Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures

In Japan, temporary pier structures are designed to withstand earthquakes in consideration of their short service life, and seismic inputs exceeding the design are also expected. In order to confirm the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism in this temporary pier structure, a fundamental study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ce/papers 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.2249-2253
Hauptverfasser: Sekiguchi, Minoru, Taniguchi, Nozomu, Kobayashi, Kaoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2253
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 2249
container_title ce/papers
container_volume 6
creator Sekiguchi, Minoru
Taniguchi, Nozomu
Kobayashi, Kaoru
description In Japan, temporary pier structures are designed to withstand earthquakes in consideration of their short service life, and seismic inputs exceeding the design are also expected. In order to confirm the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism in this temporary pier structure, a fundamental study was conducted using a model specimen. The strength test results showed that the fuse mechanism behaved similar to a rigid body, and then the mortar fuse failed. After the failure of the mortar fuse, the reaction force was generated by the addition of the residual bearing capacity of the mortar fuse and the reaction force of the coil spring. The dynamic loading test results showed that the CFT columns contacted the remaining portion of the fuse after the mortar fuse ruptured, temporarily increasing the maximum response acceleration to 35 m/s2, but the response period became longer, indicating the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism. In addition, the maximum load of the mortar fuse mechanism and the natural period after the mortar fuse rupture were calculated from the design values of the mortar fuse strength and the spring constant of the coil spring.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cepa.2372
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cepa_2372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CEPA2372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-ab00b78589d221aa52333357da59bd0eb708f3ac84f6691bfd3a030eb37526393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpwD_wypD2bNdxMlZRCxWtqGj3yHEuwqj5kJ2A8u9JWgYWbrnT3XPv8BDyyGDOAPjCYKPnXCh-QyZcQhwoUPL2z3xPZt5_AoDgjEWcT8jrHrXvHHra1nRbNq7-QnpE60tr6Dt661tdGaRZTzedR7pH86Gr4UxtRQ8WHT22rjPtGPFA7gp99jj77VNy2qxPyUuwe3veJqtdYNSSBzoDyFQkozjnnGktuRhKqlzLOMsBMwVRIbSJlkUYxiwrcqFBDHuhJA9FLKbk6RprXO29wyJtnC2161MG6eghHT2ko4eBXVzZb3vG_n8wTdaH1eXjB-DfXts</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Sekiguchi, Minoru ; Taniguchi, Nozomu ; Kobayashi, Kaoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Minoru ; Taniguchi, Nozomu ; Kobayashi, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><description>In Japan, temporary pier structures are designed to withstand earthquakes in consideration of their short service life, and seismic inputs exceeding the design are also expected. In order to confirm the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism in this temporary pier structure, a fundamental study was conducted using a model specimen. The strength test results showed that the fuse mechanism behaved similar to a rigid body, and then the mortar fuse failed. After the failure of the mortar fuse, the reaction force was generated by the addition of the residual bearing capacity of the mortar fuse and the reaction force of the coil spring. The dynamic loading test results showed that the CFT columns contacted the remaining portion of the fuse after the mortar fuse ruptured, temporarily increasing the maximum response acceleration to 35 m/s2, but the response period became longer, indicating the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism. In addition, the maximum load of the mortar fuse mechanism and the natural period after the mortar fuse rupture were calculated from the design values of the mortar fuse strength and the spring constant of the coil spring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-7075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cepa.2372</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Long‐period ; Seismic design ; temporary bridge pier</subject><ispartof>ce/papers, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.2249-2253</ispartof><rights>2023 Ernst &amp; Sohn GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcepa.2372$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcepa.2372$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><title>Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures</title><title>ce/papers</title><description>In Japan, temporary pier structures are designed to withstand earthquakes in consideration of their short service life, and seismic inputs exceeding the design are also expected. In order to confirm the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism in this temporary pier structure, a fundamental study was conducted using a model specimen. The strength test results showed that the fuse mechanism behaved similar to a rigid body, and then the mortar fuse failed. After the failure of the mortar fuse, the reaction force was generated by the addition of the residual bearing capacity of the mortar fuse and the reaction force of the coil spring. The dynamic loading test results showed that the CFT columns contacted the remaining portion of the fuse after the mortar fuse ruptured, temporarily increasing the maximum response acceleration to 35 m/s2, but the response period became longer, indicating the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism. In addition, the maximum load of the mortar fuse mechanism and the natural period after the mortar fuse rupture were calculated from the design values of the mortar fuse strength and the spring constant of the coil spring.</description><subject>Long‐period</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>temporary bridge pier</subject><issn>2509-7075</issn><issn>2509-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EElXpwD_wypD2bNdxMlZRCxWtqGj3yHEuwqj5kJ2A8u9JWgYWbrnT3XPv8BDyyGDOAPjCYKPnXCh-QyZcQhwoUPL2z3xPZt5_AoDgjEWcT8jrHrXvHHra1nRbNq7-QnpE60tr6Dt661tdGaRZTzedR7pH86Gr4UxtRQ8WHT22rjPtGPFA7gp99jj77VNy2qxPyUuwe3veJqtdYNSSBzoDyFQkozjnnGktuRhKqlzLOMsBMwVRIbSJlkUYxiwrcqFBDHuhJA9FLKbk6RprXO29wyJtnC2161MG6eghHT2ko4eBXVzZb3vG_n8wTdaH1eXjB-DfXts</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Sekiguchi, Minoru</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Nozomu</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Kaoru</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures</title><author>Sekiguchi, Minoru ; Taniguchi, Nozomu ; Kobayashi, Kaoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c742-ab00b78589d221aa52333357da59bd0eb708f3ac84f6691bfd3a030eb37526393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Long‐period</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>temporary bridge pier</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Nozomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ce/papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sekiguchi, Minoru</au><au>Taniguchi, Nozomu</au><au>Kobayashi, Kaoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures</atitle><jtitle>ce/papers</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>2249</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2249-2253</pages><issn>2509-7075</issn><eissn>2509-7075</eissn><abstract>In Japan, temporary pier structures are designed to withstand earthquakes in consideration of their short service life, and seismic inputs exceeding the design are also expected. In order to confirm the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism in this temporary pier structure, a fundamental study was conducted using a model specimen. The strength test results showed that the fuse mechanism behaved similar to a rigid body, and then the mortar fuse failed. After the failure of the mortar fuse, the reaction force was generated by the addition of the residual bearing capacity of the mortar fuse and the reaction force of the coil spring. The dynamic loading test results showed that the CFT columns contacted the remaining portion of the fuse after the mortar fuse ruptured, temporarily increasing the maximum response acceleration to 35 m/s2, but the response period became longer, indicating the deformation behavior of the fuse mechanism. In addition, the maximum load of the mortar fuse mechanism and the natural period after the mortar fuse rupture were calculated from the design values of the mortar fuse strength and the spring constant of the coil spring.</abstract><doi>10.1002/cepa.2372</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2509-7075
ispartof ce/papers, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.2249-2253
issn 2509-7075
2509-7075
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cepa_2372
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Long‐period
Seismic design
temporary bridge pier
title Measures to Improve Seismic Resistance by Fuse Mechanism in Pier Structures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A08%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measures%20to%20Improve%20Seismic%20Resistance%20by%20Fuse%20Mechanism%20in%20Pier%20Structures&rft.jtitle=ce/papers&rft.au=Sekiguchi,%20Minoru&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=2249&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2249-2253&rft.issn=2509-7075&rft.eissn=2509-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cepa.2372&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECEPA2372%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true