Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion
Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Separation science plus 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Separation science plus |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Nguyen, Minh Thao Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug Thiede, Bernd Reubsaet, Léon |
description | Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sscp.202100062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_101723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SSCP313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGq3rvMCUyeXmU6WUrxBQaG6HpLMiYzMJCEZle76CAXfsE9iynjbCYec_yTffwI_Quckn5M8pxcxaj-nOU1DXtIjNKHFgmWkIsXxH32KZjG-JIRUJaNCTNBu3cswYB_cAK7bxDbiKHvfQYjYuJAeYL_ddVJh5YbB9Wl49SPeWiytHD377Qd-gJAcvbQasDPY2cR66SHgpn2GOLTOYu16LwM0eHBJ2zewh2vZ_SJn6MTILsLsq0_R0_XV4_I2W93f3C0vV5lmvGJZqbQpjS54BakkLzmnREm-MEWjKl6WgksjiAbNDBFUUMVAQMGAq0YyUGyK8LhXhzZ9bGvrgqxJXhU0nWRBWULm34iLMYCpfWhTXJsE1IfU60Pq9U_qycBGw3vbweYful6vlw-MMPYJYVqMhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><description>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2573-1815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-1815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sscp.202100062</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>dried blood spot ; microsampling ; pre‐lab digestion ; protein analysis ; smart sampling</subject><ispartof>Separation science plus, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsscp.202100062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsscp.202100062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,26544,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><title>Separation science plus</title><description>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</description><subject>dried blood spot</subject><subject>microsampling</subject><subject>pre‐lab digestion</subject><subject>protein analysis</subject><subject>smart sampling</subject><issn>2573-1815</issn><issn>2573-1815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGq3rvMCUyeXmU6WUrxBQaG6HpLMiYzMJCEZle76CAXfsE9iynjbCYec_yTffwI_Quckn5M8pxcxaj-nOU1DXtIjNKHFgmWkIsXxH32KZjG-JIRUJaNCTNBu3cswYB_cAK7bxDbiKHvfQYjYuJAeYL_ddVJh5YbB9Wl49SPeWiytHD377Qd-gJAcvbQasDPY2cR66SHgpn2GOLTOYu16LwM0eHBJ2zewh2vZ_SJn6MTILsLsq0_R0_XV4_I2W93f3C0vV5lmvGJZqbQpjS54BakkLzmnREm-MEWjKl6WgksjiAbNDBFUUMVAQMGAq0YyUGyK8LhXhzZ9bGvrgqxJXhU0nWRBWULm34iLMYCpfWhTXJsE1IfU60Pq9U_qycBGw3vbweYful6vlw-MMPYJYVqMhw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creator><creator>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creator><creator>Thiede, Bernd</creator><creator>Reubsaet, Léon</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><author>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>dried blood spot</topic><topic>microsampling</topic><topic>pre‐lab digestion</topic><topic>protein analysis</topic><topic>smart sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Separation science plus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Minh Thao</au><au>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</au><au>Thiede, Bernd</au><au>Reubsaet, Léon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</atitle><jtitle>Separation science plus</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>171-183</pages><issn>2573-1815</issn><eissn>2573-1815</eissn><abstract>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</abstract><doi>10.1002/sscp.202100062</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2573-1815 |
ispartof | Separation science plus, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183 |
issn | 2573-1815 2573-1815 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_10852_101723 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives |
subjects | dried blood spot microsampling pre‐lab digestion protein analysis smart sampling |
title | Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A56%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smart%20proteolysis%20samplers%20for%20pre%E2%80%90lab%20bottom%E2%80%90up%20protein%20analysis%20%E2%80%93%20Performance%20of%20on%E2%80%90paper%20digestion%20compared%20to%20conventional%20digestion&rft.jtitle=Separation%20science%20plus&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Minh%20Thao&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=171-183&rft.issn=2573-1815&rft.eissn=2573-1815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sscp.202100062&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_crist%3ESSCP313%3C/wiley_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |