The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences
On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered Opinion 2/13 and stunned the legal world by declaring that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Accession Agreement) was incompatible with the constituent treatie...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | German law journal 2015-03, Vol.16 (1), p.169-178 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 178 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 169 |
| container_title | German law journal |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Johansen, Stian Øby |
| description | On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered
Opinion 2/13
and stunned the legal world by declaring that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Accession Agreement) was incompatible with the constituent treaties of the Union. Although some experts, admittedly, had been skeptical about certain aspects of Draft Accession Agreement, no one seems to have expected an opinion so critical and uncompromising. The opinion has consequently received widespread disapproval in the EU legal blogosphere. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S2071832200019465 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_43756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1710254784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-3b6a36cd957cdb1b545daee368060e5c9be43225609172cf128faee0c7e796003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AT-boZW2SzcfusZRWC4WKtngM2exbjGyza5Ie_PfuUgXB03vMDMPMIHRLyQMlVM1eGVG0yBkjhNCSS3GGJiOUjdj5n_8SXcX4QUiuBJMT9LZ7B_wCzicIfYBkkus87hq8Wy33eB6Ssy3gnHPsPN72zo80m9EcG1_jdYr4uUvgkzMtXnQ-wucRvIV4jS4a00a4-blTtF8td4unbLN9XC_mm8wyqlKWV9Lk0talULauaCW4qA1ALgsiCQhbVsCH0EKSkipmG8qKZuCJVaBKObSYoruTrw0uJue174LRlBSCaT50lIPi_qToQzeEi0kfXLTQtsZDd4yaKkqY4Krgg5T-mnUxBmh0H9zBhK_BUI8z638z59-X72vn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710254784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library - Law</source><source>Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Johansen, Stian Øby</creator><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Stian Øby</creatorcontrib><description>On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered
Opinion 2/13
and stunned the legal world by declaring that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Accession Agreement) was incompatible with the constituent treaties of the Union. Although some experts, admittedly, had been skeptical about certain aspects of Draft Accession Agreement, no one seems to have expected an opinion so critical and uncompromising. The opinion has consequently received widespread disapproval in the EU legal blogosphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-8322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-8322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200019465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>German Law Journal</publisher><subject>EU accession ; Europe ; European Convention on Human Rights ; European Union ; Germany ; Legal aspects ; Political science ; Treaties</subject><ispartof>German law journal, 2015-03, Vol.16 (1), p.169-178</ispartof><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-3b6a36cd957cdb1b545daee368060e5c9be43225609172cf128faee0c7e796003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-3b6a36cd957cdb1b545daee368060e5c9be43225609172cf128faee0c7e796003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,26546,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Stian Øby</creatorcontrib><title>The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences</title><title>German law journal</title><description>On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered
Opinion 2/13
and stunned the legal world by declaring that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Accession Agreement) was incompatible with the constituent treaties of the Union. Although some experts, admittedly, had been skeptical about certain aspects of Draft Accession Agreement, no one seems to have expected an opinion so critical and uncompromising. The opinion has consequently received widespread disapproval in the EU legal blogosphere.</description><subject>EU accession</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>European Convention on Human Rights</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Legal aspects</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><issn>2071-8322</issn><issn>2071-8322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEUDKJgrf4AT-boZW2SzcfusZRWC4WKtngM2exbjGyza5Ie_PfuUgXB03vMDMPMIHRLyQMlVM1eGVG0yBkjhNCSS3GGJiOUjdj5n_8SXcX4QUiuBJMT9LZ7B_wCzicIfYBkkus87hq8Wy33eB6Ssy3gnHPsPN72zo80m9EcG1_jdYr4uUvgkzMtXnQ-wucRvIV4jS4a00a4-blTtF8td4unbLN9XC_mm8wyqlKWV9Lk0talULauaCW4qA1ALgsiCQhbVsCH0EKSkipmG8qKZuCJVaBKObSYoruTrw0uJue174LRlBSCaT50lIPi_qToQzeEi0kfXLTQtsZDd4yaKkqY4Krgg5T-mnUxBmh0H9zBhK_BUI8z638z59-X72vn</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Johansen, Stian Øby</creator><general>German Law Journal</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences</title><author>Johansen, Stian Øby</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-3b6a36cd957cdb1b545daee368060e5c9be43225609172cf128faee0c7e796003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>EU accession</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>European Convention on Human Rights</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Legal aspects</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johansen, Stian Øby</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>German law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johansen, Stian Øby</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences</atitle><jtitle>German law journal</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>169-178</pages><issn>2071-8322</issn><eissn>2071-8322</eissn><abstract>On 18 December 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered
Opinion 2/13
and stunned the legal world by declaring that the Draft Agreement on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (the Accession Agreement) was incompatible with the constituent treaties of the Union. Although some experts, admittedly, had been skeptical about certain aspects of Draft Accession Agreement, no one seems to have expected an opinion so critical and uncompromising. The opinion has consequently received widespread disapproval in the EU legal blogosphere.</abstract><pub>German Law Journal</pub><doi>10.1017/S2071832200019465</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2071-8322 |
| ispartof | German law journal, 2015-03, Vol.16 (1), p.169-178 |
| issn | 2071-8322 2071-8322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_10852_43756 |
| source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; HeinOnline Law Journal Library - Law; Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | EU accession Europe European Convention on Human Rights European Union Germany Legal aspects Political science Treaties |
| title | The Reinterpretation of TFEU Article 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A28%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reinterpretation%20of%20TFEU%20Article%20344%20in%20Opinion%202/13%20and%20Its%20Potential%20Consequences&rft.jtitle=German%20law%20journal&rft.au=Johansen,%20Stian%20%C3%98by&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=169-178&rft.issn=2071-8322&rft.eissn=2071-8322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2071832200019465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E1710254784%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710254784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |