Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities
This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New media & society 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1732 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1715 |
container_title | New media & society |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Ytre-Arne, Brita Syvertsen, Trine Moe, Hallvard Karlsen, Faltin |
description | This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1461444820913561 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_79964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444820913561</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1461444820913561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3b-YHuJrZpMnGmxSrQsFLBW8hzSY1ZZssyVbx35vSCiJ4mmHmvWG-h9AlkBsAIW6BcWCMNTWRQCccjtBoN6oEhcnxod_tT9FZzmtCgDMhR-htYTd9TLrDerP0H7qzwdiMfcB5o9PQv8dg8TbbOzyNwXXeDD6ssOviZ77G5tco2dzHkP3Sd37wNp-jE6e7bC8OdYxeZw-L6VM1f3l8nt7PK0OZGCouhRTgqJQtb5luQTrDYalJrS1vNW21E444bqwEkIxq52itG8MLAYFG0zG62t81yefyiQqFRgFpJrUSUnJWFORHEXNO1qk--QL3VVRql536m12xVHtL1iur1nGbQmH4X_8N6Jdu2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444820913561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media & society, 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444820913561$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444820913561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21818,26566,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Hallvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><title>New media & society</title><description>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt3b-YHuJrZpMnGmxSrQsFLBW8hzSY1ZZssyVbx35vSCiJ4mmHmvWG-h9AlkBsAIW6BcWCMNTWRQCccjtBoN6oEhcnxod_tT9FZzmtCgDMhR-htYTd9TLrDerP0H7qzwdiMfcB5o9PQv8dg8TbbOzyNwXXeDD6ssOviZ77G5tco2dzHkP3Sd37wNp-jE6e7bC8OdYxeZw-L6VM1f3l8nt7PK0OZGCouhRTgqJQtb5luQTrDYalJrS1vNW21E444bqwEkIxq52itG8MLAYFG0zG62t81yefyiQqFRgFpJrUSUnJWFORHEXNO1qk--QL3VVRql536m12xVHtL1iur1nGbQmH4X_8N6Jdu2Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creator><creator>Syvertsen, Trine</creator><creator>Moe, Hallvard</creator><creator>Karlsen, Faltin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</title><author>Ytre-Arne, Brita ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Moe, Hallvard ; Karlsen, Faltin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-697971f399d6d4ad19fc61ba02ae6da3daf7f0f6ce911943aff32a8c6001018a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ytre-Arne, Brita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moe, Hallvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsen, Faltin</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ytre-Arne, Brita</au><au>Syvertsen, Trine</au><au>Moe, Hallvard</au><au>Karlsen, Faltin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities</atitle><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1715</spage><epage>1732</epage><pages>1715-1732</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>This article explores implications of the central position of the smartphone in an age of constant connectivity. Based on a qualitative study of 50 informants, we ask how users experience and handle temporal ambivalences in everyday smartphone use, drawing on the concepts flow and responsibilization to conceptualize central dimensions of such ambivalences. The notion of conflicting flows illuminates how brief checking cycles expand at the expense of other activities, resulting in a temporal conflict experienced by users. Responsibilization points to how users take individual responsibility for managing such conflicting flows, and to how this practice is difficult and conflict-ridden. We conclude that while individual time management is often framed as the solution to temporal conflicts, such attempts at regulating smartphone use appear inadequate. Our conceptualization of temporal ambivalence offers a more nuanced understanding of why this is the case.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1461444820913561</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-6007</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-4448 |
ispartof | New media & society, 2020-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1715-1732 |
issn | 1461-4448 1461-7315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_10852_79964 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; SAGE Complete |
title | Temporal ambivalences in smartphone use: Conflicting flows, conflicting responsibilities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A58%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20ambivalences%20in%20smartphone%20use:%20Conflicting%20flows,%20conflicting%20responsibilities&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Ytre-Arne,%20Brita&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1715&rft.epage=1732&rft.pages=1715-1732&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444820913561&rft_dat=%3Csage_crist%3E10.1177_1461444820913561%3C/sage_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444820913561&rfr_iscdi=true |