Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices

Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen Duc, Anh, Khan, Khalid, Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid, Lønnestad, Tor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Nguyen Duc, Anh
Khan, Khalid
Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid
Lønnestad, Tor
description Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2600537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2600537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26005373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjDsKwkAQQNNYiHqH8QBCPkTBToKihZAiWNiEdbOrA7szYWdyf1N4AKsHj8dbZs87EsYpwgPNKzhoEw-TVQHPCW6kLpFTYA_dB-ktcBrHgNYoMskRGo6RCVpUb0IQMDTMB2MVrZN1tpituM2Pq2x7OXfNdWcTiiL1xMn0RVHWeV_u87yuDtU_zRfbqzoq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><description>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</description><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,782,887,26574</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600537$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><description>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjDsKwkAQQNNYiHqH8QBCPkTBToKihZAiWNiEdbOrA7szYWdyf1N4AKsHj8dbZs87EsYpwgPNKzhoEw-TVQHPCW6kLpFTYA_dB-ktcBrHgNYoMskRGo6RCVpUb0IQMDTMB2MVrZN1tpituM2Pq2x7OXfNdWcTiiL1xMn0RVHWeV_u87yuDtU_zRfbqzoq</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creator><creator>Khan, Khalid</creator><creator>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creator><creator>Lønnestad, Tor</creator><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</title><author>Nguyen Duc, Anh ; Khan, Khalid ; Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid ; Lønnestad, Tor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26005373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen Duc, Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lønnestad, Tor</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen Duc, Anh</au><au>Khan, Khalid</au><au>Bajwa, Sohaib Shahid</au><au>Lønnestad, Tor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices</atitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks. View Full-Text.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2600537
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-06T00%3A48%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20Viable%20Products%20for%20Internet%20of%20Things%20Applications:%20Common%20Pitfalls%20and%20Practices&rft.au=Nguyen%20Duc,%20Anh&rft.date=2019&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2600537%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true