Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

Negotiations are ongoing to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). If adopted, the ILBI will lik...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arctic Review on Law and Politics 2020, Vol.11, p.189-214
Hauptverfasser: De Lucia, Vito, Nickels, Philipp Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 214
container_issue
container_start_page 189
container_title Arctic Review on Law and Politics
container_volume 11
creator De Lucia, Vito
Nickels, Philipp Peter
description Negotiations are ongoing to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). If adopted, the ILBI will likely apply to parts of the Arctic Ocean where the Arctic Council has played an important role for ocean governance. This begs the question of what role the Arctic Council will play vis-à-vis a future ILBI, which is envisioned to “not undermine existing relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional and sectoral bodies” (UN General Assembly Resolution 72/249). Against this backdrop, this article reflects on the future relationship between the Arctic Council and the ILBI. In so doing, the article initially discusses possible meanings of the notion of not undermining and, more broadly, how the ILBI will likely determine its institutional relationship with relevant bodies for BBNJ. Based on that, the article provides a short overview of the role of the Arctic Council in Arctic Ocean governance and explores whether the Arctic Council would qualify as a relevant regional body that shall not be undermined by the future ILBI.
doi_str_mv 10.23865/arctic.v11.2554
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10037_20102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48710630</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3b5d7d0b23f748508cce28b85eca817a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>48710630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-31ae0e5dd0ce110671668d9bfdecfe0daa7dbeba1133e5ebbde59835253837ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kd1uEzEQhVcIJKLSe24QfoEN_lmvncsmohAUtVIF15Z_xsHV1ka2N1KeBt6FF8NJaK_GHp3zjWZO170neEmZHPknnW0NdnkgZEk5H151i9YX_cBH-rpbELki_Ug5fdtdlxIMppSMAo_Dovv9AH6CZo57lCKqPwE9pAlQ8uf3zZmLNmmONkzoEEr_90_fCtLodq5zBrSNFXLUNaSoJ7SDvZ6mI1qH6E7MbSw1z08Q6wm_DsmFA-QS6hGF2PCgC1rDMUWH7p4Z3-Ycigv29H3XvfF6KnD9v151P24_f9987Xf3X7abm11vKRe1Z0QDBu4ctkAIHgUZR-lWxjuwHrDTWjgDRhPCGHAwxgFfScYpZ5IJ79lVt71wXdKP6lcOTzofVdJBnRsp75XO7RQTKGa4Ew4byrwYJMfSWqDSSA5WSyJ0Y328sGzbo11WxZS1IhgzoSgmmDYFflakUjL4l4kEq3Oi6pKoaomqU6LN8uFieSw15Rf9IEVbl2H2Dy2kop4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>De Lucia, Vito ; Nickels, Philipp Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Vito ; Nickels, Philipp Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Negotiations are ongoing to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). If adopted, the ILBI will likely apply to parts of the Arctic Ocean where the Arctic Council has played an important role for ocean governance. This begs the question of what role the Arctic Council will play vis-à-vis a future ILBI, which is envisioned to “not undermine existing relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional and sectoral bodies” (UN General Assembly Resolution 72/249). Against this backdrop, this article reflects on the future relationship between the Arctic Council and the ILBI. In so doing, the article initially discusses possible meanings of the notion of not undermining and, more broadly, how the ILBI will likely determine its institutional relationship with relevant bodies for BBNJ. Based on that, the article provides a short overview of the role of the Arctic Council in Arctic Ocean governance and explores whether the Arctic Council would qualify as a relevant regional body that shall not be undermined by the future ILBI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1891-6252</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2387-4562</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2387-4562</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23865/arctic.v11.2554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cappelen Damm AS</publisher><subject>arctic council ; areas beyond national jurisdiction ; bbnj ; biodiversity ; Environmental law: 347 ; law of the sea ; Law: 340 ; Miljørett: 347 ; Peer-reviewed article ; Rettsvitenskap: 340 ; Samfunnsvitenskap: 200 ; Social science: 200 ; VDP</subject><ispartof>Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 2020, Vol.11, p.189-214</ispartof><rights>2020 Vito De Lucia &amp; Philipp Peter Nickels</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48710630$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48710630$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,4024,25354,26567,27923,27924,27925,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48710630$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickels, Philipp Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction</title><title>Arctic Review on Law and Politics</title><description>Negotiations are ongoing to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). If adopted, the ILBI will likely apply to parts of the Arctic Ocean where the Arctic Council has played an important role for ocean governance. This begs the question of what role the Arctic Council will play vis-à-vis a future ILBI, which is envisioned to “not undermine existing relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional and sectoral bodies” (UN General Assembly Resolution 72/249). Against this backdrop, this article reflects on the future relationship between the Arctic Council and the ILBI. In so doing, the article initially discusses possible meanings of the notion of not undermining and, more broadly, how the ILBI will likely determine its institutional relationship with relevant bodies for BBNJ. Based on that, the article provides a short overview of the role of the Arctic Council in Arctic Ocean governance and explores whether the Arctic Council would qualify as a relevant regional body that shall not be undermined by the future ILBI.</description><subject>arctic council</subject><subject>areas beyond national jurisdiction</subject><subject>bbnj</subject><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Environmental law: 347</subject><subject>law of the sea</subject><subject>Law: 340</subject><subject>Miljørett: 347</subject><subject>Peer-reviewed article</subject><subject>Rettsvitenskap: 340</subject><subject>Samfunnsvitenskap: 200</subject><subject>Social science: 200</subject><subject>VDP</subject><issn>1891-6252</issn><issn>2387-4562</issn><issn>2387-4562</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kd1uEzEQhVcIJKLSe24QfoEN_lmvncsmohAUtVIF15Z_xsHV1ka2N1KeBt6FF8NJaK_GHp3zjWZO170neEmZHPknnW0NdnkgZEk5H151i9YX_cBH-rpbELki_Ug5fdtdlxIMppSMAo_Dovv9AH6CZo57lCKqPwE9pAlQ8uf3zZmLNmmONkzoEEr_90_fCtLodq5zBrSNFXLUNaSoJ7SDvZ6mI1qH6E7MbSw1z08Q6wm_DsmFA-QS6hGF2PCgC1rDMUWH7p4Z3-Ycigv29H3XvfF6KnD9v151P24_f9987Xf3X7abm11vKRe1Z0QDBu4ctkAIHgUZR-lWxjuwHrDTWjgDRhPCGHAwxgFfScYpZ5IJ79lVt71wXdKP6lcOTzofVdJBnRsp75XO7RQTKGa4Ew4byrwYJMfSWqDSSA5WSyJ0Y328sGzbo11WxZS1IhgzoSgmmDYFflakUjL4l4kEq3Oi6pKoaomqU6LN8uFieSw15Rf9IEVbl2H2Dy2kop4</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>De Lucia, Vito</creator><creator>Nickels, Philipp Peter</creator><general>Cappelen Damm AS</general><general>Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing</general><general>Cappelen Damm Akademisk NOASP</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction</title><author>De Lucia, Vito ; Nickels, Philipp Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-31ae0e5dd0ce110671668d9bfdecfe0daa7dbeba1133e5ebbde59835253837ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>arctic council</topic><topic>areas beyond national jurisdiction</topic><topic>bbnj</topic><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Environmental law: 347</topic><topic>law of the sea</topic><topic>Law: 340</topic><topic>Miljørett: 347</topic><topic>Peer-reviewed article</topic><topic>Rettsvitenskap: 340</topic><topic>Samfunnsvitenskap: 200</topic><topic>Social science: 200</topic><topic>VDP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Lucia, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickels, Philipp Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Arctic Review on Law and Politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Lucia, Vito</au><au>Nickels, Philipp Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction</atitle><jtitle>Arctic Review on Law and Politics</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>189</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>189-214</pages><issn>1891-6252</issn><issn>2387-4562</issn><eissn>2387-4562</eissn><abstract>Negotiations are ongoing to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). If adopted, the ILBI will likely apply to parts of the Arctic Ocean where the Arctic Council has played an important role for ocean governance. This begs the question of what role the Arctic Council will play vis-à-vis a future ILBI, which is envisioned to “not undermine existing relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional and sectoral bodies” (UN General Assembly Resolution 72/249). Against this backdrop, this article reflects on the future relationship between the Arctic Council and the ILBI. In so doing, the article initially discusses possible meanings of the notion of not undermining and, more broadly, how the ILBI will likely determine its institutional relationship with relevant bodies for BBNJ. Based on that, the article provides a short overview of the role of the Arctic Council in Arctic Ocean governance and explores whether the Arctic Council would qualify as a relevant regional body that shall not be undermined by the future ILBI.</abstract><pub>Cappelen Damm AS</pub><doi>10.23865/arctic.v11.2554</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1891-6252
ispartof Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 2020, Vol.11, p.189-214
issn 1891-6252
2387-4562
2387-4562
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10037_20102
source Jstor Journals Open Access
subjects arctic council
areas beyond national jurisdiction
bbnj
biodiversity
Environmental law: 347
law of the sea
Law: 340
Miljørett: 347
Peer-reviewed article
Rettsvitenskap: 340
Samfunnsvitenskap: 200
Social science: 200
VDP
title Reflecting on the Role of the Arctic Council vis-à-vis a Future International Legally Binding Instrument on Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflecting%20on%20the%20Role%20of%20the%20Arctic%20Council%20vis-%C3%A0-vis%20a%20Future%20International%20Legally%20Binding%20Instrument%20on%20Biodiversity%20in%20Areas%20Beyond%20National%20Jurisdiction&rft.jtitle=Arctic%20Review%20on%20Law%20and%20Politics&rft.au=De%20Lucia,%20Vito&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=189-214&rft.issn=1891-6252&rft.eissn=2387-4562&rft_id=info:doi/10.23865/arctic.v11.2554&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_JFNAL%3E48710630%3C/jstor_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48710630&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3b5d7d0b23f748508cce28b85eca817a&rfr_iscdi=true