Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability

This study compares the enzymatic activity of nanoscale arrays bearing the oxidase CotA that are produced by two lithographic methods: polymer pen lithography (PPL), a scanning probe lithography for small‐area fabrication (≈1 cm2); and stepper photolithography, a large‐scale method (>300 cm2) use...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advanced materials technologies 2022-08, Vol.7 (8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Fruncillo, Silvia, Toh, Yeow Teck, Blanford, Christopher F., Su, Xiaodi, Liu, Hong, Wong, Lu Shin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Advanced materials technologies
container_volume 7
creator Fruncillo, Silvia
Toh, Yeow Teck
Blanford, Christopher F.
Su, Xiaodi
Liu, Hong
Wong, Lu Shin
description This study compares the enzymatic activity of nanoscale arrays bearing the oxidase CotA that are produced by two lithographic methods: polymer pen lithography (PPL), a scanning probe lithography for small‐area fabrication (≈1 cm2); and stepper photolithography, a large‐scale method (>300 cm2) used in the microelectronics sector. In both cases, arrays of 600 nm gold features are produced and functionalized with CotA through a bioconjugation method that gives uniform protein orientation. The enzyme activity of these arrays is then quantified over 100 days. The enzyme arrays produced by photolithography give higher oxidation activities immediately after fabrication but degrade more rapidly when compared to those produced by PPL. This result is due to the poorer passivation on the bulk surface of photolithographically produced arrays, resulting in a greater amount of non‐specifically adsorbed enzymes. However, once the results are adjusted to account for the differences in passivation and surface area, it is found that the enzymes immobilized on the gold features give essentially the same activity regardless of the lithographic method used. Thus, these results suggest PPL is a suitable method for prototyping biodevices prior to scale‐up, provided that due consideration is given to the design of the fabricated features. A head‐to‐head comparison of the small‐scale lithographic method polymer pen lithography (PPL) and large‐scale stepper photolithography for the fabrication of enzymatic nanoscale arrays with oxidative activity is reported. The two methods are found to give arrays with the same oxidative activity and similar stability in time regardless of the lithographic method used.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/admt.202200490
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_admt_202200490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADMT202200490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-6f52b61568742d0ca25b127b2af0bf76ce69a81420b12a070498d9e83f6a1e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZefc4X6LxJ17Txrcz5B6oTnOBbuU2TLdK1Iwlq_fR2TNQ3n-69h3MunB8h5wymDIBfYL0NUw6cA8wkHJERj0USpSBfjv_sp2Ti_SsAMMlEnPERsYUNm27tcLexij5iCNq1tl3TztAHbDuvsNE0dw57v9fCRtPlh63Ra7poP_utpvMu5Jd0YYxWYfC0NFfBvtnQU2xr-hSwss1wnZETg43Xk-85Js_Xi9X8NiqWN3fzvIhUzCVEwiS8EiwRWTrjNSjkScV4WnE0UJlUKC0kZmzGYZAR0qFuVkudxUYg0xLiMZke_irXee-0KXfObtH1JYNyz6rcsyp_WA0BeQi820b3_7jL_Op-9Zv9AtEMbf0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fruncillo, Silvia ; Toh, Yeow Teck ; Blanford, Christopher F. ; Su, Xiaodi ; Liu, Hong ; Wong, Lu Shin</creator><creatorcontrib>Fruncillo, Silvia ; Toh, Yeow Teck ; Blanford, Christopher F. ; Su, Xiaodi ; Liu, Hong ; Wong, Lu Shin</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the enzymatic activity of nanoscale arrays bearing the oxidase CotA that are produced by two lithographic methods: polymer pen lithography (PPL), a scanning probe lithography for small‐area fabrication (≈1 cm2); and stepper photolithography, a large‐scale method (&gt;300 cm2) used in the microelectronics sector. In both cases, arrays of 600 nm gold features are produced and functionalized with CotA through a bioconjugation method that gives uniform protein orientation. The enzyme activity of these arrays is then quantified over 100 days. The enzyme arrays produced by photolithography give higher oxidation activities immediately after fabrication but degrade more rapidly when compared to those produced by PPL. This result is due to the poorer passivation on the bulk surface of photolithographically produced arrays, resulting in a greater amount of non‐specifically adsorbed enzymes. However, once the results are adjusted to account for the differences in passivation and surface area, it is found that the enzymes immobilized on the gold features give essentially the same activity regardless of the lithographic method used. Thus, these results suggest PPL is a suitable method for prototyping biodevices prior to scale‐up, provided that due consideration is given to the design of the fabricated features. A head‐to‐head comparison of the small‐scale lithographic method polymer pen lithography (PPL) and large‐scale stepper photolithography for the fabrication of enzymatic nanoscale arrays with oxidative activity is reported. The two methods are found to give arrays with the same oxidative activity and similar stability in time regardless of the lithographic method used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2365-709X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2365-709X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/admt.202200490</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>multicopper oxidase ; polymer pen lithography ; protein array ; scanning probe lithography ; stepper photolithography</subject><ispartof>Advanced materials technologies, 2022-08, Vol.7 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Advanced Materials Technologies published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-6f52b61568742d0ca25b127b2af0bf76ce69a81420b12a070498d9e83f6a1e903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-6f52b61568742d0ca25b127b2af0bf76ce69a81420b12a070498d9e83f6a1e903</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7437-123X ; 0000-0003-4953-8349 ; 0000-0002-0112-7818 ; 0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fadmt.202200490$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fadmt.202200490$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fruncillo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Yeow Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Christopher F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Lu Shin</creatorcontrib><title>Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability</title><title>Advanced materials technologies</title><description>This study compares the enzymatic activity of nanoscale arrays bearing the oxidase CotA that are produced by two lithographic methods: polymer pen lithography (PPL), a scanning probe lithography for small‐area fabrication (≈1 cm2); and stepper photolithography, a large‐scale method (&gt;300 cm2) used in the microelectronics sector. In both cases, arrays of 600 nm gold features are produced and functionalized with CotA through a bioconjugation method that gives uniform protein orientation. The enzyme activity of these arrays is then quantified over 100 days. The enzyme arrays produced by photolithography give higher oxidation activities immediately after fabrication but degrade more rapidly when compared to those produced by PPL. This result is due to the poorer passivation on the bulk surface of photolithographically produced arrays, resulting in a greater amount of non‐specifically adsorbed enzymes. However, once the results are adjusted to account for the differences in passivation and surface area, it is found that the enzymes immobilized on the gold features give essentially the same activity regardless of the lithographic method used. Thus, these results suggest PPL is a suitable method for prototyping biodevices prior to scale‐up, provided that due consideration is given to the design of the fabricated features. A head‐to‐head comparison of the small‐scale lithographic method polymer pen lithography (PPL) and large‐scale stepper photolithography for the fabrication of enzymatic nanoscale arrays with oxidative activity is reported. The two methods are found to give arrays with the same oxidative activity and similar stability in time regardless of the lithographic method used.</description><subject>multicopper oxidase</subject><subject>polymer pen lithography</subject><subject>protein array</subject><subject>scanning probe lithography</subject><subject>stepper photolithography</subject><issn>2365-709X</issn><issn>2365-709X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxYMoOOZefc4X6LxJ17Txrcz5B6oTnOBbuU2TLdK1Iwlq_fR2TNQ3n-69h3MunB8h5wymDIBfYL0NUw6cA8wkHJERj0USpSBfjv_sp2Ti_SsAMMlEnPERsYUNm27tcLexij5iCNq1tl3TztAHbDuvsNE0dw57v9fCRtPlh63Ra7poP_utpvMu5Jd0YYxWYfC0NFfBvtnQU2xr-hSwss1wnZETg43Xk-85Js_Xi9X8NiqWN3fzvIhUzCVEwiS8EiwRWTrjNSjkScV4WnE0UJlUKC0kZmzGYZAR0qFuVkudxUYg0xLiMZke_irXee-0KXfObtH1JYNyz6rcsyp_WA0BeQi820b3_7jL_Op-9Zv9AtEMbf0</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Fruncillo, Silvia</creator><creator>Toh, Yeow Teck</creator><creator>Blanford, Christopher F.</creator><creator>Su, Xiaodi</creator><creator>Liu, Hong</creator><creator>Wong, Lu Shin</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-123X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-8349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-7818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability</title><author>Fruncillo, Silvia ; Toh, Yeow Teck ; Blanford, Christopher F. ; Su, Xiaodi ; Liu, Hong ; Wong, Lu Shin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3290-6f52b61568742d0ca25b127b2af0bf76ce69a81420b12a070498d9e83f6a1e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>multicopper oxidase</topic><topic>polymer pen lithography</topic><topic>protein array</topic><topic>scanning probe lithography</topic><topic>stepper photolithography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fruncillo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toh, Yeow Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanford, Christopher F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xiaodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Lu Shin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Advanced materials technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fruncillo, Silvia</au><au>Toh, Yeow Teck</au><au>Blanford, Christopher F.</au><au>Su, Xiaodi</au><au>Liu, Hong</au><au>Wong, Lu Shin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability</atitle><jtitle>Advanced materials technologies</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2365-709X</issn><eissn>2365-709X</eissn><abstract>This study compares the enzymatic activity of nanoscale arrays bearing the oxidase CotA that are produced by two lithographic methods: polymer pen lithography (PPL), a scanning probe lithography for small‐area fabrication (≈1 cm2); and stepper photolithography, a large‐scale method (&gt;300 cm2) used in the microelectronics sector. In both cases, arrays of 600 nm gold features are produced and functionalized with CotA through a bioconjugation method that gives uniform protein orientation. The enzyme activity of these arrays is then quantified over 100 days. The enzyme arrays produced by photolithography give higher oxidation activities immediately after fabrication but degrade more rapidly when compared to those produced by PPL. This result is due to the poorer passivation on the bulk surface of photolithographically produced arrays, resulting in a greater amount of non‐specifically adsorbed enzymes. However, once the results are adjusted to account for the differences in passivation and surface area, it is found that the enzymes immobilized on the gold features give essentially the same activity regardless of the lithographic method used. Thus, these results suggest PPL is a suitable method for prototyping biodevices prior to scale‐up, provided that due consideration is given to the design of the fabricated features. A head‐to‐head comparison of the small‐scale lithographic method polymer pen lithography (PPL) and large‐scale stepper photolithography for the fabrication of enzymatic nanoscale arrays with oxidative activity is reported. The two methods are found to give arrays with the same oxidative activity and similar stability in time regardless of the lithographic method used.</abstract><doi>10.1002/admt.202200490</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-123X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-8349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-7818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-4588</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2365-709X
ispartof Advanced materials technologies, 2022-08, Vol.7 (8), p.n/a
issn 2365-709X
2365-709X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_admt_202200490
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects multicopper oxidase
polymer pen lithography
protein array
scanning probe lithography
stepper photolithography
title Lithographic Patterning of Nanoscale Arrays of the Oxidase Enzyme CotA: Effects on Activity and Stability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T18%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithographic%20Patterning%20of%20Nanoscale%20Arrays%20of%20the%20Oxidase%20Enzyme%20CotA:%20Effects%20on%20Activity%20and%20Stability&rft.jtitle=Advanced%20materials%20technologies&rft.au=Fruncillo,%20Silvia&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2365-709X&rft.eissn=2365-709X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/admt.202200490&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EADMT202200490%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true