The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International criminal law review 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516
1. Verfasser: Lingaas, Carola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 516
container_issue 3
container_start_page 485
container_title International criminal law review
container_volume 15
creator Lingaas, Carola
description The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the ictr and the icty on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).
doi_str_mv 10.1163/15718123-01503002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_61822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761666338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c97956994074d1f473ebbeb100e7118c632d8f1621d6dec5f1b0884041428f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4MmAFy-rmWQ3m_UmtWqhIJQWvMV0N2tTt0ndbJHe-hj6en0Ss9SCeJoZ5pv5Z_gROgdyDcDZDSQpCKAsIpAQRgg9QB1IeBoljL8c_smP0Yn3c0KA0zTroNfxTON-pZczZRtsLG5CPXJucYvbzsRq5dd4rPw7diW-16Wxxr7h7eZrpHKjqu3mu50a2EbXVjXGWVXhXm0Wpk2G6vMUHZWq8vrsN3bR5KE_7j1Fw-fHQe9uGOVMsCbKszRLeJbFJI0LKOOU6elUT4EQnQKInDNaiDIcDQUvdJ6UMCVCxCSGmIqSFKyLLnZ789r4xlhpXa0kEJFQyUFQGoirHbGs3cdK-0YujM91VSmr3cpLSDlwzlm4p4su_6Fztwr_VYHiGaFxEGWBgr2k877WpVyGx1W9DrKydUXuXZF7V9gPYNB81w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690244283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lingaas, Carola</creator><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><description>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the ictr and the icty on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-536X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1567-536X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1571-8123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/15718123-01503002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Apartheid ; Crime ; Criminal Law ; Ethnic Groups ; Genocide ; Historical Development ; International Court ; International law ; Political persecution ; Statutes ; War crimes</subject><ispartof>International criminal law review, 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516</ispartof><rights>Copyright Koninklijke Brill NV 2015</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,26565,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><title>International criminal law review</title><description>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the ictr and the icty on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Apartheid</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Historical Development</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Political persecution</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><subject>War crimes</subject><issn>1567-536X</issn><issn>1567-536X</issn><issn>1571-8123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4MmAFy-rmWQ3m_UmtWqhIJQWvMV0N2tTt0ndbJHe-hj6en0Ss9SCeJoZ5pv5Z_gROgdyDcDZDSQpCKAsIpAQRgg9QB1IeBoljL8c_smP0Yn3c0KA0zTroNfxTON-pZczZRtsLG5CPXJucYvbzsRq5dd4rPw7diW-16Wxxr7h7eZrpHKjqu3mu50a2EbXVjXGWVXhXm0Wpk2G6vMUHZWq8vrsN3bR5KE_7j1Fw-fHQe9uGOVMsCbKszRLeJbFJI0LKOOU6elUT4EQnQKInDNaiDIcDQUvdJ6UMCVCxCSGmIqSFKyLLnZ789r4xlhpXa0kEJFQyUFQGoirHbGs3cdK-0YujM91VSmr3cpLSDlwzlm4p4su_6Fztwr_VYHiGaFxEGWBgr2k877WpVyGx1W9DrKydUXuXZF7V9gPYNB81w</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Lingaas, Carola</creator><general>Koninklijke Brill NV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><author>Lingaas, Carola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c97956994074d1f473ebbeb100e7118c632d8f1621d6dec5f1b0884041428f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Apartheid</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Historical Development</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Political persecution</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><topic>War crimes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>International criminal law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lingaas, Carola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</atitle><jtitle>International criminal law review</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>485-516</pages><issn>1567-536X</issn><eissn>1567-536X</eissn><eissn>1571-8123</eissn><abstract>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the ictr and the icty on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Koninklijke Brill NV</pub><doi>10.1163/15718123-01503002</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1567-536X
ispartof International criminal law review, 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516
issn 1567-536X
1567-536X
1571-8123
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_61822
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Anthropology
Apartheid
Crime
Criminal Law
Ethnic Groups
Genocide
Historical Development
International Court
International law
Political persecution
Statutes
War crimes
title The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Elephant%20in%20the%20Room:%20The%20Uneasy%20Task%20of%20Defining%20%E2%80%98Racial%E2%80%99%20in%20International%20Criminal%20Law&rft.jtitle=International%20criminal%20law%20review&rft.au=Lingaas,%20Carola&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=485-516&rft.issn=1567-536X&rft.eissn=1567-536X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/15718123-01503002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E1761666338%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690244283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true