Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)
Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98-11 (RTOG 98-11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nod...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2013-02, Vol.119 (4), p.748-755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 755 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 748 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | GLYNNE-JONES, Robert SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David ADAMS, Richard GOLLINS, Simon HARRISON, Mark MEADOWS, Helen M JITLAL, Mark |
description | Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98-11 (RTOG 98-11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nodes and male sex predicted poorer overall survival (OS). The EORTC 22861 trial indicated that the same factors were prognostic for locoregional control. In the current report, the authors investigated potential prognostic factors from the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I), in which patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiation (CRT) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C.
In the ACT I trial, associations between several baseline characteristics and 3 endpoints were investigated: locoregional failure (LRF), anal cancer death (ACD), and OS. The analyses were restricted to 292 patients who received CRT, which subsequently became standard treatment. A score was derived using multivariable Cox regression to identify the set of factors that, together, had the best prognostic performance. This score was then validated with a large, independent prospective trial (the ACT II trial).
Palpable, clinically positive lymph nodes were associated with LRF (P = .012), a greater risk of ACD (P = .031), and decreased OS (P = .006) in multivariable analyses. Men had worse outcomes than women for LRF (P = .036), ACD (P = .039), and OS (P = .008). On average, a lower hemoglobin level had an adverse effect on ACD (P = .008), and a higher white blood cell count had an adverse effect on OS (P = .001). However, external validation of the score was poor for LRF (area under the curve [AUC] = 54%) but was better for ACD (AUC = 67%) and OS (AUC = 63%).
The results from this analysis of the ACT I trial supported evidence for palpable lymph nodes and male sex as prognostic factors for LRF and OS, and lower hemoglobin levels and a higher white blood cell count were identified as prognostic factors for ACD and OS, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.27825 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>23011911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-61ed3cea97e87082fa0497db56038f91b67cb67bfd4a86c00deea7c0b27348753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkdtq3DAQhkVpaLZpb_oAZW4KbcGpJB9k524x3SQkJSHdQO-MLI8TlbW0jORAHrLvVCW7PVwMc_o0muFn7J3gx4Jz-cU4Q8dS1bJ8wRaCNyrjopAv2YJzXmdlkf84ZK9D-JlSJcv8FTuUOReiEWLBfl2Tv3M-RGtgpU30FGD0BDdoZiJ0BkG7Ab7P9GAf9Aasg6VLvtWpRSdwig5JR-vu4Oxx6-M9BgywIj9BiuGbjjMhXM3R-Ck1_PhcXlkKEW6djTjARXo8JL71ngbrdsNaP002RkTwbv9Z2imgJnP__wawJpuSj8t2Deef3rCDUW8Cvt37I3a7-rpuz7LLq9PzdnmZGamqmFUCh9ygbhTWitdy1Lxo1NCXFc_rsRF9pUyyfhwKXVeG8wFRK8N7qfKiVmV-xD7v5hryIRCO3ZbspOmxE7x70qR70qR71iTB73fwdu4nHP6if0RIwIc9oIPRm5HSZTb84xSvZFPK_Dc77Zdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert ; SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David ; ADAMS, Richard ; GOLLINS, Simon ; HARRISON, Mark ; MEADOWS, Helen M ; JITLAL, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert ; SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David ; ADAMS, Richard ; GOLLINS, Simon ; HARRISON, Mark ; MEADOWS, Helen M ; JITLAL, Mark ; United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party ; for the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</creatorcontrib><description>Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98-11 (RTOG 98-11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nodes and male sex predicted poorer overall survival (OS). The EORTC 22861 trial indicated that the same factors were prognostic for locoregional control. In the current report, the authors investigated potential prognostic factors from the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I), in which patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiation (CRT) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C.
In the ACT I trial, associations between several baseline characteristics and 3 endpoints were investigated: locoregional failure (LRF), anal cancer death (ACD), and OS. The analyses were restricted to 292 patients who received CRT, which subsequently became standard treatment. A score was derived using multivariable Cox regression to identify the set of factors that, together, had the best prognostic performance. This score was then validated with a large, independent prospective trial (the ACT II trial).
Palpable, clinically positive lymph nodes were associated with LRF (P = .012), a greater risk of ACD (P = .031), and decreased OS (P = .006) in multivariable analyses. Men had worse outcomes than women for LRF (P = .036), ACD (P = .039), and OS (P = .008). On average, a lower hemoglobin level had an adverse effect on ACD (P = .008), and a higher white blood cell count had an adverse effect on OS (P = .001). However, external validation of the score was poor for LRF (area under the curve [AUC] = 54%) but was better for ACD (AUC = 67%) and OS (AUC = 63%).
The results from this analysis of the ACT I trial supported evidence for palpable lymph nodes and male sex as prognostic factors for LRF and OS, and lower hemoglobin levels and a higher white blood cell count were identified as prognostic factors for ACD and OS, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23011911</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Anus Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Anus Neoplasms - mortality ; Anus Neoplasms - pathology ; Anus Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Female ; Fluorouracil - administration & dosage ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Hemoglobins - analysis ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mitomycin - administration & dosage ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2013-02, Vol.119 (4), p.748-755</ispartof><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-61ed3cea97e87082fa0497db56038f91b67cb67bfd4a86c00deea7c0b27348753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27062952$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23011911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLLINS, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRISON, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADOWS, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JITLAL, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98-11 (RTOG 98-11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nodes and male sex predicted poorer overall survival (OS). The EORTC 22861 trial indicated that the same factors were prognostic for locoregional control. In the current report, the authors investigated potential prognostic factors from the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I), in which patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiation (CRT) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C.
In the ACT I trial, associations between several baseline characteristics and 3 endpoints were investigated: locoregional failure (LRF), anal cancer death (ACD), and OS. The analyses were restricted to 292 patients who received CRT, which subsequently became standard treatment. A score was derived using multivariable Cox regression to identify the set of factors that, together, had the best prognostic performance. This score was then validated with a large, independent prospective trial (the ACT II trial).
Palpable, clinically positive lymph nodes were associated with LRF (P = .012), a greater risk of ACD (P = .031), and decreased OS (P = .006) in multivariable analyses. Men had worse outcomes than women for LRF (P = .036), ACD (P = .039), and OS (P = .008). On average, a lower hemoglobin level had an adverse effect on ACD (P = .008), and a higher white blood cell count had an adverse effect on OS (P = .001). However, external validation of the score was poor for LRF (area under the curve [AUC] = 54%) but was better for ACD (AUC = 67%) and OS (AUC = 63%).
The results from this analysis of the ACT I trial supported evidence for palpable lymph nodes and male sex as prognostic factors for LRF and OS, and lower hemoglobin levels and a higher white blood cell count were identified as prognostic factors for ACD and OS, respectively.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Anus Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mitomycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkdtq3DAQhkVpaLZpb_oAZW4KbcGpJB9k524x3SQkJSHdQO-MLI8TlbW0jORAHrLvVCW7PVwMc_o0muFn7J3gx4Jz-cU4Q8dS1bJ8wRaCNyrjopAv2YJzXmdlkf84ZK9D-JlSJcv8FTuUOReiEWLBfl2Tv3M-RGtgpU30FGD0BDdoZiJ0BkG7Ab7P9GAf9Aasg6VLvtWpRSdwig5JR-vu4Oxx6-M9BgywIj9BiuGbjjMhXM3R-Ck1_PhcXlkKEW6djTjARXo8JL71ngbrdsNaP002RkTwbv9Z2imgJnP__wawJpuSj8t2Deef3rCDUW8Cvt37I3a7-rpuz7LLq9PzdnmZGamqmFUCh9ygbhTWitdy1Lxo1NCXFc_rsRF9pUyyfhwKXVeG8wFRK8N7qfKiVmV-xD7v5hryIRCO3ZbspOmxE7x70qR70qR71iTB73fwdu4nHP6if0RIwIc9oIPRm5HSZTb84xSvZFPK_Dc77Zdw</recordid><startdate>20130215</startdate><enddate>20130215</enddate><creator>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert</creator><creator>SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David</creator><creator>ADAMS, Richard</creator><creator>GOLLINS, Simon</creator><creator>HARRISON, Mark</creator><creator>MEADOWS, Helen M</creator><creator>JITLAL, Mark</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130215</creationdate><title>Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)</title><author>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert ; SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David ; ADAMS, Richard ; GOLLINS, Simon ; HARRISON, Mark ; MEADOWS, Helen M ; JITLAL, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-61ed3cea97e87082fa0497db56038f91b67cb67bfd4a86c00deea7c0b27348753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Anus Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mitomycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ADAMS, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOLLINS, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRISON, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEADOWS, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JITLAL, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GLYNNE-JONES, Robert</au><au>SEBAG-MONTEFIORE, David</au><au>ADAMS, Richard</au><au>GOLLINS, Simon</au><au>HARRISON, Mark</au><au>MEADOWS, Helen M</au><au>JITLAL, Mark</au><aucorp>United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</aucorp><aucorp>for the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial Working Party</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I)</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2013-02-15</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>748-755</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>Only 2 prospective studies have previously reported prognostic factors for anal cancer, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 22861 (EORTC 22861) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 98-11 (RTOG 98-11). Both of those trials reported that clinically positive lymph nodes and male sex predicted poorer overall survival (OS). The EORTC 22861 trial indicated that the same factors were prognostic for locoregional control. In the current report, the authors investigated potential prognostic factors from the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I), in which patients were randomized to receive either radiotherapy alone or chemoradiation (CRT) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C.
In the ACT I trial, associations between several baseline characteristics and 3 endpoints were investigated: locoregional failure (LRF), anal cancer death (ACD), and OS. The analyses were restricted to 292 patients who received CRT, which subsequently became standard treatment. A score was derived using multivariable Cox regression to identify the set of factors that, together, had the best prognostic performance. This score was then validated with a large, independent prospective trial (the ACT II trial).
Palpable, clinically positive lymph nodes were associated with LRF (P = .012), a greater risk of ACD (P = .031), and decreased OS (P = .006) in multivariable analyses. Men had worse outcomes than women for LRF (P = .036), ACD (P = .039), and OS (P = .008). On average, a lower hemoglobin level had an adverse effect on ACD (P = .008), and a higher white blood cell count had an adverse effect on OS (P = .001). However, external validation of the score was poor for LRF (area under the curve [AUC] = 54%) but was better for ACD (AUC = 67%) and OS (AUC = 63%).
The results from this analysis of the ACT I trial supported evidence for palpable lymph nodes and male sex as prognostic factors for LRF and OS, and lower hemoglobin levels and a higher white blood cell count were identified as prognostic factors for ACD and OS, respectively.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>23011911</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.27825</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2013-02, Vol.119 (4), p.748-755 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_27825 |
source | Wiley Free Content; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols Anus Neoplasms - drug therapy Anus Neoplasms - mortality Anus Neoplasms - pathology Anus Neoplasms - radiotherapy Biological and medical sciences Chemoradiotherapy Female Fluorouracil - administration & dosage Fluorouracil - therapeutic use Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Hemoglobins - analysis Humans Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mitomycin - administration & dosage Prognosis Prospective Studies Recurrence Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus Survival Rate Treatment Outcome Tumors United Kingdom |
title | Prognostic Factors for Recurrence and Survival in Anal Cancer: Generating Hypotheses From the Mature Outcomes of the First United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A40%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20Factors%20for%20Recurrence%20and%20Survival%20in%20Anal%20Cancer:%20Generating%20Hypotheses%20From%20the%20Mature%20Outcomes%20of%20the%20First%20United%20Kingdom%20Coordinating%20Committee%20on%20Cancer%20Research%20Anal%20Cancer%20Trial%20(ACT%20I)&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=GLYNNE-JONES,%20Robert&rft.aucorp=United%20Kingdom%20Coordinating%20Committee%20on%20Cancer%20Research%20Anal%20Cancer%20Trial%20Working%20Party&rft.date=2013-02-15&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=748-755&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.27825&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E23011911%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23011911&rfr_iscdi=true |