Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Although the recent literature indicates that mpox (monkeypox) primarily affects men, there are also multiple reports in women. Estimates of the sex distribution of mpox patients and patterns will enable a better understanding of the ongoing mpox outbreak. Methods In this systematic revie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Satapathy, Prakasini, Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib, Padhi, Bijaya K, Gandhi, Aravind P, Sandeep, Mokanpally, Suvvari, Tarun Kumar, Kumar, Jogendra, Kaur, Gunjeet, Barboza, Joshuan J, Schlagenhauf, Patricia, Sah, Ranjit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Satapathy, Prakasini
Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib
Padhi, Bijaya K
Gandhi, Aravind P
Sandeep, Mokanpally
Suvvari, Tarun Kumar
Kumar, Jogendra
Kaur, Gunjeet
Barboza, Joshuan J
Schlagenhauf, Patricia
Sah, Ranjit
description Background Although the recent literature indicates that mpox (monkeypox) primarily affects men, there are also multiple reports in women. Estimates of the sex distribution of mpox patients and patterns will enable a better understanding of the ongoing mpox outbreak. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, seven databases were searched for studies published in English up to January 4th, 2023. The proportion of women with mpox was the primary outcome. A random-effects model was fitted for the primary outcome, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to check possible outliers in the studies. Results Here we screened 470 articles and included 60 studies for qualitative synthesis. 42 studies with 3125 women out of 47,407 confirmed cases were found suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of female patients is 17.22% (95% CI: 10.49-25.11; I2 = 98.86%). Subgroup analyses reveal higher proportion before 2022 [44.09% (42.93–46.86] than 2022 onwards [2.40% (1.17–3.98)], and in endemic countries [43.13% (37.63–48.72)] than in nonendemic countries [6.15% (2.20–11.65)]. Conclusions There is considerable caseload (17.22%) amongst women, which must be seen in the context of a much higher proportion (44.09%) in studies prior to 2022 compared to 2.40% in the 2022 outbreak indicating an epidemiological shift. Data on disease characteristics among women with mpox disease are scarce. Further studies should focus on these aspects to better understand the disease in women and empower epidemiologists and clinicians to make evidence-based decisions for this vulnerable group.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3168478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3168478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_31684783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNizsOglAQAGksjHqH9QAkIn6InTEaGxq1JyssyUbYR94uv9trjAewmilmpgGmjRugY98qsJSUGzv5GPSuJgGUAlxrT0_4AqUBCtYGPRuTHuAI91GNajTO4UYdU_89UjIMUbAalXUeTEqslBY_zoLl5fw4XcPcsxpLJs5jFkXr7SqLo12y2SfxP80b4IU9Fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Satapathy, Prakasini ; Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib ; Padhi, Bijaya K ; Gandhi, Aravind P ; Sandeep, Mokanpally ; Suvvari, Tarun Kumar ; Kumar, Jogendra ; Kaur, Gunjeet ; Barboza, Joshuan J ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Sah, Ranjit</creator><creatorcontrib>Satapathy, Prakasini ; Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib ; Padhi, Bijaya K ; Gandhi, Aravind P ; Sandeep, Mokanpally ; Suvvari, Tarun Kumar ; Kumar, Jogendra ; Kaur, Gunjeet ; Barboza, Joshuan J ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Sah, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><description>Background Although the recent literature indicates that mpox (monkeypox) primarily affects men, there are also multiple reports in women. Estimates of the sex distribution of mpox patients and patterns will enable a better understanding of the ongoing mpox outbreak. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, seven databases were searched for studies published in English up to January 4th, 2023. The proportion of women with mpox was the primary outcome. A random-effects model was fitted for the primary outcome, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to check possible outliers in the studies. Results Here we screened 470 articles and included 60 studies for qualitative synthesis. 42 studies with 3125 women out of 47,407 confirmed cases were found suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of female patients is 17.22% (95% CI: 10.49-25.11; I2 = 98.86%). Subgroup analyses reveal higher proportion before 2022 [44.09% (42.93–46.86] than 2022 onwards [2.40% (1.17–3.98)], and in endemic countries [43.13% (37.63–48.72)] than in nonendemic countries [6.15% (2.20–11.65)]. Conclusions There is considerable caseload (17.22%) amongst women, which must be seen in the context of a much higher proportion (44.09%) in studies prior to 2022 compared to 2.40% in the 2022 outbreak indicating an epidemiological shift. Data on disease characteristics among women with mpox disease are scarce. Further studies should focus on these aspects to better understand the disease in women and empower epidemiologists and clinicians to make evidence-based decisions for this vulnerable group.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Nature</publisher><creationdate>2024</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3168478$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Satapathy, Prakasini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padhi, Bijaya K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Aravind P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandeep, Mokanpally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suvvari, Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Jogendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Gunjeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barboza, Joshuan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sah, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><title>Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><description>Background Although the recent literature indicates that mpox (monkeypox) primarily affects men, there are also multiple reports in women. Estimates of the sex distribution of mpox patients and patterns will enable a better understanding of the ongoing mpox outbreak. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, seven databases were searched for studies published in English up to January 4th, 2023. The proportion of women with mpox was the primary outcome. A random-effects model was fitted for the primary outcome, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to check possible outliers in the studies. Results Here we screened 470 articles and included 60 studies for qualitative synthesis. 42 studies with 3125 women out of 47,407 confirmed cases were found suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of female patients is 17.22% (95% CI: 10.49-25.11; I2 = 98.86%). Subgroup analyses reveal higher proportion before 2022 [44.09% (42.93–46.86] than 2022 onwards [2.40% (1.17–3.98)], and in endemic countries [43.13% (37.63–48.72)] than in nonendemic countries [6.15% (2.20–11.65)]. Conclusions There is considerable caseload (17.22%) amongst women, which must be seen in the context of a much higher proportion (44.09%) in studies prior to 2022 compared to 2.40% in the 2022 outbreak indicating an epidemiological shift. Data on disease characteristics among women with mpox disease are scarce. Further studies should focus on these aspects to better understand the disease in women and empower epidemiologists and clinicians to make evidence-based decisions for this vulnerable group.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNizsOglAQAGksjHqH9QAkIn6InTEaGxq1JyssyUbYR94uv9trjAewmilmpgGmjRugY98qsJSUGzv5GPSuJgGUAlxrT0_4AqUBCtYGPRuTHuAI91GNajTO4UYdU_89UjIMUbAalXUeTEqslBY_zoLl5fw4XcPcsxpLJs5jFkXr7SqLo12y2SfxP80b4IU9Fg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Satapathy, Prakasini</creator><creator>Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib</creator><creator>Padhi, Bijaya K</creator><creator>Gandhi, Aravind P</creator><creator>Sandeep, Mokanpally</creator><creator>Suvvari, Tarun Kumar</creator><creator>Kumar, Jogendra</creator><creator>Kaur, Gunjeet</creator><creator>Barboza, Joshuan J</creator><creator>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creator><creator>Sah, Ranjit</creator><general>Nature</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Satapathy, Prakasini ; Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib ; Padhi, Bijaya K ; Gandhi, Aravind P ; Sandeep, Mokanpally ; Suvvari, Tarun Kumar ; Kumar, Jogendra ; Kaur, Gunjeet ; Barboza, Joshuan J ; Schlagenhauf, Patricia ; Sah, Ranjit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_31684783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Satapathy, Prakasini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padhi, Bijaya K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Aravind P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandeep, Mokanpally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suvvari, Tarun Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Jogendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, Gunjeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barboza, Joshuan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sah, Ranjit</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Satapathy, Prakasini</au><au>Shamim, Muhammad Aaqib</au><au>Padhi, Bijaya K</au><au>Gandhi, Aravind P</au><au>Sandeep, Mokanpally</au><au>Suvvari, Tarun Kumar</au><au>Kumar, Jogendra</au><au>Kaur, Gunjeet</au><au>Barboza, Joshuan J</au><au>Schlagenhauf, Patricia</au><au>Sah, Ranjit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Background Although the recent literature indicates that mpox (monkeypox) primarily affects men, there are also multiple reports in women. Estimates of the sex distribution of mpox patients and patterns will enable a better understanding of the ongoing mpox outbreak. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, seven databases were searched for studies published in English up to January 4th, 2023. The proportion of women with mpox was the primary outcome. A random-effects model was fitted for the primary outcome, and a sensitivity analysis was performed to check possible outliers in the studies. Results Here we screened 470 articles and included 60 studies for qualitative synthesis. 42 studies with 3125 women out of 47,407 confirmed cases were found suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of female patients is 17.22% (95% CI: 10.49-25.11; I2 = 98.86%). Subgroup analyses reveal higher proportion before 2022 [44.09% (42.93–46.86] than 2022 onwards [2.40% (1.17–3.98)], and in endemic countries [43.13% (37.63–48.72)] than in nonendemic countries [6.15% (2.20–11.65)]. Conclusions There is considerable caseload (17.22%) amongst women, which must be seen in the context of a much higher proportion (44.09%) in studies prior to 2022 compared to 2.40% in the 2022 outbreak indicating an epidemiological shift. Data on disease characteristics among women with mpox disease are scarce. Further studies should focus on these aspects to better understand the disease in women and empower epidemiologists and clinicians to make evidence-based decisions for this vulnerable group.</abstract><pub>Nature</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3168478
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A12%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mpox%20virus%20infection%20in%20women%20and%20outbreak%20sex%20disparities:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.au=Satapathy,%20Prakasini&rft.date=2024&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3168478%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true