Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study

Objective: To answer five research questions: Do Norwegian physicians know about the three important aspects of EBM? Do they use EBM methods in their clinical practice? What are their attitudes towards EBM? Has EBM in their opinion changed medical practice during the last 10 years? Do they use EBM b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel, Aasland, Olaf G, Nylenna, Magne, Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel
Aasland, Olaf G
Nylenna, Magne
Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø
description Objective: To answer five research questions: Do Norwegian physicians know about the three important aspects of EBM? Do they use EBM methods in their clinical practice? What are their attitudes towards EBM? Has EBM in their opinion changed medical practice during the last 10 years? Do they use EBM based information sources? Design: Cross sectional survey in 2006. Setting: Norway. Participants: 966 doctors who responded to a questionnaire (70% response rate). Results: In total 87% of the physicians mentioned the use of randomised clinical trials as a key aspect of EBM, while 53% of them mentioned use of clinical expertise and only 19% patients' values. 40% of the respondents reported that their practice had always been evidence-based. Many respondents experienced difficulties in using EBM principles in their clinical practice because of lack of time and difficulties in searching EBM based literature. 80% agreed that EBM helps physicians towards better practice and 52% that it improves patients' health. As reasons for changes in medical practice 86% of respondents mentioned medical progress, but only 39% EBM. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that Norwegian physicians have a limited knowledge of the key aspects of EBM but a positive attitude towards the concept. They had limited experience in the practice of EBM and were rather indifferent to the impact of EBM on medical practice. For solving a patient problem, physicians would rather consult a colleague than searching evidence based resources such as the Cochrane Library.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2367616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2367616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_23676163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sKwkAQANNYiPoPa2UVMAYjWBoigviA2IfzdhMXwp7cXgz5e1P4AVYzxcw0wqvzPTVsBO6vQdmOpis4i-tbwobA1WAE4fZmYScK5um6AMWHkcRSfDBKCBfC8RTaQ-6dalySDWNtWihDh8M8mtSmVVr8OIuWx-KRn2LrWQNLJc6bKkk223W1SbNdlmTpP80XbaM9rA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel ; Aasland, Olaf G ; Nylenna, Magne ; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</creator><creatorcontrib>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel ; Aasland, Olaf G ; Nylenna, Magne ; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To answer five research questions: Do Norwegian physicians know about the three important aspects of EBM? Do they use EBM methods in their clinical practice? What are their attitudes towards EBM? Has EBM in their opinion changed medical practice during the last 10 years? Do they use EBM based information sources? Design: Cross sectional survey in 2006. Setting: Norway. Participants: 966 doctors who responded to a questionnaire (70% response rate). Results: In total 87% of the physicians mentioned the use of randomised clinical trials as a key aspect of EBM, while 53% of them mentioned use of clinical expertise and only 19% patients' values. 40% of the respondents reported that their practice had always been evidence-based. Many respondents experienced difficulties in using EBM principles in their clinical practice because of lack of time and difficulties in searching EBM based literature. 80% agreed that EBM helps physicians towards better practice and 52% that it improves patients' health. As reasons for changes in medical practice 86% of respondents mentioned medical progress, but only 39% EBM. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that Norwegian physicians have a limited knowledge of the key aspects of EBM but a positive attitude towards the concept. They had limited experience in the practice of EBM and were rather indifferent to the impact of EBM on medical practice. For solving a patient problem, physicians would rather consult a colleague than searching evidence based resources such as the Cochrane Library.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><creationdate>2009</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2367616$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aasland, Olaf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nylenna, Magne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</creatorcontrib><title>Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study</title><description>Objective: To answer five research questions: Do Norwegian physicians know about the three important aspects of EBM? Do they use EBM methods in their clinical practice? What are their attitudes towards EBM? Has EBM in their opinion changed medical practice during the last 10 years? Do they use EBM based information sources? Design: Cross sectional survey in 2006. Setting: Norway. Participants: 966 doctors who responded to a questionnaire (70% response rate). Results: In total 87% of the physicians mentioned the use of randomised clinical trials as a key aspect of EBM, while 53% of them mentioned use of clinical expertise and only 19% patients' values. 40% of the respondents reported that their practice had always been evidence-based. Many respondents experienced difficulties in using EBM principles in their clinical practice because of lack of time and difficulties in searching EBM based literature. 80% agreed that EBM helps physicians towards better practice and 52% that it improves patients' health. As reasons for changes in medical practice 86% of respondents mentioned medical progress, but only 39% EBM. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that Norwegian physicians have a limited knowledge of the key aspects of EBM but a positive attitude towards the concept. They had limited experience in the practice of EBM and were rather indifferent to the impact of EBM on medical practice. For solving a patient problem, physicians would rather consult a colleague than searching evidence based resources such as the Cochrane Library.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7sKwkAQANNYiPoPa2UVMAYjWBoigviA2IfzdhMXwp7cXgz5e1P4AVYzxcw0wqvzPTVsBO6vQdmOpis4i-tbwobA1WAE4fZmYScK5um6AMWHkcRSfDBKCBfC8RTaQ-6dalySDWNtWihDh8M8mtSmVVr8OIuWx-KRn2LrWQNLJc6bKkk223W1SbNdlmTpP80XbaM9rA</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel</creator><creator>Aasland, Olaf G</creator><creator>Nylenna, Magne</creator><creator>Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study</title><author>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel ; Aasland, Olaf G ; Nylenna, Magne ; Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_23676163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aasland, Olaf G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nylenna, Magne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ulvenes, Lidziya Vanahel</au><au>Aasland, Olaf G</au><au>Nylenna, Magne</au><au>Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study</atitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><abstract>Objective: To answer five research questions: Do Norwegian physicians know about the three important aspects of EBM? Do they use EBM methods in their clinical practice? What are their attitudes towards EBM? Has EBM in their opinion changed medical practice during the last 10 years? Do they use EBM based information sources? Design: Cross sectional survey in 2006. Setting: Norway. Participants: 966 doctors who responded to a questionnaire (70% response rate). Results: In total 87% of the physicians mentioned the use of randomised clinical trials as a key aspect of EBM, while 53% of them mentioned use of clinical expertise and only 19% patients' values. 40% of the respondents reported that their practice had always been evidence-based. Many respondents experienced difficulties in using EBM principles in their clinical practice because of lack of time and difficulties in searching EBM based literature. 80% agreed that EBM helps physicians towards better practice and 52% that it improves patients' health. As reasons for changes in medical practice 86% of respondents mentioned medical progress, but only 39% EBM. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that Norwegian physicians have a limited knowledge of the key aspects of EBM but a positive attitude towards the concept. They had limited experience in the practice of EBM and were rather indifferent to the impact of EBM on medical practice. For solving a patient problem, physicians would rather consult a colleague than searching evidence based resources such as the Cochrane Library.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2367616
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Norwegian Physicians' Knowledge of and Opinions about Evidence-Based Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A38%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Norwegian%20Physicians'%20Knowledge%20of%20and%20Opinions%20about%20Evidence-Based%20Medicine:%20Cross-Sectional%20Study&rft.au=Ulvenes,%20Lidziya%20Vanahel&rft.date=2009&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2367616%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true