Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience

Social distancing restrictions imposed by the global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in traditional User-Centered Design processes. This paper presents a shift in methodological thinking and deployment of participatory processes toward a more dynamic and resilient approach of user-cente...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Mallam, Steven, Nordby, Kjetil, Haavardtun, Per, Nordland, Hanna, Westerberg, Tine Viveka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Mallam, Steven
Nordby, Kjetil
Haavardtun, Per
Nordland, Hanna
Westerberg, Tine Viveka
description Social distancing restrictions imposed by the global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in traditional User-Centered Design processes. This paper presents a shift in methodological thinking and deployment of participatory processes toward a more dynamic and resilient approach of user-centered design in a multi-year joint academia-industry design project. We moved beyond an overreliance on resource-intensive formal discrete events – such as in-person design workshops, focus groups, or traditional field studies and observations – toward including more continuous inputs to create a more sustainable and fluid approach within a living lab ecosystem. User-centered data collection methods were organized in a framework across three dimensions of interaction: 1) Communication; 2) Timing; and 3) Presence. Expanding methodological options along these differing dimensions increased opportunities for more diversified inputs and sample recruitment, while increasing overall data and design feedback collected. Lowering participation and knowledge sharing thresholds enabled more continuous, inclusive involvement of key stakeholders throughout design processes.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2988063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2988063</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_29880633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHAMzshMK8nMS1cISCwqyUzOLEgsyS-qVHBJLc5Mz1NwLCgoyk9MzkgtVnDLL1LwzEsuSk0sTk1RCALK52Sm5iWn8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkU31xBnD93kosxioMnxeflFifGGhkamBvFGlhYWBmbGxsSoAQAAUTFb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Mallam, Steven ; Nordby, Kjetil ; Haavardtun, Per ; Nordland, Hanna ; Westerberg, Tine Viveka</creator><creatorcontrib>Mallam, Steven ; Nordby, Kjetil ; Haavardtun, Per ; Nordland, Hanna ; Westerberg, Tine Viveka</creatorcontrib><description>Social distancing restrictions imposed by the global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in traditional User-Centered Design processes. This paper presents a shift in methodological thinking and deployment of participatory processes toward a more dynamic and resilient approach of user-centered design in a multi-year joint academia-industry design project. We moved beyond an overreliance on resource-intensive formal discrete events – such as in-person design workshops, focus groups, or traditional field studies and observations – toward including more continuous inputs to create a more sustainable and fluid approach within a living lab ecosystem. User-centered data collection methods were organized in a framework across three dimensions of interaction: 1) Communication; 2) Timing; and 3) Presence. Expanding methodological options along these differing dimensions increased opportunities for more diversified inputs and sample recruitment, while increasing overall data and design feedback collected. Lowering participation and knowledge sharing thresholds enabled more continuous, inclusive involvement of key stakeholders throughout design processes.</description><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2988063$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mallam, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordby, Kjetil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haavardtun, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordland, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerberg, Tine Viveka</creatorcontrib><title>Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience</title><description>Social distancing restrictions imposed by the global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in traditional User-Centered Design processes. This paper presents a shift in methodological thinking and deployment of participatory processes toward a more dynamic and resilient approach of user-centered design in a multi-year joint academia-industry design project. We moved beyond an overreliance on resource-intensive formal discrete events – such as in-person design workshops, focus groups, or traditional field studies and observations – toward including more continuous inputs to create a more sustainable and fluid approach within a living lab ecosystem. User-centered data collection methods were organized in a framework across three dimensions of interaction: 1) Communication; 2) Timing; and 3) Presence. Expanding methodological options along these differing dimensions increased opportunities for more diversified inputs and sample recruitment, while increasing overall data and design feedback collected. Lowering participation and knowledge sharing thresholds enabled more continuous, inclusive involvement of key stakeholders throughout design processes.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHAMzshMK8nMS1cISCwqyUzOLEgsyS-qVHBJLc5Mz1NwLCgoyk9MzkgtVnDLL1LwzEsuSk0sTk1RCALK52Sm5iWn8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBkU31xBnD93kosxioMnxeflFifGGhkamBvFGlhYWBmbGxsSoAQAAUTFb</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Mallam, Steven</creator><creator>Nordby, Kjetil</creator><creator>Haavardtun, Per</creator><creator>Nordland, Hanna</creator><creator>Westerberg, Tine Viveka</creator><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience</title><author>Mallam, Steven ; Nordby, Kjetil ; Haavardtun, Per ; Nordland, Hanna ; Westerberg, Tine Viveka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_29880633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mallam, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordby, Kjetil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haavardtun, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordland, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westerberg, Tine Viveka</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mallam, Steven</au><au>Nordby, Kjetil</au><au>Haavardtun, Per</au><au>Nordland, Hanna</au><au>Westerberg, Tine Viveka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience</atitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Social distancing restrictions imposed by the global outbreak of COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in traditional User-Centered Design processes. This paper presents a shift in methodological thinking and deployment of participatory processes toward a more dynamic and resilient approach of user-centered design in a multi-year joint academia-industry design project. We moved beyond an overreliance on resource-intensive formal discrete events – such as in-person design workshops, focus groups, or traditional field studies and observations – toward including more continuous inputs to create a more sustainable and fluid approach within a living lab ecosystem. User-centered data collection methods were organized in a framework across three dimensions of interaction: 1) Communication; 2) Timing; and 3) Presence. Expanding methodological options along these differing dimensions increased opportunities for more diversified inputs and sample recruitment, while increasing overall data and design feedback collected. Lowering participation and knowledge sharing thresholds enabled more continuous, inclusive involvement of key stakeholders throughout design processes.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2988063
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Shifting Participatory Design Approaches For Increased Resilience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A52%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shifting%20Participatory%20Design%20Approaches%20For%20Increased%20Resilience&rft.au=Mallam,%20Steven&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2988063%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true