Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities

This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732
Hauptverfasser: Ytre-Arne, Brita, Syvertsen, Trine, Moe, Hallvard, Karlsen, Faltin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1732
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1715
container_title New media & society
container_volume 22
creator Ytre-Arne, Brita
Syvertsen, Trine
Moe, Hallvard
Karlsen, Faltin
description This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1461444820913561
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_79964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444820913561</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1461444820913561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3b-YHuJrZpMnGmxSrQsFLBW8hzSY1ZZssyVbx35vSCiJ4mmHmvWG-h9AlkBsAIW6BcWCMNTWRQCccjtBoN6oEhcnxod_tT9FZzmtCgDMhR-htYTd9TLrDerP0H7qzwdiMfcB5o9PQv8dg8TbbOzyNwXXeDD6ssOviZ77G5tco2dzHkP3Sd37wNp-jE6e7bC8OdYxeZw-L6VM1f3l8nt7PK0OZGCouhRTgqJQtb5luQTrDYalJrS1vNW21E444bqwEkIxq52itG8MLAYFG0zG62t81yefyiQqFRgFpJrUSUnJWFORHEXNO1qk--QL3VVRql536m12xVHtL1iur1nGbQmH4X_8N6Jdu2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444820913561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444820913561$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444820913561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21818,26566,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Hallvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><description>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3b-YHuJrZpMnGmxSrQsFLBW8hzSY1ZZssyVbx35vSCiJ4mmHmvWG-h9AlkBsAIW6BcWCMNTWRQCccjtBoN6oEhcnxod_tT9FZzmtCgDMhR-htYTd9TLrDerP0H7qzwdiMfcB5o9PQv8dg8TbbOzyNwXXeDD6ssOviZ77G5tco2dzHkP3Sd37wNp-jE6e7bC8OdYxeZw-L6VM1f3l8nt7PK0OZGCouhRTgqJQtb5luQTrDYalJrS1vNW21E444bqwEkIxq52itG8MLAYFG0zG62t81yefyiQqFRgFpJrUSUnJWFORHEXNO1qk--QL3VVRql536m12xVHtL1iur1nGbQmH4X_8N6Jdu2Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creator><creator>Syvertsen, Trine</creator><creator>Moe, Hallvard</creator><creator>Karlsen, Faltin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><author>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Hallvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ytre-Arne, Brita</au><au>Syvertsen, Trine</au><au>Moe, Hallvard</au><au>Karlsen, Faltin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1715</spage><epage>1732</epage><pages>1715-1732</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444820913561</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_79964
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; SAGE Complete
title Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20ambivalences%20in%20smartphone%20use:%20Conflicting%20flows,%20conflicting%20responsibilities&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Ytre-Arne,%20Brita&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1715&rft.epage=1732&rft.pages=1715-1732&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444820913561&rft_dat=%3Csage_crist%3E10.1177_1461444820913561%3C/sage_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444820913561&rfr_iscdi=true