Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure

Background As therapeutic advancements are made in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), it is important to have a fully validated, sensitive, and reliable disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) to accurately measure changes in AD and MCI symptomatic disease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2023-12, Vol.19 (S21), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rosero, Spencer, Varma, Anika, Seabury, Jamison, Weinstein, Jennifer, Engebrecht, Charlotte, Dilek, Nuran, Arky, Abigail, Santos, Elizabeth, Heatwole, Chad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S21
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 19
creator Rosero, Spencer
Varma, Anika
Seabury, Jamison
Weinstein, Jennifer
Engebrecht, Charlotte
Dilek, Nuran
Arky, Abigail
Santos, Elizabeth
Heatwole, Chad
description Background As therapeutic advancements are made in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), it is important to have a fully validated, sensitive, and reliable disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) to accurately measure changes in AD and MCI symptomatic disease burden. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has encouraged the use of PROs to measure therapeutic benefit of potential new treatments. This research describes the development, testing, and validation of a novel, multifactorial PRO: The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI). Methods We conducted interviews and a large cross‐sectional study involving individuals with AD and MCI and their caregivers to determine what symptoms and issues are most important to patients (Figure 1). Questions were selected for the AD‐HI based on their importance to patients with MCI and AD, potential to respond to therapeutic intervention, and generalizability to the broader MCI and AD patient population as determined through qualitative interviews and a cross‐sectional study. We beta tested the initial version of the AD‐HI with individuals with MCI and AD to determine its clarity, ease of use, and relevance to those with MCI and AD. We performed test‐retest reliability, known groups validity, internal consistency, and area under the curve analyses of the AD‐HI to assess the statistical characteristics, performance, and clinical meaningfulness of the outcome measure. Results The content of the AD‐HI was validated using a cross‐sectional study of 104 patients. The final version of the AD‐HI contains 9 subscales that measure disease burden in the following areas: 1) Memory, 2) Cognitive health, 3) Fatigue, 4) Sleep, 5) Social health, 6) Communication, 7) Emotional health, 8) Physical health, and 9) Pain. The AD‐HI was identified as easy to use, relevant to the patient population, responsive, and clear during beta testing. The ADCR‐HI was shown to be reliable during test‐retest reliability testing with 22 individuals and able to distinguish between patient cohorts with different disease severities. Conclusion The AD‐HI is a is a valid, sensitive, and reliable marker of disease burden in AD This disease‐specific outcome measure is available for use by researchers, clinicians, patient organizations, and companies to measure changes in disease burden during therapeutic trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.077264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_077264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ077264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-ade68dc02fba22f6f07bb3153028fa2b25cf1a23ed36cba924b7540a43801f6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UTtOAzEQXSGQCIGGE7gERILt_SV0UQIkUiQaaGhWs96xYuRdR7YDJFWOQMupuENOgqNEFBQ083tv3oz0ouic0S6jlN-AXnVpnvMsOYhaLE15J-V5__C3zuhxdOLcK6UJ7bG0FX2P8A21mdfYeGIkATIHr0KzWX9anBvrsSJm4YWpkdQIbmGRSGPJQK9mqGq0m_WXI5VyAcNb4mf4BxrtoKA3RtB-RiZNhR_kYjDajiaX1-GmXGi9JG-gVQXbg94YHQIpjXYeLRFaNUpAmFkVIjQVsRhkrZgR1UgLztuF8OG30-hIgnZ4ts_t6Pn-7mk47kwfHybDwbQjGIuTDlSY9SpBuSyBc5lJmpdlzNKY8p4EXvJUSAY8xirORAl9npR5mlBI4h5lMoO4HV3tdIU1zlmUxdyqGuyyYLTYWlEEK4qdFYHMduR3pXH5D7MYTF_2Oz9r-pVi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Rosero, Spencer ; Varma, Anika ; Seabury, Jamison ; Weinstein, Jennifer ; Engebrecht, Charlotte ; Dilek, Nuran ; Arky, Abigail ; Santos, Elizabeth ; Heatwole, Chad</creator><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Spencer ; Varma, Anika ; Seabury, Jamison ; Weinstein, Jennifer ; Engebrecht, Charlotte ; Dilek, Nuran ; Arky, Abigail ; Santos, Elizabeth ; Heatwole, Chad</creatorcontrib><description>Background As therapeutic advancements are made in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), it is important to have a fully validated, sensitive, and reliable disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) to accurately measure changes in AD and MCI symptomatic disease burden. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has encouraged the use of PROs to measure therapeutic benefit of potential new treatments. This research describes the development, testing, and validation of a novel, multifactorial PRO: The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI). Methods We conducted interviews and a large cross‐sectional study involving individuals with AD and MCI and their caregivers to determine what symptoms and issues are most important to patients (Figure 1). Questions were selected for the AD‐HI based on their importance to patients with MCI and AD, potential to respond to therapeutic intervention, and generalizability to the broader MCI and AD patient population as determined through qualitative interviews and a cross‐sectional study. We beta tested the initial version of the AD‐HI with individuals with MCI and AD to determine its clarity, ease of use, and relevance to those with MCI and AD. We performed test‐retest reliability, known groups validity, internal consistency, and area under the curve analyses of the AD‐HI to assess the statistical characteristics, performance, and clinical meaningfulness of the outcome measure. Results The content of the AD‐HI was validated using a cross‐sectional study of 104 patients. The final version of the AD‐HI contains 9 subscales that measure disease burden in the following areas: 1) Memory, 2) Cognitive health, 3) Fatigue, 4) Sleep, 5) Social health, 6) Communication, 7) Emotional health, 8) Physical health, and 9) Pain. The AD‐HI was identified as easy to use, relevant to the patient population, responsive, and clear during beta testing. The ADCR‐HI was shown to be reliable during test‐retest reliability testing with 22 individuals and able to distinguish between patient cohorts with different disease severities. Conclusion The AD‐HI is a is a valid, sensitive, and reliable marker of disease burden in AD This disease‐specific outcome measure is available for use by researchers, clinicians, patient organizations, and companies to measure changes in disease burden during therapeutic trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.077264</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S21), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 the Alzheimer's Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.077264$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.077264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varma, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabury, Jamison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engebrecht, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilek, Nuran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arky, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heatwole, Chad</creatorcontrib><title>Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background As therapeutic advancements are made in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), it is important to have a fully validated, sensitive, and reliable disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) to accurately measure changes in AD and MCI symptomatic disease burden. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has encouraged the use of PROs to measure therapeutic benefit of potential new treatments. This research describes the development, testing, and validation of a novel, multifactorial PRO: The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI). Methods We conducted interviews and a large cross‐sectional study involving individuals with AD and MCI and their caregivers to determine what symptoms and issues are most important to patients (Figure 1). Questions were selected for the AD‐HI based on their importance to patients with MCI and AD, potential to respond to therapeutic intervention, and generalizability to the broader MCI and AD patient population as determined through qualitative interviews and a cross‐sectional study. We beta tested the initial version of the AD‐HI with individuals with MCI and AD to determine its clarity, ease of use, and relevance to those with MCI and AD. We performed test‐retest reliability, known groups validity, internal consistency, and area under the curve analyses of the AD‐HI to assess the statistical characteristics, performance, and clinical meaningfulness of the outcome measure. Results The content of the AD‐HI was validated using a cross‐sectional study of 104 patients. The final version of the AD‐HI contains 9 subscales that measure disease burden in the following areas: 1) Memory, 2) Cognitive health, 3) Fatigue, 4) Sleep, 5) Social health, 6) Communication, 7) Emotional health, 8) Physical health, and 9) Pain. The AD‐HI was identified as easy to use, relevant to the patient population, responsive, and clear during beta testing. The ADCR‐HI was shown to be reliable during test‐retest reliability testing with 22 individuals and able to distinguish between patient cohorts with different disease severities. Conclusion The AD‐HI is a is a valid, sensitive, and reliable marker of disease burden in AD This disease‐specific outcome measure is available for use by researchers, clinicians, patient organizations, and companies to measure changes in disease burden during therapeutic trials.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UTtOAzEQXSGQCIGGE7gERILt_SV0UQIkUiQaaGhWs96xYuRdR7YDJFWOQMupuENOgqNEFBQ083tv3oz0ouic0S6jlN-AXnVpnvMsOYhaLE15J-V5__C3zuhxdOLcK6UJ7bG0FX2P8A21mdfYeGIkATIHr0KzWX9anBvrsSJm4YWpkdQIbmGRSGPJQK9mqGq0m_WXI5VyAcNb4mf4BxrtoKA3RtB-RiZNhR_kYjDajiaX1-GmXGi9JG-gVQXbg94YHQIpjXYeLRFaNUpAmFkVIjQVsRhkrZgR1UgLztuF8OG30-hIgnZ4ts_t6Pn-7mk47kwfHybDwbQjGIuTDlSY9SpBuSyBc5lJmpdlzNKY8p4EXvJUSAY8xirORAl9npR5mlBI4h5lMoO4HV3tdIU1zlmUxdyqGuyyYLTYWlEEK4qdFYHMduR3pXH5D7MYTF_2Oz9r-pVi</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Rosero, Spencer</creator><creator>Varma, Anika</creator><creator>Seabury, Jamison</creator><creator>Weinstein, Jennifer</creator><creator>Engebrecht, Charlotte</creator><creator>Dilek, Nuran</creator><creator>Arky, Abigail</creator><creator>Santos, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Heatwole, Chad</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure</title><author>Rosero, Spencer ; Varma, Anika ; Seabury, Jamison ; Weinstein, Jennifer ; Engebrecht, Charlotte ; Dilek, Nuran ; Arky, Abigail ; Santos, Elizabeth ; Heatwole, Chad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1134-ade68dc02fba22f6f07bb3153028fa2b25cf1a23ed36cba924b7540a43801f6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Spencer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varma, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seabury, Jamison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engebrecht, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dilek, Nuran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arky, Abigail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heatwole, Chad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rosero, Spencer</au><au>Varma, Anika</au><au>Seabury, Jamison</au><au>Weinstein, Jennifer</au><au>Engebrecht, Charlotte</au><au>Dilek, Nuran</au><au>Arky, Abigail</au><au>Santos, Elizabeth</au><au>Heatwole, Chad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>S21</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background As therapeutic advancements are made in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), it is important to have a fully validated, sensitive, and reliable disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PRO) to accurately measure changes in AD and MCI symptomatic disease burden. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has encouraged the use of PROs to measure therapeutic benefit of potential new treatments. This research describes the development, testing, and validation of a novel, multifactorial PRO: The Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI). Methods We conducted interviews and a large cross‐sectional study involving individuals with AD and MCI and their caregivers to determine what symptoms and issues are most important to patients (Figure 1). Questions were selected for the AD‐HI based on their importance to patients with MCI and AD, potential to respond to therapeutic intervention, and generalizability to the broader MCI and AD patient population as determined through qualitative interviews and a cross‐sectional study. We beta tested the initial version of the AD‐HI with individuals with MCI and AD to determine its clarity, ease of use, and relevance to those with MCI and AD. We performed test‐retest reliability, known groups validity, internal consistency, and area under the curve analyses of the AD‐HI to assess the statistical characteristics, performance, and clinical meaningfulness of the outcome measure. Results The content of the AD‐HI was validated using a cross‐sectional study of 104 patients. The final version of the AD‐HI contains 9 subscales that measure disease burden in the following areas: 1) Memory, 2) Cognitive health, 3) Fatigue, 4) Sleep, 5) Social health, 6) Communication, 7) Emotional health, 8) Physical health, and 9) Pain. The AD‐HI was identified as easy to use, relevant to the patient population, responsive, and clear during beta testing. The ADCR‐HI was shown to be reliable during test‐retest reliability testing with 22 individuals and able to distinguish between patient cohorts with different disease severities. Conclusion The AD‐HI is a is a valid, sensitive, and reliable marker of disease burden in AD This disease‐specific outcome measure is available for use by researchers, clinicians, patient organizations, and companies to measure changes in disease burden during therapeutic trials.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.077264</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S21), p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_077264
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
title Development of a patient‐reported outcome measure for Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease‐Health Index (AD‐HI), a fully validated tool to bolster clinical trial and research infrastructure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20a%20patient%E2%80%90reported%20outcome%20measure%20for%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20disease:%20the%20Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20Disease%E2%80%90Health%20Index%20(AD%E2%80%90HI),%20a%20fully%20validated%20tool%20to%20bolster%20clinical%20trial%20and%20research%20infrastructure&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Rosero,%20Spencer&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=S21&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.077264&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EALZ077264%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true