Dose and time response of ruminally infused algae on rumen fermentation characteristics, biohydrogenation and Butyrivibrio qroup bacteria in qoats
Background: Micro-algae could inhibit the complete rumen BH of dietary 18-carbon unsaturated fatty acid (UFAs). This study aimed to examine dose and time responses of algae supplementation on rumen fermentation, biohydrogenation and Butyrivibrio group bacteria in goats. Methods: Six goats were used...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 畜牧与生物技术杂志:英文版 2016, Vol.7 (4), p.532-543 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Micro-algae could inhibit the complete rumen BH of dietary 18-carbon unsaturated fatty acid (UFAs). This study aimed to examine dose and time responses of algae supplementation on rumen fermentation, biohydrogenation and Butyrivibrio group bacteria in goats. Methods: Six goats were used in a repeated 3 x 3 Latin square design, and offered a fixed diet. Algae were infused through rumen cannule with 0 (Control), 6.1 (L-AIg), or 18.3 g (H-AIg) per day. Rumen contents were sampled on d 0, 3, 7, 14 and 20. Results: H-AIg reduced total volatile fatty acid concentration and acetate molar proportion (P 〈 0.05), and increased propionate molar proportion (P 〈 0.05), whereas L-AIg had no effect on rumen fermentation. Changes in proportions of acetate and propionate in H-AIg were obvious from d 7 onwards and reached the largest differences with the control on d 14. Algae induced a dose-dependent decrease in 18:0 and increased trons-18:1 in the ruminal content (P 〈 0.05). H-AIg increased the concentrations of t9, t] 1-18:2 and tl 1, cl 5-18:2 (P 〈 0.05). L-AIg only seemed to induce a transient change in 18-carbon isomers, while H-AIg induced a rapid elevation, already obvious on d 3, concentrations of these fatty acid rose in some cases again on d 20. Algae had no effect on the abundances of Butyrivibfio spp. and Butyrivibrio proteoclosdcus (P 〉 0.10), while H-AIg reduced the total bacteria abundance (P 〈 0.05). However, this was induced by a significant difference between control and H-AIg on d 14 (-4.43 %). Afterwards, both treatments did not differ as increased variation in the H-AIg repetitions, with in some cases a return of the bacterial abundance to the basal level (d 0). Conclusions: Changes in rumen fermentation and 18-carbon UFAs metabolism in response to algae were related to the supplementation level, but there was no evidence of shift in ruminal biohydrogenation pathways towards t1 0-18:1 L-AIg mainly induced a transient effect on rumen biohydrogenation of 18-carbon UFAs, while H-AIg showed an acute inhibition and these effects were not associated with the known hydrogenating bacteria. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1674-9782 2049-1891 |