Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway

Background False‐positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2022-04, Vol.128 (7), p.1373-1380
Hauptverfasser: Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M., Larsen, Marthe, Román, Marta, Hofvind, Solveig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1380
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1373
container_title Cancer
container_volume 128
creator Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M.
Larsen, Marthe
Román, Marta
Hofvind, Solveig
description Background False‐positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway, which targets women aged 50 to 69 years. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed screening outcomes from 421,545 women who underwent 1,894,523 screening examinations during 1995‐2019. Empirical data were used to calculate the cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result and a first false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure over 10 screening rounds. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of adjusting for irregular attendance, age at screening, and number of screens attended. Results The cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result was 18.04% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.00%‐18.07%). It was 5.01% (95% CI, 5.01%‐5.02%) for experiencing a false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure. Adjusting for irregular attendance or age at screening did not appreciably affect these estimates. After adjustments for the number of screens attended, the cumulative risk of a first false‐positive screening result was 18.28% (95% CI, 18.24%‐18.32%), and the risk of a false‐positive screening result including an invasive procedure was 5.11% (95% CI, 5.11%‐5.22%). This suggested that there was minimal bias from dependent censoring. Conclusions Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result if they attend 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway. One in 20 will experience a false‐positive screening result with an invasive procedure. Lay Summary A false‐positive screening result occurs when a woman attending mammographic screening is called back for further assessment because of suspicious findings, but the assessment does not detect breast cancer. Further assessment includes additional imaging. Usually, it involves ultrasound, and sometimes, it involves a biopsy. This study has evaluated the chance of experiencing a false‐positive screening result among women attending 10 screening examinations over 20 years in BreastScreen Norway. Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result over 10 screening rounds. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result involving a biopsy. Using data fro
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.34078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10037_24227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2612398432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4178-d799f2e28b8abe21fe2a3d1fd4d1df6f728a850b990b45f4f91eb6bc41af0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0EoqeFDQ8AlthUSCm-JU7YlYibVBWJsmAXOckYXBI79YXq7HgEnoFH40nwyWkRYsHK9szn_x_Nj9AjSk4oIez5YAd_wgWR9R20oaSRBaGC3UUbQkhdlIJ_OkCHIVzmp2Qlv48OuGg4lURu0M82zWlS0XwD7E34ip3GCms1Bfj1_cfigllbYfAA1tjP2ENIU3yBT_MtehcWGFZicF-cjzjENG5xCjsU5sV4M6gJjypmUe9mTAnuDVhrcvUvUZfsGLCx-KUHFeLF2sHnzl-r7QN0b53n4c15hC5ev_rYvi3O3r95156eFYOgsi5G2TSaAav7WvXAqAam-Ej1KEY66kpLVqu6JH3TkF6UWuiGQl_1-bPSBPgRerJXHfIaorGddV51eb9cdkwwJjNxvCcW764ShNjNJgwwTcqCS6FjFWW8qQVnGX36D3rpkrd5-kxxWVZNJapMPbu1dCF40N3izaz8NtvunFm3S7Zbk83w4xvJ1M8w_kFvo8wA3QPXZoLtf6S69rz9sBf9DeL3sWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637569646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. ; Larsen, Marthe ; Román, Marta ; Hofvind, Solveig</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. ; Larsen, Marthe ; Román, Marta ; Hofvind, Solveig</creatorcontrib><description>Background False‐positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway, which targets women aged 50 to 69 years. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed screening outcomes from 421,545 women who underwent 1,894,523 screening examinations during 1995‐2019. Empirical data were used to calculate the cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result and a first false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure over 10 screening rounds. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of adjusting for irregular attendance, age at screening, and number of screens attended. Results The cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result was 18.04% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.00%‐18.07%). It was 5.01% (95% CI, 5.01%‐5.02%) for experiencing a false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure. Adjusting for irregular attendance or age at screening did not appreciably affect these estimates. After adjustments for the number of screens attended, the cumulative risk of a first false‐positive screening result was 18.28% (95% CI, 18.24%‐18.32%), and the risk of a false‐positive screening result including an invasive procedure was 5.11% (95% CI, 5.11%‐5.22%). This suggested that there was minimal bias from dependent censoring. Conclusions Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result if they attend 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway. One in 20 will experience a false‐positive screening result with an invasive procedure. Lay Summary A false‐positive screening result occurs when a woman attending mammographic screening is called back for further assessment because of suspicious findings, but the assessment does not detect breast cancer. Further assessment includes additional imaging. Usually, it involves ultrasound, and sometimes, it involves a biopsy. This study has evaluated the chance of experiencing a false‐positive screening result among women attending 10 screening examinations over 20 years in BreastScreen Norway. Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result over 10 screening rounds. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result involving a biopsy. Using data from the population‐based breast screening program in Norway, this study finds that nearly 1 in 5 women attending 10 biennial screening rounds will experience a false‐positive screening result. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result that involves an invasive procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34078</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34931707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; breast neoplasms ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Cohort analysis ; Confidence intervals ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Empirical analysis ; Evaluation ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Invasiveness ; Mammography ; Mammography - methods ; mass screening ; Mass Screening - methods ; Middle Aged ; Norway - epidemiology ; Oncology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Screening ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2022-04, Vol.128 (7), p.1373-1380</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4178-d799f2e28b8abe21fe2a3d1fd4d1df6f728a850b990b45f4f91eb6bc41af0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4178-d799f2e28b8abe21fe2a3d1fd4d1df6f728a850b990b45f4f91eb6bc41af0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9076-8918 ; 0000-0001-8749-6237 ; 0000-0003-0178-8939</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.34078$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.34078$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,1428,26548,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Marthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofvind, Solveig</creatorcontrib><title>Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background False‐positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway, which targets women aged 50 to 69 years. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed screening outcomes from 421,545 women who underwent 1,894,523 screening examinations during 1995‐2019. Empirical data were used to calculate the cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result and a first false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure over 10 screening rounds. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of adjusting for irregular attendance, age at screening, and number of screens attended. Results The cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result was 18.04% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.00%‐18.07%). It was 5.01% (95% CI, 5.01%‐5.02%) for experiencing a false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure. Adjusting for irregular attendance or age at screening did not appreciably affect these estimates. After adjustments for the number of screens attended, the cumulative risk of a first false‐positive screening result was 18.28% (95% CI, 18.24%‐18.32%), and the risk of a false‐positive screening result including an invasive procedure was 5.11% (95% CI, 5.11%‐5.22%). This suggested that there was minimal bias from dependent censoring. Conclusions Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result if they attend 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway. One in 20 will experience a false‐positive screening result with an invasive procedure. Lay Summary A false‐positive screening result occurs when a woman attending mammographic screening is called back for further assessment because of suspicious findings, but the assessment does not detect breast cancer. Further assessment includes additional imaging. Usually, it involves ultrasound, and sometimes, it involves a biopsy. This study has evaluated the chance of experiencing a false‐positive screening result among women attending 10 screening examinations over 20 years in BreastScreen Norway. Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result over 10 screening rounds. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result involving a biopsy. Using data from the population‐based breast screening program in Norway, this study finds that nearly 1 in 5 women attending 10 biennial screening rounds will experience a false‐positive screening result. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result that involves an invasive procedure.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>breast neoplasms</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>mass screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1TAQhi0EoqeFDQ8AlthUSCm-JU7YlYibVBWJsmAXOckYXBI79YXq7HgEnoFH40nwyWkRYsHK9szn_x_Nj9AjSk4oIez5YAd_wgWR9R20oaSRBaGC3UUbQkhdlIJ_OkCHIVzmp2Qlv48OuGg4lURu0M82zWlS0XwD7E34ip3GCms1Bfj1_cfigllbYfAA1tjP2ENIU3yBT_MtehcWGFZicF-cjzjENG5xCjsU5sV4M6gJjypmUe9mTAnuDVhrcvUvUZfsGLCx-KUHFeLF2sHnzl-r7QN0b53n4c15hC5ev_rYvi3O3r95156eFYOgsi5G2TSaAav7WvXAqAam-Ej1KEY66kpLVqu6JH3TkF6UWuiGQl_1-bPSBPgRerJXHfIaorGddV51eb9cdkwwJjNxvCcW764ShNjNJgwwTcqCS6FjFWW8qQVnGX36D3rpkrd5-kxxWVZNJapMPbu1dCF40N3izaz8NtvunFm3S7Zbk83w4xvJ1M8w_kFvo8wA3QPXZoLtf6S69rz9sBf9DeL3sWE</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M.</creator><creator>Larsen, Marthe</creator><creator>Román, Marta</creator><creator>Hofvind, Solveig</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-8939</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway</title><author>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M. ; Larsen, Marthe ; Román, Marta ; Hofvind, Solveig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4178-d799f2e28b8abe21fe2a3d1fd4d1df6f728a850b990b45f4f91eb6bc41af0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>breast neoplasms</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>mass screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Marthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Román, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofvind, Solveig</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsuruda, Kaitlyn M.</au><au>Larsen, Marthe</au><au>Román, Marta</au><au>Hofvind, Solveig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1373</spage><epage>1380</epage><pages>1373-1380</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background False‐positive screening results are an inevitable and commonly recognized disadvantage of mammographic screening. This study estimated the cumulative probability of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result in women attending 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway, which targets women aged 50 to 69 years. Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzed screening outcomes from 421,545 women who underwent 1,894,523 screening examinations during 1995‐2019. Empirical data were used to calculate the cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result and a first false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure over 10 screening rounds. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of adjusting for irregular attendance, age at screening, and number of screens attended. Results The cumulative risk of experiencing a first false‐positive screening result was 18.04% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.00%‐18.07%). It was 5.01% (95% CI, 5.01%‐5.02%) for experiencing a false‐positive screening result that involved an invasive procedure. Adjusting for irregular attendance or age at screening did not appreciably affect these estimates. After adjustments for the number of screens attended, the cumulative risk of a first false‐positive screening result was 18.28% (95% CI, 18.24%‐18.32%), and the risk of a false‐positive screening result including an invasive procedure was 5.11% (95% CI, 5.11%‐5.22%). This suggested that there was minimal bias from dependent censoring. Conclusions Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result if they attend 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway. One in 20 will experience a false‐positive screening result with an invasive procedure. Lay Summary A false‐positive screening result occurs when a woman attending mammographic screening is called back for further assessment because of suspicious findings, but the assessment does not detect breast cancer. Further assessment includes additional imaging. Usually, it involves ultrasound, and sometimes, it involves a biopsy. This study has evaluated the chance of experiencing a false‐positive screening result among women attending 10 screening examinations over 20 years in BreastScreen Norway. Nearly 1 in 5 women will experience a false‐positive screening result over 10 screening rounds. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result involving a biopsy. Using data from the population‐based breast screening program in Norway, this study finds that nearly 1 in 5 women attending 10 biennial screening rounds will experience a false‐positive screening result. One in 20 women will experience a false‐positive screening result that involves an invasive procedure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34931707</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.34078</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-8918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-8939</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2022-04, Vol.128 (7), p.1373-1380
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10037_24227
source MEDLINE; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Biopsy
Breast cancer
breast neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Cohort analysis
Confidence intervals
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Empirical analysis
Evaluation
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Invasiveness
Mammography
Mammography - methods
mass screening
Mass Screening - methods
Middle Aged
Norway - epidemiology
Oncology
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Screening
Statistical analysis
title Cumulative risk of a false‐positive screening result: A retrospective cohort study using empirical data from 10 biennial screening rounds in BreastScreen Norway
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A46%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cumulative%20risk%20of%20a%20false%E2%80%90positive%20screening%20result:%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study%20using%20empirical%20data%20from%2010%20biennial%20screening%20rounds%20in%20BreastScreen%20Norway&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Tsuruda,%20Kaitlyn%20M.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1373&rft.epage=1380&rft.pages=1373-1380&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.34078&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E2612398432%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637569646&rft_id=info:pmid/34931707&rfr_iscdi=true