“Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices
Users of online recipe websites tend to prefer unhealthy foods. Their popularity under- mines the healthiness of traditional food recommender systems, as many users lack nutritional knowledge to make informed food decisions. Moreover, the presented infor- mation is often unrelated to nutrition or di...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Starke, Alain Dominique Musto, Cataldo Rapp, Amon Semeraro, Giovanni Trattner, Christoph |
description | Users of online recipe websites tend to prefer unhealthy foods. Their popularity under- mines the healthiness of traditional food recommender systems, as many users lack nutritional knowledge to make informed food decisions. Moreover, the presented infor- mation is often unrelated to nutrition or difficult to understand. To alleviate this, we present a methodology to generate natural language justifications that emphasize the nutritional content, health risks, or benefits of recommended recipes. Our framework takes a user and two recipes as input and produces an automatically generated natural language justification as output, based on the user’s characteristics and the recipes’ features, following a knowledge-based recommendation approach. We evaluated our methodology in two crowdsourcing studies. In Study 1 (N = 502), we compared user food choices for two personalized recommendation approaches, based on either a (1) single-style justification or (2) comparative justification was shown, using a no justification baseline. The recommendations were either popularity-based or health- aware, the latter based on the health and nutritional needs of the user. We found that comparative justification styles were effective in supporting choices for our health- aware recommendations, confirming the impact of our methodology on food choices. In Study 2 (N = 504), we used the same methodology to compare the effectiveness of eight different comparative justification strategies. We presented pairs of recipes twice to users: once without and once with a pairwise justification. Results indicated that justifications led to significantly healthier choices for first course meals, while strategies that compared food features and emphasized health risks, benefits, and a user’s lifestyle were most effective, catering to health-related choice motivations. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3117321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3117321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_31173213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTEKwkAQRdNYiHqH8QCCmyCCrSg2dgHLMGwmychmJ-zsFuk8iF7OkxjBA1g9Pu_Dm2fj-_EsyTm4Ety6ab0OkJR9Cx5jCujAoW8TtgT3pJEbthhZvAJ7QAhkeaAvpO_J1xRAR43UQxTQNAwSInSELnY8uUakBtsJW9JlNmvQKa1-XGTr86k8XjY28BTylZeAlTH5blsVxuyL3BT_fD5HjEgU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Starke, Alain Dominique ; Musto, Cataldo ; Rapp, Amon ; Semeraro, Giovanni ; Trattner, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Starke, Alain Dominique ; Musto, Cataldo ; Rapp, Amon ; Semeraro, Giovanni ; Trattner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Users of online recipe websites tend to prefer unhealthy foods. Their popularity under- mines the healthiness of traditional food recommender systems, as many users lack nutritional knowledge to make informed food decisions. Moreover, the presented infor- mation is often unrelated to nutrition or difficult to understand. To alleviate this, we present a methodology to generate natural language justifications that emphasize the nutritional content, health risks, or benefits of recommended recipes. Our framework takes a user and two recipes as input and produces an automatically generated natural language justification as output, based on the user’s characteristics and the recipes’ features, following a knowledge-based recommendation approach. We evaluated our methodology in two crowdsourcing studies. In Study 1 (N = 502), we compared user food choices for two personalized recommendation approaches, based on either a (1) single-style justification or (2) comparative justification was shown, using a no justification baseline. The recommendations were either popularity-based or health- aware, the latter based on the health and nutritional needs of the user. We found that comparative justification styles were effective in supporting choices for our health- aware recommendations, confirming the impact of our methodology on food choices. In Study 2 (N = 504), we used the same methodology to compare the effectiveness of eight different comparative justification strategies. We presented pairs of recipes twice to users: once without and once with a pairwise justification. Results indicated that justifications led to significantly healthier choices for first course meals, while strategies that compared food features and emphasized health risks, benefits, and a user’s lifestyle were most effective, catering to health-related choice motivations.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><creationdate>2023</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3117321$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Starke, Alain Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musto, Cataldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Amon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeraro, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trattner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>“Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices</title><description>Users of online recipe websites tend to prefer unhealthy foods. Their popularity under- mines the healthiness of traditional food recommender systems, as many users lack nutritional knowledge to make informed food decisions. Moreover, the presented infor- mation is often unrelated to nutrition or difficult to understand. To alleviate this, we present a methodology to generate natural language justifications that emphasize the nutritional content, health risks, or benefits of recommended recipes. Our framework takes a user and two recipes as input and produces an automatically generated natural language justification as output, based on the user’s characteristics and the recipes’ features, following a knowledge-based recommendation approach. We evaluated our methodology in two crowdsourcing studies. In Study 1 (N = 502), we compared user food choices for two personalized recommendation approaches, based on either a (1) single-style justification or (2) comparative justification was shown, using a no justification baseline. The recommendations were either popularity-based or health- aware, the latter based on the health and nutritional needs of the user. We found that comparative justification styles were effective in supporting choices for our health- aware recommendations, confirming the impact of our methodology on food choices. In Study 2 (N = 504), we used the same methodology to compare the effectiveness of eight different comparative justification strategies. We presented pairs of recipes twice to users: once without and once with a pairwise justification. Results indicated that justifications led to significantly healthier choices for first course meals, while strategies that compared food features and emphasized health risks, benefits, and a user’s lifestyle were most effective, catering to health-related choice motivations.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTEKwkAQRdNYiHqH8QCCmyCCrSg2dgHLMGwmychmJ-zsFuk8iF7OkxjBA1g9Pu_Dm2fj-_EsyTm4Ety6ab0OkJR9Cx5jCujAoW8TtgT3pJEbthhZvAJ7QAhkeaAvpO_J1xRAR43UQxTQNAwSInSELnY8uUakBtsJW9JlNmvQKa1-XGTr86k8XjY28BTylZeAlTH5blsVxuyL3BT_fD5HjEgU</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Starke, Alain Dominique</creator><creator>Musto, Cataldo</creator><creator>Rapp, Amon</creator><creator>Semeraro, Giovanni</creator><creator>Trattner, Christoph</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>“Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices</title><author>Starke, Alain Dominique ; Musto, Cataldo ; Rapp, Amon ; Semeraro, Giovanni ; Trattner, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_31173213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Starke, Alain Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musto, Cataldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Amon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeraro, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trattner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Starke, Alain Dominique</au><au>Musto, Cataldo</au><au>Rapp, Amon</au><au>Semeraro, Giovanni</au><au>Trattner, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices</atitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Users of online recipe websites tend to prefer unhealthy foods. Their popularity under- mines the healthiness of traditional food recommender systems, as many users lack nutritional knowledge to make informed food decisions. Moreover, the presented infor- mation is often unrelated to nutrition or difficult to understand. To alleviate this, we present a methodology to generate natural language justifications that emphasize the nutritional content, health risks, or benefits of recommended recipes. Our framework takes a user and two recipes as input and produces an automatically generated natural language justification as output, based on the user’s characteristics and the recipes’ features, following a knowledge-based recommendation approach. We evaluated our methodology in two crowdsourcing studies. In Study 1 (N = 502), we compared user food choices for two personalized recommendation approaches, based on either a (1) single-style justification or (2) comparative justification was shown, using a no justification baseline. The recommendations were either popularity-based or health- aware, the latter based on the health and nutritional needs of the user. We found that comparative justification styles were effective in supporting choices for our health- aware recommendations, confirming the impact of our methodology on food choices. In Study 2 (N = 504), we used the same methodology to compare the effectiveness of eight different comparative justification strategies. We presented pairs of recipes twice to users: once without and once with a pairwise justification. Results indicated that justifications led to significantly healthier choices for first course meals, while strategies that compared food features and emphasized health risks, benefits, and a user’s lifestyle were most effective, catering to health-related choice motivations.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3117321 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives |
title | “Tell Me Why”: using natural language justifications in a recipe recommender system to support healthier food choices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CTell%20Me%20Why%E2%80%9D:%20using%20natural%20language%20justifications%20in%20a%20recipe%20recommender%20system%20to%20support%20healthier%20food%20choices&rft.au=Starke,%20Alain%20Dominique&rft.date=2023&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3117321%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |