The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of social issues 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 312 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 298 |
container_title | The Australian journal of social issues |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Ambrey, Christopher L. Fleming, Christopher M. Manning, Matthew |
description | The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajs4.21 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ajs4_21</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.326367882594094</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2131574630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwpeeCHd8tW0uZxDnWPgxaa3IU0Tl9ktM2mR_XvbVUGEIV4dOOc5z-G8AFwiOEAQ4qFcBTrA6Aj0UEZ4TFmSHIMeREkaM4LRKTgLYQUhzBAnPTBcLHUUnLKyjJQLVeRMVDWt21Kqt2guq9oXchfldVga63U4BydGlkFffNU-eL6_W4wn8ezp4XE8msUqwSmKlTKq4HmCaMEzkrAcFjw1Jk2xMblBKSZ5lhuVaqUx4XmRMIaIZFQWRmrKCemDq8679e691qESK1f7TXNSYESaZygjsKGuO0p5F4LXRmy9XUu_EwiKNg3RptFu9MFNR37YUu8OYWI0ndM9_dLRfm0roVxZalVZtwkrWQURtPRqKezGuP3c-VdROCtkHlohIYgJq0u5lYJgRliaZTjhFHLaiCc_xA1hqoO6P1XT_6u-B79ln_P0rsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131574630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-6321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1839-4655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sydney: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Benefits ; Climate change ; Climatic changes ; Cost benefit analysis ; Costs ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Evaluation ; Expenditures ; Forest & brush fires ; Income ; Life satisfaction ; Mental health ; Methodology ; Natural disasters ; non‐market valuation ; Preferences ; Risk ; Social policy ; social welfare ; Studies ; Trauma ; Valuation ; Victoria ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of social issues, 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312</ispartof><rights>2017 Australian Social Policy Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajs4.21$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajs4.21$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27342,27922,27923,33772,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><title>The Australian journal of social issues</title><description>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</description><subject>Benefits</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Forest & brush fires</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Life satisfaction</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Natural disasters</subject><subject>non‐market valuation</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>social welfare</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0157-6321</issn><issn>1839-4655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf4FwpeeCHd8tW0uZxDnWPgxaa3IU0Tl9ktM2mR_XvbVUGEIV4dOOc5z-G8AFwiOEAQ4qFcBTrA6Aj0UEZ4TFmSHIMeREkaM4LRKTgLYQUhzBAnPTBcLHUUnLKyjJQLVeRMVDWt21Kqt2guq9oXchfldVga63U4BydGlkFffNU-eL6_W4wn8ezp4XE8msUqwSmKlTKq4HmCaMEzkrAcFjw1Jk2xMblBKSZ5lhuVaqUx4XmRMIaIZFQWRmrKCemDq8679e691qESK1f7TXNSYESaZygjsKGuO0p5F4LXRmy9XUu_EwiKNg3RptFu9MFNR37YUu8OYWI0ndM9_dLRfm0roVxZalVZtwkrWQURtPRqKezGuP3c-VdROCtkHlohIYgJq0u5lYJgRliaZTjhFHLaiCc_xA1hqoO6P1XT_6u-B79ln_P0rsc</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Fleming, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Manning, Matthew</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</title><author>Ambrey, Christopher L. ; Fleming, Christopher M. ; Manning, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5271-ccfcd9b514d98356b0d97ff772ffbf1723b8bfc7ece239bd56613a64adfae4933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Benefits</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Forest & brush fires</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Life satisfaction</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Natural disasters</topic><topic>non‐market valuation</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>social welfare</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ambrey, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ambrey, Christopher L.</au><au>Fleming, Christopher M.</au><au>Manning, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of social issues</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>312</epage><pages>298-312</pages><issn>0157-6321</issn><eissn>1839-4655</eissn><abstract>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have predicted with high confidence that the risk of bushfires will increase in the future. As this risk increases, so too does the need for appropriate policy responses. In developing these responses, costs need to be weighed against benefits. To fully appreciate the benefits of bushfire risk mitigation policies and strengthen the development of social policies around such events, it is necessary to include the psychological cost of experiencing these events. In this study, we employ the 'life satisfaction approach' to place a monetary estimate on the cost of Australia's Black Saturday bushfires (Australia's worst bushfires on record). Results reveal that the bushfires significantly reduce self-reported levels of life satisfaction, with an implied willingness-to-pay of AUD 2,991 in terms of annual household income, or AUD 1,039 per capita, to reduce by one percent the extent to which an individual's immediate local area was affected by the Black Saturday bushfires. In doing so, we identify an apparent gap between current levels of expenditure on bushfire response and mitigation, and that amount which (with the inclusion of associated social benefits) would be welfare maximising.</abstract><cop>Sydney</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ajs4.21</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0157-6321 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of social issues, 2017-12, Vol.52 (4), p.298-312 |
issn | 0157-6321 1839-4655 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ajs4_21 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Benefits Climate change Climatic changes Cost benefit analysis Costs Economics Efficiency Evaluation Expenditures Forest & brush fires Income Life satisfaction Mental health Methodology Natural disasters non‐market valuation Preferences Risk Social policy social welfare Studies Trauma Valuation Victoria Willingness to pay |
title | The social cost of the Black Saturday bushfires |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20social%20cost%20of%20the%20Black%20Saturday%20bushfires&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20social%20issues&rft.au=Ambrey,%20Christopher%20L.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=312&rft.pages=298-312&rft.issn=0157-6321&rft.eissn=1839-4655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajs4.21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131574630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131574630&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.326367882594094&rfr_iscdi=true |