Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal
There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been sho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIChE Journal 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 277 |
container_title | AIChE Journal |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Zhou, S. Garbett, E. S. Boucher, R. F. |
description | There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/aic.690420126 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_690420126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AIC690420126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7yt43ZpNskn3KNV-QFEEpeAlpLOTGt3ulmSr1r_elJbiydMww-_NvHmEXGa0l1HKboyDniyoYDRj8oh0slyoNC9ofkw6lNIsjYPslJyF8B47pvqsQ_p3fpOE9Qo9NHW5htbVi2RpFjW2DhKo0NTbSWOT1br6RO9-sEygMdU5ObGmCnixr13yMrx_HozT6eNoMridpiCii3TOrJxzMZ9DUSihJOWMm9wUZcnB2kKiBV4gQ24lylKVfakUShBYGi4LYXmXXO32NqF1OoBrEd6i1xqh1fFTIWhk0h0DvgnBo9Ur75bGb3RG9TYaHaPRh2gif73jVyaAqaw3NbhwELGYDaP9iKkd9uUq3Py_U99OBn8P7A250OL3QWn8h5aKq1zPHkY6n42eXsdDpjn_BdRUguE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><description>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420126</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AICEAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT ; 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS ; Applied sciences ; ASHES ; CALORIFIC VALUE ; COAL ; Coal and derived products ; COAL PREPARATION ; DEASHING ; DESULFURIZATION ; EFFICIENCY ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS ; Fuels ; MAGNETIC SEPARATORS ; Mechanical preparation ; PERFORMANCE TESTING ; Processing ; PULVERIZED FUELS ; PYRITE ; REMOVAL ; SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</subject><ispartof>AIChE Journal, 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faic.690420126$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faic.690420126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2127208$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/201440$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><title>AIChE Journal</title><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><description>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</description><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</subject><subject>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>ASHES</subject><subject>CALORIFIC VALUE</subject><subject>COAL</subject><subject>Coal and derived products</subject><subject>COAL PREPARATION</subject><subject>DEASHING</subject><subject>DESULFURIZATION</subject><subject>EFFICIENCY</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>MAGNETIC SEPARATORS</subject><subject>Mechanical preparation</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE TESTING</subject><subject>Processing</subject><subject>PULVERIZED FUELS</subject><subject>PYRITE</subject><subject>REMOVAL</subject><subject>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</subject><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7yt43ZpNskn3KNV-QFEEpeAlpLOTGt3ulmSr1r_elJbiydMww-_NvHmEXGa0l1HKboyDniyoYDRj8oh0slyoNC9ofkw6lNIsjYPslJyF8B47pvqsQ_p3fpOE9Qo9NHW5htbVi2RpFjW2DhKo0NTbSWOT1br6RO9-sEygMdU5ObGmCnixr13yMrx_HozT6eNoMridpiCii3TOrJxzMZ9DUSihJOWMm9wUZcnB2kKiBV4gQ24lylKVfakUShBYGi4LYXmXXO32NqF1OoBrEd6i1xqh1fFTIWhk0h0DvgnBo9Ur75bGb3RG9TYaHaPRh2gif73jVyaAqaw3NbhwELGYDaP9iKkd9uUq3Py_U99OBn8P7A250OL3QWn8h5aKq1zPHkY6n42eXsdDpjn_BdRUguE</recordid><startdate>199601</startdate><enddate>199601</enddate><creator>Zhou, S.</creator><creator>Garbett, E. S.</creator><creator>Boucher, R. F.</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199601</creationdate><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><author>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</topic><topic>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>ASHES</topic><topic>CALORIFIC VALUE</topic><topic>COAL</topic><topic>Coal and derived products</topic><topic>COAL PREPARATION</topic><topic>DEASHING</topic><topic>DESULFURIZATION</topic><topic>EFFICIENCY</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>MAGNETIC SEPARATORS</topic><topic>Mechanical preparation</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE TESTING</topic><topic>Processing</topic><topic>PULVERIZED FUELS</topic><topic>PYRITE</topic><topic>REMOVAL</topic><topic>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>AIChE Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, S.</au><au>Garbett, E. S.</au><au>Boucher, R. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</atitle><jtitle>AIChE Journal</jtitle><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><date>1996-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>277-284</pages><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><coden>AICEAC</coden><abstract>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.690420126</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1541 |
ispartof | AIChE Journal, 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284 |
issn | 0001-1541 1547-5905 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_690420126 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS Applied sciences ASHES CALORIFIC VALUE COAL Coal and derived products COAL PREPARATION DEASHING DESULFURIZATION EFFICIENCY Energy Exact sciences and technology FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS Fuels MAGNETIC SEPARATORS Mechanical preparation PERFORMANCE TESTING Processing PULVERIZED FUELS PYRITE REMOVAL SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS |
title | Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20superconducting%20magnetic%20cleaning%20of%20pulverized%20coal&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20Journal&rft.au=Zhou,%20S.&rft.date=1996-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=277-284&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft.coden=AICEAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.690420126&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_osti_%3EAIC690420126%3C/wiley_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |