The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of social issues 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312
Hauptverfasser: Ambrey, Christopher L., Fleming, Christopher M., Manning, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 312
container_issue 4
container_start_page 298
container_title The Australian journal of social issues
container_volume 52
creator Ambrey, Christopher L.
Fleming, Christopher M.
Manning, Matthew
description The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajs4.21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ajs4_21</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.326367882594094</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2131574630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwpeeCHd8tW0uZxDnWPgxaa3IU0Tl9ktM2mR_XvbVUGEIV4dOOc5z-G8AFwiOEAQ4qFcBTrA6Aj0UEZ4TFmSHIMeREkaM4LRKTgLYQUhzBAnPTBcLHUUnLKyjJQLVeRMVDWt21Kqt2guq9oXchfldVga63U4BydGlkFffNU-eL6_W4wn8ezp4XE8msUqwSmKlTKq4HmCaMEzkrAcFjw1Jk2xMblBKSZ5lhuVaqUx4XmRMIaIZFQWRmrKCemDq8679e691qESK1f7TXNSYESaZygjsKGuO0p5F4LXRmy9XUu_EwiKNg3RptFu9MFNR37YUu8OYWI0ndM9_dLRfm0roVxZalVZtwkrWQURtPRqKezGuP3c-VdROCtkHlohIYgJq0u5lYJgRliaZTjhFHLaiCc_xA1hqoO6P1XT_6u-B79ln_P0rsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131574630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Benefits ; Climate change ; Climatic changes ; Cost benefit analysis ; Costs ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Evaluation ; Expenditures ; Forest &amp; brush fires ; Income ; Life satisfaction ; Mental health ; Methodology ; Natural disasters ; non‐market valuation ; Preferences ; Risk ; Social policy ; social welfare ; Studies ; Trauma ; Valuation ; Victoria ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312</ispartof><rights>2017 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajs4.21$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajs4.21$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27342,27922,27923,33772,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><description>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</description><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Forest &amp; brush fires</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Life satisfaction</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Natural disasters</subject><subject>non‐market valuation</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>social welfare</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwpeeCHd8tW0uZxDnWPgxaa3IU0Tl9ktM2mR_XvbVUGEIV4dOOc5z-G8AFwiOEAQ4qFcBTrA6Aj0UEZ4TFmSHIMeREkaM4LRKTgLYQUhzBAnPTBcLHUUnLKyjJQLVeRMVDWt21Kqt2guq9oXchfldVga63U4BydGlkFffNU-eL6_W4wn8ezp4XE8msUqwSmKlTKq4HmCaMEzkrAcFjw1Jk2xMblBKSZ5lhuVaqUx4XmRMIaIZFQWRmrKCemDq8679e691qESK1f7TXNSYESaZygjsKGuO0p5F4LXRmy9XUu_EwiKNg3RptFu9MFNR37YUu8OYWI0ndM9_dLRfm0roVxZalVZtwkrWQURtPRqKezGuP3c-VdROCtkHlohIYgJq0u5lYJgRliaZTjhFHLaiCc_xA1hqoO6P1XT_6u-B79ln_P0rsc</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Fleming, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Manning, Matthew</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><author>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Forest &amp; brush fires</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Life satisfaction</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Natural disasters</topic><topic>non‐market valuation</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>social welfare</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian &amp; European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ambrey, Christopher L.</au><au>Fleming, Christopher M.</au><au>Manning, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>298-312</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><abstract>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ajs4.21</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0157-6321
ispartof The Australian journal of social issues, 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312
issn 0157-6321
1839-4655
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ajs4_21
source Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Benefits
Climate change
Climatic changes
Cost benefit analysis
Costs
Economics
Efficiency
Evaluation
Expenditures
Forest & brush fires
Income
Life satisfaction
Mental health
Methodology
Natural disasters
non‐market valuation
Preferences
Risk
Social policy
social welfare
Studies
Trauma
Valuation
Victoria
Willingness to pay
title The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20cost%20of%20the%20Black%20Saturday%20bushfires&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Ambrey,%20Christopher%20L.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=298-312&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajs4.21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131574630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131574630&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.326367882594094&rfr_iscdi=true