Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2003-01, Vol.97 (2), p.457-464
Hauptverfasser: Arinaga, Mitsuyuki, Noguchi, Tsuyoshi, Takeno, Shinsuke, Chujo, Masao, Miura, Takashi, Uchida, Yuzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 2
container_start_page 457
container_title Cancer
container_volume 97
creator Arinaga, Mitsuyuki
Noguchi, Tsuyoshi
Takeno, Shinsuke
Chujo, Masao
Miura, Takashi
Uchida, Yuzo
description BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with primary NSCLC. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC and who did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 was performed. The clinicopathologic implications of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Of 180 patients with NSCLC, 137 patients (76.1%) were positive for VEGF‐C, and 40 patients (22.2%) were positive for VEGFR‐3. VEGF‐C expression was observed frequently in patients with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.026). For VEGFR‐3 expression, significant correlations were demonstrated with age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.008), and histologic differentiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.03). Patients who had positive staining for VEGF‐C showed significantly less favorable survival rates compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGF‐C (P = 0.003). The survival rates of patients who had positive staining for VEGFR‐3 also were significantly lower compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGFR‐3 (P < 0.001). Patients who had positive staining for both VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Univariate analysis revealed the following prognostic factors: gender (P = 0.03), tumor status (T1,T2 vs. T3; P < 0.01), lymph node status (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), tumor size (≤ 35 mm vs. > 35 mm; P < 0.01), disease stage (Stage I vs. Stages II and III; P < 0.01), VEGF‐C expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), VEGFR‐3 expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01) and combined VEGF‐C and/or VEGFR‐3 expression (both positive vs. VEGF‐C or VEGFR‐3 positive; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VEGFR‐3 expression was the only independent negative prognostic factor (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression may be indicative of survival rates for patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2003;97:457–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11073 Patients who showed positive staining fo
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.11073
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_11073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR11073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-e79ba3b1ff14e74ddc6a9e63c4b05934ebeae0d8e1302c070c9daeda4725a7ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0M9LwzAUwPEgipvTi3-A5OJF6EyadFmPUvwFQ0EUvJXX9HWLZOlIOsf-GP9XMzvwJl6SF_iQB19Czjkbc8bSa-20H3POlDggQ85ylTAu00MyZIxNk0yK9wE5CeEjPlWaiWMy4GnGp0KxIfkqrHFGg6XBzJ1p4ug00rahnxD02oKn6Oq2W6A1Ec19u-kWtAHdtZ4WFFz9H-hR42o3CGocXUFn0HWBbkwkrnVhCdZSjfGwazenGrw2rl3CKTlqwAY8298j8nZ3-1o8JLPn-8fiZpZokUqRoMorEBVvGi5RybrWE8hxIrSsWJYLiRUCsnqKXLBUM8V0XgPWIGMOUIBiRK76f7VvQ_DYlCtvluC3JWflrnG5a1z-NI74oserdbXE-pfuo0ZwuQexDNjGx6Qm_DqZ8TSfqOh47zbG4vaPlWXxVLz0y78BsZGYvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki ; Noguchi, Tsuyoshi ; Takeno, Shinsuke ; Chujo, Masao ; Miura, Takashi ; Uchida, Yuzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki ; Noguchi, Tsuyoshi ; Takeno, Shinsuke ; Chujo, Masao ; Miura, Takashi ; Uchida, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with primary NSCLC. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC and who did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 was performed. The clinicopathologic implications of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Of 180 patients with NSCLC, 137 patients (76.1%) were positive for VEGF‐C, and 40 patients (22.2%) were positive for VEGFR‐3. VEGF‐C expression was observed frequently in patients with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.026). For VEGFR‐3 expression, significant correlations were demonstrated with age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.008), and histologic differentiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.03). Patients who had positive staining for VEGF‐C showed significantly less favorable survival rates compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGF‐C (P = 0.003). The survival rates of patients who had positive staining for VEGFR‐3 also were significantly lower compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGFR‐3 (P < 0.001). Patients who had positive staining for both VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Univariate analysis revealed the following prognostic factors: gender (P = 0.03), tumor status (T1,T2 vs. T3; P < 0.01), lymph node status (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), tumor size (≤ 35 mm vs. > 35 mm; P < 0.01), disease stage (Stage I vs. Stages II and III; P < 0.01), VEGF‐C expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), VEGFR‐3 expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01) and combined VEGF‐C and/or VEGFR‐3 expression (both positive vs. VEGF‐C or VEGFR‐3 positive; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VEGFR‐3 expression was the only independent negative prognostic factor (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression may be indicative of survival rates for patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2003;97:457–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11073 Patients who showed positive staining for vascular endothelial growth factor C showed significantly unfavorable survival compared with patients who showed negative staining. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 expression was an independent negative prognostic factor for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12518370</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; Endothelial Growth Factors - metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Lung Neoplasms - metabolism ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; nonsmall cell lung carcinoma ; Pneumology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C ; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2003-01, Vol.97 (2), p.457-464</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-e79ba3b1ff14e74ddc6a9e63c4b05934ebeae0d8e1302c070c9daeda4725a7ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-e79ba3b1ff14e74ddc6a9e63c4b05934ebeae0d8e1302c070c9daeda4725a7ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.11073$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.11073$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14512967$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12518370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noguchi, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chujo, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description><![CDATA[BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with primary NSCLC. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC and who did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 was performed. The clinicopathologic implications of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Of 180 patients with NSCLC, 137 patients (76.1%) were positive for VEGF‐C, and 40 patients (22.2%) were positive for VEGFR‐3. VEGF‐C expression was observed frequently in patients with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.026). For VEGFR‐3 expression, significant correlations were demonstrated with age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.008), and histologic differentiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.03). Patients who had positive staining for VEGF‐C showed significantly less favorable survival rates compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGF‐C (P = 0.003). The survival rates of patients who had positive staining for VEGFR‐3 also were significantly lower compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGFR‐3 (P < 0.001). Patients who had positive staining for both VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Univariate analysis revealed the following prognostic factors: gender (P = 0.03), tumor status (T1,T2 vs. T3; P < 0.01), lymph node status (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), tumor size (≤ 35 mm vs. > 35 mm; P < 0.01), disease stage (Stage I vs. Stages II and III; P < 0.01), VEGF‐C expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), VEGFR‐3 expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01) and combined VEGF‐C and/or VEGFR‐3 expression (both positive vs. VEGF‐C or VEGFR‐3 positive; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VEGFR‐3 expression was the only independent negative prognostic factor (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression may be indicative of survival rates for patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2003;97:457–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11073 Patients who showed positive staining for vascular endothelial growth factor C showed significantly unfavorable survival compared with patients who showed negative staining. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 expression was an independent negative prognostic factor for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.]]></description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Endothelial Growth Factors - metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C</subject><subject>vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - metabolism</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0M9LwzAUwPEgipvTi3-A5OJF6EyadFmPUvwFQ0EUvJXX9HWLZOlIOsf-GP9XMzvwJl6SF_iQB19Czjkbc8bSa-20H3POlDggQ85ylTAu00MyZIxNk0yK9wE5CeEjPlWaiWMy4GnGp0KxIfkqrHFGg6XBzJ1p4ug00rahnxD02oKn6Oq2W6A1Ec19u-kWtAHdtZ4WFFz9H-hR42o3CGocXUFn0HWBbkwkrnVhCdZSjfGwazenGrw2rl3CKTlqwAY8298j8nZ3-1o8JLPn-8fiZpZokUqRoMorEBVvGi5RybrWE8hxIrSsWJYLiRUCsnqKXLBUM8V0XgPWIGMOUIBiRK76f7VvQ_DYlCtvluC3JWflrnG5a1z-NI74oserdbXE-pfuo0ZwuQexDNjGx6Qm_DqZ8TSfqOh47zbG4vaPlWXxVLz0y78BsZGYvQ</recordid><startdate>20030115</startdate><enddate>20030115</enddate><creator>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki</creator><creator>Noguchi, Tsuyoshi</creator><creator>Takeno, Shinsuke</creator><creator>Chujo, Masao</creator><creator>Miura, Takashi</creator><creator>Uchida, Yuzo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030115</creationdate><title>Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</title><author>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki ; Noguchi, Tsuyoshi ; Takeno, Shinsuke ; Chujo, Masao ; Miura, Takashi ; Uchida, Yuzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-e79ba3b1ff14e74ddc6a9e63c4b05934ebeae0d8e1302c070c9daeda4725a7ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Endothelial Growth Factors - metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C</topic><topic>vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noguchi, Tsuyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Shinsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chujo, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchida, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arinaga, Mitsuyuki</au><au>Noguchi, Tsuyoshi</au><au>Takeno, Shinsuke</au><au>Chujo, Masao</au><au>Miura, Takashi</au><au>Uchida, Yuzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2003-01-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>457-464</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract><![CDATA[BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with primary NSCLC. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC and who did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 was performed. The clinicopathologic implications of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Of 180 patients with NSCLC, 137 patients (76.1%) were positive for VEGF‐C, and 40 patients (22.2%) were positive for VEGFR‐3. VEGF‐C expression was observed frequently in patients with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.026). For VEGFR‐3 expression, significant correlations were demonstrated with age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.008), and histologic differentiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.03). Patients who had positive staining for VEGF‐C showed significantly less favorable survival rates compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGF‐C (P = 0.003). The survival rates of patients who had positive staining for VEGFR‐3 also were significantly lower compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGFR‐3 (P < 0.001). Patients who had positive staining for both VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Univariate analysis revealed the following prognostic factors: gender (P = 0.03), tumor status (T1,T2 vs. T3; P < 0.01), lymph node status (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), tumor size (≤ 35 mm vs. > 35 mm; P < 0.01), disease stage (Stage I vs. Stages II and III; P < 0.01), VEGF‐C expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), VEGFR‐3 expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01) and combined VEGF‐C and/or VEGFR‐3 expression (both positive vs. VEGF‐C or VEGFR‐3 positive; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VEGFR‐3 expression was the only independent negative prognostic factor (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression may be indicative of survival rates for patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2003;97:457–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11073 Patients who showed positive staining for vascular endothelial growth factor C showed significantly unfavorable survival compared with patients who showed negative staining. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 expression was an independent negative prognostic factor for nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12518370</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.11073</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2003-01, Vol.97 (2), p.457-464
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_11073
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - metabolism
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
Endothelial Growth Factors - metabolism
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Lung Neoplasms - metabolism
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
Pneumology
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Tumors of the respiratory system and mediastinum
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C
vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - metabolism
title Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A27%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20significance%20of%20vascular%20endothelial%20growth%20factor%20C%20and%20vascular%20endothelial%20growth%20factor%20receptor%203%20in%20patients%20with%20nonsmall%20cell%20lung%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Arinaga,%20Mitsuyuki&rft.date=2003-01-15&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=457-464&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.11073&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECNCR11073%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12518370&rfr_iscdi=true