Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1950 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1941 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Woo, Janghee Palmisiano, Neil Tester, William Leighton, John C. |
description | The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.27994 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27994</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR27994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwB0osXoTpJ2qY5SvELFgVR8CJlNp26lW5bkuiy_97WrnrzlASeycu8jB1zOOcA4sI0xp4LpXW0w6YctAqBR2KXTQEgDeNIvkzYgXPv_VOJWO6ziZAxRCpJp-w1axtv20-yriIXVE2Aja-oqwqyK6yDN9uu_TIo0fjWBpYMdcPFL8litxn8ijw6j74ygWnrtie-nzPYGLKHbK_E2tHR9pyx5-urp-w2nD_c3GWX89DIWEdhDCkaLXQaJ0WMUvFCREBa4SLWKATpKFVRkRScFCQISpZCgEAgSTItMZUzdjb-a2zrnKUy72y1QrvJOeRDR_nQUf7dUY9PRtx9LFZU_NKfUnpwugXoDNal7Xep3J9TUnMOond8dOuqps0_kXl2nz2O4V-MSH_u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23504768</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cetuximab ; chemotherapy ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; KRAS mutation ; Medical sciences ; Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; panitumumab ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration & dosage ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.27994$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.27994$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27391102$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23504768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmisiano, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tester, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cetuximab</subject><subject>chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>KRAS mutation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>panitumumab</subject><subject>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwB0osXoTpJ2qY5SvELFgVR8CJlNp26lW5bkuiy_97WrnrzlASeycu8jB1zOOcA4sI0xp4LpXW0w6YctAqBR2KXTQEgDeNIvkzYgXPv_VOJWO6ziZAxRCpJp-w1axtv20-yriIXVE2Aja-oqwqyK6yDN9uu_TIo0fjWBpYMdcPFL8litxn8ijw6j74ygWnrtie-nzPYGLKHbK_E2tHR9pyx5-urp-w2nD_c3GWX89DIWEdhDCkaLXQaJ0WMUvFCREBa4SLWKATpKFVRkRScFCQISpZCgEAgSTItMZUzdjb-a2zrnKUy72y1QrvJOeRDR_nQUf7dUY9PRtx9LFZU_NKfUnpwugXoDNal7Xep3J9TUnMOond8dOuqps0_kXl2nz2O4V-MSH_u</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Woo, Janghee</creator><creator>Palmisiano, Neil</creator><creator>Tester, William</creator><creator>Leighton, John C.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</title><author>Woo, Janghee ; Palmisiano, Neil ; Tester, William ; Leighton, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-508ac929856d5a371d240e97ab59a22e94874d6d1e706a073f2202a0e3e38fa83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cetuximab</topic><topic>chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>KRAS mutation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects)</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>panitumumab</topic><topic>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woo, Janghee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmisiano, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tester, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leighton, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woo, Janghee</au><au>Palmisiano, Neil</au><au>Tester, William</au><au>Leighton, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1941</spage><epage>1950</epage><pages>1941-1950</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>The randomized first‐line trials, including the CRYSTAL trial, the OPUS trial, and the PRIME trial, have demonstrated the significant efficacy of cetuximab or panitumumab in patients with v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) wild‐type tumors. The addition of an antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR)‐directed monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy for these patients significantly improved progression‐free survival, response rates, and R0 resection rates to a greater extent than overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. However, 2 recent randomized phase 3 trials, the MRC COIN trial and the Nordic VII trial, reported an unexpected lack of benefit from the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. In addition, recent retrospective analyses performed on a pooled data set from major clinical trials added more complexity, reporting an unexpected association of KRAS G13D mutation with a better clinical outcome compared with patients who had other KRAS mutations in the first‐line and salvage settings, whereas the other independent analysis failed to demonstrate a benefit from panitumumab in patients with the same KRAS G13D mutation. The anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibody‐associated skin toxicity and the controversial strategies of management also are discussed. In this review, the authors analyze the previous randomized clinical trials and more critically re‐evaluate recent trials and subgroup analyses to derive 3 factors that need to be taken into consideration regarding the addition of EGFR‐directed monoclonal antibodies to chemotherapy: the preclinical data on mechanisms of action between chemotherapy and anti‐EGFR antibodies along with mechanisms of resistance to anti‐EGFR antibodies, the role of cross‐over events in overall survival data, and the significant dose reductions of chemotherapeutic agents when combined with anti‐EGFR agents. Cancer 2013;119:1941–1950. © 2013 American Cancer Society.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>23504768</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.27994</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2013-06, Vol.119 (11), p.1941-1950 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27994 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Biological and medical sciences Cetuximab chemotherapy Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy Colorectal Neoplasms - genetics Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Humans KRAS mutation Medical sciences Multiple tumors. Solid tumors. Tumors in childhood (general aspects) Neoplasm Metastasis panitumumab Protein Kinase Inhibitors - administration & dosage Protein Kinase Inhibitors - therapeutic use Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - antagonists & inhibitors Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor - metabolism Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Tumors |
title | Controversies in antiepidermal growth factor receptor therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T21%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Controversies%20in%20antiepidermal%20growth%20factor%20receptor%20therapy%20in%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Woo,%20Janghee&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1941&rft.epage=1950&rft.pages=1941-1950&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.27994&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECNCR27994%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23504768&rfr_iscdi=true |