The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Background Memory impairment is a predominant symptom in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been proposed as a promising non‐pharmaceutical intervention to slow down the deterioration of cognitive functions. While previous studies have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2023-12, Vol.19 (S19), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Aaron TC, Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua, Ip, Tsz Fung, Yiu, Karen KL, Chan, Joyce YC, Goh, Wilson Wen Bin, Tsoi, Kelvin KF
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S19
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 19
creator Chan, Aaron TC
Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua
Ip, Tsz Fung
Yiu, Karen KL
Chan, Joyce YC
Goh, Wilson Wen Bin
Tsoi, Kelvin KF
description Background Memory impairment is a predominant symptom in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been proposed as a promising non‐pharmaceutical intervention to slow down the deterioration of cognitive functions. While previous studies have reported the benefits of CCT on global cognition, few have focused specifically on memory outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of CCT on memory outcomes in adults with MCI or dementia. Method A literature search was conducted via the PubMed, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases from inception to Sept 2022. Inclusion criteria included: (1) participants with MCI or dementia, (2) CCT as one of the interventions, (3) randomized trials with a non‐CCT comparison group, and (4) studies that reported changes in memory‐related neuropsychological scores before and after the intervention. The outcomes were measures of verbal memory, visual memory and working memory. With the heterogeneous definitions of CCT, the standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled using a random‐effects model. Result Thirty‐nine clinical trials with 2,010 participants with MCI or dementia were included. The mean age ranged from 44 to 83, and the percentage of males ranged from 21% to 73%. Participants with MCI that received CCT demonstrated significantly better performance in verbal memory (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.90), visual memory (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.84) and working memory (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.72) than the control groups. In the sub‐group analyses of different control groups, those MCI patients who received CCT demonstrated better verbal memory performance than the usual care and the active control groups, but comparable results as the paper‐and‐pencil cognitive training group. For the studies that include dementia participants, CCT effects were not significantly better than the control groups. Conclusion Computerized cognitive training conferred significant benefits in preserving memory function in people with MCI, while the benefits were not statistically significant in patients with dementia. This study also supports that computerized cognitive training can be enhanced by using mobile devices, gamification and immersive technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.071342
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_071342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ071342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1132-46405fafe73b814e7e64f975ca409ed398459663c16503473cb101b2127e61853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QReI6XYsZ2fZVQKVGoFgrJhE7nJc2uUOJXttkpXHIEzcDROQqoixIrVmyd9MyMNQpeUDCgh4bWsdgMSU8bDI9SjQoSBCOP0-FdH5BSdOfdGCCcJFT30OVsCHikFhXe4UXjY1Ku1B6t3UHbPwmivN4BnVmqjzQI3Bk-hbmyLH8GqxtbSFIC1wVm5rrqIrfZLPNXVX_O4XkltazAeNxbfwF5pOcAZfm6dh1p6XeAn2GjYYmnKrsDLr_cPaWTVOu3O0YmSlYOLn9tHL7ej2fA-mDzcjYfZJCgoZWHAI06EkgpiNk8ohxgirtJYFJKTFEqWJlykUcQKGgnCeMyKOSV0HtKwI2kiWB9dHXIL2zhnQeUrq2tp25ySfL9u3q2bH9btYHqAt7qC9h8yzyavP55vyTR-3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Chan, Aaron TC ; Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua ; Ip, Tsz Fung ; Yiu, Karen KL ; Chan, Joyce YC ; Goh, Wilson Wen Bin ; Tsoi, Kelvin KF</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Aaron TC ; Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua ; Ip, Tsz Fung ; Yiu, Karen KL ; Chan, Joyce YC ; Goh, Wilson Wen Bin ; Tsoi, Kelvin KF</creatorcontrib><description>Background Memory impairment is a predominant symptom in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been proposed as a promising non‐pharmaceutical intervention to slow down the deterioration of cognitive functions. While previous studies have reported the benefits of CCT on global cognition, few have focused specifically on memory outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of CCT on memory outcomes in adults with MCI or dementia. Method A literature search was conducted via the PubMed, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases from inception to Sept 2022. Inclusion criteria included: (1) participants with MCI or dementia, (2) CCT as one of the interventions, (3) randomized trials with a non‐CCT comparison group, and (4) studies that reported changes in memory‐related neuropsychological scores before and after the intervention. The outcomes were measures of verbal memory, visual memory and working memory. With the heterogeneous definitions of CCT, the standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled using a random‐effects model. Result Thirty‐nine clinical trials with 2,010 participants with MCI or dementia were included. The mean age ranged from 44 to 83, and the percentage of males ranged from 21% to 73%. Participants with MCI that received CCT demonstrated significantly better performance in verbal memory (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.90), visual memory (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.84) and working memory (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.72) than the control groups. In the sub‐group analyses of different control groups, those MCI patients who received CCT demonstrated better verbal memory performance than the usual care and the active control groups, but comparable results as the paper‐and‐pencil cognitive training group. For the studies that include dementia participants, CCT effects were not significantly better than the control groups. Conclusion Computerized cognitive training conferred significant benefits in preserving memory function in people with MCI, while the benefits were not statistically significant in patients with dementia. This study also supports that computerized cognitive training can be enhanced by using mobile devices, gamification and immersive technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.071342</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S19), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 the Alzheimer's Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.071342$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.071342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Aaron TC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Tsz Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Karen KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Joyce YC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Wilson Wen Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, Kelvin KF</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background Memory impairment is a predominant symptom in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been proposed as a promising non‐pharmaceutical intervention to slow down the deterioration of cognitive functions. While previous studies have reported the benefits of CCT on global cognition, few have focused specifically on memory outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of CCT on memory outcomes in adults with MCI or dementia. Method A literature search was conducted via the PubMed, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases from inception to Sept 2022. Inclusion criteria included: (1) participants with MCI or dementia, (2) CCT as one of the interventions, (3) randomized trials with a non‐CCT comparison group, and (4) studies that reported changes in memory‐related neuropsychological scores before and after the intervention. The outcomes were measures of verbal memory, visual memory and working memory. With the heterogeneous definitions of CCT, the standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled using a random‐effects model. Result Thirty‐nine clinical trials with 2,010 participants with MCI or dementia were included. The mean age ranged from 44 to 83, and the percentage of males ranged from 21% to 73%. Participants with MCI that received CCT demonstrated significantly better performance in verbal memory (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.90), visual memory (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.84) and working memory (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.72) than the control groups. In the sub‐group analyses of different control groups, those MCI patients who received CCT demonstrated better verbal memory performance than the usual care and the active control groups, but comparable results as the paper‐and‐pencil cognitive training group. For the studies that include dementia participants, CCT effects were not significantly better than the control groups. Conclusion Computerized cognitive training conferred significant benefits in preserving memory function in people with MCI, while the benefits were not statistically significant in patients with dementia. This study also supports that computerized cognitive training can be enhanced by using mobile devices, gamification and immersive technologies.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QReI6XYsZ2fZVQKVGoFgrJhE7nJc2uUOJXttkpXHIEzcDROQqoixIrVmyd9MyMNQpeUDCgh4bWsdgMSU8bDI9SjQoSBCOP0-FdH5BSdOfdGCCcJFT30OVsCHikFhXe4UXjY1Ku1B6t3UHbPwmivN4BnVmqjzQI3Bk-hbmyLH8GqxtbSFIC1wVm5rrqIrfZLPNXVX_O4XkltazAeNxbfwF5pOcAZfm6dh1p6XeAn2GjYYmnKrsDLr_cPaWTVOu3O0YmSlYOLn9tHL7ej2fA-mDzcjYfZJCgoZWHAI06EkgpiNk8ohxgirtJYFJKTFEqWJlykUcQKGgnCeMyKOSV0HtKwI2kiWB9dHXIL2zhnQeUrq2tp25ySfL9u3q2bH9btYHqAt7qC9h8yzyavP55vyTR-3w</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Chan, Aaron TC</creator><creator>Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua</creator><creator>Ip, Tsz Fung</creator><creator>Yiu, Karen KL</creator><creator>Chan, Joyce YC</creator><creator>Goh, Wilson Wen Bin</creator><creator>Tsoi, Kelvin KF</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</title><author>Chan, Aaron TC ; Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua ; Ip, Tsz Fung ; Yiu, Karen KL ; Chan, Joyce YC ; Goh, Wilson Wen Bin ; Tsoi, Kelvin KF</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1132-46405fafe73b814e7e64f975ca409ed398459663c16503473cb101b2127e61853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Aaron TC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Tsz Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Karen KL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Joyce YC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goh, Wilson Wen Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsoi, Kelvin KF</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Aaron TC</au><au>Tran, Yeuk Shun Joshua</au><au>Ip, Tsz Fung</au><au>Yiu, Karen KL</au><au>Chan, Joyce YC</au><au>Goh, Wilson Wen Bin</au><au>Tsoi, Kelvin KF</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>S19</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background Memory impairment is a predominant symptom in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been proposed as a promising non‐pharmaceutical intervention to slow down the deterioration of cognitive functions. While previous studies have reported the benefits of CCT on global cognition, few have focused specifically on memory outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of CCT on memory outcomes in adults with MCI or dementia. Method A literature search was conducted via the PubMed, Medline, Embase and PsycINFO databases from inception to Sept 2022. Inclusion criteria included: (1) participants with MCI or dementia, (2) CCT as one of the interventions, (3) randomized trials with a non‐CCT comparison group, and (4) studies that reported changes in memory‐related neuropsychological scores before and after the intervention. The outcomes were measures of verbal memory, visual memory and working memory. With the heterogeneous definitions of CCT, the standardized mean differences (SMD) were pooled using a random‐effects model. Result Thirty‐nine clinical trials with 2,010 participants with MCI or dementia were included. The mean age ranged from 44 to 83, and the percentage of males ranged from 21% to 73%. Participants with MCI that received CCT demonstrated significantly better performance in verbal memory (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.90), visual memory (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.84) and working memory (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.72) than the control groups. In the sub‐group analyses of different control groups, those MCI patients who received CCT demonstrated better verbal memory performance than the usual care and the active control groups, but comparable results as the paper‐and‐pencil cognitive training group. For the studies that include dementia participants, CCT effects were not significantly better than the control groups. Conclusion Computerized cognitive training conferred significant benefits in preserving memory function in people with MCI, while the benefits were not statistically significant in patients with dementia. This study also supports that computerized cognitive training can be enhanced by using mobile devices, gamification and immersive technologies.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.071342</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2023-12, Vol.19 (S19), p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_071342
source Wiley Journals
title The Effects of Computerized Cognitive Training on Memory Performance in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A57%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Computerized%20Cognitive%20Training%20on%20Memory%20Performance%20in%20Adults%20with%20Mild%20Cognitive%20Impairment%20or%20Dementia.%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Chan,%20Aaron%20TC&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=S19&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.071342&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EALZ071342%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true