic>chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>KRAS mutation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>panitumumab</topic><topic>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmisiano, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tester, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Janghee</au><au>Palmisiano, Neil</au><au>Tester, William</au><au>Leighton, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1941</spage><epage>1950</epage><pages>1941-1950</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>23504768</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.27994</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27994
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Cetuximab
chemotherapy
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
KRAS mutation
Medical sciences
Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)
Neoplasm Metastasis
panitumumab
Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
Tumors
title Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversies%20in%20antiepidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20therapy%20in%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Woo,%20Janghee&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1941&rft.epage=1950&rft.pages=1941-1950&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.27994&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECNCR27994%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23504768&rfr_iscdi=true