Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow

Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Strand, Andreas, Smith, Ivar Eskerud, Unander, Tor Erling, Steinsland, Ingelin, Hellevik, Leif Rune
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Strand, Andreas
Smith, Ivar Eskerud
Unander, Tor Erling
Steinsland, Ingelin
Hellevik, Leif Rune
description Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3025325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3025325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30253253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAQQLNxIeodxgME-qEnEMW16DoM7aQJxMyQjJTe3i48gPDgLd7bm8crj1QUY9YVpLDgjBo5g4bCnzkAgvAW4c0TJfBcoCrhtNqqqAS6sJWAlUCiEPjEy9HsPKZKp58P5ny7Pi93O5ZYNWaXuaBr225oXN90Q7_xz_MFUE04AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Strand, Andreas ; Smith, Ivar Eskerud ; Unander, Tor Erling ; Steinsland, Ingelin ; Hellevik, Leif Rune</creator><creatorcontrib>Strand, Andreas ; Smith, Ivar Eskerud ; Unander, Tor Erling ; Steinsland, Ingelin ; Hellevik, Leif Rune</creatorcontrib><description>Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates</description><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI</publisher><subject>Monte Carlo ; polynomial chaos ; sensitivity analysis ; two-phase flow ; uncertainty quantification ; unit cell</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3025325$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strand, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ivar Eskerud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unander, Tor Erling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinsland, Ingelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellevik, Leif Rune</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow</title><description>Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates</description><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>polynomial chaos</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>two-phase flow</subject><subject>uncertainty quantification</subject><subject>unit cell</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAQQLNxIeodxgME-qEnEMW16DoM7aQJxMyQjJTe3i48gPDgLd7bm8crj1QUY9YVpLDgjBo5g4bCnzkAgvAW4c0TJfBcoCrhtNqqqAS6sJWAlUCiEPjEy9HsPKZKp58P5ny7Pi93O5ZYNWaXuaBr225oXN90Q7_xz_MFUE04AQ</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Strand, Andreas</creator><creator>Smith, Ivar Eskerud</creator><creator>Unander, Tor Erling</creator><creator>Steinsland, Ingelin</creator><creator>Hellevik, Leif Rune</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow</title><author>Strand, Andreas ; Smith, Ivar Eskerud ; Unander, Tor Erling ; Steinsland, Ingelin ; Hellevik, Leif Rune</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30253253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>polynomial chaos</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>two-phase flow</topic><topic>uncertainty quantification</topic><topic>unit cell</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strand, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ivar Eskerud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unander, Tor Erling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinsland, Ingelin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hellevik, Leif Rune</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strand, Andreas</au><au>Smith, Ivar Eskerud</au><au>Unander, Tor Erling</au><au>Steinsland, Ingelin</au><au>Hellevik, Leif Rune</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow</atitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates</abstract><pub>MDPI</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3025325
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects Monte Carlo
polynomial chaos
sensitivity analysis
two-phase flow
uncertainty quantification
unit cell
title Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T06%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20propagation%20through%20a%20point%20model%20for%20steady-state%20two-phase%20pipe%20flow&rft.au=Strand,%20Andreas&rft.date=2020&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3025325%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true