Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion

Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Separation science plus 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Minh Thao, Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug, Thiede, Bernd, Reubsaet, Léon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue 5
container_start_page 171
container_title Separation science plus
container_volume 5
creator Nguyen, Minh Thao
Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug
Thiede, Bernd
Reubsaet, Léon
description Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sscp.202100062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_101723</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SSCP313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGq3rvMCUyeXmU6WUrxBQaG6HpLMiYzMJCEZle76CAXfsE9iynjbCYec_yTffwI_Quckn5M8pxcxaj-nOU1DXtIjNKHFgmWkIsXxH32KZjG-JIRUJaNCTNBu3cswYB_cAK7bxDbiKHvfQYjYuJAeYL_ddVJh5YbB9Wl49SPeWiytHD377Qd-gJAcvbQasDPY2cR66SHgpn2GOLTOYu16LwM0eHBJ2zewh2vZ_SJn6MTILsLsq0_R0_XV4_I2W93f3C0vV5lmvGJZqbQpjS54BakkLzmnREm-MEWjKl6WgksjiAbNDBFUUMVAQMGAq0YyUGyK8LhXhzZ9bGvrgqxJXhU0nWRBWULm34iLMYCpfWhTXJsE1IfU60Pq9U_qycBGw3vbweYful6vlw-MMPYJYVqMhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><description>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2573-1815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-1815</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sscp.202100062</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>dried blood spot ; microsampling ; pre‐lab digestion ; protein analysis ; smart sampling</subject><ispartof>Separation science plus, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsscp.202100062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsscp.202100062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,26544,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><title>Separation science plus</title><description>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</description><subject>dried blood spot</subject><subject>microsampling</subject><subject>pre‐lab digestion</subject><subject>protein analysis</subject><subject>smart sampling</subject><issn>2573-1815</issn><issn>2573-1815</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWGq3rvMCUyeXmU6WUrxBQaG6HpLMiYzMJCEZle76CAXfsE9iynjbCYec_yTffwI_Quckn5M8pxcxaj-nOU1DXtIjNKHFgmWkIsXxH32KZjG-JIRUJaNCTNBu3cswYB_cAK7bxDbiKHvfQYjYuJAeYL_ddVJh5YbB9Wl49SPeWiytHD377Qd-gJAcvbQasDPY2cR66SHgpn2GOLTOYu16LwM0eHBJ2zewh2vZ_SJn6MTILsLsq0_R0_XV4_I2W93f3C0vV5lmvGJZqbQpjS54BakkLzmnREm-MEWjKl6WgksjiAbNDBFUUMVAQMGAq0YyUGyK8LhXhzZ9bGvrgqxJXhU0nWRBWULm34iLMYCpfWhTXJsE1IfU60Pq9U_qycBGw3vbweYful6vlw-MMPYJYVqMhw</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creator><creator>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creator><creator>Thiede, Bernd</creator><creator>Reubsaet, Léon</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</title><author>Nguyen, Minh Thao ; Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug ; Thiede, Bernd ; Reubsaet, Léon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-6bcf6fc548e48ea464421ba47f5db846694af91cec3f19292b3e9e53e4bda3eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>dried blood spot</topic><topic>microsampling</topic><topic>pre‐lab digestion</topic><topic>protein analysis</topic><topic>smart sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Minh Thao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiede, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reubsaet, Léon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Separation science plus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Minh Thao</au><au>Halvorsen, Trine Grønhaug</au><au>Thiede, Bernd</au><au>Reubsaet, Léon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion</atitle><jtitle>Separation science plus</jtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>171-183</pages><issn>2573-1815</issn><eissn>2573-1815</eissn><abstract>Here the relation between digestion of proteins by trypsin covalently bound to paper and trypsin in‐solution is investigated. The trypsin acting on paper is covalently bound. A trypsin concentration of 0.5% (w/v) results in the highest digestion activity of all concentrations tested. Additionally, it can be seen that trypsin on‐paper has retained approx. 50% of its activity. Unlike trypsin in‐solution, the stability of the smart proteolysis samplers was regarded to be stable for at least four months when kept refrigerated. Autolysis was very small for covalently bound trypsin: less than 2% compared to in‐solution trypsin. Proteomic analysis of diluted human serum showed more protein identifications (214) in‐solution digestions than on‐paper digestions (76). Also, higher coverage for the in‐solution digestion was obtained. Those proteins identified after on‐paper digestion with no or few disulfide bonds seem to have more similar sequence coverages compared to those identified after in‐solution digestion. Smart samplers allow the determination of at least 70–75 proteins without performing the overnight digestion. All in all, trypsin covalently bound to paper shows to retain high proteolytic activity and is a stable alternative for conventional digestions. In this way, smart proteolytic samplers show their feasibility in pre‐lab sample preparation.</abstract><doi>10.1002/sscp.202100062</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2701</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2573-1815
ispartof Separation science plus, 2022-05, Vol.5 (5), p.171-183
issn 2573-1815
2573-1815
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_101723
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects dried blood spot
microsampling
pre‐lab digestion
protein analysis
smart sampling
title Smart proteolysis samplers for pre‐lab bottom‐up protein analysis – Performance of on‐paper digestion compared to conventional digestion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A56%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smart%20proteolysis%20samplers%20for%20pre%E2%80%90lab%20bottom%E2%80%90up%20protein%20analysis%20%E2%80%93%20Performance%20of%20on%E2%80%90paper%20digestion%20compared%20to%20conventional%20digestion&rft.jtitle=Separation%20science%20plus&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Minh%20Thao&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=171-183&rft.issn=2573-1815&rft.eissn=2573-1815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sscp.202100062&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_crist%3ESSCP313%3C/wiley_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true