Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties

Portland cement is the prime zonal isolation material used in hydrocarbon wells and its utilization has been extended to geothermal, carbon sequestration and gas storage wells. Despite the vast quantity of research activities and publications, well integrity reports show shortcomings associated with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Kamali, Mohammadreza, Khalifeh, Mahmoud, Saasen, Arild, Godøy, Rune, Delabroy, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Kamali, Mohammadreza
Khalifeh, Mahmoud
Saasen, Arild
Godøy, Rune
Delabroy, Laurent
description Portland cement is the prime zonal isolation material used in hydrocarbon wells and its utilization has been extended to geothermal, carbon sequestration and gas storage wells. Despite the vast quantity of research activities and publications, well integrity reports show shortcomings associated with Portland cement at specific conditions of pressure, temperature, chemical environment and geographical locations. In this experimental study, four alternative barrier materials have been selected for further experiments at laboratory scale: an industrial class of expansive cement, a non-cement pozzolanic slurry, a rock-based geopolymer and an organic thermosetting resin. Neat class G cement was used as reference material for comparing the results. The study includes the rheological behavior of the candidate materials, static fluid-loss and pumpability at both atmospheric and elevated pressures. All of the materials at the liquid phase showed an acceptable viscosity profile at the operational shear rates. The consistency curve of the slurries showed that the barrier materials are pumpable for the desired period with the right-angle set (RAS), except for the pozzolanic slurry, which was not able to make gel up to 24 h at dynamic conditions. Mechanical properties of the candidate barrier materials including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), modulus of flexibility, sonic strength development and tensile strength of the samples were characterized up to 28 days of curing. The UCS test results showed that the thermosetting resin has an extremely high compressive strength compared to the other materials, while the geopolymer and the pozzolanic slurry are more ductile. The tensile strength of the materials experienced no significant change over time; however, for the neat class G cement, it is reduced after 28 days.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3052056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3052056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30520563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTsOwkAMRNNQIOAO5gBI-Sj0CIEoKOkjE5xgaXcdeZdIUFHTckNOwhI4ANXIM_M84-SxMoHUYeCewFMI7FqwGD1G46ERhU7Zol6hJktuyNGd4CYODbAXE1lx8Lo_YY9HUQwSy9SjuXwTaUDPJEZariPygS3VZ3TD2al0pIHJT5NREzdp9tNJMt9uDuvdolb2cbdy8XmVZXmZVkVa5mm5LP7pvAG1_E6j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Kamali, Mohammadreza ; Khalifeh, Mahmoud ; Saasen, Arild ; Godøy, Rune ; Delabroy, Laurent</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Mohammadreza ; Khalifeh, Mahmoud ; Saasen, Arild ; Godøy, Rune ; Delabroy, Laurent</creatorcontrib><description>Portland cement is the prime zonal isolation material used in hydrocarbon wells and its utilization has been extended to geothermal, carbon sequestration and gas storage wells. Despite the vast quantity of research activities and publications, well integrity reports show shortcomings associated with Portland cement at specific conditions of pressure, temperature, chemical environment and geographical locations. In this experimental study, four alternative barrier materials have been selected for further experiments at laboratory scale: an industrial class of expansive cement, a non-cement pozzolanic slurry, a rock-based geopolymer and an organic thermosetting resin. Neat class G cement was used as reference material for comparing the results. The study includes the rheological behavior of the candidate materials, static fluid-loss and pumpability at both atmospheric and elevated pressures. All of the materials at the liquid phase showed an acceptable viscosity profile at the operational shear rates. The consistency curve of the slurries showed that the barrier materials are pumpable for the desired period with the right-angle set (RAS), except for the pozzolanic slurry, which was not able to make gel up to 24 h at dynamic conditions. Mechanical properties of the candidate barrier materials including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), modulus of flexibility, sonic strength development and tensile strength of the samples were characterized up to 28 days of curing. The UCS test results showed that the thermosetting resin has an extremely high compressive strength compared to the other materials, while the geopolymer and the pozzolanic slurry are more ductile. The tensile strength of the materials experienced no significant change over time; however, for the neat class G cement, it is reduced after 28 days.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier</publisher><creationdate>2021</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3052056$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalifeh, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saasen, Arild</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godøy, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delabroy, Laurent</creatorcontrib><title>Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties</title><description>Portland cement is the prime zonal isolation material used in hydrocarbon wells and its utilization has been extended to geothermal, carbon sequestration and gas storage wells. Despite the vast quantity of research activities and publications, well integrity reports show shortcomings associated with Portland cement at specific conditions of pressure, temperature, chemical environment and geographical locations. In this experimental study, four alternative barrier materials have been selected for further experiments at laboratory scale: an industrial class of expansive cement, a non-cement pozzolanic slurry, a rock-based geopolymer and an organic thermosetting resin. Neat class G cement was used as reference material for comparing the results. The study includes the rheological behavior of the candidate materials, static fluid-loss and pumpability at both atmospheric and elevated pressures. All of the materials at the liquid phase showed an acceptable viscosity profile at the operational shear rates. The consistency curve of the slurries showed that the barrier materials are pumpable for the desired period with the right-angle set (RAS), except for the pozzolanic slurry, which was not able to make gel up to 24 h at dynamic conditions. Mechanical properties of the candidate barrier materials including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), modulus of flexibility, sonic strength development and tensile strength of the samples were characterized up to 28 days of curing. The UCS test results showed that the thermosetting resin has an extremely high compressive strength compared to the other materials, while the geopolymer and the pozzolanic slurry are more ductile. The tensile strength of the materials experienced no significant change over time; however, for the neat class G cement, it is reduced after 28 days.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTsOwkAMRNNQIOAO5gBI-Sj0CIEoKOkjE5xgaXcdeZdIUFHTckNOwhI4ANXIM_M84-SxMoHUYeCewFMI7FqwGD1G46ERhU7Zol6hJktuyNGd4CYODbAXE1lx8Lo_YY9HUQwSy9SjuXwTaUDPJEZariPygS3VZ3TD2al0pIHJT5NREzdp9tNJMt9uDuvdolb2cbdy8XmVZXmZVkVa5mm5LP7pvAG1_E6j</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Kamali, Mohammadreza</creator><creator>Khalifeh, Mahmoud</creator><creator>Saasen, Arild</creator><creator>Godøy, Rune</creator><creator>Delabroy, Laurent</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties</title><author>Kamali, Mohammadreza ; Khalifeh, Mahmoud ; Saasen, Arild ; Godøy, Rune ; Delabroy, Laurent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30520563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khalifeh, Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saasen, Arild</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Godøy, Rune</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delabroy, Laurent</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamali, Mohammadreza</au><au>Khalifeh, Mahmoud</au><au>Saasen, Arild</au><au>Godøy, Rune</au><au>Delabroy, Laurent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties</atitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Portland cement is the prime zonal isolation material used in hydrocarbon wells and its utilization has been extended to geothermal, carbon sequestration and gas storage wells. Despite the vast quantity of research activities and publications, well integrity reports show shortcomings associated with Portland cement at specific conditions of pressure, temperature, chemical environment and geographical locations. In this experimental study, four alternative barrier materials have been selected for further experiments at laboratory scale: an industrial class of expansive cement, a non-cement pozzolanic slurry, a rock-based geopolymer and an organic thermosetting resin. Neat class G cement was used as reference material for comparing the results. The study includes the rheological behavior of the candidate materials, static fluid-loss and pumpability at both atmospheric and elevated pressures. All of the materials at the liquid phase showed an acceptable viscosity profile at the operational shear rates. The consistency curve of the slurries showed that the barrier materials are pumpable for the desired period with the right-angle set (RAS), except for the pozzolanic slurry, which was not able to make gel up to 24 h at dynamic conditions. Mechanical properties of the candidate barrier materials including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), modulus of flexibility, sonic strength development and tensile strength of the samples were characterized up to 28 days of curing. The UCS test results showed that the thermosetting resin has an extremely high compressive strength compared to the other materials, while the geopolymer and the pozzolanic slurry are more ductile. The tensile strength of the materials experienced no significant change over time; however, for the neat class G cement, it is reduced after 28 days.</abstract><pub>Elsevier</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3052056
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Alternative setting materials for primary cementing and zonal isolation – Laboratory evaluation of rheological and mechanical properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A30%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alternative%20setting%20materials%20for%20primary%20cementing%20and%20zonal%20isolation%20%E2%80%93%20Laboratory%20evaluation%20of%20rheological%20and%20mechanical%20properties&rft.au=Kamali,%20Mohammadreza&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3052056%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true