Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation
Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO 2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO 2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation wer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical engineering & technology 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2045 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2034 |
| container_title | Chemical engineering & technology |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra Amini, Younes Amirabedi, Parya Raveshiyan, Saba Hassanvand, Amin |
| description | Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO
2
separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO
2
removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO
2
removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO
2
removal efficiency. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ceat.202300102 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ceat_202300102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_ceat_202300102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-b4b7ecba91e3f17d4dd26ff7712df0d396cfb4f32138e7c446e111eb9badd2a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFOhDAQhhujibh69dwXADttFxZvBnfVZM0eljuZljbBACUtaPbthdXsYTKZ_N8_h4-QR2AJMMaftMEx4YwLxoDxKxLBmkMsga-vScRyweJsDektuQvhi83MfERkKlw3TCOOjeuxpbt2amr6euqxa3Sgx6ab2nNGnaVIP02nPPaGFq4fUY_OUztPcaCcHs2A_sw-0_LH0fI0mLDULqXtN7bTmbgnNxbbYB7-94qUu21ZvMf7w9tH8bKP9UbyWEmVGa0wByMsZLWsa55am2XAa8tqkafaKmkFB7ExmZYyNQBgVK5wJjEXK5L8vdXeheCNrQbfdOhPFbBqcVYtzqqLM_ELvkJhlg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Raveshiyan, Saba ; Hassanvand, Amin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Raveshiyan, Saba ; Hassanvand, Amin</creatorcontrib><description>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO
2
separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO
2
removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO
2
removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO
2
removal efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202300102</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Chemical engineering & technology, 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-b4b7ecba91e3f17d4dd26ff7712df0d396cfb4f32138e7c446e111eb9badd2a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-b4b7ecba91e3f17d4dd26ff7712df0d396cfb4f32138e7c446e111eb9badd2a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7548-9475</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirabedi, Parya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveshiyan, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanvand, Amin</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><title>Chemical engineering & technology</title><description>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO
2
separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO
2
removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO
2
removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO
2
removal efficiency.</description><issn>0930-7516</issn><issn>1521-4125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFOhDAQhhujibh69dwXADttFxZvBnfVZM0eljuZljbBACUtaPbthdXsYTKZ_N8_h4-QR2AJMMaftMEx4YwLxoDxKxLBmkMsga-vScRyweJsDektuQvhi83MfERkKlw3TCOOjeuxpbt2amr6euqxa3Sgx6ab2nNGnaVIP02nPPaGFq4fUY_OUztPcaCcHs2A_sw-0_LH0fI0mLDULqXtN7bTmbgnNxbbYB7-94qUu21ZvMf7w9tH8bKP9UbyWEmVGa0wByMsZLWsa55am2XAa8tqkafaKmkFB7ExmZYyNQBgVK5wJjEXK5L8vdXeheCNrQbfdOhPFbBqcVYtzqqLM_ELvkJhlg</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra</creator><creator>Amini, Younes</creator><creator>Amirabedi, Parya</creator><creator>Raveshiyan, Saba</creator><creator>Hassanvand, Amin</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-9475</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><author>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Raveshiyan, Saba ; Hassanvand, Amin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-b4b7ecba91e3f17d4dd26ff7712df0d396cfb4f32138e7c446e111eb9badd2a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirabedi, Parya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveshiyan, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanvand, Amin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chemical engineering & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sayyah Alborzi, Zahra</au><au>Amini, Younes</au><au>Amirabedi, Parya</au><au>Raveshiyan, Saba</au><au>Hassanvand, Amin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Chemical engineering & technology</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2034</spage><epage>2045</epage><pages>2034-2045</pages><issn>0930-7516</issn><eissn>1521-4125</eissn><abstract>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO
2
separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO
2
removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO
2
removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO
2
removal efficiency.</abstract><doi>10.1002/ceat.202300102</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-9475</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0930-7516 |
| ispartof | Chemical engineering & technology, 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045 |
| issn | 0930-7516 1521-4125 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ceat_202300102 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| title | Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO 2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Fluid%20Dynamics%20Simulation%20of%20a%20Membrane%20Contactor%20for%20CO%202%20Separation:%20Two%20Types%20of%20Membrane%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20engineering%20&%20technology&rft.au=Sayyah%20Alborzi,%20Zahra&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2034&rft.epage=2045&rft.pages=2034-2045&rft.issn=0930-7516&rft.eissn=1521-4125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ceat.202300102&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_ceat_202300102%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |