Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft
BACKGROUND The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services has been commissioned by Norwegian Directorate of Health’s Cancer Programme to make an assessment of the cost per progression-free year gained associated with the use of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rapport 2009 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | nor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Rapport |
container_volume | |
creator | Movik, Espen Hamidi, Vida Norderhaug, Inger Natvig Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne |
description | BACKGROUND The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services has been commissioned by Norwegian Directorate of Health’s Cancer Programme to make an assessment of the cost per progression-free year gained associated with the use of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone, as first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The result is likely to have bearings on a possible revision of the treatment guidelines for breast cancer in Norway.
METHODS
We developed a health economic model of the Markov type in which we compared data from a clinical study, Miller et al. 2007, with Norwegian cost data associated with the treatment alternatives.
RESULTS
Mean progression-free time in the group treated with bevacizumab+paclitaxel was 1 1.2 years whereas it was 0.73 years in the comparator group. This resulted in an incremental effect of 0,47 progression-free years. With regard to quality of life, the incremental effect was 0.2 QALYs. We estimated the incremental costs associated with use of bevacizumab+paclitaxel from a health service perspective to be NOK 765 000, which translates into a cost per progression-free life year gained of NOK 1.6 million and a cost per QALY gained of NOK 3.8 million. The estimate from the societal perspective, where tax, value-added tax and social security payments were deducted, was approx. NOK 1.3 million per progression-free life-year and NOK 3 million per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION
The cost per progression-free year gained is relatively high, and the cost per QALY gained is higher than cost-effective thresholds which have been proposed in Norway. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2378338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2378338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_23783383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjjEOgkAQRWksjHqHsTYmAjHSGw0HsCcDDLqyO5idkYg38Eb0XExMLCyt_kv-S_6fBq-UrNDQ1w03zkgNyGg7IcAWcmqxMM-7w3x1w8IaxQdZEHSO2Jozk4KjEn46tMQE0jioht6LkjV8pZwuyOWIZ2hH35GiKOpnLvedaO2p0nkwqXD8svjmLFgeD6d9ui68ETWcceMxC8Nou8mieJfEcRL_47wBR5FPwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Movik, Espen ; Hamidi, Vida ; Norderhaug, Inger Natvig ; Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</creator><creatorcontrib>Movik, Espen ; Hamidi, Vida ; Norderhaug, Inger Natvig ; Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services has been commissioned by Norwegian Directorate of Health’s Cancer Programme to make an assessment of the cost per progression-free year gained associated with the use of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone, as first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The result is likely to have bearings on a possible revision of the treatment guidelines for breast cancer in Norway.
METHODS
We developed a health economic model of the Markov type in which we compared data from a clinical study, Miller et al. 2007, with Norwegian cost data associated with the treatment alternatives.
RESULTS
Mean progression-free time in the group treated with bevacizumab+paclitaxel was 1 1.2 years whereas it was 0.73 years in the comparator group. This resulted in an incremental effect of 0,47 progression-free years. With regard to quality of life, the incremental effect was 0.2 QALYs. We estimated the incremental costs associated with use of bevacizumab+paclitaxel from a health service perspective to be NOK 765 000, which translates into a cost per progression-free life year gained of NOK 1.6 million and a cost per QALY gained of NOK 3.8 million. The estimate from the societal perspective, where tax, value-added tax and social security payments were deducted, was approx. NOK 1.3 million per progression-free life-year and NOK 3 million per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION
The cost per progression-free year gained is relatively high, and the cost per QALY gained is higher than cost-effective thresholds which have been proposed in Norway.</description><language>nor</language><publisher>Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors ; Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710 ; Breast Neoplasms ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Drug Costs ; Health Care Costs ; Helsefag: 800 ; Klinisk farmakologi: 739 ; Klinisk medisinske fag: 750 ; Medisinske Fag: 700 ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Onkologi: 762 ; Samfunnsfarmasi: 812 ; VDP</subject><ispartof>Rapport, 2009</ispartof><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2378338$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Movik, Espen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Vida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norderhaug, Inger Natvig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</creatorcontrib><title>Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft</title><title>Rapport</title><description>BACKGROUND The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services has been commissioned by Norwegian Directorate of Health’s Cancer Programme to make an assessment of the cost per progression-free year gained associated with the use of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone, as first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The result is likely to have bearings on a possible revision of the treatment guidelines for breast cancer in Norway.
METHODS
We developed a health economic model of the Markov type in which we compared data from a clinical study, Miller et al. 2007, with Norwegian cost data associated with the treatment alternatives.
RESULTS
Mean progression-free time in the group treated with bevacizumab+paclitaxel was 1 1.2 years whereas it was 0.73 years in the comparator group. This resulted in an incremental effect of 0,47 progression-free years. With regard to quality of life, the incremental effect was 0.2 QALYs. We estimated the incremental costs associated with use of bevacizumab+paclitaxel from a health service perspective to be NOK 765 000, which translates into a cost per progression-free life year gained of NOK 1.6 million and a cost per QALY gained of NOK 3.8 million. The estimate from the societal perspective, where tax, value-added tax and social security payments were deducted, was approx. NOK 1.3 million per progression-free life-year and NOK 3 million per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION
The cost per progression-free year gained is relatively high, and the cost per QALY gained is higher than cost-effective thresholds which have been proposed in Norway.</description><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors</subject><subject>Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Helsefag: 800</subject><subject>Klinisk farmakologi: 739</subject><subject>Klinisk medisinske fag: 750</subject><subject>Medisinske Fag: 700</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Onkologi: 762</subject><subject>Samfunnsfarmasi: 812</subject><subject>VDP</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjjEOgkAQRWksjHqHsTYmAjHSGw0HsCcDDLqyO5idkYg38Eb0XExMLCyt_kv-S_6fBq-UrNDQ1w03zkgNyGg7IcAWcmqxMM-7w3x1w8IaxQdZEHSO2Jozk4KjEn46tMQE0jioht6LkjV8pZwuyOWIZ2hH35GiKOpnLvedaO2p0nkwqXD8svjmLFgeD6d9ui68ETWcceMxC8Nou8mieJfEcRL_47wBR5FPwQ</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Movik, Espen</creator><creator>Hamidi, Vida</creator><creator>Norderhaug, Inger Natvig</creator><creator>Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</creator><general>Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft</title><author>Movik, Espen ; Hamidi, Vida ; Norderhaug, Inger Natvig ; Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_23783383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>nor</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors</topic><topic>Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Helsefag: 800</topic><topic>Klinisk farmakologi: 739</topic><topic>Klinisk medisinske fag: 750</topic><topic>Medisinske Fag: 700</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Onkologi: 762</topic><topic>Samfunnsfarmasi: 812</topic><topic>VDP</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Movik, Espen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Vida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norderhaug, Inger Natvig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Rapport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Movik, Espen</au><au>Hamidi, Vida</au><au>Norderhaug, Inger Natvig</au><au>Klemp Gjertsen, Marianne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft</atitle><jtitle>Rapport</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><abstract>BACKGROUND The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services has been commissioned by Norwegian Directorate of Health’s Cancer Programme to make an assessment of the cost per progression-free year gained associated with the use of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone, as first line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The result is likely to have bearings on a possible revision of the treatment guidelines for breast cancer in Norway.
METHODS
We developed a health economic model of the Markov type in which we compared data from a clinical study, Miller et al. 2007, with Norwegian cost data associated with the treatment alternatives.
RESULTS
Mean progression-free time in the group treated with bevacizumab+paclitaxel was 1 1.2 years whereas it was 0.73 years in the comparator group. This resulted in an incremental effect of 0,47 progression-free years. With regard to quality of life, the incremental effect was 0.2 QALYs. We estimated the incremental costs associated with use of bevacizumab+paclitaxel from a health service perspective to be NOK 765 000, which translates into a cost per progression-free life year gained of NOK 1.6 million and a cost per QALY gained of NOK 3.8 million. The estimate from the societal perspective, where tax, value-added tax and social security payments were deducted, was approx. NOK 1.3 million per progression-free life-year and NOK 3 million per QALY gained.
CONCLUSION
The cost per progression-free year gained is relatively high, and the cost per QALY gained is higher than cost-effective thresholds which have been proposed in Norway.</abstract><pub>Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | Rapport, 2009 |
issn | |
language | nor |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2378338 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives |
subjects | Angiogenesis Inhibitors Basale medisinske, odontologiske og veterinærmedisinske fag: 710 Breast Neoplasms Cost-Benefit Analysis Drug Costs Health Care Costs Helsefag: 800 Klinisk farmakologi: 739 Klinisk medisinske fag: 750 Medisinske Fag: 700 Neoplasm Metastasis Onkologi: 762 Samfunnsfarmasi: 812 VDP |
title | Helseøkonomisk analyse av bevacizumab+paclitaxel sammenlignet med paclitaxel alene som førstelinjebehandling ved metastatisk brystkreft |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Helse%C3%B8konomisk%20analyse%20av%20bevacizumab+paclitaxel%20sammenlignet%20med%20paclitaxel%20alene%20som%20f%C3%B8rstelinjebehandling%20ved%20metastatisk%20brystkreft&rft.jtitle=Rapport&rft.au=Movik,%20Espen&rft.date=2009&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2378338%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |