Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage

Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in Digestive Medicine 2024-03, Vol.11 (1), p.33-40
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Chi‐Chih, Su, Chang‐Cheng, Huang, Yen‐Pin, Huang, Wen‐Hsin, Tsai, Tsung‐Yu, Sung, Wen‐Wei, Yang, Tzu‐Wei, Lin, Jaw‐Town, Lin, Chun‐Che, Yen, Hsu‐Heng, Tsai, Ming‐Chang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 33
container_title Advances in Digestive Medicine
container_volume 11
creator Wang, Chi‐Chih
Su, Chang‐Cheng
Huang, Yen‐Pin
Huang, Wen‐Hsin
Tsai, Tsung‐Yu
Sung, Wen‐Wei
Yang, Tzu‐Wei
Lin, Jaw‐Town
Lin, Chun‐Che
Yen, Hsu‐Heng
Tsai, Ming‐Chang
description Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait‐and‐see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow‐up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event‐related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE‐free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE‐related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE‐free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250‐0.941, P = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE‐free survival in high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aid2.13358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aid2_13358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AID213358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1988-72806bc6bd4b22e4a9a0f8af5e9abb02751402d13ac6443cb026503d094ad0b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEhV0wwm8RkoZOz9NllX5q1SJBbCOxvakNbhNsZOi7DgCXJGTkFIkWLGaN0_fG2keY2cCRgJAXqA1ciTiOM0P2EDGqYiKHODwjz5mwxCeAEBkWZKn4wH7uG9VoJeW1g3Xy9qR7kJDuqlXHberja-3xD3p1vsdoayz6DtO2377fHuvPBEPrd_aLTpu13xpF8ve9zY8c9RtQ79HbWMD32Bj-2jgWDXk-QKdUw6N6bXxaNe4oFN2VKELNPyZJ-zx-uphehvN725m08k80qLI82gsc8iUzpRJlJSUYIFQ5VilVKBSIMepSEAaEaPOkiTWvZWlEBsoEjSgRHzCzvd3ta9D8FSVG29X_XelgHLXZ7nrs_zus4fFHn61jrp_yHIyu5T7zBdhPX4J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Wang, Chi‐Chih ; Su, Chang‐Cheng ; Huang, Yen‐Pin ; Huang, Wen‐Hsin ; Tsai, Tsung‐Yu ; Sung, Wen‐Wei ; Yang, Tzu‐Wei ; Lin, Jaw‐Town ; Lin, Chun‐Che ; Yen, Hsu‐Heng ; Tsai, Ming‐Chang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chi‐Chih ; Su, Chang‐Cheng ; Huang, Yen‐Pin ; Huang, Wen‐Hsin ; Tsai, Tsung‐Yu ; Sung, Wen‐Wei ; Yang, Tzu‐Wei ; Lin, Jaw‐Town ; Lin, Chun‐Che ; Yen, Hsu‐Heng ; Tsai, Ming‐Chang</creatorcontrib><description>Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait‐and‐see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow‐up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event‐related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE‐free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE‐related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE‐free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250‐0.941, P = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE‐free survival in high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2351-9800</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2351-9797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2351-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aid2.13358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</publisher><subject>cholecystectomy ; clinical management ; percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage ; recurrent biliary event ; subsequent cholecystectomy</subject><ispartof>Advances in Digestive Medicine, 2024-03, Vol.11 (1), p.33-40</ispartof><rights>2022 The Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan, The Digestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan and Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1988-72806bc6bd4b22e4a9a0f8af5e9abb02751402d13ac6443cb026503d094ad0b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8222-0503 ; 0000-0002-7211-4192 ; 0000-0002-3387-3516 ; 0000-0002-1522-8177 ; 0000-0001-6857-4383 ; 0000-0002-3494-2245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faid2.13358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faid2.13358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1430,27911,27912,46396,46820</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chi‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Chang‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yen‐Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Tsung‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Wen‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tzu‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jaw‐Town</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun‐Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Hsu‐Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ming‐Chang</creatorcontrib><title>Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage</title><title>Advances in Digestive Medicine</title><description>Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait‐and‐see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow‐up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event‐related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE‐free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE‐related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE‐free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250‐0.941, P = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE‐free survival in high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.</description><subject>cholecystectomy</subject><subject>clinical management</subject><subject>percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage</subject><subject>recurrent biliary event</subject><subject>subsequent cholecystectomy</subject><issn>2351-9800</issn><issn>2351-9797</issn><issn>2351-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEhV0wwm8RkoZOz9NllX5q1SJBbCOxvakNbhNsZOi7DgCXJGTkFIkWLGaN0_fG2keY2cCRgJAXqA1ciTiOM0P2EDGqYiKHODwjz5mwxCeAEBkWZKn4wH7uG9VoJeW1g3Xy9qR7kJDuqlXHberja-3xD3p1vsdoayz6DtO2377fHuvPBEPrd_aLTpu13xpF8ve9zY8c9RtQ79HbWMD32Bj-2jgWDXk-QKdUw6N6bXxaNe4oFN2VKELNPyZJ-zx-uphehvN725m08k80qLI82gsc8iUzpRJlJSUYIFQ5VilVKBSIMepSEAaEaPOkiTWvZWlEBsoEjSgRHzCzvd3ta9D8FSVG29X_XelgHLXZ7nrs_zus4fFHn61jrp_yHIyu5T7zBdhPX4J</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Wang, Chi‐Chih</creator><creator>Su, Chang‐Cheng</creator><creator>Huang, Yen‐Pin</creator><creator>Huang, Wen‐Hsin</creator><creator>Tsai, Tsung‐Yu</creator><creator>Sung, Wen‐Wei</creator><creator>Yang, Tzu‐Wei</creator><creator>Lin, Jaw‐Town</creator><creator>Lin, Chun‐Che</creator><creator>Yen, Hsu‐Heng</creator><creator>Tsai, Ming‐Chang</creator><general>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-3516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-4383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-2245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage</title><author>Wang, Chi‐Chih ; Su, Chang‐Cheng ; Huang, Yen‐Pin ; Huang, Wen‐Hsin ; Tsai, Tsung‐Yu ; Sung, Wen‐Wei ; Yang, Tzu‐Wei ; Lin, Jaw‐Town ; Lin, Chun‐Che ; Yen, Hsu‐Heng ; Tsai, Ming‐Chang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1988-72806bc6bd4b22e4a9a0f8af5e9abb02751402d13ac6443cb026503d094ad0b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cholecystectomy</topic><topic>clinical management</topic><topic>percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage</topic><topic>recurrent biliary event</topic><topic>subsequent cholecystectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chi‐Chih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Chang‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yen‐Pin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Wen‐Hsin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Tsung‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Wen‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Tzu‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Jaw‐Town</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun‐Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yen, Hsu‐Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Ming‐Chang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Advances in Digestive Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chi‐Chih</au><au>Su, Chang‐Cheng</au><au>Huang, Yen‐Pin</au><au>Huang, Wen‐Hsin</au><au>Tsai, Tsung‐Yu</au><au>Sung, Wen‐Wei</au><au>Yang, Tzu‐Wei</au><au>Lin, Jaw‐Town</au><au>Lin, Chun‐Che</au><au>Yen, Hsu‐Heng</au><au>Tsai, Ming‐Chang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage</atitle><jtitle>Advances in Digestive Medicine</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>33-40</pages><issn>2351-9800</issn><issn>2351-9797</issn><eissn>2351-9800</eissn><abstract>Cholelithiasis is a disease with increasing prevalence over the decades. Gallbladder drainage (GBD) is an alternative choice in critically ill patients who cannot tolerate early surgery for acute cholecystitis. In previous data, early or delayed cholecystectomy (CCY) leads to less recurrent biliary events (RBEs) comparing to using a wait‐and‐see strategy. We wondered if a subsequent CCY strategy after GBD can benefit patients with high surgical risk. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome after percutaneous transhepatic GBD and risk factors for RBEs. We studied 180 adult acute cholecystitis patients who received percutaneous transhepatic GBD during index admission between July 2017 and December 2018 in Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Changhua Christian Hospital after exclusion of patients died during the index admission or lost follow‐up within 30 days. We further divided these patients into those who received subsequent CCY within 2 months and those who received no CCY within 2 months. RBEs, mortality, and biliary event‐related mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the most important factors of RBE‐free survival. There were 8 cases (13.6%) in the subsequent CCY group that experienced recurrent biliary events, whereas 39 cases (32.2%) experienced recurrent biliary events in the no CCY within 2 months group. The proportion and average recurrent biliary events per person were all significantly lower in the subsequent CCY group. Although the overall mortality rate was higher in the group that had no CCY within 2 months (16.5% vs 5.1%), the RBE‐related mortality difference was insignificant. The most decisive factor to determine RBE‐free survival is whether there was a subsequent CCY or not (HR: 0.485, 95% CI: 0.250‐0.941, P = .032). We found that subsequent CCY can decrease further RBEs and improve RBE‐free survival in high‐risk patients with acute cholecystitis that accepted percutaneous transhepatic GBD initially.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/aid2.13358</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8222-0503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7211-4192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3387-3516</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-4383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-2245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2351-9800
ispartof Advances in Digestive Medicine, 2024-03, Vol.11 (1), p.33-40
issn 2351-9800
2351-9797
2351-9800
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aid2_13358
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects cholecystectomy
clinical management
percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage
recurrent biliary event
subsequent cholecystectomy
title Subsequent cholecystectomy improve recurrent biliary event‐free survival in high‐risk acute cholecystitis patients after gallbladder drainage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subsequent%20cholecystectomy%20improve%20recurrent%20biliary%20event%E2%80%90free%20survival%20in%20high%E2%80%90risk%20acute%20cholecystitis%20patients%20after%20gallbladder%20drainage&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20Digestive%20Medicine&rft.au=Wang,%20Chi%E2%80%90Chih&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=33-40&rft.issn=2351-9800&rft.eissn=2351-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aid2.13358&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAID213358%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true