Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms

In interactive models of speech production, wordforms that are related to a target form are co-activated during lexical planning, and co-activated wordforms can leave phonetic traces on the target. This mechanism has been proposed to account for phonetic similarities among morphologically related wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2019-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1690-1696
Hauptverfasser: Seyfarth, Scott, Vander Klok, Jozina, Garellek, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1696
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1690
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 26
creator Seyfarth, Scott
Vander Klok, Jozina
Garellek, Marc
description In interactive models of speech production, wordforms that are related to a target form are co-activated during lexical planning, and co-activated wordforms can leave phonetic traces on the target. This mechanism has been proposed to account for phonetic similarities among morphologically related wordforms. We test this hypothesis in a Javanese verb paradigm. In Javanese, one class of verbs is inflected by nasalizing an initial voiceless obstruent: one form of each word begins with a nasal, while its otherwise identical relative begins with a voiceless obstruent. We predict that if morphologically related forms are co-activated during production, the nasal-initial forms of these words should show phonetic traces of their obstruent-initial forms, as compared to nasal-initial wordforms that do not alternate. Twenty-seven native Javanese speakers produced matched pairs of alternating and non-alternating wordforms. Based on an acoustic analysis of nasal resonance and closure duration, we present good evidence against the original hypothesis: We find that the alternating nasals are phonetically identical to the non-alternating ones on both measures. We argue that interactive effects during lexical planning do not offer the best account for morphologically conditioned phonetic similarities. We discuss an alternative involving competition between phonotactic constraints and word-specific phonological structures.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_75345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2255465965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e0708a1ef77ddd3beec0e4f4b18b91bc463f19fcdc201d86c907f8ff62f02153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVwiF_5gSzshmy86aT0bi2NcV4YvInXQq0uDTIz6omkHsjfR5OxHfAiC1ESdereEpeQDxQ-cS2Hz4VywXgP1LSjuO7ZG3JCJae95AyO2h2U6Q0fxDE5LeURAKQy6h055pQZAAon5P52FydMHju3cjGV2sVUMTtf4w47DAF9Ld2cOpdr9Mva1dgeMXU_3M4lLNjtMI_d1mU3xdWmnJO3wa0Lvn-qZ-Thy-3Pm2_93f3X7zfXd70XgteeIWgYHMWg9TRNfET0gCKIkQ6joaMXigdqgp88AzoNyhvQYQhBsQCs_fGMXB50fY6lxmTTnJ2lMEhmteRiT1wdiG2efy1Yqt3E4nG9bmvPS7GMSSmUNGqPfnyFPs5LTm1_ywRo3ahBN4o9W86lZAx2m-PG5d_N1u4DsYdAbAvE_g3EsjZ08SS9jBucXkaeE2gAPwCltdIK8z_v_8j-AXXtlMc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2407765987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>Springer Online Journals - JUSTICE</source><creator>Seyfarth, Scott ; Vander Klok, Jozina ; Garellek, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Seyfarth, Scott ; Vander Klok, Jozina ; Garellek, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>In interactive models of speech production, wordforms that are related to a target form are co-activated during lexical planning, and co-activated wordforms can leave phonetic traces on the target. This mechanism has been proposed to account for phonetic similarities among morphologically related wordforms. We test this hypothesis in a Javanese verb paradigm. In Javanese, one class of verbs is inflected by nasalizing an initial voiceless obstruent: one form of each word begins with a nasal, while its otherwise identical relative begins with a voiceless obstruent. We predict that if morphologically related forms are co-activated during production, the nasal-initial forms of these words should show phonetic traces of their obstruent-initial forms, as compared to nasal-initial wordforms that do not alternate. Twenty-seven native Javanese speakers produced matched pairs of alternating and non-alternating wordforms. Based on an acoustic analysis of nasal resonance and closure duration, we present good evidence against the original hypothesis: We find that the alternating nasals are phonetically identical to the non-alternating ones on both measures. We argue that interactive effects during lexical planning do not offer the best account for morphologically conditioned phonetic similarities. We discuss an alternative involving competition between phonotactic constraints and word-specific phonological structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31290010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acoustic phonetics ; Acoustics ; Adult ; Articulatory phonetics ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brief Report ; Cognitive Psychology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Indonesia ; Javanese ; Morphology ; Nasals ; Obstruents ; Phonetics ; Phonological rules ; Phonology ; Phonotactics ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychology ; Speech ; Speech - physiology ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech production ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2019-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1690-1696</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2019</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e0708a1ef77ddd3beec0e4f4b18b91bc463f19fcdc201d86c907f8ff62f02153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e0708a1ef77ddd3beec0e4f4b18b91bc463f19fcdc201d86c907f8ff62f02153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,26544,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31290010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seyfarth, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Klok, Jozina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garellek, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>In interactive models of speech production, wordforms that are related to a target form are co-activated during lexical planning, and co-activated wordforms can leave phonetic traces on the target. This mechanism has been proposed to account for phonetic similarities among morphologically related wordforms. We test this hypothesis in a Javanese verb paradigm. In Javanese, one class of verbs is inflected by nasalizing an initial voiceless obstruent: one form of each word begins with a nasal, while its otherwise identical relative begins with a voiceless obstruent. We predict that if morphologically related forms are co-activated during production, the nasal-initial forms of these words should show phonetic traces of their obstruent-initial forms, as compared to nasal-initial wordforms that do not alternate. Twenty-seven native Javanese speakers produced matched pairs of alternating and non-alternating wordforms. Based on an acoustic analysis of nasal resonance and closure duration, we present good evidence against the original hypothesis: We find that the alternating nasals are phonetically identical to the non-alternating ones on both measures. We argue that interactive effects during lexical planning do not offer the best account for morphologically conditioned phonetic similarities. We discuss an alternative involving competition between phonotactic constraints and word-specific phonological structures.</description><subject>Acoustic phonetics</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Articulatory phonetics</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Indonesia</subject><subject>Javanese</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nasals</subject><subject>Obstruents</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonological rules</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Phonotactics</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech - physiology</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctqHDEQRUVwiF_5gSzshmy86aT0bi2NcV4YvInXQq0uDTIz6omkHsjfR5OxHfAiC1ESdereEpeQDxQ-cS2Hz4VywXgP1LSjuO7ZG3JCJae95AyO2h2U6Q0fxDE5LeURAKQy6h055pQZAAon5P52FydMHju3cjGV2sVUMTtf4w47DAF9Ld2cOpdr9Mva1dgeMXU_3M4lLNjtMI_d1mU3xdWmnJO3wa0Lvn-qZ-Thy-3Pm2_93f3X7zfXd70XgteeIWgYHMWg9TRNfET0gCKIkQ6joaMXigdqgp88AzoNyhvQYQhBsQCs_fGMXB50fY6lxmTTnJ2lMEhmteRiT1wdiG2efy1Yqt3E4nG9bmvPS7GMSSmUNGqPfnyFPs5LTm1_ywRo3ahBN4o9W86lZAx2m-PG5d_N1u4DsYdAbAvE_g3EsjZ08SS9jBucXkaeE2gAPwCltdIK8z_v_8j-AXXtlMc</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Seyfarth, Scott</creator><creator>Vander Klok, Jozina</creator><creator>Garellek, Marc</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms</title><author>Seyfarth, Scott ; Vander Klok, Jozina ; Garellek, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2e0708a1ef77ddd3beec0e4f4b18b91bc463f19fcdc201d86c907f8ff62f02153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acoustic phonetics</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Articulatory phonetics</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Indonesia</topic><topic>Javanese</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nasals</topic><topic>Obstruents</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonological rules</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Phonotactics</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech - physiology</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seyfarth, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vander Klok, Jozina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garellek, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seyfarth, Scott</au><au>Vander Klok, Jozina</au><au>Garellek, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1690</spage><epage>1696</epage><pages>1690-1696</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>In interactive models of speech production, wordforms that are related to a target form are co-activated during lexical planning, and co-activated wordforms can leave phonetic traces on the target. This mechanism has been proposed to account for phonetic similarities among morphologically related wordforms. We test this hypothesis in a Javanese verb paradigm. In Javanese, one class of verbs is inflected by nasalizing an initial voiceless obstruent: one form of each word begins with a nasal, while its otherwise identical relative begins with a voiceless obstruent. We predict that if morphologically related forms are co-activated during production, the nasal-initial forms of these words should show phonetic traces of their obstruent-initial forms, as compared to nasal-initial wordforms that do not alternate. Twenty-seven native Javanese speakers produced matched pairs of alternating and non-alternating wordforms. Based on an acoustic analysis of nasal resonance and closure duration, we present good evidence against the original hypothesis: We find that the alternating nasals are phonetically identical to the non-alternating ones on both measures. We argue that interactive effects during lexical planning do not offer the best account for morphologically conditioned phonetic similarities. We discuss an alternative involving competition between phonotactic constraints and word-specific phonological structures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31290010</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1690-1696
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_75345
source MEDLINE; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Springer Online Journals - JUSTICE
subjects Acoustic phonetics
Acoustics
Adult
Articulatory phonetics
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Humans
Hypotheses
Indonesia
Javanese
Morphology
Nasals
Obstruents
Phonetics
Phonological rules
Phonology
Phonotactics
Psycholinguistics
Psychology
Speech
Speech - physiology
Speech Acoustics
Speech production
Verbs
title Evidence against interactive effects on articulation in Javanese verb paradigms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20against%20interactive%20effects%20on%20articulation%20in%20Javanese%20verb%20paradigms&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Seyfarth,%20Scott&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1690&rft.epage=1696&rft.pages=1690-1696&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-019-01637-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E2255465965%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2407765987&rft_id=info:pmid/31290010&rfr_iscdi=true