Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation

Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hoang, Nguyen Tien, Taherzadeh, Oliver, Ohashi, Haruka, Yonekura, Yusuke, Nishijima, Shota, Yamabe, Masaki, Matsui, Testuya, Matsuda, Hiroyuki, Moran, Daniel Dean, Kanemoto, Keiichiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Hoang, Nguyen Tien
Taherzadeh, Oliver
Ohashi, Haruka
Yonekura, Yusuke
Nishijima, Shota
Yamabe, Masaki
Matsui, Testuya
Matsuda, Hiroyuki
Moran, Daniel Dean
Kanemoto, Keiichiro
description Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP > 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km2, grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3070572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3070572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30705723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNizEOwjAMALMwIOAP5gFIaauqD0AgFibYIze4laXIiRwXvg9DH8B0w91t3eOOpbDMULKRGGOCmGVKHK3CSPYhEphTHn8CZ-W4JFuUAOUFRqpUTdepkr7ROMvebSZMlQ4rd-54vTzPt1NUrsYSJCuGpml7Hzo_-H5ou3-aL9uVOTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Hoang, Nguyen Tien ; Taherzadeh, Oliver ; Ohashi, Haruka ; Yonekura, Yusuke ; Nishijima, Shota ; Yamabe, Masaki ; Matsui, Testuya ; Matsuda, Hiroyuki ; Moran, Daniel Dean ; Kanemoto, Keiichiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoang, Nguyen Tien ; Taherzadeh, Oliver ; Ohashi, Haruka ; Yonekura, Yusuke ; Nishijima, Shota ; Yamabe, Masaki ; Matsui, Testuya ; Matsuda, Hiroyuki ; Moran, Daniel Dean ; Kanemoto, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><description>Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP &gt; 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km2, grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>National Academy of Sciences</publisher><creationdate>2023</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3070572$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoang, Nguyen Tien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taherzadeh, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Haruka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonekura, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishijima, Shota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Testuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Daniel Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanemoto, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><title>Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation</title><description>Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP &gt; 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km2, grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNizEOwjAMALMwIOAP5gFIaauqD0AgFibYIze4laXIiRwXvg9DH8B0w91t3eOOpbDMULKRGGOCmGVKHK3CSPYhEphTHn8CZ-W4JFuUAOUFRqpUTdepkr7ROMvebSZMlQ4rd-54vTzPt1NUrsYSJCuGpml7Hzo_-H5ou3-aL9uVOTg</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Hoang, Nguyen Tien</creator><creator>Taherzadeh, Oliver</creator><creator>Ohashi, Haruka</creator><creator>Yonekura, Yusuke</creator><creator>Nishijima, Shota</creator><creator>Yamabe, Masaki</creator><creator>Matsui, Testuya</creator><creator>Matsuda, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Moran, Daniel Dean</creator><creator>Kanemoto, Keiichiro</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation</title><author>Hoang, Nguyen Tien ; Taherzadeh, Oliver ; Ohashi, Haruka ; Yonekura, Yusuke ; Nishijima, Shota ; Yamabe, Masaki ; Matsui, Testuya ; Matsuda, Hiroyuki ; Moran, Daniel Dean ; Kanemoto, Keiichiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30705723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoang, Nguyen Tien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taherzadeh, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohashi, Haruka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonekura, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishijima, Shota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamabe, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsui, Testuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Daniel Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanemoto, Keiichiro</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoang, Nguyen Tien</au><au>Taherzadeh, Oliver</au><au>Ohashi, Haruka</au><au>Yonekura, Yusuke</au><au>Nishijima, Shota</au><au>Yamabe, Masaki</au><au>Matsui, Testuya</au><au>Matsuda, Hiroyuki</au><au>Moran, Daniel Dean</au><au>Kanemoto, Keiichiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation</atitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Demand for food products, often from international trade, has brought agricultural land use into direct competition with biodiversity. Where these potential conflicts occur and which consumers are responsible is poorly understood. By combining conservation priority (CP) maps with agricultural trade data, we estimate current potential conservation risk hotspots driven by 197 countries across 48 agricultural products. Globally, a third of agricultural production occurs in sites of high CP (CP &gt; 0.75, max = 1.0). While cattle, maize, rice, and soybean pose the greatest threat to very high-CP sites, other low-conservation risk products (e.g., sugar beet, pearl millet, and sunflower) currently are less likely to be grown in sites of agriculture–conservation conflict. Our analysis suggests that a commodity can cause dissimilar conservation threats in different production regions. Accordingly, some of the conservation risks posed by different countries depend on their demand and sourcing patterns of agricultural commodities. Our spatial analyses identify potential hotspots of competition between agriculture and high-conservation value sites (i.e., 0.5° resolution, or ~367 to 3,077km2, grid cells containing both agriculture and high-biodiversity priority habitat), thereby providing additional information that could help prioritize conservation activities and safeguard biodiversity in individual countries and globally. A web-based GIS tool at https://agriculture.spatialfootprint.com/biodiversity/ systematically visualizes the results of our analyses.</abstract><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3070572
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Mapping potential conflicts between global agriculture and terrestrial conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mapping%20potential%20conflicts%20between%20global%20agriculture%20and%20terrestrial%20conservation&rft.au=Hoang,%20Nguyen%20Tien&rft.date=2023&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3070572%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true