Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms

Digital platforms such as Google, Facebook and Netflix have caused a watershed moment not only for markets and businesses but also for media policy. Concerns about the US-based digital platforms’ impact on national media markets have grown among European media businesses as well as policy makers. Me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of communication (London) 2019-08, Vol.34 (4), p.395-409
Hauptverfasser: Enli, Gunn, Raats, Tim, Syvertsen, Trine, Donders, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 409
container_issue 4
container_start_page 395
container_title European journal of communication (London)
container_volume 34
creator Enli, Gunn
Raats, Tim
Syvertsen, Trine
Donders, Karen
description Digital platforms such as Google, Facebook and Netflix have caused a watershed moment not only for markets and businesses but also for media policy. Concerns about the US-based digital platforms’ impact on national media markets have grown among European media businesses as well as policy makers. Media policy research argues that small media markets are particularly vulnerable to global players and foreign influence, but that market size must be understood also in the context of political traditions. This article investigates how digital platforms influence media policy for private media businesses in the small media systems of Norway and Flanders. Drawing on 20 qualitative interviews with CEOs and top-level media managers in these two small media markets, we ask what private media businesses expect from policy makers in light of the intensified competition from digital platforms, what experience they have with cooperating with policy makers and what explains the differences between Norway and Flanders. A key finding is that the managers in both markets want policy makers to regulate digital platforms to secure level playing field, and that the Norwegian respondents had more positive experiences with co-regulation and expressed more trust in policy makers and policy instruments, compared to the Flemish. Despite the global players and the need for transnational solutions, regional variations in policy making still matters, and might inform the discussion about how to regulate the digital platforms.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0267323119861512
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_78086</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0267323119861512</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2270905369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c545098a16c0546578174bb972ef2fce66a0f7e593eac5783f8ebc42a990db253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3bwY8r06STbK5CFL8AsWLnkM2TWrKdndNUqH_3tQqguBpDs8zLzMvQqcELgiR8hKokIwyQlQjCCd0D01ILaBiEvg-mmxxteWH6CilJQBhRPEJunpy82DwOHTBbrAfIh5j-DDZ4dUXCD3Obw6bhcODx_OwCNl0eOxMLu4qHaMDb7rkTr7nFL3e3rzM7qvH57uH2fVjZZnkubK85qAaQ4QFXgsuGyLrtlWSOk-9dUIY8NJxxZyxhTLfuNbW1CgF85ZyNkVnu1wbQ8qh1_0QjSbQcKplA40oxvnOGOPwvnYp6-Wwjn05SlMqQQFnQhULfnKGlKLzury7MnFTsvS2R_23x7JS7VZSKeE39F__E8aIbrM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2270905369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Enli, Gunn ; Raats, Tim ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Donders, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Enli, Gunn ; Raats, Tim ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Donders, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Digital platforms such as Google, Facebook and Netflix have caused a watershed moment not only for markets and businesses but also for media policy. Concerns about the US-based digital platforms’ impact on national media markets have grown among European media businesses as well as policy makers. Media policy research argues that small media markets are particularly vulnerable to global players and foreign influence, but that market size must be understood also in the context of political traditions. This article investigates how digital platforms influence media policy for private media businesses in the small media systems of Norway and Flanders. Drawing on 20 qualitative interviews with CEOs and top-level media managers in these two small media markets, we ask what private media businesses expect from policy makers in light of the intensified competition from digital platforms, what experience they have with cooperating with policy makers and what explains the differences between Norway and Flanders. A key finding is that the managers in both markets want policy makers to regulate digital platforms to secure level playing field, and that the Norwegian respondents had more positive experiences with co-regulation and expressed more trust in policy makers and policy instruments, compared to the Flemish. Despite the global players and the need for transnational solutions, regional variations in policy making still matters, and might inform the discussion about how to regulate the digital platforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-3231</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0267323119861512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advertising campaigns ; Chief executives ; Communication ; Companies ; Executives (Business) ; International trade ; Markets ; Mass media effects ; Media ; Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Regional variations ; Respondents ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>European journal of communication (London), 2019-08, Vol.34 (4), p.395-409</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c545098a16c0546578174bb972ef2fce66a0f7e593eac5783f8ebc42a990db253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c545098a16c0546578174bb972ef2fce66a0f7e593eac5783f8ebc42a990db253</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9458-6983</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0267323119861512$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0267323119861512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,26544,27843,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enli, Gunn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raats, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donders, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms</title><title>European journal of communication (London)</title><description>Digital platforms such as Google, Facebook and Netflix have caused a watershed moment not only for markets and businesses but also for media policy. Concerns about the US-based digital platforms’ impact on national media markets have grown among European media businesses as well as policy makers. Media policy research argues that small media markets are particularly vulnerable to global players and foreign influence, but that market size must be understood also in the context of political traditions. This article investigates how digital platforms influence media policy for private media businesses in the small media systems of Norway and Flanders. Drawing on 20 qualitative interviews with CEOs and top-level media managers in these two small media markets, we ask what private media businesses expect from policy makers in light of the intensified competition from digital platforms, what experience they have with cooperating with policy makers and what explains the differences between Norway and Flanders. A key finding is that the managers in both markets want policy makers to regulate digital platforms to secure level playing field, and that the Norwegian respondents had more positive experiences with co-regulation and expressed more trust in policy makers and policy instruments, compared to the Flemish. Despite the global players and the need for transnational solutions, regional variations in policy making still matters, and might inform the discussion about how to regulate the digital platforms.</description><subject>Advertising campaigns</subject><subject>Chief executives</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Executives (Business)</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mass media effects</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0267-3231</issn><issn>1460-3705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt3bwY8r06STbK5CFL8AsWLnkM2TWrKdndNUqH_3tQqguBpDs8zLzMvQqcELgiR8hKokIwyQlQjCCd0D01ILaBiEvg-mmxxteWH6CilJQBhRPEJunpy82DwOHTBbrAfIh5j-DDZ4dUXCD3Obw6bhcODx_OwCNl0eOxMLu4qHaMDb7rkTr7nFL3e3rzM7qvH57uH2fVjZZnkubK85qAaQ4QFXgsuGyLrtlWSOk-9dUIY8NJxxZyxhTLfuNbW1CgF85ZyNkVnu1wbQ8qh1_0QjSbQcKplA40oxvnOGOPwvnYp6-Wwjn05SlMqQQFnQhULfnKGlKLzury7MnFTsvS2R_23x7JS7VZSKeE39F__E8aIbrM</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Enli, Gunn</creator><creator>Raats, Tim</creator><creator>Syvertsen, Trine</creator><creator>Donders, Karen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-6983</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms</title><author>Enli, Gunn ; Raats, Tim ; Syvertsen, Trine ; Donders, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c545098a16c0546578174bb972ef2fce66a0f7e593eac5783f8ebc42a990db253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Advertising campaigns</topic><topic>Chief executives</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Executives (Business)</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mass media effects</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enli, Gunn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raats, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvertsen, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donders, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>European journal of communication (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enli, Gunn</au><au>Raats, Tim</au><au>Syvertsen, Trine</au><au>Donders, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms</atitle><jtitle>European journal of communication (London)</jtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>395-409</pages><issn>0267-3231</issn><eissn>1460-3705</eissn><abstract>Digital platforms such as Google, Facebook and Netflix have caused a watershed moment not only for markets and businesses but also for media policy. Concerns about the US-based digital platforms’ impact on national media markets have grown among European media businesses as well as policy makers. Media policy research argues that small media markets are particularly vulnerable to global players and foreign influence, but that market size must be understood also in the context of political traditions. This article investigates how digital platforms influence media policy for private media businesses in the small media systems of Norway and Flanders. Drawing on 20 qualitative interviews with CEOs and top-level media managers in these two small media markets, we ask what private media businesses expect from policy makers in light of the intensified competition from digital platforms, what experience they have with cooperating with policy makers and what explains the differences between Norway and Flanders. A key finding is that the managers in both markets want policy makers to regulate digital platforms to secure level playing field, and that the Norwegian respondents had more positive experiences with co-regulation and expressed more trust in policy makers and policy instruments, compared to the Flemish. Despite the global players and the need for transnational solutions, regional variations in policy making still matters, and might inform the discussion about how to regulate the digital platforms.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0267323119861512</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9458-6983</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-3231
ispartof European journal of communication (London), 2019-08, Vol.34 (4), p.395-409
issn 0267-3231
1460-3705
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_78086
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; PAIS Index
subjects Advertising campaigns
Chief executives
Communication
Companies
Executives (Business)
International trade
Markets
Mass media effects
Media
Policy analysis
Policy making
Regional variations
Respondents
Traditions
title Media policy for private media in the age of digital platforms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Media%20policy%20for%20private%20media%20in%20the%20age%20of%20digital%20platforms&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20communication%20(London)&rft.au=Enli,%20Gunn&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=395-409&rft.issn=0267-3231&rft.eissn=1460-3705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0267323119861512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E2270905369%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2270905369&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0267323119861512&rfr_iscdi=true