Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal

There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been sho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIChE Journal 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, S., Garbett, E. S., Boucher, R. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 1
container_start_page 277
container_title AIChE Journal
container_volume 42
creator Zhou, S.
Garbett, E. S.
Boucher, R. F.
description There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aic.690420126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_690420126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AIC690420126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7yt43ZpNskn3KNV-QFEEpeAlpLOTGt3ulmSr1r_elJbiydMww-_NvHmEXGa0l1HKboyDniyoYDRj8oh0slyoNC9ofkw6lNIsjYPslJyF8B47pvqsQ_p3fpOE9Qo9NHW5htbVi2RpFjW2DhKo0NTbSWOT1br6RO9-sEygMdU5ObGmCnixr13yMrx_HozT6eNoMridpiCii3TOrJxzMZ9DUSihJOWMm9wUZcnB2kKiBV4gQ24lylKVfakUShBYGi4LYXmXXO32NqF1OoBrEd6i1xqh1fFTIWhk0h0DvgnBo9Ur75bGb3RG9TYaHaPRh2gif73jVyaAqaw3NbhwELGYDaP9iKkd9uUq3Py_U99OBn8P7A250OL3QWn8h5aKq1zPHkY6n42eXsdDpjn_BdRUguE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><description>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420126</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AICEAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers</publisher><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT ; 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS ; Applied sciences ; ASHES ; CALORIFIC VALUE ; COAL ; Coal and derived products ; COAL PREPARATION ; DEASHING ; DESULFURIZATION ; EFFICIENCY ; Energy ; Exact sciences and technology ; FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS ; Fuels ; MAGNETIC SEPARATORS ; Mechanical preparation ; PERFORMANCE TESTING ; Processing ; PULVERIZED FUELS ; PYRITE ; REMOVAL ; SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</subject><ispartof>AIChE Journal, 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 American Institute of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faic.690420126$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faic.690420126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,881,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2127208$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/201440$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><title>AIChE Journal</title><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><description>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</description><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</subject><subject>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>ASHES</subject><subject>CALORIFIC VALUE</subject><subject>COAL</subject><subject>Coal and derived products</subject><subject>COAL PREPARATION</subject><subject>DEASHING</subject><subject>DESULFURIZATION</subject><subject>EFFICIENCY</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>MAGNETIC SEPARATORS</subject><subject>Mechanical preparation</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE TESTING</subject><subject>Processing</subject><subject>PULVERIZED FUELS</subject><subject>PYRITE</subject><subject>REMOVAL</subject><subject>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</subject><issn>0001-1541</issn><issn>1547-5905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7yt43ZpNskn3KNV-QFEEpeAlpLOTGt3ulmSr1r_elJbiydMww-_NvHmEXGa0l1HKboyDniyoYDRj8oh0slyoNC9ofkw6lNIsjYPslJyF8B47pvqsQ_p3fpOE9Qo9NHW5htbVi2RpFjW2DhKo0NTbSWOT1br6RO9-sEygMdU5ObGmCnixr13yMrx_HozT6eNoMridpiCii3TOrJxzMZ9DUSihJOWMm9wUZcnB2kKiBV4gQ24lylKVfakUShBYGi4LYXmXXO32NqF1OoBrEd6i1xqh1fFTIWhk0h0DvgnBo9Ur75bGb3RG9TYaHaPRh2gif73jVyaAqaw3NbhwELGYDaP9iKkd9uUq3Py_U99OBn8P7A250OL3QWn8h5aKq1zPHkY6n42eXsdDpjn_BdRUguE</recordid><startdate>199601</startdate><enddate>199601</enddate><creator>Zhou, S.</creator><creator>Garbett, E. S.</creator><creator>Boucher, R. F.</creator><general>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199601</creationdate><title>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</title><author>Zhou, S. ; Garbett, E. S. ; Boucher, R. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4126-b2f6b34bbc9974760323a5a9dd3cff96efc39e2e3f6e6d7d8677e6c4eda3694f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</topic><topic>20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>ASHES</topic><topic>CALORIFIC VALUE</topic><topic>COAL</topic><topic>Coal and derived products</topic><topic>COAL PREPARATION</topic><topic>DEASHING</topic><topic>DESULFURIZATION</topic><topic>EFFICIENCY</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>MAGNETIC SEPARATORS</topic><topic>Mechanical preparation</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE TESTING</topic><topic>Processing</topic><topic>PULVERIZED FUELS</topic><topic>PYRITE</topic><topic>REMOVAL</topic><topic>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garbett, E. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boucher, R. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>AIChE Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, S.</au><au>Garbett, E. S.</au><au>Boucher, R. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal</atitle><jtitle>AIChE Journal</jtitle><addtitle>AIChE J</addtitle><date>1996-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>277-284</pages><issn>0001-1541</issn><eissn>1547-5905</eissn><coden>AICEAC</coden><abstract>There are wet and dry methods of cleaning pulverized coal for thermal power stations. However, it may be desirable to use a dry process because dewatering finely pulverized coal is difficult and expensive, and burning wet coal reduces the thermal efficiency of the combustion process. It has been shown that high gradient magnetic filters can be constructed which will extract micron-sized paramagnetic particles from a pulverized coal-air stream passing through the filter. Conventional magnetic separators are generally restricted to separating strongly magnetic materials, such as iron and magnetite. High gradient magnetic filters are capable of separating weakly paramagnetic particles, the magnetic force being proportional to the product of field strength and gradient. Only superconducting magnets are currently economic to generate sufficiently large background magnetic fields of, say, more than 2 Tesla, over the volumes required for the desulfurization of coal. These experimental tests indicated that the dry magnetic desulfurization process was able to remove up to 69% of the pyritic sulfur and 33% of the ash content from a typical pulverized coal in a vertically upward airstream rig, and the heating value recovery is 97%. Increasing magnetic fields increases the percentage of reductions of pyritic sulfur, total sulfur, and ash. The penalty for the improved sulfur removals was the reduced heating value recoveries.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Institute of Chemical Engineers</pub><doi>10.1002/aic.690420126</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1541
ispartof AIChE Journal, 1996-01, Vol.42 (1), p.277-284
issn 0001-1541
1547-5905
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_690420126
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT
20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
Applied sciences
ASHES
CALORIFIC VALUE
COAL
Coal and derived products
COAL PREPARATION
DEASHING
DESULFURIZATION
EFFICIENCY
Energy
Exact sciences and technology
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
Fuels
MAGNETIC SEPARATORS
Mechanical preparation
PERFORMANCE TESTING
Processing
PULVERIZED FUELS
PYRITE
REMOVAL
SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS
title Dry superconducting magnetic cleaning of pulverized coal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20superconducting%20magnetic%20cleaning%20of%20pulverized%20coal&rft.jtitle=AIChE%20Journal&rft.au=Zhou,%20S.&rft.date=1996-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=277-284&rft.issn=0001-1541&rft.eissn=1547-5905&rft.coden=AICEAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aic.690420126&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_osti_%3EAIC690420126%3C/wiley_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true