Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people
Background Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders. Search methods We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CIN...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | CD006237 |
container_title | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
container_volume | 2014 |
creator | Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen Faber, Babs Verbeek, Jos H Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela Hees, Hiske L Verhoeven, Arco C van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M Bültmann, Ute Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen |
description | Background
Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders.
Search methods
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.
Main results
We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias.
Work‐directed interventions
We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone.
There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21).
There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91).
Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication
Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results.
Clinical interventions, psychological
We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01).
Clinical interventions, psychological com |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006237_pub3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CD006237.pub3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIvVPmBlLUd24k4QXlVqsQFzpbjbESgjSM7bdW_J1EIQlw47XNmdoeQOYUFBWDXNJGCpiJdLO8BJONq0exyfkKm_SDuJ6e_8gm5COEDgMuMqXMyYSJRwIFOyc2qbtHvsW4rV4eodVG1bbzbY-Sx3fm67xyc_4yqOiqw8RgCFlGDrtngJTkrzSbg1XeckbfHh9flc7x-eVotb9ex5Z1kjLZMRWYks0lSWpWKPGcFs6nlSca7O0yegTIilUqhKrgqEgBhlM0UVyWVGZ8ROfBa70LwWOrGV1vjj5qC7t3Qoxt6dEP3bnTA-QDsqi0WP7Dx_W7hblg4VBs8auvsuzc1_sP7R-ULvrhvHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cochrane Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders.
Search methods
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.
Main results
We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias.
Work‐directed interventions
We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone.
There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21).
There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91).
Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication
Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results.
Clinical interventions, psychological
We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01).
Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication
We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months).
We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05).
Clinical interventions, exercise
We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24).
Authors' conclusions
We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25470301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms ; 2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders ; 3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability ; 3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work ; Absenteeism ; Adult ; Antidepressive Agents ; Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ; Condition ; Depression ; Depression - therapy ; Depressive disorder ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy ; Depressive disorders & major depression ; Disability in the workplace ; Health & safety at work ; Humans ; Insurance medicine ; Managing occupational disease ; Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences ; Mental health ; Mood disorders ; Muscle Stretching Exercises ; Occupational Health ; Occupational health outcome ; Older people ; Population ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Return to Work ; Return to Work - psychology ; Sick Leave ; Work ability support</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25470301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Babs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Jos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hees, Hiske L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Arco C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bültmann, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Background
Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders.
Search methods
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.
Main results
We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias.
Work‐directed interventions
We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone.
There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21).
There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91).
Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication
Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results.
Clinical interventions, psychological
We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01).
Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication
We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months).
We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05).
Clinical interventions, exercise
We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24).
Authors' conclusions
We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</description><subject>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms</subject><subject>2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders</subject><subject>3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability</subject><subject>3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work</subject><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents</subject><subject>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</subject><subject>Condition</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorder</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</subject><subject>Depressive disorders & major depression</subject><subject>Disability in the workplace</subject><subject>Health & safety at work</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance medicine</subject><subject>Managing occupational disease</subject><subject>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Muscle Stretching Exercises</subject><subject>Occupational Health</subject><subject>Occupational health outcome</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Return to Work</subject><subject>Return to Work - psychology</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Work ability support</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RWY</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBCIlsIvVPmBlLUd24k4QXlVqsQFzpbjbESgjSM7bdW_J1EIQlw47XNmdoeQOYUFBWDXNJGCpiJdLO8BJONq0exyfkKm_SDuJ6e_8gm5COEDgMuMqXMyYSJRwIFOyc2qbtHvsW4rV4eodVG1bbzbY-Sx3fm67xyc_4yqOiqw8RgCFlGDrtngJTkrzSbg1XeckbfHh9flc7x-eVotb9ex5Z1kjLZMRWYks0lSWpWKPGcFs6nlSca7O0yegTIilUqhKrgqEgBhlM0UVyWVGZ8ROfBa70LwWOrGV1vjj5qC7t3Qoxt6dEP3bnTA-QDsqi0WP7Dx_W7hblg4VBs8auvsuzc1_sP7R-ULvrhvHQ</recordid><startdate>20141203</startdate><enddate>20141203</enddate><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><creator>Faber, Babs</creator><creator>Verbeek, Jos H</creator><creator>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creator><creator>Hees, Hiske L</creator><creator>Verhoeven, Arco C</creator><creator>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creator><creator>Bültmann, Ute</creator><creator>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>7PX</scope><scope>RWY</scope><scope>ZYTZH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141203</creationdate><title>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</title><author>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ; Faber, Babs ; Verbeek, Jos H ; Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela ; Hees, Hiske L ; Verhoeven, Arco C ; van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M ; Bültmann, Ute ; Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3003-ecf859a62c44fc785bb2d2c8c3493470ab907a58677e7d37d4005a7c9737f1693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms</topic><topic>2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders</topic><topic>3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability</topic><topic>3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work</topic><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents</topic><topic>Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</topic><topic>Condition</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorder</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy</topic><topic>Depressive disorders & major depression</topic><topic>Disability in the workplace</topic><topic>Health & safety at work</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance medicine</topic><topic>Managing occupational disease</topic><topic>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Muscle Stretching Exercises</topic><topic>Occupational Health</topic><topic>Occupational health outcome</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Return to Work</topic><topic>Return to Work - psychology</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Work ability support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Babs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbeek, Jos H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hees, Hiske L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, Arco C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bültmann, Ute</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library (Open Aceess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</au><au>Faber, Babs</au><au>Verbeek, Jos H</au><au>Neumeyer‐Gromen, Angela</au><au>Hees, Hiske L</au><au>Verhoeven, Arco C</au><au>van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M</au><au>Bültmann, Ute</au><au>Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2014-12-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>CD006237</spage><pages>CD006237-</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Background
Work disability such as sickness absence is common in people with depression.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing work disability in employees with depressive disorders.
Search methods
We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until January 2014.
Selection criteria
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs of work‐directed and clinical interventions for depressed people that included sickness absence as an outcome.
Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently extracted the data and assessed trial quality. We used standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to pool study results in the studies we judged to be sufficiently similar. We used GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.
Main results
We included 23 studies with 26 study arms, involving 5996 participants with either a major depressive disorder or a high level of depressive symptoms. We judged 14 studies to have a high risk of bias and nine to have a low risk of bias.
Work‐directed interventions
We identified five work‐directed interventions. There was moderate quality evidence that a work‐directed intervention added to a clinical intervention reduced sickness absence (SMD ‐0.40; 95% CI ‐0.66 to ‐0.14; 3 studies) compared to a clinical intervention alone.
There was moderate quality evidence based on a single study that enhancing the clinical care in addition to regular work‐directed care was not more effective than work‐directed care alone (SMD ‐0.14; 95% CI ‐0.49 to 0.21).
There was very low quality evidence based on one study that regular care by occupational physicians that was enhanced with an exposure‐based return to work program did not reduce sickness absence compared to regular care by occupational physicians (non‐significant finding: SMD 0.45; 95% CI ‐0.00 to 0.91).
Clinical interventions, antidepressant medication
Three studies compared the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medication on reducing sickness absence and yielded highly inconsistent results.
Clinical interventions, psychological
We found moderate quality evidence based on three studies that telephone or online cognitive behavioural therapy was more effective in reducing sick leave than usual primary or occupational care (SMD ‐0.23; 95% CI ‐0.45 to ‐0.01).
Clinical interventions, psychological combined with antidepressant medication
We found low quality evidence based on two studies that enhanced primary care did not substantially decrease sickness absence in the medium term (4 to 12 months) (SMD ‐0.02; 95% CI ‐0.15 to 0.12). A third study found no substantial effect on sickness absence in favour of this intervention in the long term (24 months).
We found high quality evidence, based on one study, that a structured telephone outreach and care management program was more effective in reducing sickness absence than usual care (SMD ‐ 0.21; 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.05).
Clinical interventions, exercise
We found low quality evidence based on one study that supervised strength exercise reduced sickness absence compared to relaxation (SMD ‐1.11; 95% CI ‐1.68 to ‐0.54). We found moderate quality evidence based on two studies that aerobic exercise was no more effective in reducing sickness absence than relaxation or stretching (SMD ‐0.06; 95% CI ‐0.36 to 0.24).
Authors' conclusions
We found moderate quality evidence that adding a work‐directed intervention to a clinical intervention reduced the number of days on sick leave compared to a clinical intervention alone. We also found moderate quality evidence that enhancing primary or occupational care with cognitive behavioural therapy reduced sick leave compared to the usual care. A structured telephone outreach and care management program that included medication reduced sickness absence compared to usual care. However, enhancing primary care with a quality improvement program did not have a considerable effect on sickness absence. There was no evidence of a difference in effect on sickness absence of one antidepressant medication compared to another. More studies are needed on work‐directed interventions. Clinical intervention studies should also include work outcomes to increase our knowledge on reducing sickness absence in depressed workers.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>25470301</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1465-1858 |
ispartof | Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014-12, Vol.2014 (12), p.CD006237 |
issn | 1465-1858 1465-1858 1469-493X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD006237_pub3 |
source | MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 2. Management of occupational disease or symptoms 2.1.2 Mental and behavioural disorders 3. Affecting the onset or course of occupational disability 3.1 Measures to rehabilitate workers or facilitate disabled workers to stay at work or return to work Absenteeism Adult Antidepressive Agents Antidepressive Agents - therapeutic use Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Condition Depression Depression - therapy Depressive disorder Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Major - therapy Depressive disorders & major depression Disability in the workplace Health & safety at work Humans Insurance medicine Managing occupational disease Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences Mental health Mood disorders Muscle Stretching Exercises Occupational Health Occupational health outcome Older people Population Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Return to Work Return to Work - psychology Sick Leave Work ability support |
title | Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A40%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20to%20improve%20return%20to%20work%20in%20depressed%20people&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Nieuwenhuijsen,%20Karen&rft.date=2014-12-03&rft.volume=2014&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=CD006237&rft.pages=CD006237-&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1465-1858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub3&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECD006237.pub3%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/25470301&rfr_iscdi=true |