Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems

Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a valuable crop in the southern Great Plains that grows from fall to spring, with fields then typically fallowed through the summer. Adding grazeable cover crops to the fallow period could increase farm profitability. The objective of this study was to determin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2021-07, Vol.113 (4), p.3361-3371
Hauptverfasser: Horn, Kyle M., Rocateli, Alexandre C., Warren, Jason G., Turner, Kenneth E., Antonangelo, João A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3371
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3361
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 113
creator Horn, Kyle M.
Rocateli, Alexandre C.
Warren, Jason G.
Turner, Kenneth E.
Antonangelo, João A.
description Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a valuable crop in the southern Great Plains that grows from fall to spring, with fields then typically fallowed through the summer. Adding grazeable cover crops to the fallow period could increase farm profitability. The objective of this study was to determine eight different cover crops’ nutritive value and simulated stocker calf performance. Cover crops were established in late spring 2016 and 2017 in Chickasha and Perkins, OK. At 6 wk after planting, two simulated grazing regimes based on cutting height were used: severe (≤2.5 cm) and recommended (7.5 cm). Legumes had the highest nutritive value in comparison to warm‐season grasses and grass–legume mixtures. Legumes resulted in higher simulated daily steer gain (DSG) and total steer gain per area (TSGA) values than grasses and mixtures at Perkins. At this location, legumes had superior forage nutritive value, compensating for lower yields. At Chickasha, grasses and mixtures had higher TSGA values (246.7 ± 6.9 kg ha–1) and lower DSG (0.17 ± 0.04 kg steer–1 d–1) values than legumes (131.6 ± 25.3 kg ha–1 and 0.48 ± 0.02 kg steer–1 d–1). This finding implied that grasses and mixtures with lower individual DSG required much higher stocking rates than legumes to achieve higher TSGA values. This increment in stocking rates could increase costs, drastically decreasing profits. Consequently, legumes might be a viable option due to their balanced forage yield and nutritive value relationship. However, consideration must be given to supplemental energy to better balance the TDN/protein ratio requirements of the stocker calf. Core Ideas Nutritive value parameters varied according to field fertility and rainfall patterns. Legumes provided the highest simulated daily steer gains. Grasses and grass–legume mixtures provided greater simulated total steer gain/area. Legumes were a better option due to the balanced yield and nutritive value relationship. Supplementation may be needed to maximize grazing beef gains on cover crops.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agj2.20708
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ220708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-8747cba9b809e6449e264aca88cce8169dd11b681c312994c40f619f474d3b6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqGw8As8I6X4Oa5jj1VVCqiiC8yR4zipSz4qO02Uf09CmJnecM-9ejoIPQJZAiH0WRUnuqQkJuIKBcCiVUg4W12jgIxpCJLTW3Tn_YkQAMkgQB_bTpUX1dq6wLrpjMPaNWeP88apwuD60jrb2s7gCTPY1vjwXapjUync27od-f5oVIv94FtT-Xt0k6vSm4e_u0BfL9vPzWu4P-zeNut9qGkciVDELNapkqkg0nDGpKGcKa2E0NoI4DLLAFIuQEdApWSakZyDzFnMsijlabRAT_Pu-K33zuTJ2dlKuSEBkkwmkslE8mtihGGGe1ua4R8yWe_e6dz5Aa4jYLc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Horn, Kyle M. ; Rocateli, Alexandre C. ; Warren, Jason G. ; Turner, Kenneth E. ; Antonangelo, João A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horn, Kyle M. ; Rocateli, Alexandre C. ; Warren, Jason G. ; Turner, Kenneth E. ; Antonangelo, João A.</creatorcontrib><description>Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a valuable crop in the southern Great Plains that grows from fall to spring, with fields then typically fallowed through the summer. Adding grazeable cover crops to the fallow period could increase farm profitability. The objective of this study was to determine eight different cover crops’ nutritive value and simulated stocker calf performance. Cover crops were established in late spring 2016 and 2017 in Chickasha and Perkins, OK. At 6 wk after planting, two simulated grazing regimes based on cutting height were used: severe (≤2.5 cm) and recommended (7.5 cm). Legumes had the highest nutritive value in comparison to warm‐season grasses and grass–legume mixtures. Legumes resulted in higher simulated daily steer gain (DSG) and total steer gain per area (TSGA) values than grasses and mixtures at Perkins. At this location, legumes had superior forage nutritive value, compensating for lower yields. At Chickasha, grasses and mixtures had higher TSGA values (246.7 ± 6.9 kg ha–1) and lower DSG (0.17 ± 0.04 kg steer–1 d–1) values than legumes (131.6 ± 25.3 kg ha–1 and 0.48 ± 0.02 kg steer–1 d–1). This finding implied that grasses and mixtures with lower individual DSG required much higher stocking rates than legumes to achieve higher TSGA values. This increment in stocking rates could increase costs, drastically decreasing profits. Consequently, legumes might be a viable option due to their balanced forage yield and nutritive value relationship. However, consideration must be given to supplemental energy to better balance the TDN/protein ratio requirements of the stocker calf. Core Ideas Nutritive value parameters varied according to field fertility and rainfall patterns. Legumes provided the highest simulated daily steer gains. Grasses and grass–legume mixtures provided greater simulated total steer gain/area. Legumes were a better option due to the balanced yield and nutritive value relationship. Supplementation may be needed to maximize grazing beef gains on cover crops.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20708</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2021-07, Vol.113 (4), p.3361-3371</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Agronomy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-8747cba9b809e6449e264aca88cce8169dd11b681c312994c40f619f474d3b6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-8747cba9b809e6449e264aca88cce8169dd11b681c312994c40f619f474d3b6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3622-4893 ; 0000-0002-9517-4921 ; 0000-0001-7992-0755 ; 0000-0001-7329-1150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fagj2.20708$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fagj2.20708$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horn, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocateli, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Jason G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, João A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a valuable crop in the southern Great Plains that grows from fall to spring, with fields then typically fallowed through the summer. Adding grazeable cover crops to the fallow period could increase farm profitability. The objective of this study was to determine eight different cover crops’ nutritive value and simulated stocker calf performance. Cover crops were established in late spring 2016 and 2017 in Chickasha and Perkins, OK. At 6 wk after planting, two simulated grazing regimes based on cutting height were used: severe (≤2.5 cm) and recommended (7.5 cm). Legumes had the highest nutritive value in comparison to warm‐season grasses and grass–legume mixtures. Legumes resulted in higher simulated daily steer gain (DSG) and total steer gain per area (TSGA) values than grasses and mixtures at Perkins. At this location, legumes had superior forage nutritive value, compensating for lower yields. At Chickasha, grasses and mixtures had higher TSGA values (246.7 ± 6.9 kg ha–1) and lower DSG (0.17 ± 0.04 kg steer–1 d–1) values than legumes (131.6 ± 25.3 kg ha–1 and 0.48 ± 0.02 kg steer–1 d–1). This finding implied that grasses and mixtures with lower individual DSG required much higher stocking rates than legumes to achieve higher TSGA values. This increment in stocking rates could increase costs, drastically decreasing profits. Consequently, legumes might be a viable option due to their balanced forage yield and nutritive value relationship. However, consideration must be given to supplemental energy to better balance the TDN/protein ratio requirements of the stocker calf. Core Ideas Nutritive value parameters varied according to field fertility and rainfall patterns. Legumes provided the highest simulated daily steer gains. Grasses and grass–legume mixtures provided greater simulated total steer gain/area. Legumes were a better option due to the balanced yield and nutritive value relationship. Supplementation may be needed to maximize grazing beef gains on cover crops.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqGw8As8I6X4Oa5jj1VVCqiiC8yR4zipSz4qO02Uf09CmJnecM-9ejoIPQJZAiH0WRUnuqQkJuIKBcCiVUg4W12jgIxpCJLTW3Tn_YkQAMkgQB_bTpUX1dq6wLrpjMPaNWeP88apwuD60jrb2s7gCTPY1vjwXapjUync27od-f5oVIv94FtT-Xt0k6vSm4e_u0BfL9vPzWu4P-zeNut9qGkciVDELNapkqkg0nDGpKGcKa2E0NoI4DLLAFIuQEdApWSakZyDzFnMsijlabRAT_Pu-K33zuTJ2dlKuSEBkkwmkslE8mtihGGGe1ua4R8yWe_e6dz5Aa4jYLc</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Horn, Kyle M.</creator><creator>Rocateli, Alexandre C.</creator><creator>Warren, Jason G.</creator><creator>Turner, Kenneth E.</creator><creator>Antonangelo, João A.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-4893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-4921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-0755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-1150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems</title><author>Horn, Kyle M. ; Rocateli, Alexandre C. ; Warren, Jason G. ; Turner, Kenneth E. ; Antonangelo, João A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-8747cba9b809e6449e264aca88cce8169dd11b681c312994c40f619f474d3b6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horn, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocateli, Alexandre C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Jason G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kenneth E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, João A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horn, Kyle M.</au><au>Rocateli, Alexandre C.</au><au>Warren, Jason G.</au><au>Turner, Kenneth E.</au><au>Antonangelo, João A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3361</spage><epage>3371</epage><pages>3361-3371</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a valuable crop in the southern Great Plains that grows from fall to spring, with fields then typically fallowed through the summer. Adding grazeable cover crops to the fallow period could increase farm profitability. The objective of this study was to determine eight different cover crops’ nutritive value and simulated stocker calf performance. Cover crops were established in late spring 2016 and 2017 in Chickasha and Perkins, OK. At 6 wk after planting, two simulated grazing regimes based on cutting height were used: severe (≤2.5 cm) and recommended (7.5 cm). Legumes had the highest nutritive value in comparison to warm‐season grasses and grass–legume mixtures. Legumes resulted in higher simulated daily steer gain (DSG) and total steer gain per area (TSGA) values than grasses and mixtures at Perkins. At this location, legumes had superior forage nutritive value, compensating for lower yields. At Chickasha, grasses and mixtures had higher TSGA values (246.7 ± 6.9 kg ha–1) and lower DSG (0.17 ± 0.04 kg steer–1 d–1) values than legumes (131.6 ± 25.3 kg ha–1 and 0.48 ± 0.02 kg steer–1 d–1). This finding implied that grasses and mixtures with lower individual DSG required much higher stocking rates than legumes to achieve higher TSGA values. This increment in stocking rates could increase costs, drastically decreasing profits. Consequently, legumes might be a viable option due to their balanced forage yield and nutritive value relationship. However, consideration must be given to supplemental energy to better balance the TDN/protein ratio requirements of the stocker calf. Core Ideas Nutritive value parameters varied according to field fertility and rainfall patterns. Legumes provided the highest simulated daily steer gains. Grasses and grass–legume mixtures provided greater simulated total steer gain/area. Legumes were a better option due to the balanced yield and nutritive value relationship. Supplementation may be needed to maximize grazing beef gains on cover crops.</abstract><doi>10.1002/agj2.20708</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3622-4893</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-4921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-0755</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-1150</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2021-07, Vol.113 (4), p.3361-3371
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20708
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Evaluating cover crops forage nutritive value in Oklahoma winter wheat systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A06%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20cover%20crops%20forage%20nutritive%20value%20in%20Oklahoma%20winter%20wheat%20systems&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Horn,%20Kyle%20M.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3361&rft.epage=3371&rft.pages=3361-3371&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/agj2.20708&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ220708%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true