Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm

Background Analyzing brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images to access the occurrence of β‐Amyloid (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer’s patients requires a lot of time and effort from physicians and also the variation of each interpreter may differ. For this reason, a machine learning mode...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alzheimer's & dementia 2022-12, Vol.18 (S7), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Simfukwe, Chanda, Youn, Young Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue S7
container_start_page
container_title Alzheimer's & dementia
container_volume 18
creator Simfukwe, Chanda
Youn, Young Chul
description Background Analyzing brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images to access the occurrence of β‐Amyloid (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer’s patients requires a lot of time and effort from physicians and also the variation of each interpreter may differ. For this reason, a machine learning model was developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) as an objective decision to predict the Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative status from brain amyloid PET images. Method A total of 154 cognitively impaired subjects were used in this study. The 18F‐florbetaben (18F‐FBB) PET was administered on all participants and the criteria for differentiating Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative state was based on brain amyloid plaque load score (BAPL) that depended on the visual assessment of PET images by the physicians. We applied the CNN algorithm trained in batches of 52 augmented 18F‐FBB PET images per subject from two classes: Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative states that were determined based on the BAPL scores. Result The binary prediction of the model average performance matrices was evaluated after 40 epochs of 5 trial‐based on test datasets. The model accuracy for predicting Aβ‐positivity and Aβ‐negativity was 82.00±0.03 in the test dataset. The sensitivity and specificity were 97.00±0.02 and 97.00±0.02 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.00±0.03. Conclusion Based on this study, the designed CNN model has the potential to be used clinically for screening amyloid PET images.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/alz.062023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_062023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ALZ062023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1133-ab1f86ce6e330c6484070408324d8aab9d2bd4e056c41b56f8506eb5006a05d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUh4MoOKc3PkGuhc6TpMm6yzqmDioO3LzwJqRJ2kX6R5KC1MfyQXwmVzq89OocDt_58eND6JrAjADQW1V9zUBQoOwETQjnNOJ0vjj92wWco4sQ3gFiSAifoNeNt8bpzrUNbguc_nzjl051Fhe-rfGdV67Bad1XrTN4s9rida1KG_AuuKbET0rvXWNxZpVvhkNala133b6-RGeFqoK9Os4p2t2vtsvHKHt-WC_TLNKEMBapnBSJ0FZYxkCLOIlhPjRjNDaJUvnC0NzEFrjQMcm5KBIOwuYcQCjgRrApuhlztW9D8LaQH97VyveSgByMyIMRORo5wGSEP11l-39ImWZvx59fF7JiWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Simfukwe, Chanda ; Youn, Young Chul</creator><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda ; Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><description>Background Analyzing brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images to access the occurrence of β‐Amyloid (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer’s patients requires a lot of time and effort from physicians and also the variation of each interpreter may differ. For this reason, a machine learning model was developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) as an objective decision to predict the Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative status from brain amyloid PET images. Method A total of 154 cognitively impaired subjects were used in this study. The 18F‐florbetaben (18F‐FBB) PET was administered on all participants and the criteria for differentiating Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative state was based on brain amyloid plaque load score (BAPL) that depended on the visual assessment of PET images by the physicians. We applied the CNN algorithm trained in batches of 52 augmented 18F‐FBB PET images per subject from two classes: Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative states that were determined based on the BAPL scores. Result The binary prediction of the model average performance matrices was evaluated after 40 epochs of 5 trial‐based on test datasets. The model accuracy for predicting Aβ‐positivity and Aβ‐negativity was 82.00±0.03 in the test dataset. The sensitivity and specificity were 97.00±0.02 and 97.00±0.02 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.00±0.03. Conclusion Based on this study, the designed CNN model has the potential to be used clinically for screening amyloid PET images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5279</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/alz.062023</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia, 2022-12, Vol.18 (S7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 the Alzheimer's Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Falz.062023$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Falz.062023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm</title><title>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</title><description>Background Analyzing brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images to access the occurrence of β‐Amyloid (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer’s patients requires a lot of time and effort from physicians and also the variation of each interpreter may differ. For this reason, a machine learning model was developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) as an objective decision to predict the Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative status from brain amyloid PET images. Method A total of 154 cognitively impaired subjects were used in this study. The 18F‐florbetaben (18F‐FBB) PET was administered on all participants and the criteria for differentiating Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative state was based on brain amyloid plaque load score (BAPL) that depended on the visual assessment of PET images by the physicians. We applied the CNN algorithm trained in batches of 52 augmented 18F‐FBB PET images per subject from two classes: Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative states that were determined based on the BAPL scores. Result The binary prediction of the model average performance matrices was evaluated after 40 epochs of 5 trial‐based on test datasets. The model accuracy for predicting Aβ‐positivity and Aβ‐negativity was 82.00±0.03 in the test dataset. The sensitivity and specificity were 97.00±0.02 and 97.00±0.02 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.00±0.03. Conclusion Based on this study, the designed CNN model has the potential to be used clinically for screening amyloid PET images.</description><issn>1552-5260</issn><issn>1552-5279</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9KwzAUh4MoOKc3PkGuhc6TpMm6yzqmDioO3LzwJqRJ2kX6R5KC1MfyQXwmVzq89OocDt_58eND6JrAjADQW1V9zUBQoOwETQjnNOJ0vjj92wWco4sQ3gFiSAifoNeNt8bpzrUNbguc_nzjl051Fhe-rfGdV67Bad1XrTN4s9rida1KG_AuuKbET0rvXWNxZpVvhkNala133b6-RGeFqoK9Os4p2t2vtsvHKHt-WC_TLNKEMBapnBSJ0FZYxkCLOIlhPjRjNDaJUvnC0NzEFrjQMcm5KBIOwuYcQCjgRrApuhlztW9D8LaQH97VyveSgByMyIMRORo5wGSEP11l-39ImWZvx59fF7JiWg</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Simfukwe, Chanda</creator><creator>Youn, Young Chul</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm</title><author>Simfukwe, Chanda ; Youn, Young Chul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1133-ab1f86ce6e330c6484070408324d8aab9d2bd4e056c41b56f8506eb5006a05d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simfukwe, Chanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Young Chul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simfukwe, Chanda</au><au>Youn, Young Chul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's &amp; dementia</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>S7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1552-5260</issn><eissn>1552-5279</eissn><abstract>Background Analyzing brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) images to access the occurrence of β‐Amyloid (Aβ) deposition in Alzheimer’s patients requires a lot of time and effort from physicians and also the variation of each interpreter may differ. For this reason, a machine learning model was developed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) as an objective decision to predict the Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative status from brain amyloid PET images. Method A total of 154 cognitively impaired subjects were used in this study. The 18F‐florbetaben (18F‐FBB) PET was administered on all participants and the criteria for differentiating Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative state was based on brain amyloid plaque load score (BAPL) that depended on the visual assessment of PET images by the physicians. We applied the CNN algorithm trained in batches of 52 augmented 18F‐FBB PET images per subject from two classes: Aβ‐positive and Aβ‐negative states that were determined based on the BAPL scores. Result The binary prediction of the model average performance matrices was evaluated after 40 epochs of 5 trial‐based on test datasets. The model accuracy for predicting Aβ‐positivity and Aβ‐negativity was 82.00±0.03 in the test dataset. The sensitivity and specificity were 97.00±0.02 and 97.00±0.02 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 90.00±0.03. Conclusion Based on this study, the designed CNN model has the potential to be used clinically for screening amyloid PET images.</abstract><doi>10.1002/alz.062023</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-5260
ispartof Alzheimer's & dementia, 2022-12, Vol.18 (S7), p.n/a
issn 1552-5260
1552-5279
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_alz_062023
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
title Prediction of Aβ State from Brain Amyloid PET Images Using Machine Learning Algorithm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A32%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20A%CE%B2%20State%20from%20Brain%20Amyloid%20PET%20Images%20Using%20Machine%20Learning%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia&rft.au=Simfukwe,%20Chanda&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=S7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1552-5260&rft.eissn=1552-5279&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/alz.062023&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EALZ062023%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true