Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung
Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet. For the selective methylation of a keto group in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemische Berichte 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 459 |
container_title | Chemische Berichte |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Kauffmann, Thomas Abel, Thomas Li, Weichang Neiteler, Gabriele Schreer, Martin Schwarze, Dieter |
description | Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation
Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet.
For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cber.19931260225 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cber_19931260225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CBER19931260225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1u2zAQhYmiBeqm3XfJA1TukPrlIgvHyI-AFC2aNPBOoKmxxZomBVJK412OkAPkEjlBF933ED1JpToL77oa4M37HgbzCHnPYMoA-Ee1RD9lQsSMZ8B5-oJMGAgRQVbwl2QCACLiIoHX5E0I3wHiJM_iCfn563EA19KuwxY7aYzcdPpWo--QulHXQTVIb9Avta17u0b7gS4Wi5uyLKd03uDWBTQ4Qkhtrwy6ttEG6Sfsmp0Zgv4xtO69amhp_9w_XOmuH8aJcWqz39NbZ-nM1Njs6rXv23YAetuhp7-f2GD90rjQNs5qJ83G3el6xLUZz3lLXq2kCfjueR6Rb2en1_OL6PLzeTmfXUaKQ5FGKBCLWAKmrJB5lmZpmvC0yLM6z_MijlXMVimoejnoTPGlkAyzhOd8lRSiqFl8RGCfq7wLweOqar3eSr-rGFRjAdVYQHVQwIAc75Efwz92__VX85PTr4f8X8nwllw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><description>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation
Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet.
For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-2940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cber.19931260225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Chemoselectivity ; Methylation of aldehydes and ketones ; Niobium complexes ; Tantalum complexes ; Titanium complexes</subject><ispartof>Chemische Berichte, 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcber.19931260225$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcber.19931260225$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neiteler, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><title>Chemische Berichte</title><description>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation
Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet.
For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</description><subject>Chemoselectivity</subject><subject>Methylation of aldehydes and ketones</subject><subject>Niobium complexes</subject><subject>Tantalum complexes</subject><subject>Titanium complexes</subject><issn>0009-2940</issn><issn>1099-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1u2zAQhYmiBeqm3XfJA1TukPrlIgvHyI-AFC2aNPBOoKmxxZomBVJK412OkAPkEjlBF933ED1JpToL77oa4M37HgbzCHnPYMoA-Ee1RD9lQsSMZ8B5-oJMGAgRQVbwl2QCACLiIoHX5E0I3wHiJM_iCfn563EA19KuwxY7aYzcdPpWo--QulHXQTVIb9Avta17u0b7gS4Wi5uyLKd03uDWBTQ4Qkhtrwy6ttEG6Sfsmp0Zgv4xtO69amhp_9w_XOmuH8aJcWqz39NbZ-nM1Njs6rXv23YAetuhp7-f2GD90rjQNs5qJ83G3el6xLUZz3lLXq2kCfjueR6Rb2en1_OL6PLzeTmfXUaKQ5FGKBCLWAKmrJB5lmZpmvC0yLM6z_MijlXMVimoejnoTPGlkAyzhOd8lRSiqFl8RGCfq7wLweOqar3eSr-rGFRjAdVYQHVQwIAc75Efwz92__VX85PTr4f8X8nwllw</recordid><startdate>199302</startdate><enddate>199302</enddate><creator>Kauffmann, Thomas</creator><creator>Abel, Thomas</creator><creator>Li, Weichang</creator><creator>Neiteler, Gabriele</creator><creator>Schreer, Martin</creator><creator>Schwarze, Dieter</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199302</creationdate><title>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</title><author>Kauffmann, Thomas ; Abel, Thomas ; Li, Weichang ; Neiteler, Gabriele ; Schreer, Martin ; Schwarze, Dieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2085-e9ee83a0e518a765655425876d777833c31f50cdb5541c2b9a1e64272f4898d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Chemoselectivity</topic><topic>Methylation of aldehydes and ketones</topic><topic>Niobium complexes</topic><topic>Tantalum complexes</topic><topic>Titanium complexes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Weichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neiteler, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreer, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarze, Dieter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chemische Berichte</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauffmann, Thomas</au><au>Abel, Thomas</au><au>Li, Weichang</au><au>Neiteler, Gabriele</au><au>Schreer, Martin</au><au>Schwarze, Dieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung</atitle><jtitle>Chemische Berichte</jtitle><date>1993-02</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>459</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>459-464</pages><issn>0009-2940</issn><eissn>1099-0682</eissn><abstract>Transition Metal‐Activated Organic Compounds, XXXVIII[1]. — Chemoselective Nucleophilic Methylation Reactions by In‐Situ‐Blocking of Aldehyde Groups by α1‐Phosphonioalkoxide Formation
Herrn Professor Ulrich Schöllkopf zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet.
For the selective methylation of a keto group in the presence of an aldehyde group the complex MeTiCl3·PPh3 and especially the reagent system [TiC]4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] proved to be favourable. For instance, 6‐oxoheptanal (8) was methylated by [TiCl4·PPh3 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the keto group with 89% yield and 99:1 selectivity, whereas it was methylated by [TiCl4 + 0.5 Me2Zn] at the aldehyde group with 81% yield and 96:4 selectivity. A selective methylation of benzaldehyde in the presence of heptanal was achieved with MeNbCl4·PPh3 or [NbCl5·PPh3 + 0.75 Me2Zn] to give (1‐chloroethyl)benzene (14; yield 92 or 53%; selectivity in each case 93:7) or with [TaCl5·PPh3 + 1.5 Me2Zn] to give mainly 1‐phenylethanol (15) besides 16. A 96:4‐selective benzylation (yield 74%) of a ketone in the presence of an aliphatic aldehyde was possible with [TiCl4·PPh3 + 1 PhCH2MgBr]. — The high chemoselectivity is caused by irreversible blocking of aliphatic aldehyde groups by α1‐phosphonioalkoxide formation[1], whilst the corresponding reaction of keto groups[1] and of benzaldehyde is reversible.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/cber.19931260225</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-2940 |
ispartof | Chemische Berichte, 1993-02, Vol.126 (2), p.459-464 |
issn | 0009-2940 1099-0682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cber_19931260225 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Chemoselectivity Methylation of aldehydes and ketones Niobium complexes Tantalum complexes Titanium complexes |
title | Übergangsmetallaktivierte organische Verbindungen, XXXVIII. Chemoselektive nucleophile Methylierungen durch In‐Situ‐Blockierung von Aldehydgruppen unter α1‐Phosphonioalkoxid‐Bildung |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A35%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%C3%9Cbergangsmetallaktivierte%20organische%20Verbindungen,%20XXXVIII.%20Chemoselektive%20nucleophile%20Methylierungen%20durch%20In%E2%80%90Situ%E2%80%90Blockierung%20von%20Aldehydgruppen%20unter%20%CE%B11%E2%80%90Phosphonioalkoxid%E2%80%90Bildung&rft.jtitle=Chemische%20Berichte&rft.au=Kauffmann,%20Thomas&rft.date=1993-02&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=459&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=459-464&rft.issn=0009-2940&rft.eissn=1099-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cber.19931260225&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECBER19931260225%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |