Bottom‐simulating reflector dynamics at Arctic thermogenic gas provinces: An example from Vestnesa Ridge, offshore west Svalbard

The Vestnesa Ridge comprises a >100 km long sediment drift located between the western continental slope of Svalbard and the Arctic mid‐ocean ridges. It hosts a deep water (>1000 m) gas hydrate and associated seafloor seepage system. Near‐seafloor headspace gas compositions and its methane car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2017-06, Vol.122 (6), p.4089-4105
Hauptverfasser: Plaza‐Faverola, A., Vadakkepuliyambatta, S., Hong, W.‐L., Mienert, J., Bünz, S., Chand, S., Greinert, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Vestnesa Ridge comprises a >100 km long sediment drift located between the western continental slope of Svalbard and the Arctic mid‐ocean ridges. It hosts a deep water (>1000 m) gas hydrate and associated seafloor seepage system. Near‐seafloor headspace gas compositions and its methane carbon isotopic signature along the ridge indicate a predominance of thermogenic gas sources feeding the system. Prediction of the base of the gas hydrate stability zone for theoretical pressure and temperature conditions and measured gas compositions results in an unusual underestimation of the observed bottom‐simulating reflector (BSR) depth. The BSR is up to 60 m deeper than predicted for pure methane and measured gas compositions with >99% methane. Models for measured gas compositions with >4% higher‐order hydrocarbons result in a better BSR approximation. However, the BSR remains >20 m deeper than predicted in a region without active seepage. A BSR deeper than predicted is primarily explained by unaccounted spatial variations in the geothermal gradient and by larger amounts of thermogenic gas at the base of the gas hydrate stability zone. Hydrates containing higher‐order hydrocarbons form at greater depths and higher temperatures and contribute with larger amounts of carbons than pure methane hydrates. In thermogenic provinces, this may imply a significant upward revision (up to 50% in the case of Vestnesa Ridge) of the amount of carbon in gas hydrates. Key Points BSR models result in an unusual underestimation of the observed BSR depth along Vestnesa Ridge, in Fram Strait Spatial variations in the geothermal gradient and thermogenic gas concentrations control the BSR dynamics in this Arctic setting Unconstrained geochemistry of deeper sediments may result in a significant underestimation of the amount of carbons in hydrates
ISSN:2169-9313
2169-9356
2169-9356
DOI:10.1002/2016JB013761