Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning

Petrophysical interpretation and optimal correlation extraction of different measurements require accurate well log depth matching. We have developed a supervised multimodal machine learning alternative for the task of simultaneously matching raw logging while drilling and electrical wireline loggin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra, Duffaut, Kenneth, Yazidi, Anis, Westad, Frank Ove, Johansen, Yngve Bolstad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra
Duffaut, Kenneth
Yazidi, Anis
Westad, Frank Ove
Johansen, Yngve Bolstad
description Petrophysical interpretation and optimal correlation extraction of different measurements require accurate well log depth matching. We have developed a supervised multimodal machine learning alternative for the task of simultaneously matching raw logging while drilling and electrical wireline logging logs. Seven one-dimensional convolutional neural networks are trained using different log measurements: gamma-ray, resistivity, P- and S-wave sonic, density, neutron and photoelectric factors, and their depth shift estimates are aggregated using different multimodal late fusion strategies. We test the late fusion average, late fusion weighted average, late fusion with linear and nonlinear learners and model-level fusion. Depth matching results using the different fusion strategies applied to two unseen wells are compared using visual inspection and the mean Pearson correlation. All models perform well, increasing the correlation after depth matching. Late fusion weighted average achieves the highest scores for all log types. The late fusion weighted average results are compared to a cross-correlation user-assisted workflow and manual depth matching for validation. In general, the convolutional neural network fused method exhibits a lower performance than the traditional methods. For one of the wells, the cross-correlation shows higher correlation values than the other methods but for the second well the manual depth match performs best. However, the differences in Pearson correlation values are small ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. The manual depth match performs very well for the sonic logs, which tend to require slightly larger depth shifts than the other measurements, thus a common depth shift might not always be suitable. Although our convolutional neural network fused approach is limited to estimating bulk shifts and uses constant fusion weights, its performance is similar to that of more time-consuming methods. Our approach might be substantially improved by including dynamic shifts (stretch/squeeze) and depth-dependent fusion weights via long-short-term memory recurrent neural networks.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3059422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3059422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30594223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHB3LC3Jz00sSU1RKE_NyVHIyU9XSEktKMlQAAomZ2TmpVsp-AClFdJKizPz8xRyS3NKMnPzUxJzgMpSCxRyUhOL8oCqeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g6Kba4izh25yUWZxSWZefF5-UWK8oaGRqUG8sYGppYmRkTExagBGAjNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra ; Duffaut, Kenneth ; Yazidi, Anis ; Westad, Frank Ove ; Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra ; Duffaut, Kenneth ; Yazidi, Anis ; Westad, Frank Ove ; Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</creatorcontrib><description>Petrophysical interpretation and optimal correlation extraction of different measurements require accurate well log depth matching. We have developed a supervised multimodal machine learning alternative for the task of simultaneously matching raw logging while drilling and electrical wireline logging logs. Seven one-dimensional convolutional neural networks are trained using different log measurements: gamma-ray, resistivity, P- and S-wave sonic, density, neutron and photoelectric factors, and their depth shift estimates are aggregated using different multimodal late fusion strategies. We test the late fusion average, late fusion weighted average, late fusion with linear and nonlinear learners and model-level fusion. Depth matching results using the different fusion strategies applied to two unseen wells are compared using visual inspection and the mean Pearson correlation. All models perform well, increasing the correlation after depth matching. Late fusion weighted average achieves the highest scores for all log types. The late fusion weighted average results are compared to a cross-correlation user-assisted workflow and manual depth matching for validation. In general, the convolutional neural network fused method exhibits a lower performance than the traditional methods. For one of the wells, the cross-correlation shows higher correlation values than the other methods but for the second well the manual depth match performs best. However, the differences in Pearson correlation values are small ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. The manual depth match performs very well for the sonic logs, which tend to require slightly larger depth shifts than the other measurements, thus a common depth shift might not always be suitable. Although our convolutional neural network fused approach is limited to estimating bulk shifts and uses constant fusion weights, its performance is similar to that of more time-consuming methods. Our approach might be substantially improved by including dynamic shifts (stretch/squeeze) and depth-dependent fusion weights via long-short-term memory recurrent neural networks.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</publisher><subject>Brønnlogging ; Machine learning ; Maskinlæring ; Petrofysikk ; Petrophysics ; Well Logging</subject><creationdate>2022</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,781,886,26569</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3059422$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffaut, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazidi, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westad, Frank Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</creatorcontrib><title>Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning</title><description>Petrophysical interpretation and optimal correlation extraction of different measurements require accurate well log depth matching. We have developed a supervised multimodal machine learning alternative for the task of simultaneously matching raw logging while drilling and electrical wireline logging logs. Seven one-dimensional convolutional neural networks are trained using different log measurements: gamma-ray, resistivity, P- and S-wave sonic, density, neutron and photoelectric factors, and their depth shift estimates are aggregated using different multimodal late fusion strategies. We test the late fusion average, late fusion weighted average, late fusion with linear and nonlinear learners and model-level fusion. Depth matching results using the different fusion strategies applied to two unseen wells are compared using visual inspection and the mean Pearson correlation. All models perform well, increasing the correlation after depth matching. Late fusion weighted average achieves the highest scores for all log types. The late fusion weighted average results are compared to a cross-correlation user-assisted workflow and manual depth matching for validation. In general, the convolutional neural network fused method exhibits a lower performance than the traditional methods. For one of the wells, the cross-correlation shows higher correlation values than the other methods but for the second well the manual depth match performs best. However, the differences in Pearson correlation values are small ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. The manual depth match performs very well for the sonic logs, which tend to require slightly larger depth shifts than the other measurements, thus a common depth shift might not always be suitable. Although our convolutional neural network fused approach is limited to estimating bulk shifts and uses constant fusion weights, its performance is similar to that of more time-consuming methods. Our approach might be substantially improved by including dynamic shifts (stretch/squeeze) and depth-dependent fusion weights via long-short-term memory recurrent neural networks.</description><subject>Brønnlogging</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Maskinlæring</subject><subject>Petrofysikk</subject><subject>Petrophysics</subject><subject>Well Logging</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHB3LC3Jz00sSU1RKE_NyVHIyU9XSEktKMlQAAomZ2TmpVsp-AClFdJKizPz8xRyS3NKMnPzUxJzgMpSCxRyUhOL8oCqeBhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g6Kba4izh25yUWZxSWZefF5-UWK8oaGRqUG8sYGppYmRkTExagBGAjNg</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra</creator><creator>Duffaut, Kenneth</creator><creator>Yazidi, Anis</creator><creator>Westad, Frank Ove</creator><creator>Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning</title><author>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra ; Duffaut, Kenneth ; Yazidi, Anis ; Westad, Frank Ove ; Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30594223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Brønnlogging</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Maskinlæring</topic><topic>Petrofysikk</topic><topic>Petrophysics</topic><topic>Well Logging</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffaut, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazidi, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westad, Frank Ove</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres Caceres, Veronica Alejandra</au><au>Duffaut, Kenneth</au><au>Yazidi, Anis</au><au>Westad, Frank Ove</au><au>Johansen, Yngve Bolstad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning</atitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><abstract>Petrophysical interpretation and optimal correlation extraction of different measurements require accurate well log depth matching. We have developed a supervised multimodal machine learning alternative for the task of simultaneously matching raw logging while drilling and electrical wireline logging logs. Seven one-dimensional convolutional neural networks are trained using different log measurements: gamma-ray, resistivity, P- and S-wave sonic, density, neutron and photoelectric factors, and their depth shift estimates are aggregated using different multimodal late fusion strategies. We test the late fusion average, late fusion weighted average, late fusion with linear and nonlinear learners and model-level fusion. Depth matching results using the different fusion strategies applied to two unseen wells are compared using visual inspection and the mean Pearson correlation. All models perform well, increasing the correlation after depth matching. Late fusion weighted average achieves the highest scores for all log types. The late fusion weighted average results are compared to a cross-correlation user-assisted workflow and manual depth matching for validation. In general, the convolutional neural network fused method exhibits a lower performance than the traditional methods. For one of the wells, the cross-correlation shows higher correlation values than the other methods but for the second well the manual depth match performs best. However, the differences in Pearson correlation values are small ranging from 0.01 to 0.1. The manual depth match performs very well for the sonic logs, which tend to require slightly larger depth shifts than the other measurements, thus a common depth shift might not always be suitable. Although our convolutional neural network fused approach is limited to estimating bulk shifts and uses constant fusion weights, its performance is similar to that of more time-consuming methods. Our approach might be substantially improved by including dynamic shifts (stretch/squeeze) and depth-dependent fusion weights via long-short-term memory recurrent neural networks.</abstract><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Geoscientists &amp; Engineers</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3059422
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects Brønnlogging
Machine learning
Maskinlæring
Petrofysikk
Petrophysics
Well Logging
title Automated well log depth matching: Late fusion multimodal deep learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A30%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20well%20log%20depth%20matching:%20Late%20fusion%20multimodal%20deep%20learning&rft.au=Torres%20Caceres,%20Veronica%20Alejandra&rft.date=2022&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3059422%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true