Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people

Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CIN...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237
Hauptverfasser: Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen, Faber, Babs, Verbeek, Jos H, Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela, Hees, Hiske L, Verhoeven, Arco C, van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M, Bültmann, Ute
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page CD006237
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume 2014
creator Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
Faber, Babs
Verbeek, Jos H
Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela
Hees, Hiske L
Verhoeven, Arco C
van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M
Bültmann, Ute
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
description Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Main results We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias. Work‐directed interventions We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone. There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21). There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91). Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results. Clinical interventions, psychological We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01). Clinical interventions, psychological com
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006237_pub3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CD006237.pub3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIvVPmBlLUd24k4QXlVqsQFzpbjbESgjSM7bdW_J1EIQlw47XNmdoeQOYUFBWDXNJGCpiJdLO8BJONq0exyfkKm_SDuJ6e_8gm5COEDgMuMqXMyYSJRwIFOyc2qbtHvsW4rV4eodVG1bbzbY-Sx3fm67xyc_4yqOiqw8RgCFlGDrtngJTkrzSbg1XeckbfHh9flc7x-eVotb9ex5Z1kjLZMRWYks0lSWpWKPGcFs6nlSca7O0yegTIilUqhKrgqEgBhlM0UVyWVGZ8ROfBa70LwWOrGV1vjj5qC7t3Qoxt6dEP3bnTA-QDsqi0WP7Dx_W7hblg4VBs8auvsuzc1_sP7R-ULvrhvHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cochrane Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Main results We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias. Work‐directed interventions We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone. There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21). There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91). Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results. Clinical interventions, psychological We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01). Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months). We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05). Clinical interventions, exercise We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24). Authors' conclusions We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25470301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms ; 2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders ; 3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability ; 3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work ; Absenteeism ; Adult ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ; Condition ; Depression ; Depression - therapy ; Depressive disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy ; Depressive disorders &amp; major depression ; Disability in the workplace ; Health &amp; safety at work ; Humans ; Insurance medicine ; Managing occupational disease ; Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences ; Mental health ; Mood disorders ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Occupational Health ; Occupational health outcome ; Older people ; Population ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Return to Work ; Return to Work - psychology ; Sick Leave ; Work ability support</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25470301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Babs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Jos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hees, Hiske L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Arco C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bültmann, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Main results We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias. Work‐directed interventions We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone. There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21). There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91). Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results. Clinical interventions, psychological We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01). Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months). We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05). Clinical interventions, exercise We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24). Authors' conclusions We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</description><subject>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms</subject><subject>2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders</subject><subject>3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability</subject><subject>3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work</subject><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</subject><subject>Condition</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorder</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorders &amp; major depression</subject><subject>Disability in the workplace</subject><subject>Health &amp; safety at work</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance medicine</subject><subject>Managing occupational disease</subject><subject>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Muscle Stretching Exercises</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Occupational health outcome</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Return to Work - psychology</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Work ability support</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RWY</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIvVPmBlLUd24k4QXlVqsQFzpbjbESgjSM7bdW_J1EIQlw47XNmdoeQOYUFBWDXNJGCpiJdLO8BJONq0exyfkKm_SDuJ6e_8gm5COEDgMuMqXMyYSJRwIFOyc2qbtHvsW4rV4eodVG1bbzbY-Sx3fm67xyc_4yqOiqw8RgCFlGDrtngJTkrzSbg1XeckbfHh9flc7x-eVotb9ex5Z1kjLZMRWYks0lSWpWKPGcFs6nlSca7O0yegTIilUqhKrgqEgBhlM0UVyWVGZ8ROfBa70LwWOrGV1vjj5qC7t3Qoxt6dEP3bnTA-QDsqi0WP7Dx_W7hblg4VBs8auvsuzc1_sP7R-ULvrhvHQ</recordid><startdate>20141203</startdate><enddate>20141203</enddate><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><creator>Faber, Babs</creator><creator>Verbeek, Jos H</creator><creator>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creator><creator>Hees, Hiske L</creator><creator>Verhoeven, Arco C</creator><creator>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creator><creator>Bültmann, Ute</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>7PX</scope><scope>RWY</scope><scope>ZYTZH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141203</creationdate><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><author>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms</topic><topic>2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders</topic><topic>3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability</topic><topic>3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work</topic><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</topic><topic>Condition</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorder</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorders &amp; major depression</topic><topic>Disability in the workplace</topic><topic>Health &amp; safety at work</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance medicine</topic><topic>Managing occupational disease</topic><topic>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Muscle Stretching Exercises</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Occupational health outcome</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Return to Work - psychology</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Work ability support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Babs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Jos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hees, Hiske L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Arco C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bültmann, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library (Open Aceess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</au><au>Faber, Babs</au><au>Verbeek, Jos H</au><au>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</au><au>Hees, Hiske L</au><au>Verhoeven, Arco C</au><au>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</au><au>Bültmann, Ute</au><au>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2014-12-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>CD006237</spage><pages>CD006237-</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence. Main results We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias. Work‐directed interventions We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone. There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21). There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91). Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results. Clinical interventions, psychological We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01). Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months). We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05). Clinical interventions, exercise We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24). Authors' conclusions We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>25470301</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-1858
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237
issn 1465-1858
1465-1858
1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006237_pub3
source MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms
2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders
3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability
3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work
Absenteeism
Adult
Antidepressive Agents
Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Condition
Depression
Depression - therapy
Depressive disorder
Depressive Disorder, Major
Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy
Depressive disorders & major depression
Disability in the workplace
Health & safety at work
Humans
Insurance medicine
Managing occupational disease
Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences
Mental health
Mood disorders
Muscle Stretching Exercises
Occupational Health
Occupational health outcome
Older people
Population
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Return to Work
Return to Work - psychology
Sick Leave
Work ability support
title Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A40%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20to%20improve%20return%20to%20work%20in%20depressed%20people&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Nieuwenhuijsen,%20Karen&rft.date=2014-12-03&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=CD006237&rft.pages=CD006237-&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1465-1858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECD006237.pub3%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25470301&rfr_iscdi=true