Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective. To preliminarily evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dose levels and dosing frequencies of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (rHuIL‐1Ra) in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. One hundred seventy‐five patients with active RA were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis and rheumatism 1996-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1092-1101
Hauptverfasser: Campion, G. V., Lebsack, M. E., Lookabaugh, J., Gordon, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1101
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1092
container_title Arthritis and rheumatism
container_volume 39
creator Campion, G. V.
Lebsack, M. E.
Lookabaugh, J.
Gordon, G.
description Objective. To preliminarily evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dose levels and dosing frequencies of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (rHuIL‐1Ra) in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. One hundred seventy‐five patients with active RA were enrolled in a randomized, double‐blind trial of rHuIL‐1Ra administered by subcutaneous injection. There were 9 treatment groups in the trial. During the initial 3‐week treatment phase, patients were treated with 20, 70, or 200 mg rHuIL‐1Ra, administered either once, 3 times, or 7 times per week, followed by a 4‐week maintenance phase, during which all patients received the treatment‐phase dose once per week. To maintain the blindness of the study, patients received daily injections of either rHuIL‐1Ra or placebo on the days rHuIL‐1Ra was not administered. Results. Recombinant HuIL‐1Ra was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was injection‐site reactions, which were reported in 62% of patients and caused 8 patients (5%) to withdraw prematurely from the study. Five patients (3%) developed serious adverse reactions unrelated to dose or dosing frequency. Due to the lack of a placebo arm and to the multiple small treatment groups, a definitive statement regarding efficacy could not be made. However, by the end of the 3‐week treatment phase, daily dosing appeared more effective than weekly dosing when assessed by the number of swollen joints, the investigator and patient assessments of disease activity, pain score, and C‐reactive protein levels. Conclusion. These preliminary data suggest that rHuIL‐1Ra may be safely administered by subcutaneous injection to RA patients. The frequency of dosing appears to be important in determining clinical response, with daily administration providing the most benefit. A placebo‐controlled trial is in progress to further assess the clinical usefulness and to better define appropriate doses of rHuIL‐1Ra in patients with RA.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/art.1780390704
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_art_1780390704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ART1780390704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-f7834e817b9d54dcab023149f4b9faac3f75e36af94dce51e68f56e4be99c3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD9PwzAQxS0EEqWwMntgTbFru4nHqvyVKiGhMkeOc24MqVNsV1U2JmY-I58EV0XAxmSd7_3e3T2EzikZUULGl8rHEc0LwiTJCT9AAyrGMiOU0UM0IITwjAlJj9FJCM-pHDPBBuj9qgvw-fbhlVsCVq7G9f7DeHjdgNM9DnFT97gz2IPuVpV1ykXcbFbKYesi-BY2L9YlhO4UsI6dT0ZRLTtnQ0wavFbRgosBb21ssG8gwbGzNU4rN95GG07RkVFtgLPvd4iebq4Xs7ts_nB7P5vOM83ohGcmLxiHguaVrAWvtarSGZRLwytplNLM5ALYRBmZmiAoTAojJsArkFIzLtgQjfa-2ncheDDl2tuV8n1JSblLsUwrlb8pJuBiD6xV0Ko1KSdtww-VhjNRFEkm97KtbaH_x7ScPi7-jPgCaBmKSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campion, G. V. ; Lebsack, M. E. ; Lookabaugh, J. ; Gordon, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Campion, G. V. ; Lebsack, M. E. ; Lookabaugh, J. ; Gordon, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To preliminarily evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dose levels and dosing frequencies of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (rHuIL‐1Ra) in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. One hundred seventy‐five patients with active RA were enrolled in a randomized, double‐blind trial of rHuIL‐1Ra administered by subcutaneous injection. There were 9 treatment groups in the trial. During the initial 3‐week treatment phase, patients were treated with 20, 70, or 200 mg rHuIL‐1Ra, administered either once, 3 times, or 7 times per week, followed by a 4‐week maintenance phase, during which all patients received the treatment‐phase dose once per week. To maintain the blindness of the study, patients received daily injections of either rHuIL‐1Ra or placebo on the days rHuIL‐1Ra was not administered. Results. Recombinant HuIL‐1Ra was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was injection‐site reactions, which were reported in 62% of patients and caused 8 patients (5%) to withdraw prematurely from the study. Five patients (3%) developed serious adverse reactions unrelated to dose or dosing frequency. Due to the lack of a placebo arm and to the multiple small treatment groups, a definitive statement regarding efficacy could not be made. However, by the end of the 3‐week treatment phase, daily dosing appeared more effective than weekly dosing when assessed by the number of swollen joints, the investigator and patient assessments of disease activity, pain score, and C‐reactive protein levels. Conclusion. These preliminary data suggest that rHuIL‐1Ra may be safely administered by subcutaneous injection to RA patients. The frequency of dosing appears to be important in determining clinical response, with daily administration providing the most benefit. A placebo‐controlled trial is in progress to further assess the clinical usefulness and to better define appropriate doses of rHuIL‐1Ra in patients with RA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-3591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-0131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/art.1780390704</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARHEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Inflammatory joint diseases ; Medical sciences</subject><ispartof>Arthritis and rheumatism, 1996-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1092-1101</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-f7834e817b9d54dcab023149f4b9faac3f75e36af94dce51e68f56e4be99c3453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-f7834e817b9d54dcab023149f4b9faac3f75e36af94dce51e68f56e4be99c3453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fart.1780390704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fart.1780390704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3143588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campion, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebsack, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookabaugh, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>Arthritis and rheumatism</title><description>Objective. To preliminarily evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dose levels and dosing frequencies of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (rHuIL‐1Ra) in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. One hundred seventy‐five patients with active RA were enrolled in a randomized, double‐blind trial of rHuIL‐1Ra administered by subcutaneous injection. There were 9 treatment groups in the trial. During the initial 3‐week treatment phase, patients were treated with 20, 70, or 200 mg rHuIL‐1Ra, administered either once, 3 times, or 7 times per week, followed by a 4‐week maintenance phase, during which all patients received the treatment‐phase dose once per week. To maintain the blindness of the study, patients received daily injections of either rHuIL‐1Ra or placebo on the days rHuIL‐1Ra was not administered. Results. Recombinant HuIL‐1Ra was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was injection‐site reactions, which were reported in 62% of patients and caused 8 patients (5%) to withdraw prematurely from the study. Five patients (3%) developed serious adverse reactions unrelated to dose or dosing frequency. Due to the lack of a placebo arm and to the multiple small treatment groups, a definitive statement regarding efficacy could not be made. However, by the end of the 3‐week treatment phase, daily dosing appeared more effective than weekly dosing when assessed by the number of swollen joints, the investigator and patient assessments of disease activity, pain score, and C‐reactive protein levels. Conclusion. These preliminary data suggest that rHuIL‐1Ra may be safely administered by subcutaneous injection to RA patients. The frequency of dosing appears to be important in determining clinical response, with daily administration providing the most benefit. A placebo‐controlled trial is in progress to further assess the clinical usefulness and to better define appropriate doses of rHuIL‐1Ra in patients with RA.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Inflammatory joint diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><issn>0004-3591</issn><issn>1529-0131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD9PwzAQxS0EEqWwMntgTbFru4nHqvyVKiGhMkeOc24MqVNsV1U2JmY-I58EV0XAxmSd7_3e3T2EzikZUULGl8rHEc0LwiTJCT9AAyrGMiOU0UM0IITwjAlJj9FJCM-pHDPBBuj9qgvw-fbhlVsCVq7G9f7DeHjdgNM9DnFT97gz2IPuVpV1ykXcbFbKYesi-BY2L9YlhO4UsI6dT0ZRLTtnQ0wavFbRgosBb21ssG8gwbGzNU4rN95GG07RkVFtgLPvd4iebq4Xs7ts_nB7P5vOM83ohGcmLxiHguaVrAWvtarSGZRLwytplNLM5ALYRBmZmiAoTAojJsArkFIzLtgQjfa-2ncheDDl2tuV8n1JSblLsUwrlb8pJuBiD6xV0Ko1KSdtww-VhjNRFEkm97KtbaH_x7ScPi7-jPgCaBmKSA</recordid><startdate>199607</startdate><enddate>199607</enddate><creator>Campion, G. V.</creator><creator>Lebsack, M. E.</creator><creator>Lookabaugh, J.</creator><creator>Gordon, G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199607</creationdate><title>Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Campion, G. V. ; Lebsack, M. E. ; Lookabaugh, J. ; Gordon, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3164-f7834e817b9d54dcab023149f4b9faac3f75e36af94dce51e68f56e4be99c3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Inflammatory joint diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campion, G. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebsack, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lookabaugh, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campion, G. V.</au><au>Lebsack, M. E.</au><au>Lookabaugh, J.</au><au>Gordon, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle><date>1996-07</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1092</spage><epage>1101</epage><pages>1092-1101</pages><issn>0004-3591</issn><eissn>1529-0131</eissn><coden>ARHEAW</coden><abstract>Objective. To preliminarily evaluate the safety and efficacy of different dose levels and dosing frequencies of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist (rHuIL‐1Ra) in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. One hundred seventy‐five patients with active RA were enrolled in a randomized, double‐blind trial of rHuIL‐1Ra administered by subcutaneous injection. There were 9 treatment groups in the trial. During the initial 3‐week treatment phase, patients were treated with 20, 70, or 200 mg rHuIL‐1Ra, administered either once, 3 times, or 7 times per week, followed by a 4‐week maintenance phase, during which all patients received the treatment‐phase dose once per week. To maintain the blindness of the study, patients received daily injections of either rHuIL‐1Ra or placebo on the days rHuIL‐1Ra was not administered. Results. Recombinant HuIL‐1Ra was well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was injection‐site reactions, which were reported in 62% of patients and caused 8 patients (5%) to withdraw prematurely from the study. Five patients (3%) developed serious adverse reactions unrelated to dose or dosing frequency. Due to the lack of a placebo arm and to the multiple small treatment groups, a definitive statement regarding efficacy could not be made. However, by the end of the 3‐week treatment phase, daily dosing appeared more effective than weekly dosing when assessed by the number of swollen joints, the investigator and patient assessments of disease activity, pain score, and C‐reactive protein levels. Conclusion. These preliminary data suggest that rHuIL‐1Ra may be safely administered by subcutaneous injection to RA patients. The frequency of dosing appears to be important in determining clinical response, with daily administration providing the most benefit. A placebo‐controlled trial is in progress to further assess the clinical usefulness and to better define appropriate doses of rHuIL‐1Ra in patients with RA.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/art.1780390704</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-3591
ispartof Arthritis and rheumatism, 1996-07, Vol.39 (7), p.1092-1101
issn 0004-3591
1529-0131
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_art_1780390704
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Inflammatory joint diseases
Medical sciences
title Dose‐range and dose‐frequency study of recombinant human interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%E2%80%90range%20and%20dose%E2%80%90frequency%20study%20of%20recombinant%20human%20interleukin%E2%80%901%20receptor%20antagonist%20in%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20and%20rheumatism&rft.au=Campion,%20G.%20V.&rft.date=1996-07&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1092&rft.epage=1101&rft.pages=1092-1101&rft.issn=0004-3591&rft.eissn=1529-0131&rft.coden=ARHEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/art.1780390704&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EART1780390704%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true