Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality

Canola (Brassica napus L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) are important oilseed crops, but improved management practices to enhance their yields and quality are needed. We studied the effect of stacked versus alternate‐year crop rotations and traditional versus improved cultural practices on cano...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2020-05, Vol.112 (3), p.2020-2032
Hauptverfasser: Sainju, Upendra M., Lenssen, Andrew W., Allen, Brett L., Jabro, Jalal D., Stevens, William B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2032
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2020
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 112
creator Sainju, Upendra M.
Lenssen, Andrew W.
Allen, Brett L.
Jabro, Jalal D.
Stevens, William B.
description Canola (Brassica napus L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) are important oilseed crops, but improved management practices to enhance their yields and quality are needed. We studied the effect of stacked versus alternate‐year crop rotations and traditional versus improved cultural practices on canola and flax growth, seed yield, oil concentration, and N‐use efficiency from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum (Triticum turgidum L.)‐durum‐canola‐pea (Pisum sativum L.) (DDCP) and durum‐durum‐flax‐pea (DDFP). Alternate‐year rotations were durum‐canola‐durum‐pea (DCDP) and durum‐flax‐durum‐pea (DFDP). The traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional tillage, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height. The improved cultural practice included a combination of no‐tillage, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Canola stand count was 36–123% greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice in 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Canola pod number and oil concentration were 3–36% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2007 and 2010, but trends reversed by 5–19% in 2008. Flax stand count was 28% greater with DFDP than DDFP in 2007 and 56% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2010. Flax pod number, seed weight, seed yield, N content, N‐use efficiency, and N‐removal index varied with crop rotations, cultural practices, and years. Canola growth and oil concentration increased with the improved cultural practice as well as flax growth, yield, and quality enhanced with alternate‐year crop rotation and the improved cultural practice in wet years.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/agj2.20176
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ220176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3096-65d478ca4dcf8d46d7c59f96c12f598c1a434abd674f76ef4c507afd68e132433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmVw4RfkjNQRp2naHqcJBmgSh8G5MvlAHaEdSSrov6drOXOy7PexZT2EXANbAmP8Ft_3fMkZFPKEJCCyPGVS5KckYWOaQiX5ObkIYc8YQCUgIbtdRPVhNFW-O1DfRYxN1waK7TjqXew9OnrwqGKjTKC281Rh2zmcCOvwhw6NcXpqv3p0TRwuyZlFF8zVX12Q1_u7l_VDun3ePK5X21RlrJKpzLUoSoVCK1tqIXWh8spWUgG3eVUqQJEJfNOyELaQxgqVswKtlqWBjIssW5Cb-e74ewje2Prgm0_0Qw2sPuqojzrqSccIwwx_N84M_5D1avPE551fuDJihw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sainju, Upendra M. ; Lenssen, Andrew W. ; Allen, Brett L. ; Jabro, Jalal D. ; Stevens, William B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M. ; Lenssen, Andrew W. ; Allen, Brett L. ; Jabro, Jalal D. ; Stevens, William B.</creatorcontrib><description>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) are important oilseed crops, but improved management practices to enhance their yields and quality are needed. We studied the effect of stacked versus alternate‐year crop rotations and traditional versus improved cultural practices on canola and flax growth, seed yield, oil concentration, and N‐use efficiency from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum (Triticum turgidum L.)‐durum‐canola‐pea (Pisum sativum L.) (DDCP) and durum‐durum‐flax‐pea (DDFP). Alternate‐year rotations were durum‐canola‐durum‐pea (DCDP) and durum‐flax‐durum‐pea (DFDP). The traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional tillage, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height. The improved cultural practice included a combination of no‐tillage, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Canola stand count was 36–123% greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice in 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Canola pod number and oil concentration were 3–36% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2007 and 2010, but trends reversed by 5–19% in 2008. Flax stand count was 28% greater with DFDP than DDFP in 2007 and 56% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2010. Flax pod number, seed weight, seed yield, N content, N‐use efficiency, and N‐removal index varied with crop rotations, cultural practices, and years. Canola growth and oil concentration increased with the improved cultural practice as well as flax growth, yield, and quality enhanced with alternate‐year crop rotation and the improved cultural practice in wet years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20176</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2020-05, Vol.112 (3), p.2020-2032</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Agronomy Journal © 2020 American Society of Agronomy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3096-65d478ca4dcf8d46d7c59f96c12f598c1a434abd674f76ef4c507afd68e132433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3096-65d478ca4dcf8d46d7c59f96c12f598c1a434abd674f76ef4c507afd68e132433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7468-671X ; 0000-0001-6943-733X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fagj2.20176$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fagj2.20176$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenssen, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Brett L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabro, Jalal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, William B.</creatorcontrib><title>Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) are important oilseed crops, but improved management practices to enhance their yields and quality are needed. We studied the effect of stacked versus alternate‐year crop rotations and traditional versus improved cultural practices on canola and flax growth, seed yield, oil concentration, and N‐use efficiency from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum (Triticum turgidum L.)‐durum‐canola‐pea (Pisum sativum L.) (DDCP) and durum‐durum‐flax‐pea (DDFP). Alternate‐year rotations were durum‐canola‐durum‐pea (DCDP) and durum‐flax‐durum‐pea (DFDP). The traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional tillage, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height. The improved cultural practice included a combination of no‐tillage, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Canola stand count was 36–123% greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice in 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Canola pod number and oil concentration were 3–36% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2007 and 2010, but trends reversed by 5–19% in 2008. Flax stand count was 28% greater with DFDP than DDFP in 2007 and 56% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2010. Flax pod number, seed weight, seed yield, N content, N‐use efficiency, and N‐removal index varied with crop rotations, cultural practices, and years. Canola growth and oil concentration increased with the improved cultural practice as well as flax growth, yield, and quality enhanced with alternate‐year crop rotation and the improved cultural practice in wet years.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEEmVw4RfkjNQRp2naHqcJBmgSh8G5MvlAHaEdSSrov6drOXOy7PexZT2EXANbAmP8Ft_3fMkZFPKEJCCyPGVS5KckYWOaQiX5ObkIYc8YQCUgIbtdRPVhNFW-O1DfRYxN1waK7TjqXew9OnrwqGKjTKC281Rh2zmcCOvwhw6NcXpqv3p0TRwuyZlFF8zVX12Q1_u7l_VDun3ePK5X21RlrJKpzLUoSoVCK1tqIXWh8spWUgG3eVUqQJEJfNOyELaQxgqVswKtlqWBjIssW5Cb-e74ewje2Prgm0_0Qw2sPuqojzrqSccIwwx_N84M_5D1avPE551fuDJihw</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Sainju, Upendra M.</creator><creator>Lenssen, Andrew W.</creator><creator>Allen, Brett L.</creator><creator>Jabro, Jalal D.</creator><creator>Stevens, William B.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-733X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality</title><author>Sainju, Upendra M. ; Lenssen, Andrew W. ; Allen, Brett L. ; Jabro, Jalal D. ; Stevens, William B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3096-65d478ca4dcf8d46d7c59f96c12f598c1a434abd674f76ef4c507afd68e132433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sainju, Upendra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenssen, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Brett L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabro, Jalal D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, William B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sainju, Upendra M.</au><au>Lenssen, Andrew W.</au><au>Allen, Brett L.</au><au>Jabro, Jalal D.</au><au>Stevens, William B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2020</spage><epage>2032</epage><pages>2020-2032</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Canola (Brassica napus L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) are important oilseed crops, but improved management practices to enhance their yields and quality are needed. We studied the effect of stacked versus alternate‐year crop rotations and traditional versus improved cultural practices on canola and flax growth, seed yield, oil concentration, and N‐use efficiency from 2006 to 2011 in the northern Great Plains, USA. Stacked rotations were durum (Triticum turgidum L.)‐durum‐canola‐pea (Pisum sativum L.) (DDCP) and durum‐durum‐flax‐pea (DDFP). Alternate‐year rotations were durum‐canola‐durum‐pea (DCDP) and durum‐flax‐durum‐pea (DFDP). The traditional cultural practice included a combination of conventional tillage, recommended seed rate, broadcast N fertilization, and reduced stubble height. The improved cultural practice included a combination of no‐tillage, increased seed rate, banded N fertilization, and increased stubble height. Canola stand count was 36–123% greater with the improved than the traditional cultural practice in 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Canola pod number and oil concentration were 3–36% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2007 and 2010, but trends reversed by 5–19% in 2008. Flax stand count was 28% greater with DFDP than DDFP in 2007 and 56% greater in the improved than the traditional practice in 2010. Flax pod number, seed weight, seed yield, N content, N‐use efficiency, and N‐removal index varied with crop rotations, cultural practices, and years. Canola growth and oil concentration increased with the improved cultural practice as well as flax growth, yield, and quality enhanced with alternate‐year crop rotation and the improved cultural practice in wet years.</abstract><doi>10.1002/agj2.20176</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-671X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-733X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2020-05, Vol.112 (3), p.2020-2032
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_20176
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Stacked crop rotations and cultural practices for canola and flax yield and quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stacked%20crop%20rotations%20and%20cultural%20practices%20for%20canola%20and%20flax%20yield%20and%20quality&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Sainju,%20Upendra%20M.&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2020&rft.epage=2032&rft.pages=2020-2032&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/agj2.20176&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ220176%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true