Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung

Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemische Berichte 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464
Hauptverfasser: Kauffmann, Thomas, Abel, Thomas, Li, Weichang, Neiteler, Gabriele, Schreer, Martin, Schwarze, Dieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 2
container_start_page 459
container_title Chemische Berichte
container_volume 126
creator Kauffmann, Thomas
Abel, Thomas
Li, Weichang
Neiteler, Gabriele
Schreer, Martin
Schwarze, Dieter
description Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cber.19931260225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cber_19931260225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CBER19931260225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1u2zAQhYmiBeqm3XfJA1TukPrlIgvHyI-AFC2aNPBOoKmxxZomBVJK412OkAPkEjlBF933ED1JpToL77oa4M37HgbzCHnPYMoA-Ee1RD9lQsSMZ8B5-oJMGAgRQVbwl2QCACLiIoHX5E0I3wHiJM_iCfn563EA19KuwxY7aYzcdPpWo--QulHXQTVIb9Avta17u0b7gS4Wi5uyLKd03uDWBTQ4Qkhtrwy6ttEG6Sfsmp0Zgv4xtO69amhp_9w_XOmuH8aJcWqz39NbZ-nM1Njs6rXv23YAetuhp7-f2GD90rjQNs5qJ83G3el6xLUZz3lLXq2kCfjueR6Rb2en1_OL6PLzeTmfXUaKQ5FGKBCLWAKmrJB5lmZpmvC0yLM6z_MijlXMVimoejnoTPGlkAyzhOd8lRSiqFl8RGCfq7wLweOqar3eSr-rGFRjAdVYQHVQwIAc75Efwz92__VX85PTr4f8X8nwllw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><description>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-2940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cber.19931260225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Chemoselectivity ; Methylation of aldehydes and ketones ; Niobium complexes ; Tantalum complexes ; Titanium complexes</subject><ispartof>Chemische Berichte, 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcber.19931260225$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcber.19931260225$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neiteler, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><title>Chemische Berichte</title><description>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</description><subject>Chemoselectivity</subject><subject>Methylation of aldehydes and ketones</subject><subject>Niobium complexes</subject><subject>Tantalum complexes</subject><subject>Titanium complexes</subject><issn>0009-2940</issn><issn>1099-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1u2zAQhYmiBeqm3XfJA1TukPrlIgvHyI-AFC2aNPBOoKmxxZomBVJK412OkAPkEjlBF933ED1JpToL77oa4M37HgbzCHnPYMoA-Ee1RD9lQsSMZ8B5-oJMGAgRQVbwl2QCACLiIoHX5E0I3wHiJM_iCfn563EA19KuwxY7aYzcdPpWo--QulHXQTVIb9Avta17u0b7gS4Wi5uyLKd03uDWBTQ4Qkhtrwy6ttEG6Sfsmp0Zgv4xtO69amhp_9w_XOmuH8aJcWqz39NbZ-nM1Njs6rXv23YAetuhp7-f2GD90rjQNs5qJ83G3el6xLUZz3lLXq2kCfjueR6Rb2en1_OL6PLzeTmfXUaKQ5FGKBCLWAKmrJB5lmZpmvC0yLM6z_MijlXMVimoejnoTPGlkAyzhOd8lRSiqFl8RGCfq7wLweOqar3eSr-rGFRjAdVYQHVQwIAc75Efwz92__VX85PTr4f8X8nwllw</recordid><startdate>199302</startdate><enddate>199302</enddate><creator>Kauffmann, Thomas</creator><creator>Abel, Thomas</creator><creator>Li, Weichang</creator><creator>Neiteler, Gabriele</creator><creator>Schreer, Martin</creator><creator>Schwarze, Dieter</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199302</creationdate><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><author>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Chemoselectivity</topic><topic>Methylation of aldehydes and ketones</topic><topic>Niobium complexes</topic><topic>Tantalum complexes</topic><topic>Titanium complexes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neiteler, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chemische Berichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauffmann, Thomas</au><au>Abel, Thomas</au><au>Li, Weichang</au><au>Neiteler, Gabriele</au><au>Schreer, Martin</au><au>Schwarze, Dieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</atitle><jtitle>Chemische Berichte</jtitle><date>1993-02</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>459-464</pages><issn>0009-2940</issn><eissn>1099-0682</eissn><abstract>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/cber.19931260225</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-2940
ispartof Chemische Berichte, 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464
issn 0009-2940
1099-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cber_19931260225
source Wiley Journals
subjects Chemoselectivity
Methylation of aldehydes and ketones
Niobium complexes
Tantalum complexes
Titanium complexes
title Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%C3%9Cbergangsmetallaktivierte%20organische%20Verbindungen,%20XXXVIII.%20Chemoselektive%20nucleophile%20Methylierungen%20durch%20In%E2%80%90Situ%E2%80%90Blockierung%20von%20Aldehydgruppen%20unter%20%CE%B11%E2%80%90Phosphonioalkoxid%E2%80%90Bildung&rft.jtitle=Chemische%20Berichte&rft.au=Kauffmann,%20Thomas&rft.date=1993-02&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=459-464&rft.issn=0009-2940&rft.eissn=1099-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cber.19931260225&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECBER19931260225%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true