Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices
Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Nguyen Duc, Anh Khan, Khalid Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid Lønnestad, Tor |
description | Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2600537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2600537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26005373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjDsKwkAQQNNYiHqH8QBCPkTBToKihZAiWNiEdbOrA7szYWdyf1N4AKsHj8dbZs87EsYpwgPNKzhoEw-TVQHPCW6kLpFTYA_dB-ktcBrHgNYoMskRGo6RCVpUb0IQMDTMB2MVrZN1tpituM2Pq2x7OXfNdWcTiiL1xMn0RVHWeV_u87yuDtU_zRfbqzoq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><description>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</description><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,782,887,26574</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600537$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><description>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjDsKwkAQQNNYiHqH8QBCPkTBToKihZAiWNiEdbOrA7szYWdyf1N4AKsHj8dbZs87EsYpwgPNKzhoEw-TVQHPCW6kLpFTYA_dB-ktcBrHgNYoMskRGo6RCVpUb0IQMDTMB2MVrZN1tpituM2Pq2x7OXfNdWcTiiL1xMn0RVHWeV_u87yuDtU_zRfbqzoq</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creator><creator>Khan, Khalid</creator><creator>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creator><creator>Lønnestad, Tor</creator><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><author>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26005373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen Duc, Anh</au><au>Khan, Khalid</au><au>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</au><au>Lønnestad, Tor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</atitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2600537 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives |
title | Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T00%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20Viable%20Products%20for%20Internet%20of%20Things%20Applications:%20Common%20Pitfalls%20and%20Practices&rft.au=Nguyen%20Duc,%20Anh&rft.date=2019&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2600537%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |