The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law
The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International criminal law review 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 516 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | International criminal law review |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lingaas, Carola |
description | The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the
ictr
and the
icty
on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/15718123-01503002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_61822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1761666338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c97956994074d1f473ebbeb100e7118c632d8f1621d6dec5f1b0884041428f0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4MmAFy-rmWQ3m_UmtWqhIJQWvMV0N2tTt0ndbJHe-hj6en0Ss9SCeJoZ5pv5Z_gROgdyDcDZDSQpCKAsIpAQRgg9QB1IeBoljL8c_smP0Yn3c0KA0zTroNfxTON-pZczZRtsLG5CPXJucYvbzsRq5dd4rPw7diW-16Wxxr7h7eZrpHKjqu3mu50a2EbXVjXGWVXhXm0Wpk2G6vMUHZWq8vrsN3bR5KE_7j1Fw-fHQe9uGOVMsCbKszRLeJbFJI0LKOOU6elUT4EQnQKInDNaiDIcDQUvdJ6UMCVCxCSGmIqSFKyLLnZ789r4xlhpXa0kEJFQyUFQGoirHbGs3cdK-0YujM91VSmr3cpLSDlwzlm4p4su_6Fztwr_VYHiGaFxEGWBgr2k877WpVyGx1W9DrKydUXuXZF7V9gPYNB81w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690244283</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Lingaas, Carola</creator><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><description>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the
ictr
and the
icty
on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1567-536X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1567-536X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1571-8123</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/15718123-01503002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Apartheid ; Crime ; Criminal Law ; Ethnic Groups ; Genocide ; Historical Development ; International Court ; International law ; Political persecution ; Statutes ; War crimes</subject><ispartof>International criminal law review, 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516</ispartof><rights>Copyright Koninklijke Brill NV 2015</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,26565,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><title>International criminal law review</title><description>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the
ictr
and the
icty
on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Apartheid</subject><subject>Crime</subject><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Historical Development</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Political persecution</subject><subject>Statutes</subject><subject>War crimes</subject><issn>1567-536X</issn><issn>1567-536X</issn><issn>1571-8123</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4MmAFy-rmWQ3m_UmtWqhIJQWvMV0N2tTt0ndbJHe-hj6en0Ss9SCeJoZ5pv5Z_gROgdyDcDZDSQpCKAsIpAQRgg9QB1IeBoljL8c_smP0Yn3c0KA0zTroNfxTON-pZczZRtsLG5CPXJucYvbzsRq5dd4rPw7diW-16Wxxr7h7eZrpHKjqu3mu50a2EbXVjXGWVXhXm0Wpk2G6vMUHZWq8vrsN3bR5KE_7j1Fw-fHQe9uGOVMsCbKszRLeJbFJI0LKOOU6elUT4EQnQKInDNaiDIcDQUvdJ6UMCVCxCSGmIqSFKyLLnZ789r4xlhpXa0kEJFQyUFQGoirHbGs3cdK-0YujM91VSmr3cpLSDlwzlm4p4su_6Fztwr_VYHiGaFxEGWBgr2k877WpVyGx1W9DrKydUXuXZF7V9gPYNB81w</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Lingaas, Carola</creator><general>Koninklijke Brill NV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</title><author>Lingaas, Carola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-c97956994074d1f473ebbeb100e7118c632d8f1621d6dec5f1b0884041428f0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Apartheid</topic><topic>Crime</topic><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Historical Development</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Political persecution</topic><topic>Statutes</topic><topic>War crimes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lingaas, Carola</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>International criminal law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lingaas, Carola</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law</atitle><jtitle>International criminal law review</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>485-516</pages><issn>1567-536X</issn><eissn>1567-536X</eissn><eissn>1571-8123</eissn><abstract>The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court contains the term ‘racial’ in its provisions on the crime of genocide, persecution and apartheid. However, it fails to provide for a definition of this historically burdened term. International criminal law is guided by the principle of legality and legal norms should be as narrowly defined as possible. This article will therefore attempt to provide a contemporary legal definition of ‘racial’. The article contains an overview of the historical development, the treatment of the issue of ‘race’ by anthropology and human rights, before turning to international criminal law. Cases dealt with by the
ictr
and the
icty
on ‘racial groups’ with regard to the crime of genocide will be analysed and categorised. The article concludes with a suggestion to juxtapose racial groups with ethnical groups, based on the perception of the perpetrator or the self-perception of the victims (subjective approach).</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Koninklijke Brill NV</pub><doi>10.1163/15718123-01503002</doi><tpages>32</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1567-536X |
ispartof | International criminal law review, 2015-01, Vol.15 (3), p.485-516 |
issn | 1567-536X 1567-536X 1571-8123 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_10852_61822 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Anthropology Apartheid Crime Criminal Law Ethnic Groups Genocide Historical Development International Court International law Political persecution Statutes War crimes |
title | The Elephant in the Room: The Uneasy Task of Defining ‘Racial’ in International Criminal Law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A26%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Elephant%20in%20the%20Room:%20The%20Uneasy%20Task%20of%20Defining%20%E2%80%98Racial%E2%80%99%20in%20International%20Criminal%20Law&rft.jtitle=International%20criminal%20law%20review&rft.au=Lingaas,%20Carola&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=485-516&rft.issn=1567-536X&rft.eissn=1567-536X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/15718123-01503002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E1761666338%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690244283&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |