Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection

Background COVID‐19 is still a major public health concern. COVID‐19 is known to affect the central nervous system (CNS), however, the extent of the cognitive effects of infection are unknown. We developed an online battery for community testing, to learn more about the cognitive effects of infectio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2023-12, Vol.19 (S22), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Butler, Joe, Lawson, Rachael A, Ling, Jonathon, Paddick, Stella‐Maria, Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A, Hodgetts, Sophie, Taylor, John‐Paul, Watermeyer, Tamlyn J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S22
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 19
creator Butler, Joe
Lawson, Rachael A
Ling, Jonathon
Paddick, Stella‐Maria
Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A
Hodgetts, Sophie
Taylor, John‐Paul
Watermeyer, Tamlyn J
description Background COVID‐19 is still a major public health concern. COVID‐19 is known to affect the central nervous system (CNS), however, the extent of the cognitive effects of infection are unknown. We developed an online battery for community testing, to learn more about the cognitive effects of infection. Method Participants were recruited between October 2020 and December 2021 from social media, and completed objective cognitive‐tasks and online health questionnaires using Psytoolkit (Stoet, 2017). Subjective questionnaire measures included fatigue, sleepiness, mood, and cognitive complaints. Objective cognitive tests measured sustained attention; spatial span; and visual short‐term memory. Participants self‐reported their comorbidities. Prior COVID‐19 infection was identified by self‐reported positive PCR or lateral flow test. Data was split into age/infection status groups of i) 18‐34y positive infection (n = 69, mean‐age: 21.4 [3.6]); ii) 18‐34y negative infection (n = 189, mean‐age: 22.65 [4.3]); iii) positive infection (n = 26, mean‐age: 46.9 [7.1]); and iv) 35y+ negative infection (n = 68, mean‐age: 45.44 [7.56]). Result Of 359 participants recruited, 95 (26.4%) reported a prior positive COVID‐19 test. We found no differences in demographic variables and any variables of interest between Covid‐positive and Covid‐negative groups overall. However, within the age/infection status groups, we found: The 35+ Covid positive group reported higher fatigue (d = 0.69) and performed poorer (d = 0.66) on a visual short‐memory task relative to the 35+ Covid‐negative individuals. Within the overall Covid‐positive sample, younger age β = ‐0.18, p = 0.04); higher fatigue (β
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.079805
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_079805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ079805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-c9e25c3db0bee7d9b972954b635d0aca378d9bc557cc40cc2d00d891b47400563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMKFL_AZKWWdxE18rMqrUqVyAA5cIsd2wFViV3ZKW078AXwjX4LTVj1y2pnVzOxqELokMCAA8TWvPweQsRzoEeoRSuOIxhk7PuAhnKIz7-cAKeSE9tD3o1NSi9Y6j22F_bKcK9HqD4W5kdgemLBvRm_RQrnKuoYbobBa80YbJbE2QY-tqQPDnjeLWnVxXC7r1uOVbt-3eR2wyxYvnLYOj2cvk5vfrx_Cgr_qDllzjk4qXnt1sZ999Hx3-zR-iKaz-8l4NI0EIQmNBFMxFYksoVQqk6xkWcxoWg4TKoELnmR5WApKMyFSECKWADJnpEyzFIAOkz662uUKZ713qirCTw13m4JA0VVZhCqLXZVBTHbila7V5h9lMZq-7j1_4h559w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Butler, Joe ; Lawson, Rachael A ; Ling, Jonathon ; Paddick, Stella‐Maria ; Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A ; Hodgetts, Sophie ; Taylor, John‐Paul ; Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, Joe ; Lawson, Rachael A ; Ling, Jonathon ; Paddick, Stella‐Maria ; Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A ; Hodgetts, Sophie ; Taylor, John‐Paul ; Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</creatorcontrib><description>Background COVID‐19 is still a major public health concern. COVID‐19 is known to affect the central nervous system (CNS), however, the extent of the cognitive effects of infection are unknown. We developed an online battery for community testing, to learn more about the cognitive effects of infection. Method Participants were recruited between October 2020 and December 2021 from social media, and completed objective cognitive‐tasks and online health questionnaires using Psytoolkit (Stoet, 2017). Subjective questionnaire measures included fatigue, sleepiness, mood, and cognitive complaints. Objective cognitive tests measured sustained attention; spatial span; and visual short‐term memory. Participants self‐reported their comorbidities. Prior COVID‐19 infection was identified by self‐reported positive PCR or lateral flow test. Data was split into age/infection status groups of i) 18‐34y positive infection (n = 69, mean‐age: 21.4 [3.6]); ii) 18‐34y negative infection (n = 189, mean‐age: 22.65 [4.3]); iii) positive infection (n = 26, mean‐age: 46.9 [7.1]); and iv) 35y+ negative infection (n = 68, mean‐age: 45.44 [7.56]). Result Of 359 participants recruited, 95 (26.4%) reported a prior positive COVID‐19 test. We found no differences in demographic variables and any variables of interest between Covid‐positive and Covid‐negative groups overall. However, within the age/infection status groups, we found: The 35+ Covid positive group reported higher fatigue (d = 0.69) and performed poorer (d = 0.66) on a visual short‐memory task relative to the 35+ Covid‐negative individuals. Within the overall Covid‐positive sample, younger age β = ‐0.18, p = 0.04); higher fatigue (β&lt;0.001) and poorer mood (β = ‐0.18, p = 0.05), were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.63 (adjusted R2 = 0.6), F(6,75) = 21.1, p &lt;0.001]. Furthermore, a higher number of co‐morbidities (β = ‐0.31, p = 0.01) was associated with poorer spatial span [R2 = 0.25 (adjusted R2 = 0.19), F(6, 75) = 4.23, p = 0.001]. Within the overall Covid‐negative sample, sleepiness (β = 0.32, p&lt;0.001) and higher fatigue (β = 0.54, p&lt;0.001) were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.66 (adjusted R2 = 0.63), F(6, 65) = 20.9, p&lt;0.001]. There were no significant associations with objective cognitive performance within this sample. Conclusion COVID‐19 infection status was associated with subjective and objective cognitive complaints. Adults aged 35‐63 years with prior COVID‐19 infection appear to be differentially affected. These data add to the body of evidence indicating there are cognitive consequences from COVID‐19 infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.079805</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S22), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 the Alzheimer's Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.079805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.079805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Rachael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddick, Stella‐Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, John‐Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background COVID‐19 is still a major public health concern. COVID‐19 is known to affect the central nervous system (CNS), however, the extent of the cognitive effects of infection are unknown. We developed an online battery for community testing, to learn more about the cognitive effects of infection. Method Participants were recruited between October 2020 and December 2021 from social media, and completed objective cognitive‐tasks and online health questionnaires using Psytoolkit (Stoet, 2017). Subjective questionnaire measures included fatigue, sleepiness, mood, and cognitive complaints. Objective cognitive tests measured sustained attention; spatial span; and visual short‐term memory. Participants self‐reported their comorbidities. Prior COVID‐19 infection was identified by self‐reported positive PCR or lateral flow test. Data was split into age/infection status groups of i) 18‐34y positive infection (n = 69, mean‐age: 21.4 [3.6]); ii) 18‐34y negative infection (n = 189, mean‐age: 22.65 [4.3]); iii) positive infection (n = 26, mean‐age: 46.9 [7.1]); and iv) 35y+ negative infection (n = 68, mean‐age: 45.44 [7.56]). Result Of 359 participants recruited, 95 (26.4%) reported a prior positive COVID‐19 test. We found no differences in demographic variables and any variables of interest between Covid‐positive and Covid‐negative groups overall. However, within the age/infection status groups, we found: The 35+ Covid positive group reported higher fatigue (d = 0.69) and performed poorer (d = 0.66) on a visual short‐memory task relative to the 35+ Covid‐negative individuals. Within the overall Covid‐positive sample, younger age β = ‐0.18, p = 0.04); higher fatigue (β&lt;0.001) and poorer mood (β = ‐0.18, p = 0.05), were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.63 (adjusted R2 = 0.6), F(6,75) = 21.1, p &lt;0.001]. Furthermore, a higher number of co‐morbidities (β = ‐0.31, p = 0.01) was associated with poorer spatial span [R2 = 0.25 (adjusted R2 = 0.19), F(6, 75) = 4.23, p = 0.001]. Within the overall Covid‐negative sample, sleepiness (β = 0.32, p&lt;0.001) and higher fatigue (β = 0.54, p&lt;0.001) were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.66 (adjusted R2 = 0.63), F(6, 65) = 20.9, p&lt;0.001]. There were no significant associations with objective cognitive performance within this sample. Conclusion COVID‐19 infection status was associated with subjective and objective cognitive complaints. Adults aged 35‐63 years with prior COVID‐19 infection appear to be differentially affected. These data add to the body of evidence indicating there are cognitive consequences from COVID‐19 infection.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMKFL_AZKWWdxE18rMqrUqVyAA5cIsd2wFViV3ZKW078AXwjX4LTVj1y2pnVzOxqELokMCAA8TWvPweQsRzoEeoRSuOIxhk7PuAhnKIz7-cAKeSE9tD3o1NSi9Y6j22F_bKcK9HqD4W5kdgemLBvRm_RQrnKuoYbobBa80YbJbE2QY-tqQPDnjeLWnVxXC7r1uOVbt-3eR2wyxYvnLYOj2cvk5vfrx_Cgr_qDllzjk4qXnt1sZ999Hx3-zR-iKaz-8l4NI0EIQmNBFMxFYksoVQqk6xkWcxoWg4TKoELnmR5WApKMyFSECKWADJnpEyzFIAOkz662uUKZ713qirCTw13m4JA0VVZhCqLXZVBTHbila7V5h9lMZq-7j1_4h559w</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Butler, Joe</creator><creator>Lawson, Rachael A</creator><creator>Ling, Jonathon</creator><creator>Paddick, Stella‐Maria</creator><creator>Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A</creator><creator>Hodgetts, Sophie</creator><creator>Taylor, John‐Paul</creator><creator>Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection</title><author>Butler, Joe ; Lawson, Rachael A ; Ling, Jonathon ; Paddick, Stella‐Maria ; Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A ; Hodgetts, Sophie ; Taylor, John‐Paul ; Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1135-c9e25c3db0bee7d9b972954b635d0aca378d9bc557cc40cc2d00d891b47400563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Rachael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paddick, Stella‐Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, John‐Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, Joe</au><au>Lawson, Rachael A</au><au>Ling, Jonathon</au><au>Paddick, Stella‐Maria</au><au>Parra‐Rodriguez, Mario A</au><au>Hodgetts, Sophie</au><au>Taylor, John‐Paul</au><au>Watermeyer, Tamlyn J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>S22</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background COVID‐19 is still a major public health concern. COVID‐19 is known to affect the central nervous system (CNS), however, the extent of the cognitive effects of infection are unknown. We developed an online battery for community testing, to learn more about the cognitive effects of infection. Method Participants were recruited between October 2020 and December 2021 from social media, and completed objective cognitive‐tasks and online health questionnaires using Psytoolkit (Stoet, 2017). Subjective questionnaire measures included fatigue, sleepiness, mood, and cognitive complaints. Objective cognitive tests measured sustained attention; spatial span; and visual short‐term memory. Participants self‐reported their comorbidities. Prior COVID‐19 infection was identified by self‐reported positive PCR or lateral flow test. Data was split into age/infection status groups of i) 18‐34y positive infection (n = 69, mean‐age: 21.4 [3.6]); ii) 18‐34y negative infection (n = 189, mean‐age: 22.65 [4.3]); iii) positive infection (n = 26, mean‐age: 46.9 [7.1]); and iv) 35y+ negative infection (n = 68, mean‐age: 45.44 [7.56]). Result Of 359 participants recruited, 95 (26.4%) reported a prior positive COVID‐19 test. We found no differences in demographic variables and any variables of interest between Covid‐positive and Covid‐negative groups overall. However, within the age/infection status groups, we found: The 35+ Covid positive group reported higher fatigue (d = 0.69) and performed poorer (d = 0.66) on a visual short‐memory task relative to the 35+ Covid‐negative individuals. Within the overall Covid‐positive sample, younger age β = ‐0.18, p = 0.04); higher fatigue (β&lt;0.001) and poorer mood (β = ‐0.18, p = 0.05), were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.63 (adjusted R2 = 0.6), F(6,75) = 21.1, p &lt;0.001]. Furthermore, a higher number of co‐morbidities (β = ‐0.31, p = 0.01) was associated with poorer spatial span [R2 = 0.25 (adjusted R2 = 0.19), F(6, 75) = 4.23, p = 0.001]. Within the overall Covid‐negative sample, sleepiness (β = 0.32, p&lt;0.001) and higher fatigue (β = 0.54, p&lt;0.001) were associated with greater perceived cognitive complaints [R2 = 0.66 (adjusted R2 = 0.63), F(6, 65) = 20.9, p&lt;0.001]. There were no significant associations with objective cognitive performance within this sample. Conclusion COVID‐19 infection status was associated with subjective and objective cognitive complaints. Adults aged 35‐63 years with prior COVID‐19 infection appear to be differentially affected. These data add to the body of evidence indicating there are cognitive consequences from COVID‐19 infection.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.079805</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S22), p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_079805
source Wiley Journals
title Predictors of subjective and objective cognitive performance examined in an online sample of adults with and without prior COVID‐19 infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A52%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20subjective%20and%20objective%20cognitive%20performance%20examined%20in%20an%20online%20sample%20of%20adults%20with%20and%20without%20prior%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20infection&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Butler,%20Joe&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=S22&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.079805&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EALZ079805%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true